Why are two school trustees on a US anti-gay-marriage site?
POLITICS / Vancouver School Board chair says she's "appalled"
Jeremy Hainsworth / Vancouver / Thursday, December 15, 2011
Share |

Gay activists want to know why two Vancouver school trustees are starring in an American anti-gay-marriage group’s video criticizing the Out in Schools (OIS) anti-homophobia program.

Vancouver School Board chair Patti Bacchus tells Xtra she's "appalled" by the video and by the fact that the interviews were filmed on school board property.

The video does not represent the direction of the board on homophobia issues, she hastens to add.

The video, posted on the website for the Marriage Anti-Defamation Alliance, shows reelected Non-Partisan Association (NPA) trustee Ken Denike and newly elected NPA trustee Sophia Woo discussing their concerns about an OIS booklet. They say the booklet, published in 2006, points youth to "a website ostensibly oriented toward counselling students," which, they claim, is actually an "adult website which contained very explicit videos containing pictures of homosexual activities."

“Trustee Denike and Trustee Woo do not speak for the Vancouver School Board," Bacchus says. "I am the spokesperson for the board."

"It's inappropriate," NPA school trustee Ken Denike says of his appearance in a video on an anti-gay-marriage website.
(NPA)
Bacchus calls the anti-marriage website "offensive."

"I fear it does stoke some of the ignorance and negativity that we have been working so hard to combat," she says. "This just takes us absolutely in the wrong direction."

“It’s created damage that is reverberating,” Bacchus says. “They are elected officials, and they are accountable for their use of Vancouver school property for this video. We will be discussing it with trustees.”

In the video, Woo says the Health Initiative for Men's (HIM) website referred to in the 2006 booklet, and particularly its Hottest at the Start campaign, does not appear connected to anti-homophobia issues. Denike says the images were not approved by the board.

"Got a lot of phone calls from parents and concerned citizens. They were all opposed to the video being shown to young students," Woo adds in the video.

Denike tells Xtra the video was filmed in October.

The Hottest at the Start campaign went online in July. OIS removed its links to HIM a month later, both online and in a new edition of the printed booklet, says OIS director of education Ross Johnstone.

Asked why the links were removed, Johnstone says HIM changed its focus to 20-something guys, which was no longer in tune with OIS’s target audience of youth.

Asked if OIS was self-censoring, Johnstone says no. OIS is careful to provide only age-appropriate material to youth, he says.

Denike and Woo first took aim at OIS in September, after Kari Simpson filed a police complaint against the anti-homophobia program and as the civic elections were beginning to heat up. Denike and Woo made headlines with their claim that the OIS booklet linked kids to porn.

Denike, Woo and NPA mayoral candidate Suzanne Anton quickly expressed regret for the statement, in a press release dated Oct 3.

The release notes that OIS had “removed references to external community resources" and acknowledges that "Out in Schools is very careful to show only age-appropriate material in its school presentations.”

Johnstone says Denike and Woo have been invited to attend OIS presentations. They have not accepted, he says.

BC Teachers Federation second vice-president Glen Hansman says he, too, has tried to contact Denike and Woo but has had no response.

"You don't just stumble into a video," Hansman says. "You don't ask where it's being used?"

Denike tells Xtra that the video's creator told them it was for a news program when it was filmed. He says he was surprised when the video turned up on the anti-gay-marriage site. He says he has contacted a lawyer to have it removed.

"It's inappropriate," Denike says. "It has nothing to do with same-sex marriage. It was strictly in order to indicate to the board that they were responsible for oversight."

During the lead-up to November's municipal election, critics of the NPA had expressed alarm that Woo was somehow aligned with Burnaby’s Parents' Voice party, which campaigned against that school district's anti-homophobia policy.

Asked about it by Xtra, Woo was clear that she supports the Vancouver board's anti-homophobia policy. "All students and teachers deserve a safe, respectful learning environment," she said.

Xtra contacted Woo for comment on the video at her school board office. She said she was in the middle of something and would call back. She did not. Later calls went to her machine, which was full. An email attempt to reach her also went unanswered.

Ryan Clayton sits on the City of Vancouver's gay advisory committee.

He says Denike and Woo obviously gave their permission for the video to be used by the anti-marriage group.

“That permission needs to be revoked," he says. "It's either exceptionally poor judgment or they're homophobic — one or the other.”

Denike is “using his position as a trustee to promote an anti-gay-marriage group," Clayton adds.

In a plea for support issued Dec 14, the chair of OIS’s parent organization, Out on Screen, says Vancouver’s queer film festival and its school program have experienced an autumn of organized, political attacks.

"Specifically, our Out in Schools program has been the target of a small group of activists who have tried to make our work a major municipal election issue, particularly regarding school board elections.”

James Ong says the attacks have taken attention away from more important issues. "We have had to focus on reacting to long, public missives, erroneous claims concerning our good work, threats of legal action, political positioning, interference with sponsors and media attention.”




Share |


Reader Comments


 
How Embarassing for Vancouver
These two make me sick. In my opinion, Sophia Woo and Ken Denike have just demonstrated that they are nothing but homophobes out to bully the GLBT community. Claiming they didn't know who was producing the anti-marriage video is ridiculous, and completely unbelievable. Vancouver parents deserve better than these two extremists; since they are incapable of apologizing, they should resign immediately.
Steve, Vancouver BC
12/15/11 9:28 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Full Civil RIghts
Onward to full civil and marriage equality rights now. Cheers, Joe Mustich, CT USA Marriage Officiant & Justice of the Peace. Fire them now. Period.
Jos. A. Mustich, Washington, CT USA Litchfield
12/15/11 9:58 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Check out the Ken & Sophia Show
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViOenILIt-E These two gave a Q&A at Peace Arch Park, on Aug 20, 2011. It looks like they're trying to encourage folks to oppose the anti-homophobia curriculum. Ken says he's concerned that VSB will adopt an anti-homophobia rule like Burnaby's 5.75. "If they care about what their children are learning at school, putting the LGBT ideas into the curriculum. We dont' mind it as an option, but if it is compulsory... "
Steve, Vancouver BC
12/16/11 1:18 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Why the controversy??
So they don't believe in gay marriage... Where's the controversy in this story? Many of us don't believe in gay marriage. Remember, in Canada we never had a say in this divisive conversation. It was forced upon us by then-Prime Minister Paul Martin. I do not and will not ever support gay marriage as it goes against everything I believe in. And don't call me "homophobic". It's got nothing to do with my feelings towards gay people. Traditional marriage just needs to be protected for the good of humanity.
Brent, Vancouver BC
12/16/11 11:49 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Covert Campaign exposed.
Denike and Woo seemed to think they could get away with running a campaign with two messages aimed at two audiences. They have been dishonest with one group or the other. This is clear in the most recent unearthed video.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViOenILIt-&feature=youtu.be This video makes it clear that any claims that Denike or Woo support anti-homophobia work in schools is without substance. They, in fact, are intentionally fanning homomphobia and did so throughout the civic election campaign. It is interesting that in this most recently unearthed video - Denike and Woo claim that Vancouver does not have a policy like Burnaby. The Vancouver School Board (VSB) passed groundbreaking comprehensive LGBTQ policy back in 2004. Either Ken Denike is too lazy to read policy, or is deliberatly lying to this crowd for political gain. Woo and Denike tell the crowd that unless they vote NPA that Vision and COPE will push a policy through. Readers should also know that the VSB never received any complaints from parents about the Out in Schools resource. Neither Denike, a sitting trustee at the time, or Woo ever raised their concerns with staff or the Board of Trustees. The worst thing about their actions, is that they feed people's homophobic fears, reinforce stereotypes and misinformation, undermine important work by groups like Out in Schools, and make other boards think twice about taking action on LGBTQ issues. In fact their actions put at risk the lives of queer and even straight youth who have been victims of discrimination based on sesxual orientation or gender identity/expression. Shame on them. Jane Bouey Former Vice Chair Vancouver School Board.
Jane Bouey, Vancouver BC
12/16/11 3:35 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Brent, this is "Why the controversy??"
Two public officials, using their public positions, used public property to advance their private agenda in an issue unrelated to their public role. . This is contrary to ethical standards in any government function. Brent, read your own comment. If you don't believe in gay marriage, don't have one. If some one else does, it is no business of yours and should not concern you. After all, you're not involved. You opposition IS clearly just homophobia. And, "we never had a say"? The opponents of marriage equality are represented in Parliament just like every other Canadian, and were very vocal in public debate at the time. As you just demonstrated, opponents of marriage equality are still having their say.
David Gervais, Vancouver BC
12/16/11 10:26 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Re: Why the controversy?
To add to David's statement, it's called marriage equality not 'gay marriage'. To say you have nothing against gay people but be willing to deny them the right to marry is nothing but bigotry and homophobia.
Teresa, Trenton Ontario
12/17/11 12:47 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Yes, Why The Controversy?
I remember when that story first broke, about teens being directed to a web site as part of a lesson that was supposedly teaching them tolerance toward homosexuals and lesbians, but many of the links were graphic. The main lesson here is: do not criticize the Gay Agenda, ever. This is a witch hunt, pure and simple.
Mike Cullinan, Lewisville TEXAS
12/18/11 5:24 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
DEAR BRENT!
I'm not gay-married you ASSHOLE, i'm just married. You make me sick you pathetic fuckface! I wish I could vote whether you could have equal rights as well, wouldn't that be a hoot? I vote we take away ALL your liberties, how would you like that Fuckface?
mike, van bc
12/23/11 11:57 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
@Brent, Vancouver BC
"Traditional marriage just needs to be protected for the good of humanity". Funny but it seems "your" humanity isn't doing so well as revealed by your post to this story.
bwteske, vancouver bc
12/24/11 10:11 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
why the controversy
Boy cock, girl cock, ee-i-ee-i-o. This isn't so much a gay issue as is it is a human rights issue. Last time I checked we are all equals. They need not resign, they should be fired.
cameron, vancouver b.c.
12/29/11 11:16 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.