Vancouver Pride won't vet signs
PRIDE 2010 / But Coolen says 'offensive' signs could be a challenge
Tamara Letkeman / Vancouver / Thursday, May 13, 2010
Share |

Members of Queers Against Israeli Apartheid march in the 2009 Toronto Pride Parade.
(Peter Bevan photo)
 The president of the Vancouver Pride Society says his organization has no plans to vet signage to be displayed during the Pride parade.

Ken Coolen says instilling a policy of reviewing signage prior to the festivities would be out of step with the spirit of the event.

"I would say that we are a celebration of diversity, and to allow that diversity within our parade is what the purpose is all about."

But Coolen also says there is a fine line between accepting diversity and allowing signs with messages deemed "offensive" in the parade.

"I think that the two need to be sort of carefully monitored," he says, adding: "We've never had that challenge."

Coolen says he could not think of any specific messages that might constitute "offensive," but mentions that "blatant vulgarity" and "racial slurs" would fall under its umbrella.

Coolen's comments are in response to Pride Toronto's short-lived but much decried sign-vetting policy. In March, the Toronto organization introduced a policy that would have allowed an ethics committee to evaluate signage prior to the parade. After the gay community expressed outrage, Pride Toronto quickly reversed its decision.

But Pride Toronto has no intention of letting anyone march in the parade under a banner “Queers Against Israeli Apartheid.” That, at least, is what the festival’s organizers have been telling city officials, according to documents released by the city.

"In my understanding of the Toronto situation, it was perceived as a racial slur," Coolen says. "If we had queers marching against another racial group, then that would be something that might be a challenge."

If such a challenge came up during Vancouver Pride, Coolen says the issue would be taken to the board of directors, as well as to different community groups to get their views on the matter.

"It would be about looking for a scope of opinions." 



Share |


Reader Comments


 
Some speech prohibited, some not
Not all speech that is "offensive" (as deemed by whomever) is unlawful. Speech that is obscene or hate-motivated would rightfully be prohibited. That which is "obscene" or "hate" is already defined by the courts. However, lawful political speech -- e.g., "Israeli apartheid," a description of and debate about a political situation -- would not be covered. It was not a "racial slur" against Whites to name apartheid in South Africa. Likewise, it is not a racial slur against Jews to name apartheid in Israel. Criticism of a government/state is not an attack on an identifiable group of people. Democracy requires that people be permitted to criticize governments -- whether their own, or those of others.
Rick, London Ontario
05/14/10 12:10 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Yesterdays ....
I sure long for the days when I could go down to the Pride parade and enjoy one afternoon with no politics in my life. I guess those days are now over - sigh. I'm all for free speech and fighting the good fight, BUT can't we have just one day a year when we can leave our politics at home and enjoy a day all as one ?
Jeff Taylor, Toronto Ontario
05/16/10 6:47 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
you were obviously oblivious Jeff
Pride has always been political. You might have been looking at naked men, but most of us noticed that it was always political.
Zezi, Toronto Ontario
05/17/10 5:44 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
RE : ZEZI
Having read your comments on the Toronto section of this newspaper, I've easily come to the conclusion that you're a very angry person. Some of the personal attacks you've directed at others have me feeling embarrassed for you - since it would seem that you have little self-respect for yourself. Your assertion about me looking at naked men and not noticing the politics in the Pride parades I've seen over the years tells me where your mind must be. Other than people marching in response to the lack of AIDS funding in the early years of the disease, the Parades have been fairly non-politically focused since the mid-eighties, through the 90's and into the 2000's. Just so you know (because your knowledge seems limited) Pride Parades began as a political protest and as I've noted above, turned to be more of a celebration. Here's hoping that you might decide to work towards letting your anger go and take future Pride Parades in for what they now are - AN ENJOYABLE AFTERNOON FOR ALL.
Jeff Taylor, Toronto Ontario
05/17/10 9:51 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Its Jeff! You betta listen!
And after reading all your blah blah blah on each and every article in Xtra Jeff. I would say you are the one with anger issues, plenty of them. And a real need for some kind of attention. Run all you want, its your shadow. Sad, so sad.
Carly Simon, Vancouver BC
05/19/10 12:46 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Toronto vs. Vancouver
One big difference between Toronto and Vancouver is the proportion of the Jewish populations compared to the general population. While both have small Jewish communities. The Vancouver Jewish community is negligible. I will hazard a guess that a Vancouver group of Queers Against Israeli Apartheid would be really small if it marched in the parade. They would be as relevant as the Queer Unicyclist and the Gay Taxidermists.
Skinny Dipper, Toronto Ontario
05/29/10 7:53 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.