Tense West End meeting
GAY VILLAGE / 'This process is a sham in my view': participant
Shauna Lewis / Vancouver / Thursday, May 20, 2010
Share |

Tempers flared when nearly 200 people took part in a City of Vancouver–hosted community forum on affordable housing and West End development on May 13.

“This process is a sham in my view,” Bill McCreery, former parks commissioner, told city staff.

“It’s basically a knee-jerk reaction by council and the planning department to try and shore up some support on an emergency basis.”

McCreery wonders why the city is only consulting residents now, a year after implementing the Short Term Incentives for Rental [STIR] program.

The STIR program offers developers incentives to build rental housing in Vancouver. Vision councillor Geoff Meggs says it keeps an election promise to spur the development of needed rental housing in the city.

“In order to do anything about affordability, we are going to have to try to increase [rental] supply, and STIR is a small piece to be able to do that,” adds Jill Davidson, senior housing planner for the city.

West End advocacy groups aren’t sold.
"I am also concerned about a comprehensive community plan in the West End," Qmunity's Jennifer Breakspear said. "But I'm also concerned about another form of housing, and that's the housing of this vital community resource centre."
(George Smeltzer photo)


“The amount of supply we are getting out of the STIR program isn’t really going to make a huge drop in the bucket for affordability,” says Christine Ackerman, director of the West End Residents Association.

COPE councillor Ellen Woodsworth, who called for the May 13 meeting, believes the $4.57 million allocated to develop the now-approved rental high-rise at Bidwell and Davie could have been better spent on a new resource centre for the queer community.

Woodsworth is urging West End residents to get more involved in the decision-making process for the contentious development proposed for 1401 Comox St.

“People need to understand the choices that can be made for that project or any development,” she says.

Woodsworth encourages people to request community amenity contributions for the Comox St development, rather than market rental housing.

Jennifer Breakspear, executive director of Qmunity, which has been promised space in the Comox St development, says the location will suit BC’s queer resource centre well.

“I’m concerned about a lack of consultation regarding development in the West End,” she told the meeting. “I am also concerned about a comprehensive community plan in the West End. I share those [concerns] with you.

“But I’m also concerned about another form of housing, and that’s the housing of this vital community resource centre,” she said.

Qmunity’s current home is “decrepit and pitiful,” she continued. “We have an opportunity to better serve you. We have an opportunity through 1401 Comox St.

“Yes, I’m selfish,” she said. “I want that development for what it could do for Qmunity. I want that development for what it could do for the West End. What I’m saying is please don’t stand in the way of this one development,” she appealed.

Her appeal was met with sneers and boos.

“It’s an awful lot of expense to build a high-rise that nobody wants in the neighbourhood in order to come up with a community space,” countered Diane Cote, who has lived in the West End for more than 30 years. “The money should go to a community space.”

A summary of the information gathered at the meeting, as well as results from a city–run West End community-needs survey, will be available online next month.

    For more information and to fill out the survey go to: http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/planning/westend/materials.htm


Share |


Reader Comments


 
The Ugly Truth
I just never seem to be able to wrap my head around this concept that some people on one hand don't want development in the West End, BUT they do want affordable housing in the West End. To me it's as simple as basic math. If you continue to build buildings (especially high - dense ones) that brings more potential rental units on the market. The more on the market, the more affordable things may remain. Some will say that they won't be affordable right from the start because they aren't labelled 'low-income' units. I've got news for for the people that think living in the West End can and will be affordable for most anyone that wants to live there - You're Dreaming. The West End, and it's surrounding area(s) are among the most beautifully anywhere in the world. The parks, the beaches, the ocean, the mountains, the views, the cleanliness, the lay-out, the shopping, the transit, the food, and the demand by the thousands that what to live there, make it basically near impossible to afford for some people. Although it's a sad fact to say this, it's pretty much out of the City's hands to try and manipulate a nature progression with a growing, thriving, city such as Vancouver. To compare a city like Vancouver to say Toronto, sure, rents over-all are a little cheaper in Toronto, but Toronto is a city that can't hold a candle to Vancouver when it comes to clean, expanding transit, well constructed roads & sidewalks, great planning around water-front land, green spaces - even benches to sit and watch a sunset, bike friendly planning, etc, etc, etc. Many time in life you have to decide what's important to you and who you're going to pay for it. Living in Vancouver is wonderful, however, the days of $500. one bedroom apartments with a view of the North Shore mountains or the Pacific Ocean are over forever I;m afraid.
Jeff Taylor, Toronto Ontario
05/20/10 12:44 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Don't Turn Vancouver into Toronto
Keep cramming high-rises into the West End and it'll soon look like Toronto - all concrete and not on a human scale. (Remember Toronto's waterfront that used to be federal parkland gifted to the city, and is now all high-rises?) I'm sorry but 390 square feet for a STIR studio that rents for market price ($1,050.00/month) will only raise prices for the tenants living in 600ft. studios because the landlords will know that's a better deal. STIR will not bring affordability & will actually cause rents to increase. The mere speculation of the windfall profits to be made by developers building high-rises will force rents up. Rents are directly linked to the value of the land.
Shards, Vancouver BC
05/20/10 6:13 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Rental FACTS
Shards, your argument is wrong flawed. Your point about a 390 square foot apartment causing a 600 square foot apartment to go up in rental value is the same as comparing a one bedroom apartment to a 2 bedroom apartment - of course the 2 bedroom will rent for more more per month. What actually causes rents to go up is a lack of rental units in the first place ! If, starting tomorrow people started moving out of the West End and they weren't being replaced by new people wanting to live in the West End, what do you think would happen to the price of a rental ? They would have to go down to entice people to move to the West End so that building owners wouldn't have empty suites. The same is true about building new buildings. If there is very few or even worse, no new buildings being built, what incentive is there for owners of current buildings to keep their rents reasonable ? Few rental units on the market plus a demand for those same rental units equals HIGHER RENTS. As for you comments about Toronto VS Vancouver, the fact is that the density of the West End (as far as buildings go) is much more dense in downtown Vancouver than in downtown Toronto. Another big difference is that because over the last few decades (until say the last 4 or so years) very few new rental units have been built in the downtown core of Toronto, the main result of this is that building owners have been able to get away with allowing their buildings rot because their tenants had little other choice if they wanted to move yet stay in the downtown city core area. Like it or not, development (including high-rises) is the way to go as far as keeping up with the demand for rental units on the market for the thousands of people that want to live in downtown Vancouver. About your comments regarding the waterfront in Toronto. Over the years, various interest groups (including developers) have NOT been able to convince the Govt of the day (mostly City) to come up with a decent plan(s) and stick with it
Jeff Taylor, Toronto Ontario
05/21/10 1:33 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
STIR rents are not affordable
The STIR units as proposed or, even if there were 5 more similar projects in the West End would not amount to a "drop in the bucket" as Ms. Ackerman says. @ $2.70 / sf STIR rents are full retail rents @ current development costs. In fact, quite the opposite might happen. When the STIR units come on-market @ significantly higher rates, the market tendency will be to want to bring lower rents up closer to the median, which has been raised because of the STIR units. &, yes your TO commenter has a point. I'd live in Shaughnessy if I could but, I have to content myself otherwise. It is sad but, it is reality. Having said that the current civic & provincial legislation has dampened the increases that otherwise would have occurred much sooner. I'm not expert in that aspect of this issue but, the City giving away the barn to developers with the STIR incentives is not the answer.
Bill McCreery, Vancouver BC
06/03/10 2:47 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.