Qmunity left out of Comox development
COMMUNITY SPACE / City says community space in building wasn't publicly endorsed
Shauna Lewis / Vancouver / Friday, February 03, 2012
Share |

BC's Queer Resource Centre will have to continue its search for a new home as there's no longer space allocated for it in a revised rezoning application for 1401 Comox St, developers say.

Henriquez Partners Architects has submitted a revamped development application to the city to build a market rental residential tower on the former St John's church site. Qmunity and Gordon Neighbourhood House had hoped they would share space in the proposed 22-storey tower in the West End. But any plans for community space in the new application have been withdrawn.

Apart from the exclusion of community space, revisions also include sculpting of the tower to reduce shadow impacts, reduced height from 66 metres (216.5 feet) to 61 metres (200 feet), larger setbacks and more green space.

The initial proposal had been submitted by Henriquez Partners Architects and its fellow project investors,Westbank Corp and the Peterson Group, to the city in March 2010, but community uproar over the plan put a halt to the process pending further public consultation. Many open houses and forums ensued, and developers were required to revamp their rezoning application to address community concerns.

Last spring, during a city-hosted forum on affordable housing, Qmunity's executive director Jennifer Breakspear faced an onslaught of community criticism when she praised the rezoning application that would allow the organization to occupy space in the tower. Breakspear described Qmunity's Bute St home as "decrepit and pitiful."

"We have an opportunity to better serve you. We have an opportunity through 1401 Comox St," she told participants.

"Yes, I'm selfish," she continued. "I want that development for what it could do for Qmunity. I want that development for what it could do for the West End. What I'm saying is please don't stand in the way of this one development," she appealed.

"It's unfortunate," says Breakspear of the lost opportunity. "That's sometimes the way these deals go."

Breakspear says she was informed of the decision at the end of last year.

"I don't know what influenced the decision," she replies when asked if public scrutiny of the proposal had influenced developers' change of heart. " [But] I was told they wanted to go in a different direction based on feedback they had received from the city," she says.

Breakspear doesn't believe the decision was a personal one against Qmunity, but rather an overhaul of the entire rezoning proposal.

City staff say the proposal for community space in the building simply wasn't publicly endorsed. "My understanding was that there was some concern about the location of Qmunity at the site," says Kevin McNaney, associate director of the city's central area planning, which includes the West End. "It appears it wasn't fully supported."

It's "now a 100-percent market rental project," he confirms.

While developers revamp their plans to incorporate community input, one local ad hoc group says it will continue to oppose the plan. "It looks just as bad as the original proposal," says Randy Helton of West End Neighbours, a group opposed to spot rezoning in the West End. "It's essentially the same building," he says, adding that the changes made have been cosmetic.

"And the small amount of community space has been cut out," he continues. "It's a bad project for the community. We deserve much better."

McNaney says the rezoning application must now go through more community consultation and departmental discussions before a final decision can be made, a process that could last well into the year.

The rezoning application for 1401 Comox had been initially considered under the Short Term Incentives for Rental Program (STIR), approved by city council in 2009 as a way to increase the city's urban market rental stock. STIR ended Dec 15, and while the city will not consider new projects under STIR, existing applications are still being considered. Councillor Tim Stevenson says he has not been informed about the revised rezoning application for 1401Comox St, saying it hasn't come to council yet.

Stevenson says that he had hoped there would be some space allocated for Qmunity and that he wants an explanation for the queer centre's exclusion from the plan.

Xtra's attempts to reach Gregory Henriquez, of Henriquez Partners Architects, were unsuccessful up to press time.

For now Qmunity will remain at its current location in the gay village. "It is functional space within its limitations," Breakspear says, adding she'll keep her eyes open for other potential locations.

A community open house to discuss the application revisions is scheduled for Feb 9, 5pm, at the Coast Plaza Hotel.




Share |


Reader Comments


 
Did the developer just get what they wanted...?
I think the developer is hearing that the community was against the project. I have not heard that. We need a central Queer Community Centre like all major North American cities have.
Berend McKezenzie, Vanouver British columbia
02/04/12 1:57 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Time to replace the ED
Let's review Jennifer Breakspear's accomplishments. Pissed off the residents of the west end and their association: check. Lost out on new office space: check. Drove Qmunity into the ground and deeper into debt: check. Lost the respect of those who work for her: check. Had run-ins with half the people in Vancouver: check. What a great ED Qmunity has. With staff like that, who needs enemies?
Bill W., Vancouver BC
02/05/12 2:59 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Bad Development the Basis of Objections
I think it would be appropriate for Mr. McNaney of the Planning Department to review his own department's summary of community consultation on this project: http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/planning/rezoning/applications/1401comox/documents/PUBLICCONSULTATIONSUMMARY.pdf The only reference to Qmunity in the document is the following: “A few people expressed uncertainty of whether this is the best location for Qmunity.” It is irresponsible to suggest that the publicly-accessible space in this development has been removed due to "lack of community support." The public's comments about the project centre around the fact that this is bad development that over-rides community objectives in the desire for private profit. People aren't opposed to Qmunity, they are opposed to development that is inconsistent with the character of the West End. Instead of coming back (now for the third time) with the same inappropriate development proposal with a five-fold increase in permitted floor area, the developer should be consulting with the community and revising the project to something that can build neighbourhood support.
Michael, Vancouver BC
02/06/12 6:23 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
No surprise
The history on developers actually delivering on community amenities is poor in Vancouver. The city approval process has a long history of amenities and public art projects mysteriously disappearing at the last stages of approval. This is not uncommon, have a look at the link below. To finish the process off, the building will be built, rentals will be be priced too high and lie empty for a period. After complaints from the developer he will be given dispensation to convert to start selling some units as condos, then ultimately to sell all the units. At that point he will have everything he wanted, have made a mountain of cash and the citizens will have zip. Welcome to Vancouver. http://www.vancourier.com/business/City+axes+space+rental+suites+from+Kingsway+complex/6025131/story.html
Nelson100, Vancouver BC
02/07/12 2:02 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
The real problem
Give your heads a shake. The real source of thie problem is the fear mongering brought on by WERA and WEN. The developer was fully prepared to build Qmunity a new space in this development, and further link Gordon Neighbourhood House as well, but no, the blatantly irresponsible Nimbyism by these groups put paid to that. So now we all lose, but there will still be a tower there. So don't blame the developer, and certainly don't blame Jennifer Breakspear. Blame the so called west end residents association, and west end neighbors . Pat them on the back for a job well done for this loss to our community.
Graham, Vancouver Bc
02/17/12 1:12 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.