Opponents pack Burnaby school board meeting
EDUCATION / Board sends anti-homophobia policy back to committee
Shauna Lewis / Vancouver / Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Share |

Staunch opponents outnumbered supporters 10 to one when the Burnaby school board met to discuss passing an anti-homophobia policy on April 26.

Nearly 100 concerned parents and citizens, many of them members of Burnaby’s Willingdon Church and nearly all of Asian descent, crowded into the packed board room holding handmade signs that read “No to 5.45.”

The Burnaby Board of Education’s policy 5.45 aims to protect the rights of gay students. However, some concerned parents claim the draft is nothing more than reverse discrimination, an infringement of human rights and, if adopted, an invasion on parental rights.

“I agree that schools should protect all our children from discrimination and harm,” says Heather Leung. “But there is no need to single out certain groups by setting up administrative regulations and strategies for the sake of promotion.

Nearly 100 opponents, many of them from Burnaby's Willingdon Church and nearly all of Asian descent, packed the district's school board meeting on April 26.
(Shauna Lewis photo)
“By implementing administrative regulations and strategy you are putting labels of ‘gay,’ ‘lesbian,’ ‘bisexual,’ transgendered,’ ‘transsexual,’ ‘two-spirited’ and ‘queer’ on the children,” she says, adding that the policy would compel students to “question their sexual orientation and sexual identity.”

“The draft policy imposes on children the idea that their family is perpetrating negative stereotypes when parents educate their children with the values that are consistent with their moral beliefs,” says George Kovacic.

Kovacic believes the anti-homophobia policy uses children as “pawns to promote a particular social agenda.”

James Sanyshyn is vice-president of the Burnaby Teachers’ Association and sits on the committee tasked with addressing homophobia in the district's schools. He praises the board for passing a draft of the anti-homophobia policy on Feb 22.

The policy “will create a climate where all students can be who they are while feeling safe and supported by the school system,” he says, urging the board to adopt the final draft “swiftly and unedited.”

“If there are a hundred of you here then some of you will have a gay and lesbian or transgendered or bisexual son or daughter,” lesbian Burnaby district school counsellor Debra Sutherland told the meeting. “And I hope you will understand that their number one way of staying alive, productive and healthy is your love and support.”

“What students need is support,” agrees 19-year-old Anthea Ballam. “Students need to learn that not only is [sexual orientation] not a choice — it’s not a problem. Why are we punished for expressing our love in a different way? High school is hard enough as it is. Let’s help try to make it easier for those who are just trying to be themselves.”

Some parents threatened to remove their children from the district if it passes the policy. Others said they would be open to further talks.

“I do think there is room for some of this policy to be part of the curriculum,” says parent James Gray. But the father of two elementary school students believes education regarding homosexuality should be reserved for Grade 7 or higher.

The school board referred the matter back to committee for further discussion. A final decision on the policy is expected by the end of this school year.  

Of BC’s 60 school districts, only 12 have passed anti-homophobia policies.





Share |


Reader Comments


 
LGBTQ and Allies can help!
James Sanyshyn here, aksing for your help! Send the Board of Education in Burnaby an email supporting the draft LGBTQ Policy. You can send your emails to the Chairperson, Larry Hayes larry,hayes@sd41.bc.ca Thanks queers and allies!
James Sanyshyn, Vancouver BC BC
04/27/11 6:37 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
IGNORANCE KILLS
Reading the answers from the parents.. clearly they don't have a clue what being gay is about ... "against moral values", "for the sake of promotion", "pawns to promote a particular social agenda”? Since when protecting a minority group become a negative "agenda"? Did they forget what it is like to be a minority themselves? And the fact that so many of them came from the same church... it's clear that they've been brainwashed by ignorant religious figures... It's just very sad to see the blind leading the blind.
Peter L, Toronto Ontario
04/27/11 9:23 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Breathtaking
I was one of the few people there who were in favour of the policy, and I have to admit that as bad as I thought the homophobes were going to be, they really out-did themselves this time. It was a breathtaking spectacle to watch these people quote the UN Declaration of Human Rights as a justification for allowing discrimination in local schools. The ignorance about the actual policy was equally astounding. Prior to last night I never heard anyone argue that ending discrimination against LGBTQ kids would mean we have to discriminate against everyone else, nor have I ever heard that doing so would also force students to come out of the closet before they are ready. This shouldn't be something that requires a long debate, at least not for the rational members of greater society...
Trevor Ritchie, Burnaby BC
04/27/11 10:53 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Education is vitally important
[The following is an edited version of an e-mail message that I sent to Burnaby Board of Education Board of Trustees Chair Mr. Hayes, on Thursday April 28, 2011.] Thursday April 28, 2011 Mr. Larry Hayes, Chair Board of Trustees The Burnaby Board of Education 604-341-0197 larry.Hayes@sd41.bc.ca Dear Mr. Hayes: You are probably receiving a lot of e-mail over this (below); here is one more (sorry)! The intolerance demonstrated as described in the stories below is absolutely intolerable, particularly in the 2011 in a nominally tolerant and accepting country such as Canada. http://www.xtra.ca/public/Vancouver/Opponents_pack_Burnaby_school_board_meeting-10078.aspx http://www.lifesite.ca/news/bc-public-school-board-considering-homophobia-heterosexism-policy There is no excuse, under any circumstance, for intolerance, bias or discrimination directed at any person, including members of the GLBT community - especially youth, who are especially vulnerable. Furthermore, education (which appears to be lacking in many of the parents described) breeds ignorance, fear, misunderstanding, intolerance and discrimination, and leads to denial of services (medical; education; housing; employment; others), and in the worst cases, violence (verbal and physical harm). Education is crucially important both to individual growth and development, and also benefits society, as a whole. In my own regard, I am male-to-female transsexual; I hold a Ph.D. in Biology (specializing in molecular genetics / genomics, toxicology, environmental health, and bioinformatics), and I am self-employed in that capacity. My educational achievements were critical to the professional (and personal) success that I enjoy, today. Sincerely, Dr. Victoria A. Stuart, Ph.D. Vancouver, B.C.
Victoria Stuart, Vancouver BC
04/28/11 12:10 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Put Asians Back In The Camps
I wonder if these people remember when the arguments they use were used against their own "race" in the USA and they were rounded up and tossed into work camps. "Japanese-American internment was the relocation and internment by the United States government in 1942 of approximately 110,000 Japanese Americans and Japanese who lived along the Pacific coast of the United States to camps called "War Relocation Camps," in the wake of Imperial Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor. The internment of Japanese Americans was applied unequally throughout the United States. Japanese Americans who lived on the West Coast of the United States were all interned, while in Hawaii, where more than 150,000 Japanese Americans composed over one-third of the territory's population, 1,200 to 1,800 Japanese Americans were interned. Of those interned, 62% were American citizens." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese-American_internment#United_States_District_Court_opinions
Corey Mondello, Boston, MASS USA
04/28/11 4:23 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Church members and sex
It is so sad to read how some people who fear that their son or daughter will become non-heterosexual beings. Maybe they need to be educated, but I doubt that the church that they belong to will help in this matter! :) I noticed that many were from China (probably wealthy Chinese from HK). Maybe they should understand that we tolerate them when they are showing off, driving their exclusive material possessions (often on borrowed money), presumably to show that they are successful (more than the losers non-Asian are?). I think they need to review their losing-face custom, which IMHO produces dysfunctional behaviours because they make me lose face every time I drive my normal car!
peter, surrey bc
04/30/11 3:28 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
I know i'm tolerant
....of all the Asians who have taken over my neighbourhood. Growing up, we had one set of Asian neighbours; the nicest people in the world! Now they have knocked down all the houses, built huge ones and come and go through their new double garages from the car straight into the house. NEVER a hello NEVER a smile NEVER given a chance to say how are you? THey do not do any activities in their yards. It IS very strange to my family. We live in a neighbourhood all our lives and feel unwelcome. But we TOLERATE them or we'd sell up and move to. ....not sure where we'd move too. I suppose Kits?
Marc, vancouver bc
04/30/11 8:05 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
This reaction is dangerous
The ignorance of these people is not just pathetic, it is dangerous. Maybe the school district should bring in the parent of some of the kids who committed suicide because of the intolerance against LBGQT kids and the absolute fear of some of those kids in facing up to who they truly are.
Barb, Burnaby BC
04/30/11 8:09 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Irony
It's ironic. In the past, gay liberals and leftists in Canada supported immigration from countries with socially conservative cultures and values. The same gay liberals and leftists also supported Canadian government policies of multiculturalism that that allowed those immigrants to maintain and develop their socially conservative cultures and values in Canada. Now, the same gay liberals and leftists are seeing their dreams for LGBT equality opposed by the socially conservative immigrants and their grown children who hate gays.
Robin, Toronto Ontario
04/30/11 8:31 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
No to Hatred
Don't these hateful parents realize that it's a public system? The School Act ensures that all students will encounter a system that's "strictly secular" and free of "religious dogma." If these parents want to inculcate their own youngsters with their church's bigoted, grandiose religious delusions, then they must do so privately and at their own expense. The Board has a duty to provide gay students and staff with a safe, hatred-free learning environment: thus, these families should be encouraged to enrol their children elsewhere.
Angus Gooch, Vancouver BC
05/01/11 4:16 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Who's the Bigot
Why do you make a point of identifying the crowd as mostly from WILLINGDON CHURCH and mostly ASIAN. Xtra is acting Christianophobic and Asianophobic. Pot - Kettle.
Jack, Burnaby BC
05/03/11 6:01 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Sorry Jack
I was there, the crowd was indeed mostly Asian. It is an observance and not racist at all. Nobody said those dirty, stinky and bigoted Asians were out in full force, did they? Nope, merely an observance. There were a FEW Caucasians there too. Try to learn the difference Jack.
Marc, Vancouver BC
05/03/11 8:17 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
??
Lol @ Jack. You funny!
Johnny, Vancouver British columbia
05/03/11 9:19 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Observation
Jack, while I can somewhat understand how you got to thinking of the article as xenophobic, I'd like to point out as someone who was there, and who ended up having to take notes on the affair that the vast majority of those in attendance and opposition to the plan were of Asian descent. That shouldn't lead people to assume that all Asian-Canadians are homophobic, but this particular group of them was. I suppose more than homophobic, the parents at the meeting were simply misinformed as to what the policy would do. Perhaps if there had been more public meetings where these parents could have found out what the policy does, there wouldn't have been such a backlash fuelled by misconceptions.
Trevor, Burnaby BC
05/03/11 10:41 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Resenting the Spoiled Child
The comments above my earlier one contain numerous anti-Christian, anti-Oriental, anti-Immigrant statements. By identifying the atendees by race and creed Xtra set the stage for these disgusting comments. The proposed policy does the exact same thing, and will result in the same behaviours. This policy creates division and resentment, not integration and harmony. In the same manner that siblings usually resent a specially favored child, the school board, by giving special status to LGBTQ students, will foster an increase in resentment and catalyze an increase in anti-LGBTQ behaviours. The policy will have the exact opposite result of the desired outcome.
Jack, Burnaby BC
05/04/11 11:19 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Sorry Jack
In my opinion, your interpretation of this article is really skewed and you are looking for a fight. I'm not sure why. You fail when it comes to making an observance versus racism. Why is it racist to observe that the crowd was mostly of Asian decent? Can you try to explain that? You know, most nights at the Pumpjack, the crowd is mostly gay. You know, there are alot of white people in Kitsilano? Alot of women with babies too. You know, at UBC, there are alot of students. You know, when I visit the Chinatown area, there are ALOT of Asians. You know, when I visit Main Street, I see alot of people of Indian decent. You know, when I go into certain coffee shops on Commercial drive, there are ALOT of Italian and European-looking people. You know, when I attend church, there are ALOT of faithful people there. You know, when I go to the Yaohan Centre in Richmond, there are an ENORMOUS amount of Asians there. Just some of my obersavations that DO NOT make me a racist in the slightest bit. thanks.
Marc, Vancouver BC
05/04/11 12:59 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Combox Racism
Marc, the COMBOX contains the anti-christian, anti-immigrant, and anti-oriental remarks. These sort of comments are ignorant, inflammatory and counterproductive. Highlighting the attendees race and creed was a deliberate editorial decision by Xtra that is without any journalistic merit... except that it serves to demonstrate empirically that when people are grouped and labelled, they become targets for bigotry and hate. Since the Burnaby policy groups and labels LBGTQ students, you can extrapolate what the outcome of implementing it are going to be. And if you are having difficulty following along, the policy will actually enlarge the problem.
Jack, Burnaby BC
05/04/11 4:53 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
closet no solution
Jack you seem to be suggesting that anti-gay bullying and harassment will be the result of this policy because it'll create a climate where there will be more students who openly identify themselves as LGBT and who therefore be more open to attack. You also suggest that the emphasis should be integration and harmony rather than division and resentment which you claim this policy will create. I get the impression that you think the solution is for LGBT students to stay in the closet as a way to support inclusion and harmony rather than educating anti-LGBT bigots about the reality of LGBT people so that they'd be more inclusive of LGBT students and more in harmony with them. The closet is an awful place for any LGBT person, its extremely corrosive of their mental, emotional and social well being to live in denial of who they really are. Telling LGBT students that they must stay in the closet to maintain harmony with anti-LGBT bigots is no solution at all, besides which while inclusive and harmony is a worthwhile goal to say its more important than the mental, emotional and social well being of LGBT students is ridiculous to say the least. If anything it is the anti-LGBT bigots who should change for the benefit of harmony and inclusion, to do so would do them a world of good, unlike insisting LGBT students stay in the closet to achieve the same goal. Besides which anti-LGBT bigotry is a choice, being LGBT, or hetero for that matter, is not. If there is to be harmony and inclusiveness in these schools its up to the anti-LGBT bigots to change their ways and not to force LGBT students to stay in the closet like you suggest they should. Besides which our schools have a responsibility to protect all their students, including those who are LGBT, protecting LGBT students is far more important than protecting the bigoted beliefs of some. Bigotry is not a right but an education in safe environment is and this policy recognized that and should be implemented asap.
Rich, Toronto Ontario
05/04/11 8:32 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Doesn't change
the FACT that most of the attendees were bigoted ASIANS!!!!!!!! Asian.Asian.Asian.Asian.Asian. If the room had been full of bigoted black people, WE WOULD HAVE SAID SO TOO.
Marc, Vancouver BC
05/04/11 9:25 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Not wholly bigoted
I wouldn't say that they were all bigoted. True, some of them definitely came with hate in their hearts, but there were a lot of scared people in that crowd who simply did not know what was happening, and felt like they had a right to know what was going to be done with their children. We should be having this kind of open discussion with them, let them know that we're not indoctrinating anyone and see if we can get them to relax a bit. Jack, if you knew anything about the school system in British Columbia, you'd know that there are already these exact same kinds of policies protecting female staff and students, as well as individuals who are ethnic minorities. Are you going to now say that ethnic groups and women face increased discrimination because we have policies specifically protecting them? I'd say you have to if you want to maintain any sort of consistency, and in those cases the facts simply don't back you up. Let's try for some rationality, just for a little while?
Trevor, Burnaby BC
05/04/11 11:52 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Re: Your Glass Quixotic Combox, Jack
"Oriental" is an offensive term.
P.Pong, Vancouver BC
05/05/11 1:38 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
E and O
Rich, I never suggested that LGBTQ's should remain "closeted". Trevor, I was unaware of the other policies. However, my opinion that focusing on the differences leads to problems is confimred by the racist, anti-religious comments here, so the facts actually do back me up.(At least here they do) P.Pong, Thanks for the heads-up. I was unaware that the term was considered offensive in Canada. In Britain and America it is not considered as such. I shall refrain from it's use. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orient There is a false statement contained in the policy that declares that heterosexuality is not the norm. 95% or more of the population is heterosexual so the statement in the policy is false. Just as 2 legs is the norm for a human beings. Sure some people have no legs, 1 leg, or perhaps 3 or 4 legs, but that does not alter the fact that 2 legs is what is normal. To teach a clearly false statement as part of an education is indoctrination.
Jack, Burnaby BC
05/05/11 12:18 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
You Jack Are Clearly A Bigot, We Get It.
Now please go back to commenting on the National Post website.
Dave, Vancouver BC
05/05/11 12:50 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Jack
I do understand the point you're trying to make, regarding the idea that if we single out groups for protection, we may inadvertently end up making those very groups become more open to attack. On the other hand, I can speak with some firsthand knowledge of what this particular policy is meant to be looking at, so I'd like to just dispel some of the rumours about it. First, while the policy does state that it is to prevent a heteronormative society from being created in schools and you rightly mention that heterosexuality is the majority position in society, heteronormative is referring more to the idea that other sexual orientations or gender expressions are either not real, or are limited enough to be considered taboo or improper. One of the main goals of this policy is to promote healthy discussions of those other sexual orientations and gender expressions, which I do accept make up a small minority of the population. We already do the same thing with religious minorities; in grade 8 social studies we have lessons on various historical and present-day religions, and there are courses you can take to delve further into those religions. Comparative Civilizations is a good course for that. We also talk about ethnic minorities and have lessons on the cultural differences of different races. Human Geography courses also talk a fair bit about where we come from and some of those differences. This policy would end up doing something similar, in that it would be talking about minority groups that we all know are there, instead of trying to pretend they don't exist. Hope that helps a little.
Trevor, Burnaby BC
05/05/11 7:33 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Pure Homophobia
This is so sad that issues like this are still happening in 2011, and here in beautiful Burnaby. Shame on you Parentsvoice, you are the Bully's don't you see this. Spend your energy helping the poor instead. You are spreading hate. I've just received a hate flyer in my mailbox today from the Homophobic group called Parentsvoice, they are trying to organise people to attend the May 10th, 2011 Burnaby School Board meeting to show opposition to Policy 5.45. NO WONDER WE STILL HAVE BULLY'S Bravo to the Burnaby School Board for this initiative. Thanks
Dawn, Burnaby BC
05/06/11 8:27 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Go To CKNW Audio Vault
Today (May 10th) between 9am and 9:30am. You will hear why this policy is needed. Proof positive that we have soooo far to go. Three callers in the short segment , all with the underlying tone of prejudice, misinformation, bigoted etc. Really is sad, we have such a far way to go.
Dave, Vancouver BC
05/10/11 1:52 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Trevor
You have the patience of Job. I wish I had heard about this issue earlier than this afternoon. I will await the result of today's "protest". It was disconcerting to learn that only 12 of 60 school districts have such policy. The Ministry should take control, give us a blanket policy and disengage those clouded by ignorance (be it a lack of knowledge or some form of indoctrination). We've come a long way. I envy the 20-somethings the opportunities they have today. I hope they can say the same thing about the next generation 20 years hence.
Chris, Port Moody BC
05/10/11 5:51 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Hey Extra
Where is the updated story on the protest that happened last night? Everyone on vacation there?
Dave, Vancouver BC
05/11/11 6:06 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.