Mission bans gay posters in schools
EDUCATION / Images deemed too 'graphic' for some students, staff
Patty Comeau / Vancouver / Wednesday, June 18, 2008
Share |

Too Graphic? The Mission school district's Director of Instruction thinks so. Randy Huth says the poster combines 'the graphic depiction of substance abuse with homosexuality' and is inappropriate.
(Fondation Émergence)
Last year, Mike Ross tried unsuccessfully to get the Mission school board to introduce a comprehensive anti-homophobia policy. Now the Grade 1 teacher has personally taken on the task of fostering a gay-friendly environment for students, staff and families in his district - with limited success.

"When things came around like Anti-Homophobia Day, Matthew Shepard Day, Pride, I was going to make sure that the different schools in our district knew when these things were happening," he says.

In late April, Ross prepared an information package for each of the schools in his district, including materials from the Fondation Émergence's 2006-2008 International Day Against Homophobia campaigns, to be displayed in staff rooms until May 17.
Censored. Mission teacher Mike Ross sent out posters to every school in his district to mark the National Day Against Homophobia. District officials banned most of them.
(Tallulah photo)


But shortly after appearing on the bulletin board at Christine Morrison Elementary school, the posters were taken down.

The district's Director of Instruction, Randy Huth, says that 2008's posters are "quite graphic" and were judged inappropriate for posting in Mission's 16 elementary school staff rooms.

The material in question features a gloved hand holding an upright syringe and the caption "Homosexuality is NOT a sickness!"

Huth says the image combines "the graphic depiction of substance abuse with homosexuality."

"That's not what we were aiming for when we were designing the poster," says Fondation Émergence representative Lauren Gosselin. "The message that we want to send out is basically a very simple one: homosexuality is not a disease, period."

Huth feels the poster contains "quite a confusing message" and that although students are generally not allowed in staff rooms, the posters were deemed inappropriate "even for staff too."

Gosselin says that to his knowledge this is the first incidence of the 2008 poster being censored.

Huth offered no formal reason for the district's choice to also ban the 2007 poster, which features a newborn wearing a hospital bracelet labelled "homosexual" and the slogan "Sexual orientation is not a choice."

If an adult happened to see the posters, "at very least it would get them talking and thinking," says Ross, "and dialogue is always a good thing."

Huth says the posters were taken down after one of Ross' colleagues came to the board with what he would only call "concerns".

Ross says he's disappointed that his colleague went directly to the school board instead of asking him for clarification.

"Maybe they feel that I would be uncomfortable talking with them, maybe they feel embarrassed, maybe they don't want to insult me or hurt my feelings," he speculates. "But basically it was effective for them because they had the poster taken down."

With the one approved poster in low supply, Ross contacted the Mission Teachers Union (MTU). He then sat down to colour new posters by hand to send to union representatives for display in each school.

Mike Trask, president of the MTU, says that the collective agreement between the teachers and the school board requires that each school have a union bulletin board and that administrators cannot remove items posted on such boards.

Trask recently met with the district's union representatives and says that no concerns about the new posters were raised. In future years, he says, the union will "get ahead of the curve" and approve anti-homophobia posters well in advance.

Ross says that at least one board trustee is also behind him, pledging to wear a rainbow button and pink shirt next May 17. Still, he feels like he's being told to "just be quiet and be happy."

His earlier attempt to place an ad in the school's newsletter for a same-sex families meeting group was also denied.

Huth says that newsletters are "about student achievement" and that Ross is "not being very tolerant and not being very respectful" of district procedures.

"I'm an impatient man," says Ross. "I don't want children jumping off of bridges, committing suicide, being beaten and battered because people actually believe that there is no problem here and that people [in Mission] are just fine with people being LGBT. If they were, why do we have our LGBT students not coming out here?"

It took Ross until he was 47 years old to publicly come out. He says that he knows several teens in Mission who have chosen to stay in the closet and that no other teacher in the district has opened up to him about being queer or trans.

"I know I'm not the only one. But if I have to be the only vocal one, so be it. I'm willing to do that."

Ross' next goal is to have Mission's Grade 10 students participate in Egale's national survey on homophobia in Canadian schools.

Huth was unable to confirm whether or not the school board will participate in the survey.


Share |


Reader Comments


 
Take those posters down!
Randy Huth's comments deeming the "Homosexuality is Not An Illness" posters offer "quite a confusing message" is true. I was aghast the first time I saw last year's poster claiming that homosexuality is "not a choice". Indeed, as queer activists, is that not what we are fighting for? The image of a baby with "presumed heterosexual" is very effective, however I just can't stomach the accompanying message that seems to tell me that I have no choice in who I date, fuck or love. The we have this year's poster which proclaims that homosexuality is "not a sickness". Thanks to some folks in the 1970s at a meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, homosexuality really IS no longer an illness. So why use a message thirty years out of date? What's worse is to conflate images of hospital gloves, syringes with messages about homosexuality! When will we learn to use our OWN language instead of using defunct, heterosexist rhetoric? Why not create a celebratory campaign with images of active, proud queers? It's been done - www.outlive.ca - is a campaign that uses celebratory images of who we are instead of using the language oppression to describe our lives. Who did la Fondation Émergence consult before designing the creative content for this campaign? Why do the Xtra newspapers run images that seem so blatantly contradictory to a true affirmation of queer identity and could very well lead to harmful mixed messages?
Adam Graham, Vancouver British Columbia
06/19/08 11:07 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
hear hear!
The best thing the queer community/ies could do would be to ditch any further reliance on Fondation Emergence's awful communications strategy. Adam Graham (hey Adam!) sets out a lot of good reasons. Another good reason is that FE appears to deliberately erase trans people and their experiences. Apparently FE (like Pink Triangle Press) is oblivious to the notion of an intersectional analysis. If you want to see intersectionality in action, go look at the videos of the recent beating of trans woman Duanna Johnson by Memphis TN police officers (just google it and you'll a truly disturbing video.) A trans woman of colour being beaten senseless by a pig with his handcuffs wrapped around his fists, while another pins her shoulders. All because she refused to respond to his demand that the "FAGGOT" come over to get fingerprinted. Hello...when will the dinosaurs that reject intersectionality finally become EXTINCT? That means you too, PTP!
Shannon Blatt, Ottawa Ontario
06/21/08 8:47 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
a difficult task
I feel for Mr. Ross in his attempts to bring discussion to the Mission school district. It is easy living in downtown Vancouver to forget that everywhere is not as liberal as where I currently live. I applaud Mr. Ross in his efforts and sympathize with his current situation. Sure the posters has some shock value, and perhaps the design is not the one that I would have come up with, and yes the message is not a new one - maybe that is what is needed sometimes?! It is also hard to argue with the observations of a long time teacher in the school district when he says students are not out as they are in other areas and that something has to be done - 20+ years in the school system has got to count for something. How about we lend a hand to his cause and efforts if we think the premise of education and awareness is of value? I am sure he'd love to have others offer their constructive criticism, ideas and help.
Gregg Ambrosi, Vancouver BC
06/22/08 9:21 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
ugly poster
Hi Shannon and Adam, Hear, hear. The poster is hideous. While I don't support censorship, I cringe every time I see those posters, and I have to control the urge not to rip them down myself. From what I understand, Fondation Emergence refuses to share the theme of the poster or its imagery with sponsoring organizations prior to its release. So many organizations end up inadvertently slapping their logo on a poster that doesn't meet with their mission or values. Fondation Emergence needs to get with the program and listen to the community. We want celebratory images that depict our sexuality. Skip the medicalized images and take direction from the people who are fighting homophobia and transphobia every day.
Ariel Troster, Ottawa ON
06/25/08 8:51 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Posters
I would honestly like to get in touch with Mr. Ross to assist him. Being recently graduated out of the Mission school district and first coming out as Trans in kindergarden to be told by a teacher that i was "wrong" in polite terms and then not coming back out until this january, i know the struggles of Mission students and families with gender orientation and identity. if someone can help me with this that would be amazing.
Tamara Mcintyre aka. Markus Quinn, Mission BC
07/02/08 3:41 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
policy support
While I genuinely appreciate Mike's effort to represent LGBT concerns and bring them to our attention, I would like to clarify some things mentioned. I might add these are my personal views and do not represent the Board. Yes Mike was disappointed to not get a comprehensive anti-homophobic policy. In reality it did create discussion on the Board, and helped bring about the Respectful Schools Policy which is based on the B.C. Human Rights Code. It was felt policy should apply to all students knowledge of rights and process to ensure they would be comfortable and safe in the public school system. In my opinion, it will give them a process to address any type of discrimination or harassment. This is not to say societies attitudes still have some ways to go to in accepting everyone as equals in a number of areas. We hope we are teaching our children to accept others as they are in Canadian society.
Randy Cairns (Trustee), Mission B.C.
07/03/08 4:52 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Mission policy is inadequate
The Mission policy (and others like it around the province) that emphasizes legal rights and non-discrimination is inadequate to address the needs of LGBTQ youth. Such policies emphasize reaction rather than proaction--they force students to take action to protect their rights when many fear for their physical and emotional safety if they acknowledge sexual orientations that do not conform to heterosexist norms. This places an undue burden on already vulnerable persons. The comments of Tamara aka Markus (see above) are indicative of pervasive homophobia and misinformation within the community. The school board has a moral responsibility to acknowledge the circumstances of LBGTQ youth and to take a more proactive role in supporting the acceptance of all students as equals. To hide the issue of homophobia within a generic non-discrimination policy is not acceptable. Courageous leadership is required.
Wendy Poole, Vancouver BC
07/05/08 8:11 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
homophobia.
Why is it that in the mission school district, and others for that matter that we were allowed to have a christian club and not a GSA? In grade 8 we tried to start a GSA at mission secondary (me at the time as a straight person ) to be told that people may be offended and that parents wouldnt like it, when there was a christian club taking place, would parents of some students not also be offended by that? It isnt my problem anymore but there are so many other kids afraid to come out because of the homophobia and transphobia that they do and will encounter. Something really does need to be done and Mr Ross is just trying to ensure that something is done.
Tamara McIntyre aka Markus Quinn, Mission BC
07/07/08 8:20 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Wow... just wow.
Being a LGBT graduate from the mission school district (and a former student of Mr. Ross') all I can say is that I am glad to see someone starting to bring awareness in schools of homophobia and transphobia. I can't believe that these posters were taken down and deemed inappropriate (a little homophobia going on here??). Good luck Mike, you're bringing much needed awareness to Missions schools.
GLBT, Mission BC
07/20/08 11:30 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.