Bassi brothers acquitted of 2010 gaybashing
GAYBASHING / Judge says assailants could not be conclusively identified
Jeremy Hainsworth / Vancouver / Monday, January 14, 2013
Share |

Onlookers' jeers filled a Vancouver courtroom Jan 14 as a provincial court judge acquitted two brothers accused of assaulting a gay couple in June 2010.

Parminder Singh Peter Bassi was charged with two counts of assault causing bodily harm in connection with the incident. His brother Ravinder Robbie Bassi was charged with one count of assault causing bodily harm.

The attack sent Peter Regier and his late partner, David Holtzman, to hospital.

Judge Raymond Low found Regier and Holtzman were "overwhelmed and severely beaten” and subjected to "multiple slurs" about their sexual orientation.

He said the attack left the couple "suffering severe injuries."

But, Low said, the evidence did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt who perpetrated the attack. So he acquitted the Bassis.

The brothers sat calmly on hearing the acquittal, but Robbie Bassi was smiling as he left the courthouse. No one from the Bassi family commented on the decision.

Despite multiple witnesses identifying Robbie and Peter Bassi (above) as the assailants in a 2010 gaybashing, the judge ruled the evidence of their involvement wasn't conclusive.
(Shimon Karmel)
Holtzman died April 9 while on holiday in Palm Springs with Regier, but Regier was in court surrounded by family and friends. "I'm very disappointed," was all he could say.

Both Holtzman's mother and nephew were in court but declined to comment.

Low said Holtzman and Regier returned home the night of the attack and encountered their assailants on stairs next to their Keefer St condo building.

He said the first man went up the stairs and was preparing to urinate. He was followed by Regier and Holtzman, who expressed their displeasure at the man urinating.

At trial, Holtzman testified that the man allegedly replied, “Fag, are you serious?”

"My response was, 'Yes, I am a fag and yes, I am serious,'" Holtzman told the court on March 23, 2012.

The man responded, “Fucking faggots. I hate you,” Holtzman testified.

Low said Regier then began to photograph the man. He said the "first man rushed to Mr Regier and grappled with him," apparently trying to get the camera. "The first man then rushed in. Holtzman ran in and tried to separate the two," Low said.

"Mr Regier did nothing but attempt to ward off the blows, pleaded for the attack to cease," Low ruled.

Low said the man uttered "continued verbal invective, repeatedly making homophobic insults."

"The second man then rushed past the grappling men and engaged Holtzman,” Low said.

Low said Holtzman was shoved in a planter twice during that part of the incident.

"He is repeatedly punching him to the point where Mr Holtzman winds up curling up in a ball, in a hedgehog position in his words, in the planter," Crown prosecutor Kirstin Murphy told Low in her closing trial remarks Nov 22. "He is being pummelled in the back of the head and having homophobic remarks hurled at him.”

"The degree of violence used by the second man was excessive," Low ruled.

But, he asked, were the defendants the assailants?

"The main issue is whether or not the defendants were in the fight," he said.

Low said video security tapes showed the incident lasted about 1:45 minutes. He said the assault was also witnessed by Craig Costantino, who lived in the building, and by passerby Jaclyn Bruno.

Costantino told the court he recognized Peter Bassi from having played soccer with him.

Low, however, said Costantino's recollection of events did not match the video evidence. He said the neighbour testified he was only feet away when he allegedly recognized Peter Bassi, but the video showed he was at least 20 feet away in lighting conditions that did not match his testimony.

Bruno was captured in a video, which showed men she identified as the accused running from the scene. She also identified them in court.

Low said Bruno testified she could "hear the assailants making repeated homophobic remarks."

The judge called Bruno a "credible, straightforward witness," noting she witnessed the attack for only about 30 seconds.

But, he said, she relied on photographs to identify the defendants. He called it a classic example of where a witness can misidentify someone.

"I am not prepared to give any weight to Ms Bruno's identification of the defendants as the assailants," Low ruled.

Low said both Regier and Holtzman, who last year identified the brothers in court as their assailants, would have been too traumatized in the course of the assault to have had much chance for a clear view of the assailants' faces. They therefore described the men generally, Low said.

"Those general features apply to scores of men in this city," Low ruled.

He said their descriptions of the men to the police were limited. He also said the couple had seen media images of the accused and noted that Holtzman had encountered the accused in the courthouse cafeteria, which the defence claimed could have bolstered his in-court identification.

Low said he had reservations about Holtzman's evidence, saying Holtzman was "evasive, argumentative and tended to exaggerate."

Holtzman's "gratuitous claim" that he was focused on seeing the eyes and faces of the attackers during the assault "defied common sense," Low added.

Low said the point at which Holtzman said he had received 50 blows lasted 20 seconds on the video.

"At a common sense level, it's not possible for a person to receive 50 blows," Low said.

Low said he gave little weight to Holtzman's evidence that was not corroborated by video.

The trial also heard from Robbie Bassi's supervisors at Vancouver International Airport, where he had worked as a security screener.

Collin Hutchinson testified he was 70 or 80 percent sure that a man in a picture taken of a surveillance video was Robbie Bassi.

"Seventy to 80 percent does not meet the standard in a criminal trial," Low said.

Airport security supervisor Kathryn Evans identified Robbie Bassi based on a photograph in which little could be seen of the face and from a definition of a muscled forearm.

Low said the face could not be seen clearly in the photo and there was no definition of the forearm.

The courtroom configuration had to be changed to accommodate the large number of people on both sides of the case.

Roger Lafreniere, a friend of the couple, attended much of the trial. "I'm very disappointed, yes, but you have to respect the decision of the court," he says. "The judge had a very difficult case."

Drew Dennis worked with Holtzman at Out on Screen, which produces Vancouver's annual Queer Film Festival. "We have to accept the judge's decision," Dennis says. "I have to wonder how many witnesses and surveillance videos it takes to deliver justice."



Share |


Reader Comments


 
What a horrible decision
What a horrible court decision. Since (1) the cops are usually not present to protect us from gaybashers, (2) the courts usually acquit gaybashers or give them a short sentence or a "slap on the wrist", and (3) the government does not allow us to carry hand guns, gay men should really take self defense courses.
James, Toronto ON
01/14/13 11:34 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Note quite
James, your second point is plain wrong. There have been three high-profile bashings in the past few years in Vancouver. The last guy got six years in jail and the one prior, 17 months. Hardly a slap on the wrist.
Biff, Burnaby BC
01/15/13 12:09 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
@Biff
Biff, you have cited two cases. There are a number of cases where the sentence was much less. For example, according to a recent Xtra article: (1) Mark Scott was found guilty of assault causing bodily harm after bashing a lesbian couple in Oshawa in 2008. He was handed a four-month sentence and one year of probation, (2) Dustin James Sciog of Fort St John was charged with three counts of assault and pleaded guilty. He was given a suspended sentence and forced to pay a $50 victim surcharge and write a letter of apology. (3) a BC judge accepted Alexandre Tchernychev’s guilty plea to assault causing bodily harm in the case of a gaybashing on Davie St in July 2010. The 22-year-old Tchernychev received 18 months probation on a suspended sentence. (4) In a Windsor gaybashing case from May 2010, John Raymond Meloche was found guilty of assault causing bodily harm and given a suspended sentence and 18 months probation. Source: http://www.xtra.ca/public/National/2011_in_review_gay_bashings-11226.aspx However, further to your comment, it would be useful if an investigative journalist or an academic were to do a empirical survey of recent sentences given by courts for gaybashings.
James, Toronto ON
01/15/13 12:26 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Accepting or opposing court decisions
The article quotes Roger Lafreniere and Drew Dennis as saying that the gay community has to accept the decision of the court in the gaybashing case involving the Bassi brothers. Similarly, people like Biff also tell us to respect the decision of the courts in gaybashing cases (see above post). Yet, when the Supreme Court of Canada recently ruled that HIV-positive people must disclose their HIV status to their sexual partners before having unprotected sex (unless they have a low viral load AND use a condom), gay activists were up in arms and wrote articles criticizing the decision on legal, factual, scientific and public policy grounds. Why do community leaders expect us to respect bad court decisions on gay bashings, yet strongly oppose court decisions on HIV transmission?
James, Toronto ON
01/15/13 12:40 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
travestie of justice!
lets appeal this judgement !
pamela Leaman, Vancouver bc
01/15/13 12:49 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Surveillance footage
The CTV news story on the acquittal shows a still photo from the surveillance footage which the police and the Crown attorney said shows the assailants fleeing the crime scene. The two people in the still photo do look like the Bassi brothers. See http://bc.ctvnews.ca/brothers-acquitted-in-vicious-attack-on-gay-couple-1.1114307
James, Toronto ON
01/15/13 6:49 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
OUTRAGEOUS!!!!!!!!!!
I WISH WE COULD DEMAND AN APPEAL OR SOMETHING! This is outrageous! I can easily tell my the surveillance photo that it is those 2 SCUM that are in the photo. They practically got away with attempted murder and get to high five each other for doing it. SIMPLY OUTRAGEOUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
marc, vancouver bc
01/15/13 9:29 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Not too surprising
We have the same problem in north Toronto. These people come from India with crazy backwards opinions and believe Canadians will soon learn to live in their culture. They are isolated and know little (and care less) about Canadians and Canadian culture. Most are here for the social benefits( read free medicare and guaranteed income suplement) and that's all. Rich white people like the judge thinks that Indians are all like APU from the Simpsons. They kick their own Canadians instead. My grandmother did the same thing.
Bryan Charlebois, Toronto Ontario
01/15/13 10:40 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Excellent Reporting!
Thank you Jeremy for the most comprehensive reporting on this court decision yet. The coverage in the daily media and on CBC's website were appalling. Well done.
Kevin Dale McKeown, Vancouver BC
01/15/13 10:04 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Is it Now Open Season On Us
With this terrible ruling my fear now is that younger Sikh males which seemingly embrace homophobia and gay bashings as part of their cultural life will now be seeking out more victims in our community. We need to be aware that this will probably be a consequence of this terrible ruling. My fear is that young Sikh males could care less if they are identified by eye witnesses and video and will increase their targeting of our community. These rampant gay bashings seem to be a status symbol within the Sikh male culture and this is very troubling. Unfortunately no South Asian leaders are willing to step up to the plate and denounce the gay bashers in their communities. Instead they will target us for speaking out, claiming us to be racists for drawing attention to the horrendous violence coming out of their culture which have had dire consequences for our community.
JamieLee, Vancouver BC
01/15/13 10:28 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
FIRE JUDGE RAYMOND LOW!
This moronic judge has a precedent of stupid rulings! Come on! 6 people said it was these 2 brothers and they were caught on video with positive ID from 2 of the accused's friends saying its them. Fire this judge! What kind of message is this sending! If I commit a crime I want to be tried by Judge Raymond Low...all I need to do is DENY DENY DENY!
Robin Jones, Vancouver BC
01/16/13 3:31 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Video isn't great but James has a point
It's a damn shame that traumatic events can and often do change a witness's perception of events, that security cameras have pretty crappy images, and that assailants often wear dark, generic clothes and commit their crimes at night. We could say it probably WAS the Bassi brothers, but 'probably' doesn't cut it in a criminal court and that standard MUST be high. I'm wondering if the victim couldn't sue (if they could afford it) in a civil court which has a lower standard of proof like they did with OJ in California.
Stephen Emery, Burnaby BC
01/17/13 1:39 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
That is Hogwash Stephen Emery
Oh c'mon Stephen Emery. What you are saying is hogwash. Four witnesses who witnesses the gay bashings identified the accused. One witness played soccer with one of the accused and identified him. Another witness was captured in the video along with the accused and she identified him. The late Mr Holtzman identified him and so did a few others including some who worked with the accused at the airport. The Judge has discounted all the witnesses evidence saying they could be mistaken and that is wrong. Need I remind you that witnesses testify under oath to tell the truth and by dismissing all their evidence, the Judge seems to have put them on trial. My fear is that many witnesses who see things as a result of this ruling may now be unwilling to testify in court cases.
JamieLee, Vancouver BC
01/17/13 4:50 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Sue them in Civil Court
Stephen's got the right answer. If you think you have been had by some runaway jury or a gutless judge, sue in civil court. chan
Tony Chan, New Westminster BC
01/17/13 6:03 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
I wasn't in court
MayBE hogwash but I wasn't at the trial. In this article the judge spelled out reasons for every dismissal. Grainy videos (I DID see that), witnesses who exaggerate and get argumentative, witnesses who have sadly, died, people who contradict themselves as witnesses, witnesses who are only certain from a photo AFTER seeing the guys in custody, make a crappy case for the standard of reasonable doubt. The Bassi guys had a good lawyer. He did his job. The Crown didn't.
Stephen Emery, Burnaby BC
01/19/13 2:43 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
was at trail
i was at the trail and the reporting of the media is horrible. holtzman and reiger initial statements to the police were that the didnt see the suspects. later they say they say them and can identify them after seeing the pics. bruno statement to police and in court was she couldnt identify them. she only could say that they were in court because they were sitting in the accussed box. constantino says he could possible recognized one but after seeing the video was un sure. plus he says thier was no homophobic slurs and that one suspect says why did u start a fight when u cant fight. they other witness says she recognized a muscular forearm. the last one that has never spoken to the suspect says he was 70 percent sure. holtzman was caught lying over and over again, ie the whole cafeteria incident. holtzman never saw the bassi laywer sittn infront of them who warned them on his arrival to the cafeteria. the judge slammed the testimony of a lying and horrible witness. they cried wolf to get noticed and to stop the ufc. why didnt they mention the taking of pictures initialy because that shows provocation not gaybashing. in reigers words that would help our case if we hid that fact. you lie you die
ken, surrey bc
01/27/13 1:10 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Sorry Ken from Surrey
Speak English and maybe we will understand your point.
marc, van bc
01/27/13 6:36 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
horrified by the lack of journalistic morals
I was at the trail for the whole thing and you will be shocked to hear that the media didn't do a good job in telling the truth. in fact nor did holtzman and reiger. they first told media that they told a man who was about to urinate on their building to stop and the man yelled homophobic slurs and attacked them. later in court they said they told the man to stop and they walked towards their front door and because past problems off people peeing they returned with a I phone taking pictures. reiger admitted on the stand they didn't tell media that they started taking pictures because it didn't help there case of gaybashing and that the police would take it more serious if they showed no provocation. secondly reiger admits the man went to grab the camera and that reiger punched the mans shoulder reflecting off and hitting him in the face. this is when he says " it all went bad then". holtzman was caught lying and making up many false accusations.ie the cafeteria incident. he claimed that the bassi threatened him but failed to see that the bassis lawyer was sitting in front of them whom had just warned them about holtzmans presence. their initial police reports say that hey didn't not see attackers and later after seeing the accused in the courts changed to accurate descriptions. as for the witnesses one lady recogniized a muscular forearm. one said 70 percent sure but has never had a face to face conversation. witness bruno says she could only identify in court because the accused were sitting in hte accused box and by looking at their sizes no facial discriptions. witness constantino says he played two soccer games with one of the brothers but when showed the video was perplexed because he remembered it different. he also said that that no homophobic slurs were said however one of the accused said" why did you start a fight if you cant fight". thier also was a security guard by the name of zaza that the crown for some reason couldn't find that ga
jo jones, delta bc
02/03/13 5:45 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Echos of San Francisco
Comment removed at the request of the commenter.
Michael, Vancouver BC
02/07/13 3:28 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
SF cont'd
Comment continuation removed at the request of the commenter.
Michael, Vancouver BC
02/07/13 3:35 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.