The rising clout of Christian nationalism in Canada
IN PRINT / Read an excerpt from Marci McDonald's new book, The Amargeddon Factor
Marci McDonald / Toronto / Thursday, June 03, 2010
Share |

From the moment I began this book, I was confronted by skeptics who insist that a truly influential religious right could never take root in Canada. For some, that denial seemed like an exercise in wishful thinking, a refusal to face the possibility that the idea of the country they cherish—liberal, tolerant, and not given to extremes of action or belief—might not be in sync with the changing reality. Others argued that if a Christian right did exist here it would have burst fully formed onto the political scene, a carbon copy of that in the U.S. — raucous and confrontational, openly pulling the strings of the Conservative Party and captained by outspoken television preachers with millions of viewers ready to respond to their bidding. But the American movement has had more than three decades to take shape and flourish; by the time scholars and the mainstream media noticed, it had already infiltrated nearly every level of government from school boards to the Senate, often by stealth.

In this country, where the CRTC has kept the reins on religious broadcasting and Catholics make up a larger proportion of the faith community, the emergent Christian right may look and sound different than its American counterpart, but in the five years since the prospect of same-sex marriage propelled evangelicals into political action, it has spawned a coalition of advocacy groups, think tanks and youth lobbies that have changed the national debate. The “sleeping giant” that Capital Xtra! magazine had warned against in 2005 is now up and about, organizing with a vengeance that will not be easily reversed. As Faytene Kryskow told a parliamentary reception, “We are here, and we are here to stay.”

With funding from a handful of conservative Christian philanthropists and a web of grassroots believers accustomed to tithing in the service of their faith, those organizations have built sophisticated databases and online networks capable of mobilizing their forces behind specific legislation with instant e-mail alerts and updates. Setting up an array of internship programs, they are also training a new generation of activists to be savvier than their secular peers in navigating the corridors of power. Already, their alumni have landed top jobs in the public service, MPs’ offices and the PMO, prompting one official from the National House of Prayer to boast in an unguarded moment, “If the media knew how many Christians there are in the government, they’d go crazy.”



In fact, as the movement focuses on taking over the “gateways of influence,” one of the portals within its sights is the mainstream media itself. Where once social conservatives regarded the fourth estate as hostile territory from which they had been sidelined, now the heads of religious-right think tanks, such as Dave Quist and Joseph Ben-Ami, have become regular spin-meisters for the social conservative point of view, their numbers on the speed-dial of Ottawa reporters seeking an instant quip or a quote. At the same time, Faytene Kryskow is training her young activists in the art of getting letters to the editor and opinion pieces published—furnishing online examples to copy and a daily index of articles demanding commentary—none of them betraying their links to 4MYCanada. As she crowed to a gathering of MPs, “You are likely reading our words much more often than you realize.”

Numerically, the Canadian religious right may still be a fraction of that in the U.S., but as Ottawa communications consultant Dennis Gruending points out, “Groups that are well-organized can punch above their weight—particularly in an era of fractured parliaments and minority governments.” A former New Democratic Party MP, Gruending laments that “there is little in progressive Ottawa to rival the networks that have been created by the religious and political right.”

Moreover, pundits who predicted those networks would vanish in the wake of the same-sex marriage defeat have instead seen them proliferate. Amid the stormy U.S. health-care debate of 2009, most Canadians were stunned to discover that one of their own was the star of a two-million-dollar television campaign warning Americans about the perils of this country’s publicly funded medical system. Shona Holmes, the poster girl for that attack, turned out to be fronting a lawsuit against Ontario’s health ministry spearheaded by a Calgary-based legal advocacy group named the Canadian Constitution Foundation. Originally created by Conservative MP John Weston, the foundation was at first not considered part of the Christian right, but one of its board members, Dr. Will Johnston, is president of Canadian Physicians for Life, and Weston himself is an evangelical who once told Christian law students that what set his Vancouver law firm apart was “the regularity and informality of prayer practiced by the partners.”

Although Weston’s initial focus was on pet libertarian peeves like medicare, since he stepped down to run for Parliament, the foundation has devoted many of its resources to defending evangelicals like former Alberta pastor Stephen Boissoin in freedom-of-speech cases against another perceived incursion of the state: human rights commissions.

Nor is the foundation the only new presence on the evangelical political scene. In 2008, it was joined by the Association for Reformed Political Action (ARPA) founded by Mark Penninga, a Laurentian Leadership Centre alumnus and former spokesman for Focus on the Family Canada, whose mission it is to “bring a biblical perspective to civil governments.” Both ARPA and the Canadian Constitution Foundation are working with more established evangelical groups in a new push to coordinate their campaigns for greater effect. Nowhere has that joint strategizing been more evident than on the issue that has been pegged as the next flashpoint in the values wars: the decriminalization of assisted suicide, or, as the religious right prefers to call it, euthanasia.


Excerpted from The Armageddon Factor.  Copyright © 2010 Marci McDonald.  Published by Random House Canada, which is a division of Random House of Canada Limited. Reproduced by arrangement with the Publisher. All rights reserved.


Marci McDonald is the winner of seven gold National Magazine Awards and the recipient of the Canadian Association of Journalists’ investigative feature award.


Xtra recently asked McDonald for her thoughts on Pride Toronto's decision to censor Queers Against Israeli Apartheid. Watch
:




Share |


Reader Comments


 
Misinformation about Cdn Const Fdn
I am the Litigation Director for the Canadian Constitution Foundation (CCF). I also happen to be an atheist who has never hesitated to let my atheist views be known publicly. Ms. McDonald is grasping at straws when she tries to paint the CCF as part of the "Christian right". Her evidence is remarkably thin. So what if one member of our 8-member board happens to be a physician who opposes abortion? What on earth does that prove? Her allegation that the CCF is "working with more established evangelical groups in a new push to coordinate their campaigns" is a complete fabrication. Where did she get this piece of information? She certainly never contacted me or anyone else on the CCF's staff or board to find out if it was true. The CCF is NOT an evangelical organization. If it were, I would not work for it. The CCF's mission is to uphold the constitutional freedoms of Canadians. Ms. McDonald mentions that one case we have been involved with as interveners was Stephen Boissoin's case. Again, so what? The Canadian Civil Liberties Association also intervened in that case on the side of Mr. Boissoin. Does that make them a Christian evangelical institution too? Ms. McDonald doesn't mention the CCF's other cases: we are fighting on behalf of dairy farmer Michael Schmidt to allow the sale of raw milk; we are supporting Irvin Leroux's case against rights violations by Canada Revenue Agency; we have supported Japanese-Canadian fishermen in their fight against racial preferences in the BC fishery; and so on. None of these cases have anything to do with religion. They have to do with freedom from state oppression. Ms. McDonald clearly has not researched the CCF very thoroughly before writing about us. She reaches conclusions that are totally unjustified and to me, an atheist, quite offensive. Karen Selick, Litigation Director, Canadian Constitution Foundation
Karen Selick, Belleville, Ontario
06/03/10 4:03 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Selick still spouting off
Just a note of clarity. McDonald addressed Selick concerning this matter on May 8 at noapologies.ca. It appears Selick just won't let it die, no matter what McDonald has said. http://noapologies.ca/?p=8344&cpage=1#comment-18266
Tim, Humboldt SK
06/03/10 11:54 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Canadians, take warning!!
Let this story stand as a warning to Canadians that under the Harper Tories, we are being led down the same path America was led down by the Republicans. Every Canadian of good conscience should stand against this infusion of fundamentalism into Canada. Fundamentalism is as dangerous to democracy as National Socialism. In some ways it's worse, because fundamentalists think they have God on their side, and therefore can do no wrong. Anyone who has heard or seen a fundamentalist pastor at work knows these idiots are not far off from Hitler. Let's get out there and derail the fundamentalist agenda!!
Kieran, Mount Pearl Newfoundland
06/04/10 11:59 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
McDonald obfuscated, didn't clarify
To Tim of Humboldt, SK who claims that McDonald "addressed" my concerns on the noapologies site: You're just dead wrong. McDonald tried to lay the blame on the Toronto Star for having changed her words. In fact, the Star had merely summarized what she said about the CCF. I've checked the book now, and the excerpt above seems to be exactly what McDonald said in the book, unlike the Star's summary. McDonald clearly says in this excerpt that the CCF is "part of the Christian right" and a "presence on the evangelical scene" both of which are just plain false. It also says that the CCF and some other group that I have never heard of are working with "more established evangelical groups" which implies that the CCF is itself an evangelical group. This too is false. McDonald should produce her evidence for these statements or else publish a retraction and an apology.
Karen Selick, Belleville, Ontario
06/05/10 8:36 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.