The changing face of news
EDITORIAL
Matt Mills / Toronto / Thursday, March 25, 2010
Share |

Most journalists are insatiably curious skeptics who easily become bored. They’re attracted to the craft, often, because every new story arc represents a new and stimulating adventure. One of the really great things about being a journalist today is that the job is changing so quickly. It’s anything but boring.

Every once in a while, a story comes along that redefines the entire process of news reportage. Those stories are usually few and far between, but in the last year, Xtra has seen a handful.

One Sunday morning last August, as I was checking my news feeds, I learned that a gunman had attacked a gathering of gay teens in Tel Aviv, killing two and wounding many more. I happened at the time to have recently returned from that city’s Pride celebration. While there, I had visited the place where the attack would shortly unfold. I had also recently familiarized myself with Twitter. Much more interesting than the BBC, AP and Al Jazeera accounts of the attack and subsequent protest vigil, were the footprints in the aftermath left on Twitter by the gay people living in Tel Aviv.

Along with heart-wrenching expressions of horror and grief, information about the gunman, who was hurt, who had died and what was going to happen next spread, one tweet at a time, from the moment the gunman fled. There was confusion and misinformation, early lack of clarity and knee-jerk expressions of irrational rage. There were also real-time accounts of gay people, groping for some action to take, moving en masse toward the scene. The work of the professional journalists covering the story for television simply couldn’t compare to the richness of unfolding events as related, a few tiny characters at a time, by those who were living it.

The next game changer was the story of Chris Skinner. Skinner, you’ll recall, was the gay man who, while walking home from a birthday celebration in Toronto’s entertainment district on the evening of Oct 18, was beaten to the ground by still-unidentified suspects who then crushed him to death under the wheels of their SUV.

The story is not unique for its horror. Toronto’s gay communities are too familiar with tragedy and violence. What made this story journalistically unique was the role played by social media and the web. Skinner’s story, as reported by Xtra, flashed within hours to gay people around the world. Rather than publishing whole new stories every few days, Xtra updated readers as each detail emerged. And the expressions of rage and grief on various social media were an overriding part of the tale. The story unfolded in real time before all our eyes, giving insight into police procedures and community activism, and acknowledging with every step which questions remained unasked.

But that was just the beginning. With a simple, single act, a few keystrokes spawned by an idea fleshed out in casual conversation among friends, two Toronto guys created a Facebook page calling for a candlelight vigil and march in Skinner’s memory. 

Within a few days, more than 1,000 people, many of them no more than familiar strangers, would gather at Church and Wellesley in one of the most beautiful demonstrations of solidarity I’ve ever had the privilege to be a part of.

This issue’s Pride Toronto coverage is another one of those redefining stories. And, from a journalistic perspective, it’s even more interesting. Our print coverage is informed almost completely by work that first appeared online at Xtra.ca. Not only did masses of people respond immediately to Xtra’s report of Pride Toronto’s new sign-vetting-by-ethics-committee policy, not only did a Facebook group spring up that would go on to attract more than 1,500 cogent dissenters, but those invested in the story began to engage in their own reportage. A flurry of meaningful and important questions and answers, formerly festering as idle gossip, have come roaring to the fore.

What does this say to me? That gay activists are using a whole new set of tools to effect positive change and that readers are, more than ever before, becoming active participants in telling the stories of our lives. It’s a wonderful and potentially very powerful evolution.


Matt Mills is editorial director of Pink Triangle Press



Share |


Reader Comments


 
Really
Can Xtra really think that 1,500 people on FB changed the Pride Board on censorship. 7,000 called for Kenny to resign. The letters to the Pride Board were mostly personal insults to Tracey Sandilands. Don't insult activists who know how to lobby but don't like the limelight. Rick Telfer taking credit, his arrogance is unbelieveable. I notice Xtra isn't all over Kyle Rae trying to block Pride's funding at City Hall. No we have to read about that in the Sun.
1,500 really, Toronto ON
03/25/10 11:16 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
R U Puffed-Up, Matt?
And to continue "1500 really"'s point: Why is there not a word about the arrest of Dr. Aubrey Levin in Xtra -- much like the complete lack of coverage in the National Post? There is some coverage in the G&M and from the CBC, while the Guardian offers the most background of all on this "shocking" case. If he's found guilty, Xtra needs to be front and center in calling for his deportation to South Africa. Redneck Albertans need to be brought to their knees with the forthcoming exposure of this man's allegedly shameful and destructive actions against GLBT people, the full extent of which the average person simply cannot fathom.
No Flurry on Dr. Levin, Vancouver BC
03/28/10 5:09 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Ed's note
Hi there anonymous stranger. Thanks for your comments (I assume both posts above are from one person). Pride did in fact, I think wisely, change its course in the face of pressure from its gay and lesbian constituients. Xtra reported on the story as it developed using what information it could establish as true and accurate. We infuse various points of view in our reportage, but we don't propogate gossip without corroboration. So it's highly likely, in fact a certainty in my mind, that there are elements to the story that have yet to be revealed. If you have additional information to share, I am all ears. As to the stories that appeared in the mainstream press that you wish we had reported on, I can only say that I don't like it when Xtra gets scooped and I do like it when Xtra does the scooping. Sometimes you get the bear, sometimes the bear gets you. I like to think we get the bear more often than not. And keep reading, we may cover some of that ground yet. You understand also that Xtra's resources are puny in comparision with those of the mainstream publications you cite. It would be wasteful for us to use them simply to parrot what has already appeared in other publications, it takes but a click for us to retweet their reports. Our journalistic work is better applied to sharing stories and points of view that can't be found elsewhere. As to my puffiness, I can assure you that my job does not contribute to any sense of self importance. Everything Xtra editors do is open to welcome criticism, warranted or otherwise. And there are days when it seems like you just can't catch a break. I certainly don't expect accolades, either for myself or for Xtra, for the work that we do. We're here to disseminate information, to help inspire action and cogent dissent, to challenge the status quo, and to set love free. We're not looking to collect gold stars. This job is really most rewarding when, as in the case of the pride story, passions ignite among gay people.
Matt Mills, Toronto Ont
03/29/10 9:03 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Passions Worthy of Ignition
Both comments are not from the same person. Why did you assume that? Puny resources or not, it only takes initiative to stake out a position, as newsmakingnews did in this link on the Levin story in 2000: http://www.newsmakingnews.com/levinlawsuit11,27,00.htm Levin's Alberta lawyer who sent the defamation notice (and is still practising) should be hoisted by his own petard (by Xtra and its readers, perhaps?)and advised of the fact that his own notice may actually constitute an "...odious, reckless, unresearched and actionable slur." The following lines from the current Guardian piece should be enough to inspire us to action: "Trudie Grobler, an intern on ward 22 saw a lesbian subjected to severe shocks...'It was traumatic. I could not believe her body could handle it,' she said later."
No Flurry on Dr. Levin, Vancouver BC
03/29/10 12:47 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Ed's note
Point taken. Best wishes.
Matt Mills, Toronto Ont
03/29/10 2:13 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Dear Puff
You really are a magic dragon fire and wrath at a moments notice for Tracey Sandilands at Pride Toronto and Helen Kennedy at Egale but for Kyle Rae threatening in excess of $200,000 of funding for Pride in grants and services not an ember. I have the letter Kyle wrote to Pride it's out there. I know who met with Pride to convince them scrap the censorship policy jammed down their throats from the City and the brave choice of members of the Pride board never to ban QuAIA and Kyle's sebsequent tantrum and the fall out at the City. I know the members of The City Economic Development Committee who are going to decided about this money... Kyle Rae, chair, Sandra Bussin our only ally it would appear, Brian Ashton, Mark Grimes, Susan Hall and Case Ootes. Do you want me to write the story for you??!! I know "Xtra's resources are puny" but come on.
Really, Toronto ON
03/30/10 11:33 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.