Queer journalist seeks answers after G20 nab
TORONTO / But gays support G20 police conduct, insists liaison cop
James Burrell / National / Wednesday, July 14, 2010
Share |

“The Pride weekend has shown that an overwhelming majority of the community appreciate and support [the] police,” says Thomas Decker, the Toronto Police Service’s lesbian, gay, bi and trans [LGBT] liaison officer.

Decker’s comments come after a June 30 Pride week reception, held by police chief Bill Blair at the 519 Church Street Community Centre, turned ugly. Police kept gay and trans people out of The 519 for more than an hour as a growing crowd on the sidewalk demanded answers about police conduct during the G20 summit.

Pride Toronto (PT) executive director Tracey Sandilands told the crowd through a megaphone that the event was organized by Toronto Police — not her organization — and that event organizers were dealing with capacity issues. In fact, the event was organized by the Toronto Police Services Board as a PT affiliate event. The PT logo appeared on the invitations and photos taken inside show the reception room well below capacity.

Blair arrived in a dark SUV to chants of “Shame! Shame! Shame!” Surrounded by police, he pushed through the crowd, entering through the front door. He paused to tip his hat, a flippant move that seemed only to anger the crowd.

Journalist Lisa Walter outside the June 30 police Pride reception. Watch the video at the end of this story.
Lisa Walter was among the crowd at The 519. As a journalist covering the G20 for Our Times, an independent Canadian labour magazine, she was arrested on June 26 after shooting photos and video of the arrests of two colleagues.

“We had shown our press passes; officers said mine was fake. I was called ‘a fucking dyke,’ a ‘douchebag’ and other slurs by officers,” she says. “The most aggressive sergeant loudly questioned my gender and started calling me ‘sir’ and ‘mister.’ He mocked my need for medication and later claimed I was the ‘girl in high school who never got laid.’”

Decker says anyone who feels they were mistreated should file a formal complaint to have their case investigated.

“All interactions with members of the public at the Prisoner Processing Centre were recorded using CCTV recording equipment,” he says. “As allegations proceed to formal complaints, they will be fully investigated. Persons who feel they have been treated inappropriately can file a complaint with the Office of the Independent Police Review Director (OIPRD).”

“Like the overwhelming majority of people, I was not informed why I was arrested, given access to a lawyer or phone, nor informed of my rights,” says Walter, who has since retained a lawyer and filed a complaint with the OIPRD.

“I was handcuffed with plastic ties the entire 13 hours of my detention, and my medication was withheld for about nine hours. When an officer finally arrived to give it to me, I was told I had to be in a separate cell. I was released at about 1:30 am… without having been charged with any violation. Later I discovered that my video camera’s hard drive had been erased and the memory card from my other camera taken.”

Event organizers told a crowd of angry gay people that they were being kept out of their own community centre due to capacity issues on June 30. But photos taken inside show the room nearly empty.
(Matt Mills photo)


“We do know that some in the LGBT community were unfairly and illegally arrested as part of the mass arrests that occurred,” says Nathalie Des Rosiers, general counsel of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA).

“And, as such, they also share much of the same treatment that was given to many other people who were peacefully demonstrating as well as some journalists, human-rights monitors and passersby.”

Des Rosiers says she has heard several reports of officers acting with courtesy and respect when dealing with the public during the summit but admits the relationship between the community and police force has been affected.

She says law reforms are needed if both sides are to move forward.

“Unfortunately, there has been some loss of confidence and trust, and it is my hope that it will be regained by the way in which they confront the mistakes that were made and make the changes that are appropriate so that it does not happen again,” says Des Rosiers.

To file a complaint with the Office of the Independent Police Review Director (OIPRD), go to oiprd.on.ca.

Watch our video report from the June 30 protest at the police Pride reception:





Share |


Reader Comments


 
It really was a shame.
It seems the Toronto Police Service and Blair have not been truthful during this whole G20 summit. With the "red zone" fence in the beginning and now this. Not sure who said the centre was closed because it was full, but it just seems like another "stock answer" we seem to have been getting a lot of those. We must never forget what happened and especially to this reporter, and many others. The public wants answers. Daniel .. Toronto http://bit.ly/bKGa13
Daniel, Toronto ON
07/14/10 9:57 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Self-anointed G20 ‘journalists’ should get real
I think The Globe and Mail's Christie Blatchford put it best, so I will take the liberty of reproducing her words from her article "Self-anointed G20 ‘journalists’ should get real." It's a really good read: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/self-anointed-g20-journalists-should-get-real/article1627346/ "... the press pass doesn’t grant even traditional journalists carte blanche access everywhere. In the midst of a riot, it is not a shield that can be waved to keep either police or rioters at bay. It is neither an avoid-jail nor get-out-of-jail-free card. One doesn’t get to cross the yellow tape at a crime scene in order to have a really good look at the dead body even if one has a press pass. One doesn’t get into cabinet meetings because one has a press pass. One doesn’t get to march into the judge’s chambers and sit in on the lawyers’ private discussions that go on there because one has a press pass. Etc., etc. Media accreditation sometimes allows reporters to go where the general public can’t, such as sports dressing rooms and backstage at concerts and the like; it may give us better seats (as in a courtroom, where there may be a press row, or at a sports event, where there is a press box); it may get us closer to the action or the participants in the action. Period. Thus, in the G20 protests, journalists, real or self-appointed, traditional or otherwise, had no special rights to go where we wanted and no special badge of protection against arrest."
William, Montreal QC
07/15/10 9:42 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
What?
First of all to William, the Charter allows for protest. No one should have been treated that way, not journalists, not the public. The very hallmark of a democracy is the right to protest. Those rights were trampled. Now to officer Decker, provide the polls that indicate how the vast majority of the gay community feels about this or resign. There's been far too much of this white washing bullshit. Let's have that full independent inquiry and after that we can decided who supports who.
Peter Bochove, Toronto Ontario
07/15/10 10:50 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Meh
If you're not in the designated protest area, then you take have to assume personal responsibility for the risks you choose to take when you enter a conflict zone involving people damaging Canadians' property. The Charter does *not* actually provide for *unlimited* protest or *unlimited* free speech, it's perfect nonsense to pretend that it does.
William, Montreal QC
07/15/10 1:58 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
LOL
Read a newspaper William, or even just look at the pictures if you find that a little too taxing. Did you see what happened to the people in the "free speech area" at Queen's Park? They were attacked by the police. That alone demands an inquiry. I say again, the right to protest is the hallmark of democracy. People were trapped, beaten and tortured, on live TV, in the free speech area. You say it's their own fault? Wow.
Peter Bochove, Toronto Ontario
07/15/10 2:23 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
I think it's you who should read
Peter, you obviously didn't read carefully what I wrote, and you are projecting your own assumptions about my views on to my comments. I absolutely agree in a review of what happened - and I absolutely believe that many people who ventured out of the zone found the trouble they sought. I'm sure that had this woman been in the protest-zone when these events occurred, then that would have been the first thing this article would have mentioned. My point is, you're not entitled to be treated differently from anyone else just because you're a journalist, and especially not if you're just a rag-tag self-appointed one with an explicit political agenda. By the way, does anyone understand why she is upset about being called a dyke? I've seen lesbians putting up signs with that word on it all over Toronto. Either it's offensive or it's not. You can't have it both ways.
William, Montreal QC
07/15/10 3:26 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Pols MII - missing in inaction
I have a question. Where in the god-damned fucking hell are Kyle Rae, Pam McConnell, Bob Rae or Glen Murray in any of this? These people -- the downtown L/liberal mafioso -- collectively represent large constituencies of glbt people and students, well represented in the peaceful majority of protesters abused and detained. If we recall that both Stonewall and Toronto Pride were built on the reactions of our communities to police violence then our sense of history must compel us to speak up. Hello? Is there anybody out there? Kyle Rae used to brag about over-turning police cars after the bath raids. And now, of all the times in a career built climbing our backs, he has nothing to say, choosing to leave for an extended two week long AIDS conference attendance in Europe, on our dime? Is this for real? Peter Bochove - you write big cheques. Can't you make a phone call and get them to wake up? I'm not even calling for Blair resignation and I'm definitely not part of an anti-police lynch mob, though I certainly understand the anger. I just want some answers, and an enquiry seems like the best way to go about that, since every week reveals new allegations of abuse. Once again, Rae proves that the Pussy Palace was his Waterloo (not sure why, since taxpayers paid his court ordered compensation to the officers he libelled, not him personally). We paid that to ensure that politicians are protected when they speak up against alleged police brutality. It's supposed to be a free speech insurance policy to protect those who are after all supposed to represent us. If it doesn't work, we ought to reconsider spending that money in the future.
Alex MacLean, Toronto ON
07/21/10 2:39 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.