Queer Ontario boycotts Pride Toronto panel
PRIDE / Brent Hawkes' Pride Toronto consultations are 'fundamentally flawed,' says group
Allison Martell, with files from Scott Dagostino / Toronto / Thursday, September 09, 2010
Share |

Queer Ontario announced that it will boycott Pride Toronto’s (PT) planned community consultations, expected to kick off this fall. 
 
“The group sees the process of constituting the panel as fundamentally flawed and inconsistent with the values and principles of community relations and community engagement,” Queer Ontario said in a statement released on Aug 30. The group will not attend any public meetings held by the panel and will communicate its concerns directly to PT.
 
The consultations are part of a deal brokered in the days before Pride by Metropolitan Community Church pastor Brent Hawkes, lawyer Doug Elliott and 519 Church St Community Centre executive director Maura Lawless. 
 
Their proposal, approved by the board, first rescinded PT’s ban on the phrase “Israeli apartheid” and then called for a panel of “LGBTTIQQ2SA leaders and friends” to consult with the community and make recommendations on how Pride can support freedom of speech and reconcile with the broader community. 
 
Hawkes has confirmed that he will serve as chair of the panel, but there have been no further announcements. In particular, Hawkes has not released the names of the other panellists.
 
Queer Ontario, positioned as a successor to the Coalition for Lesbian and Gay Rights in Ontario, launched in January. It has no office space, paid staff or long-term funding, but it has emerged as a vocal critic of PT through the censorship controversy. Nick Mulé, Queer Ontario’s founder, said that the group’s concerns with the consultation panel have been building since it was announced.
 
“I think they had a great opportunity, Pride Toronto, to work directly with the community and should have opened up the process and made it far more transparent,” says Mulé. 
 
He asked why Hawkes was chosen to lead the process without more community input. 
 
Hawkes could not be reached for comment, as he is currently on vacation. PT staff were not available to comment.
 
“I can’t speak on behalf of the rest of the group,” says Lawless, “but I think our hope would be that once people have all the information, they will see that the panel is representative and they will choose to participate.” 
 
Until the panel members are announced, Lawless says, “criticism is a little early.... I hope that when people see who the panel are — and to be frank, I’m not even privy at this point as to who those people are — I hope the community will find it reflective of its diversity.”
 
In its statement, Queer Ontario asked, “Why did Lawless consult with the executive directors of an unnamed list of community organizations, effectively overlooking the numerous grassroots [lesbian, gay, bi and trans] groups and organizations without one?”
 
“We made a list of the organizations that are well-known in the community,” Lawless explains. “It’s not like the LGBT community is particularly massive; it’s an interconnected community where lots of people know each other.”
 
If the selection process seems slow and secretive, Lawless says, “it’s about respecting that the people considering this have a right to be asked and to consider the opportunity. Plus, we’re in the middle of summer. I know that’s impacted some folks’ availability. My hope is that folks allow the process to happen and get engaged when the opportunities present themselves to participate.”
 
Mulé isn’t holding out hope.
 
“This is a middle body that will be, in essence, doing the dirty work that Pride Toronto needs to be doing directly with the community,” he says. “If they’re trying to develop a relationship with the community, they need to be talking directly with the community.” 


Share |


Reader Comments


 
Our entire Statement
Our entire statement: "Queer Ontario Boycotts Pride Community Consultations due to Flawed Advisory Panel Process" http://queerontario.org/2010/08/30/queer-ontario-boycotts-pride-community-consultations-due-to-flawed-advisory-panel-process/ From the statement: "Queer Ontario is committed to a future Pride that is both celebratory and political, and one that is respectful and inclusive of all LGBT-affirming interests. We are intent on neither disrupting the process or on dismantling Pride, but rather steadfastly committed to finding a mutually respectful way of engaging directly with Pride Toronto to work towards a successful and community-affirming Pride."
Queer Ontario, Toronto Ontario
09/09/10 1:35 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Also Worth Noting...
Pride Toronto has been graciously (read: 'uncharacteristically') answering board-related questions on its Facebook group, under the link to the official statement distancing itself from the PCFS's "All Can!" debate held last night ( http://www.facebook.com/PrideToronto?v=wall&story_fbid=124275497623141 ). I invite all inquiring minds to pose their board-related questions directly to the organization in hopes that PT will answer them in a direct and timely manner. And if you are indeed thinking of writing one, ***PLEASE*** take the time to read what has already been posted so that there are no duplicate questions; otherwise your efforts risk coming off as 'hasty' and 'ill-considered'. Cheers -- and Good Luck!
Martin, Toronto Ontario
09/09/10 2:05 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Gay and Gayer
Why are the gays always boycotting this and that? Must be a gay thing.
James, Toronto Ont
09/09/10 3:58 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
girlcott, surely or is it transcott
Gays have nothing to do with this. These are Queers and they are Queercotting. Get with the program, Mary.
June Jejune, toronto ON
09/09/10 5:51 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
What is diversity?
Lawless says she hopes the panel will be reflective of the diversity of "the community." This is an interesting point for a bunch of reasons, but not the least of which is the assumption that 1) there is 'a community' and 2) it can be well represented in three or five or seven people. This is an assumption which is bound to fail for a bunch of reasons. I won't list them all here, but one of these reasons is the rather superficial understanding that diversity is about identity only; that if you have a bunch of people and about half of them don't look like a white guy, that you have 'diversity' - and that this should be a goal in and of itself. The Pride board was diverse by this formula but still made some regrettable decisions. But diversity also needs to include a diversity of life experiences and opinions, and in this, Pride fails us. They ask that potential board members have a certain kind of experience and this generally involves the usual sorts of not-for-profit organizers. This tends to screen out people who don't relate to the politics through the regular channels or who don't share the piecemeal approach that the not-for-profit sector seems to favour. But it especially favours the university educated. Working class people tend not to get selected. I realize you need skills and that many of those skills need to come from people with post-secondary training. But how about making room for those who have made a contribution that doesn't fit into pre-ordained categories. How about including a diversity of class backgrounds and abilities in your understanding of diversity, and maybe making room for people who haven't necessarily sat on a board before. Because the matrix is broken. A group of people of differing skin tones drawn from non-profit management isn't very diverse, though it may look that way on the surface.
Alex MacLean, Toronto Ontario
09/09/10 7:00 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
And to add to that, Alex...
... I recommend it also include people of differing ideological backgrounds -- even the so-called 'polarizing' individuals that Brent Hawkes has prejudicially excluded from being potential candidates for the panel.
Martin, Toronto Ontario
09/09/10 7:52 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Diversity as an end in and of itself...
Martin, I thought I had implied or stated that, but on a second look, I hadn't. But I agree with you. There needs to be a range of ideological opinion. But the thing is - I had thought Pride had that! The decision that overturned the censor policy was not unanimous. So there was a difference of opinion there. I am very concerned with this idea that a diversity of skin colours means arriving at a "correct" decision. As if there is one correct answer that a truly representative body would locate. Some seem to place the blame where it does not belong; i.e. if an incorrect decsion was arrived at, that necessarily means that this is the result of a non-democratic body making decisions. How wrong that assumption is. This has gone on a long time. I hope that the critics run and win. I'll be very interested in their proposed solution.
Alex, Toronto ON
09/10/10 12:12 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
REALLY?!
I notice that Evan Dean is up for election for the board at PT. ReallY? is this seriously the best that we can do? Can we not actually find suitable queer people to sit on the board? Straight people on the board now?! Like its not already a real shame that half the staff persons at PT are straight. It just makes me sic! As much as it makes me sick that PT couldn't find a Canadian to be ED and had to outsource to South Africa. Perhaps though the straight people can run PT then the actual queers in this community?! Thank god I'm leaving city and will no longer have to watch these people run a muck of an organization that I volunteered 10 yrs of my life too! 10 YRS... ...TIME WASTED ON THIS COMMUNITY! GET YOUR CHIT TOGETHER REALLY LGBTTIQQ2SA's OF TORONTO! REALLY!
Robert K., Montreal QC
09/18/10 9:45 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.