Pride Toronto's Tracey Sandilands resigns
BREAKING NEWS / Leaving post effective Jan 28
Andrea Houston and Marcus McCann / Toronto / Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Share |

Tracey Sandilands, executive director of Pride Toronto (PT) since 2008, has resigned from her position, PT's board of directors announced on Jan 26.

The board will take over supervision of day-to-day activities of the staff and volunteers until a recruitment plan is developed. “Planning for the 2011 Pride Week festival is well underway and will continue without interruption,” the PT board states in a Jan 26 news release. Over the next few months, Pride Toronto will be reviewing its structure to ensure that it is properly positioned to meet its members' needs.

Sandilands presided over a tumultuous period in PT's history, including two attempts by the organization's board to censor pride parade participants. In December, Xtra named Sandilands Toronto Newsmaker of the Year.

PT racked up one of its worst financial losses in recent memory in 2010, according to the organization's audited financial statements, released by the PT board of directors on Jan 25. The document reveals a loss of $431,808  including the exhaustion of the organization's contingency fund. That leaves the organization $109,401 in the red. The statements also reveal that PT spent an extra $100,000 on staff salaries and benefits in 2010.

The statements include a note about Sandilands’ partner, Janine Marais. Marais was employed “through various periods” between April 2009 and November 2010. Despite laying off six staff in July, PT paid $40,317 for the fiscal year in consulting fees to Marais for website updating and newsletter services. Board members Mark Singh and Jim Cullen approved her for the work.

PT board co-chair Francisco Alvarez maintains it was Sandilands' decision to leave. "All she said was it is time for her to leave to do other things," he says.

Tracey Sandilands.
(Matt Mills photo)


Sandilands will receive a severance package, but Alvarez refused to reveal the amount. “I’m not at liberty to discuss the package. We have an agreement with her that specifies confidentiality.”

"We are going to wait for the results of the Community Advisory Panel recommendations before we make any decisions moving forward with our administrative structure," he says. "We will announce what we’ll be doing at some point, but at the moment we will just carry on and take a more direct oversight of expenses.”

The new executive director will need to have the experience to manage an event the size of Pride Week and a solid knowledge of fundraising, Alvarez says. "Also, going forward, community relations are going to be a stronger focus." 

Alvarez wouldn’t state Sandilands' salary, citing confidentiality.

Sandilands' cellphone is no longer working, but she sent the following tweet at 5:09pm to Singh, who was part of the board committee that hired her in 2008: "Thank you Mark. The quantity of supportive messages I am getting from those who actually know is very heartening! "

PT board member Roy Mitchell says he wishes Sandilands "all the best." But he adds that PT still faces some real problems.

"It's a system that has to be fixed," he says. "Tracey's resigning is part of a bigger process that Pride has to go through. The community owns Pride. It's our Pride. Pride has lost that connection to the community. Her leaving is part of Pride reconnecting back to the community."

Don't expect the drama at PT to be over, says Ashleigh Ingle of the Pride Coalition for Free Speech. Ingle worries that Sandilands’ resignation could be used to “silence criticism” at the Jan 26 general meeting.

“I do think it’s important, but I think it’s dangerous if you stop there,” says Ingle. “Given all the things that have come out, we also worry about her being scapegoated as a way to absolve the board of any responsibility.”

“This isn’t something that happened overnight in 2008 when she arrived, and it’s not going to go away overnight in 2011 when she leaves,” says Ingle.

Savannah Garmon called the news "long overdue."

"It's clear she didn't have a handle on the situation," she says. "Now it depends on what the board does next. It's time to appoint a new director. PT should be asking, 'How do we reconnect with the community? I hope they pick someone with legitimacy."

“I don’t bear her any ill will,” adds Elle Flanders, who went toe to toe with Sandilands over Queers Against Israeli Apartheid, “but I think it was clear from the beginning that she wasn’t capable of handling complex issues.”



Share |


Reader Comments


 
The whiners and complainers won
Has anyone noticed that *every* Executive Director Pride Toronto has ever had was bullied to the point of resignation by an unappreciative "community?" While there will undoubtedly be some who will celebrate Tracey's resignation, the truth is the LGBT community revels in destroying the spirit and morale of all those who dare to step into a leadership role. Shame on you.
Chris, Toronto ON
01/26/11 4:00 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
oh ok
Right Chris, we should all just shut up and not question anything the authorities tell us. Good call!
gidget, Toronto ON
01/26/11 4:03 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
What a shame
It looks like we lost a visionary leader who tried to make pride relevant to today's queers. Hope the "activists" who have no other cause to jump on are happy. Sock hop at the 519, anyone?
Robert, Toronto ON
01/26/11 4:15 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
re: robert
in WHAT way was Tracey Sandilands visionary? She just got caught red-handed in a conflict of interest and oversaw the past 2 years of mis-management at Pride. What exactly was her vision?
B., Toronto ON
01/26/11 4:25 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Vultures
I agree with Robert. I can't even imagine who would consider taking Tracey's job after the way the way she was beaten up (Remember that she was in the job exactly *three* days before the first attack article by Xtra) Hopefully the gaytivists can now put their sites on another hard -working organization. I'm sure there are some gay polar bears that are picking on some gay seals somewhere.
Chris M., Toronto ON
01/26/11 5:01 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Sandilands
However "mean" one feels the community may have been to this "visionary" who lost more money and brought more conflict to the event than it's ever known, the truth is a lot of money has gone missing and until it's discovered who took it Ms Sandilands should not be leaving Toronto for any reason.
Brad Fraser, Toronto ON
01/26/11 5:10 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Ding, dong!
We all know who "Robert" is, and that Tracey was his catspaw. There was nothing visionary about Tracey. She was a bungling incompetent who turned a surplus into an operating deficit, and finally a debt. She presided over 2 years of chaos and war with the community she is supposed to serve. She has been caught out, along with "Robert", on multiple lies and now, financial conflict of interest that was concealed from most board members, and which Tracey lied to the membership about (via Genevieve D'Iorio) at the AGM.
Mary Singh, Toronto Ontario
01/26/11 5:15 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Wow!
The ED resigned so everyone who was so vocal about the Pride issues and demanded her resignation should take stock and realize that your voice was heard...oh wait, what's that I hear, more bitching and moaning...thought so. I'm not a defender of Ms. Sandilands nor do I stand behind those who claim to be "community" members who seem to think they somehow have been charged with speaking on behalf of everyone in the queer community. But I do work in the not-for-profit sector and I do understand how challenging it can be to run an organization where people feel/think because they identify with that organization they are owed something. My personal opinion is that Pride Toronto does a great job at providing a big celebration for the city..queer, straight, bi, whatever your preference...to participate and enjoy. Do they satisfy everyone, no and to me, that's fine. If you donate to Pride or have a membership to it then you should have a say and influence as a voting member or the organization. If you don't donate or have membership then, while entitled to your opinion, you don't get to have influence. As for all the negativity, sheesh, get over yourselves already. Put the bitterness aside, come to the table with something positive and don't be so paranoid...or move on already! Life's too short and Pride, for all it's faults, is a great organization and event for all people and this city.
Mike, Toronto Ontario
01/26/11 5:18 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
per Sinead O'Connor: fight the real enemy
the name underneath all of this is MARK SINGH, who approved Tracey's wife's position. MARK SINGH is in a similar conflict of interest, his his boyfriend (who's trouble and a whole other story) being contracted for the pride gala (which cost over 100 000 to produce and made about 92 000 this year) and the bid for world pride. MARK SINGH, who takes potshots at respected groups like the 519. MARK SINGH whose dishonesty at the last AGM is youtubed for all to see it. Tracey needed to go, but the man behind her curtain is MARK SINGH. Pride's downfall will be its continued association with Mark Singh. Xtra, there's a story here that should be getting as much coverage as Tracey did.
B., Toronto ON
01/26/11 5:22 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Catspaw
Mary, I think you're mistaking me for someone. Although I have met Tracey, I have no connection whatsoever to Pride. (although I did volunteer last year)I'd appreciate that you not accuse me of lying to anyone. I also respectfully disagree with your characterizations of Tracey, but I suppose that is obvious from my first post.
Robert, Toronto ON
01/26/11 5:38 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
@Brad
Why is it that all you aging queers seem to forget the history of the organization? (oh ya, old age). You are clearly forgetting all the other raucous fights that saw entire boards of director's resign after Xtra-coordinated coups. If you whiners and complainers are going to overthrow a regime, I certainly hope you are man enough (and/or woman enough) to step up to the bar and take charge. Otherwise, you are just like those two old geezers from the Muppets who criticize from the sidelines without adding anything.
Chris M., Toronto ON
01/26/11 5:47 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
One Singh to rule them all
Hopefully this will also hamper the ability of former board members close to Tracey to intervene in/meddle with Pride's management from a distance.
Dawood, Toronto Ontario
01/26/11 6:07 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
It has all happened before...
... It will all happen again... The position of ED for Pride Toronto is a brutal and thankless job. I commend Tracey for taking on the challenge, and wish her well on what ever she does next. I trust now that the position has opened up, those with all the criticism, and all the solutions will step up to the plate and become directly involved themselves... ~si
Steve Ireson, Toronto Ontario
01/26/11 6:11 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
when did this happen before?
steve, can you tell me when before in pride's history The ED had her wife on payroll creating a conflict of interest and history of lying at AGMs? I was never a huge fan of Fatima Amarshi, but I never for a second doubted her honesty or her knowledge of the organization's and community's history.
ryan, tdot ON
01/26/11 6:26 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
@ Chris M
WOW - and I suppose YOU were there and know everything? You know nothing other than what you're told. Were YOU involved in 1995 when the Director's resigned? ... Thought not. So STFU about what you know nothing about. Tracey has lied. If you're stupid enough to have believed her lies, then you're just a "yes man" ... probably one of her personal pawns. Get the facts, learn the truth, and stop swallowing what's put in your mouth. All of you above who think this has happened because of "lefties", you're all so so wrong. The financial statements speak for themselves. The truth is, Tracey should never have been hired in the 1st place ... she squandered all the money with the OK of Mark Singh and then blamed everyone else for her own ineptitude. Despite the best efforts of a few to get PT "defunded", PT was still given LOTS of $$. But Tracey as the ED decided to spend it all on things OTHER than the festival ... Sorry, no "howling lefties"; are responsible for this predicament, just plain, simple incompetence!
Not any of the above, Tor Ont
01/26/11 7:11 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Mark Singh must be a super evil genious...
...according to the likes of "B." Wonder what other heists he's pulled off in his life? (Sorry, just saw the movie Despicable Me last night) Somebody send him my resume. Seriously, though, Sandilands and the Pride Board may not have made ALL the right decisions but I find it hard to believe that anyone would willingly put up with the kind of abuse that comes with a senior position at Pride without having the best interests of Pride at heart. As such, it's almost comical the pure glee with which these few "activists" have taken to attacking these people. To Tracey Sandilands and the Pride Board: thank you for your hard work. You had to go to the other side of the world to find someone who was unaware of the abuse that came with the job. Good luck this time. To the "activists" who have nothing better to do than bitch and complain on this website or at the Pride meetings: why don't you step up and take on these senior roles. Let's see how much better you do.
G. Palazar, Toronto ON
01/26/11 7:29 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Well actually...
I was around when the great purge took place and had the distinct pleasure of working with the team who picked up the pieces and tried to rebuild the organization (many of whom themselves resigned after similar witch hunts). BTW. Your outrageous accusations, gossip and innuendo make you appear as a lunatic. (making it pretty easy to ignore had it not been for the very personal attack)If I were you I'd take your own advice and STFU before your buffoonery rivals that of our great mayor.
Chris M., Toronto ON
01/26/11 7:56 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Pride takes 2 steps back
and ANOTHER rebuilding begins after the "community" tears apart Pride.. Again. It sure has happened before, visit the archives. Tracey came in to a mess, reached higher than most, and that's why the attacks were so mean and personal. And continue to be. Come on Brad; your insinuation is deplorable. The organization is audited and scrutized to the penny. I can't help thinking that the initial, and then subsequent response to her leadership would have been very different if she were not a woman. Reminds me how Xtra and a few others continously attacked the former ED of the 519. Look up old issues in the Archives on that one too. Well, folks; reality is gonna bite.
Liz, Toronto Ont
01/26/11 9:31 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
@ Chris
chris m., who else on the pride team paid $40 000 to their wife, had no previous connection to Toronto's lgbtq folk, and was always getting caught in lies? I remember folks like Adrienne de Francesco, Fatima Amarshi, and even Janis Purdy leaving the org, but the details this time are completely diff and you know it.
Ryan, Tdot ON
01/26/11 9:36 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
re: per Sinead O'Connor: fight the real enemy
I don't know that much about the inner workings of Pride but based on some things I've heard I have to agree with you that Mark Singh should at the very least be investigated a little more closely by Xtra. The Gala fiasco alone is a big concern, and how his husband can be allowed to get the contract for that is beyond me. That said I do have some sympathy for Sandilands, the ED faces all the criticism while other board members like Singh go pretty much under the radar. Being ED of Pride is no doubt an extremely difficult job but I don't think Sandilands was up for it, that or the rest of the board weren't doing their jobs well enough, I don't know how the board is supposed to function well enough to say for sure but to me it seems they lost their focus on the various communities that make up Toronto's LGBT community and instead focused far too much on entertainment and relied too heavily on their PR company instead of community representatives. I believe that Pride should first and foremost be a celebration of all the Toronto LGBT communities, big entertainment spectacles are great but its the communities that matter most and what make Pride special, the entertainment should always come second to the various communities. As well there seemed to be some poor choices made that cost Pride money, the Gala fiasco is just one of them. I hope whoever takes over is going to be capable enough to handle all of the aspects of Pride and wish them good luck.
Rich, Toronto Ontario
01/26/11 10:01 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
a job well done
Tracey Sandilands got out at the right time. The amplified criticism she endured throughout her tenure was ruthless and served no purpose. Pride became the punching bag for alot of the community's ills and torment. If she hadn't resigned today she would have had to sit through all the hecklers and peanut gallery people chanting for her resignation at tomorrow's AGM. Pride antagonists also bear some culpability in the matter of the organization's financial losses. But instead of asking 'Where is the money?' you should be asking 'How much did I lose on this investment?' and I'm guessing there are precious few who can raise their hand to that. $100K deficit isn't that shocking, considering all the bad press, threatened boycotts, exodus of sponsors, getting axed by the federal government, and bad economic times of late. With all that, and the local queer activist brigade picketing outside of Pride's management office, I'd say the 2010 festival was still pretty successful. It definately didn't disolve into a Sock Hop at the 519, as Robert puts it. Tracey Sandilands did the community a service, and she did not become wealthy doing it. Maybe she wasn't perfect, but she wasn't corrupt! I wish her all the best and hope her replacement is of strong will. (And it should be noted, Xtra! actually gave Elle Flanders the last word on this announcement, priceless).
Ryan, Toronto ON
01/26/11 10:28 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Liz,Liz,Liz
Liz your little friend was caught misleading the board. And if you are who I think you are your travel agency benefited from your association with Pride and hired Tracey's girlfriend yourself. As a business person you know an audit proves nothing so I will be demanding a forensic audit at the AGM. She mislead the community and jumped on the self interested bandwagon. Pride has grown so fast the old structure doesn't work. I have faith and hope in the Community Advisory Panel that it will make recommendations on a better structure. World pride might not be as profitable for some of Tracey's friends...I can see why you are all so pissed!
Glad to see the back of her, Toronto ON
01/26/11 10:33 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
I'm disgusted
I can't believe the slimy, reprehensible comments from some of you @Glad to see... @ Brad, @Not any of the above, you should be embarrassed of your behavior. The gossip, untruths and libelous personal attacks can only be likened to the way Fox News covers a story. The Pride board is a group of volunteers who devote hundreds of hours each year doing the best job they can. The ED job is complex, political and almost impossible to helm (as the past 25+ years of history has shown us). To add to that burden the necessity to put up with crap from people like you, would make sane people rethink their interest. Criticism is welcome. But what you people spout is vile.
Another Chris, Toronto ON
01/26/11 11:14 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
@Chris
The thing about libel is that the allegations can't be true. Fact- Tracey hired her girlfriend, paid her $40,000 at the same time she laid off staff. The current board didn't know and at the last Pride Toronto public meeting Tracey was asked directly by Jane Farrow "is your girlfriend on the payroll?". Tracey said no. So who is slimy and vile? Making our community agencies accountable to the community takes interested community members. I will not be apologizing for the demise of this liar. Yes liar. Hiring your girlfriend's company means she is on the payroll. Spending Pride into the ground and making false statements about the loss of funding is again a lie. What part of this is libelious or reprehrensible? I am sure there are board members who feel the same level of betrayal and shock I feel. Fox news are you kidding. The board made a brave move pushing her out. Yeah I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks she did not jump on her own. I used to think Xtra was unnecessarily harsh with Tracey. I owe Matt Mills and Marcus McCann an apology they had her number before most of us. Like I said the structure of Pride needs to change let's see what CAP recommends. "Crap from people like me" means getting rid of liars who would use their position for nepotism and personal gain. Let's not forget to mention the shambles she has left with the black queer community and the Trans community.
Glad to see the back of her, Toronto ON
01/27/11 12:09 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Brad Fraser's comment on "missing money"
I don't understand Brad Fraser's comment above that "a lot of money has gone missing". The audited annual financial statements just show a deficit - that Pride Toronto spent more money than it took in and is now in debt. What evidence exists that money is "missing"?
Joe, Toronto Ontario
01/27/11 12:28 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
public inquiry?
this is good news to pride since the organization itself needs new leadership and direction, not just the organization but the board as well. i don't deny that tracey might be a good person who tried her best to manage the festival. everyone knows the headaches and frustrations of running a million-strong event. however there were clear ethical violations that some part of the community obviously feel very passionately about, including mismanagement of funds, and paying out their significant others'. just like everybody else, THIS is OUR community. is there some sort of ethics commissioner for people to lodge complaints to and settle this in a public inquiry? and find out if these actions were lawful and ethical.
Chris Jai Centeno, Ottawa/Toronto Ontario
01/27/11 1:09 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
No severance if you resign
The article stats that Sandilands will receive a severance package. Employees who resign are not legally entitled to severance. It looks like the board of Pride Toronto basically terminated her employment and are allowing her to say she "resigned" as a face-saving measure.
David, Toronto Ontario
01/27/11 9:40 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
ridiculous.
mark singh's hubby has been benefiting financially for years, with all of the galas, interpride agms, world pride bids for a start. not shocking in the least that that ideology has spread through his minions (i mean, colleagues.) why does no one care to look into HIM for a change? Endless people see it, but no one has enough power to actually change it. Nepotism and inflated egos are the kiss of death for far too many non-profits. Forensic audits are needed. And considering the 1000hrs+ of my time and money I have donated to pride over the years, you're darn sure I have a right to be upset and voice my opinion.
l.d., toronto ontario
01/27/11 10:44 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
time to Singh for his supper
pride toronto's board MUST sever all ties with singh and his partner. singh is a shrewd business man who has no investment in the community. his only interest was to benefit from the festival personally. this not only came from the questionably 'legitimate' contracting of his partner, but also more underhanded methods but i probly cant say theft here can i? im a past volunteer and unfortunately experienced first hand the disgustiung advances he makes on young guys involved in the festival. so if you arent concerned about the money at least save a legion of young gay men from someone who uses their position to get into their pants.
james, Toronto ON
01/27/11 11:44 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
RE: time to Singh for his supper
James if you have experienced any inappropriate actions from Mark Singh, I suggest you contact the board and file a complaint. These are serious concerns that needs to be heard.
mark, Toronto Ontario
01/27/11 4:06 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
The Whole Board needs
to be investigated. The more I'm reading the more something stinks, really bad.
tim, toronto on
01/27/11 4:28 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
severance if you resign
David people may not be entitled to severance if they quit voluntarily, but that doesn't always mean it won't get paid out. We don't know the details, but Tracey could have resigned after a Constructive Dismissal by the Board (which may or not have been forced upon her). We've heard that relations between Board members are caustic so I suspect that's probably the case, but again we don't know, nor is it any of our business. Tracey is not Dalton McGuinty. Pride is not the government. To Chris Jai's point about holding a public inquiry, total nonsense. So they have a $100K deficit, it was a bad year, it's a managable loss. People need to start being more honest - nobody gave a rat's ass about Pride's finances until a couple weeks ago, but they had been calling for Tracey to resign for a year. People moan about how big and corporate Pride's got, now all of a sudden they've become budget hawks. Please.
Ryan, Toronto ON
01/27/11 4:35 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
@ ryan
That's a lie, Ryan. At the AGM in sept , the biggest sticking point was finances re: the oh-so-secretive, we-don't-need-this-audited-yet financials. That was in September, so more than a few weeks ago. Prior to that, finances were also a big topic at the Pride/Blockorama meeting last year before pride.
AFKAP, toronto ON
01/27/11 4:42 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
100K deficit
@Ryan that's exactly my point. Part of the community feels like they were robbed obviously since funding comes from the public purse through grants and various governments. Some sort of investigation, be it in inquiry or perhaps in another form, should settle this and find out whether this was done correctly or not? Yes I agree with you that many have been calling for Tracey's resignation. But many people as well tried in vain to shed light on the organization's finances. Its board and Tracey have maintained tight-lipped about that in every step of the way, when asked by media but also by community members who have attended numerous general meetings. How can we -- the community -- know anything about Pride's dealings when there was no accountability there to begin with?
Chris Jai Centeno, Toronto/Ottawa ON
01/27/11 5:18 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
puh-lease Ryan!
you know what's total nonsense? someone who's responsible for fundraising at PT trying to convince us that there's no need for a public inquiry! makes me think theres still more to uncover
j.t., toronto on
01/27/11 7:14 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
deeply disappointed...
I feel that Pride Toronto, all the people that work there and all who are associated with them have been using me, my friends and my community for their own personal gain. I feel mislead, very disappointed and that nobody cares about us. We are the people who need to have pride but instead have deception.
john, Hamilton Ontario
01/27/11 8:03 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
None of our business?
@Ryan. You wrote: "We've heard that relations between Board members are caustic so I suspect that's probably the case, but again we don't know, nor is it any of our business". You're wrong: it is our business. If it's true that you work for Pride Toronto, your statement really sums up the problem with Pride Toronto: its officers and directors think it's their personal fiefdom. But, it's not. It's a tax-exempt, non-profit organization that receives public funding. The only reason that governments fund Pride is because it purports to serve the gay community. The moment you take taxpayer funds is the moment you become accountable to the public. If you want to work for a private sector business that is not accountable to the public, then resign from Pride Toronto and do so.
David, Toronto Ontario
01/27/11 9:44 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
where is she?
I wonder if Tracey Sandilands plans to stay in Canada or return to South Africa. If she's lucky, there'll be a seat sale....or maybe a one-way plane ticket was part of her severance package.
JG, Toronto Ontario
01/27/11 11:49 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
i feel bad for Tracey
I've never met the woman, but I would assume that if she was willing to pick up and move her entire life halfway around the world, she probably did so with the best of intentions. She couldn't have had deep ties with the community, and therefore should have been removed from some of the politics. Clearly the organization has issues that go well beyond the realm of the executive director.
mike, toronto on
01/28/11 12:42 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Correction
Pride Toronto did not post a loss of just over 100k. The net loss according to the Audited Financial Statements is $431,808 for the year ended 31 July 2010. The $109,401 figure is actually a net deficit figure meaning that as of the end of the year, if Pride Toronto liquidated all assets of the corporation to pay all the liabilities, the organization would still owe the $109,401 amount. In otherwords, it owes more than is owns.
Ross, Toronto Ontario
01/28/11 12:53 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
since you asked......
Tracey was pushed out, she didn't quit. That's why she was given a severance package. She has not and will not be releasing a public statement. That was part of the settlement. In return, Pride has made it look like she resigned so she can save a little face. Other truths: the commenters up-thread are correct about Mark Singh's evil-ness. The General Meeting is the first in a long time that was conducted without any skullduggery. Queen's Park stage will not be returning this year. Ta!
TheTruthFairy, Toronto Ontario
01/28/11 3:25 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
shocked at level of corruption and incompetence
I was shocked at the levels of corruption and/orincompetence at the highest levels of Pride revealed in the GM last evening. Francisco Alvarez admitted that despite what he had been telling the media, that "news" of Tracey's "partner" secretly on the payroll was a shock when revealed to him in November and that 2 lawyers were brought in to negotiate her depaarture and settlement package which because of the Holiday season took until this week. So it wasn't a "stunning surprise" that she left as he told CBC, but a negotiated exit. And the blame was put on former co-chairs who allowed the obvious conflcit of interest. Meanwhile the treasurer blandly chcarcterized all of the mis-spending & irregularities as "discrepancies" or "issues" (whatever that means and more or less everyday normal business practices..From what I could see and hear at the General Meeting most of the PT Board is at best incompetent (even in chairing the meeting by accepted rules of procedure and at worst, very enabling of the irregularities. What a sorry spectacle the meeting was in terms of handling just community concerns and outrage. One can only hope that the panel of esteemed LGBT people now going over the many structural and ethical lapses of PT will make their recommendations soon and that the PT Board will accept them all without tampering with them. It is up to all of us in the LGBT community who can help by volunteering to bring PT back on the tracks and away from the sorry shambles it appears to be. Let's all work together to turn things around now that Ms Sandilands and former co-Chair/Treasurer are history. We as a community deserve much better.
james dubro, toronto ontario
01/28/11 6:41 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Ed's note
Hi Ross, quite right. I've clarified the pertinent passage in the story above.
Matt Mills, Toronto Ont
01/28/11 6:46 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
reporting of ED leaving was mislead by PT PR/spin
Tooth fairy notwithstanding, why has there been so much mendacity in the reporting everywhere on Ms Sandilands well deserved departure including by the co-Chair Franciso Alvaraez who until last night's GM was saying endlessly on the media (CBC, CITYpulse) in the past days that "resignation" was a total surprise to him and he had nothing but great things to say about her, when last night's meeting it was apparent that he and the Board had lost confidence in her as the result of certain revelation to them about the secret hiring of her partner as "consultant" and they negotiated with lawyers over the past weeks her departure. Yo cannot have it n=both ways--"surprise resignation" of a "great Executive Director" and PT lawyers negotiating a settlement package after certain facts were made known to the new Co Chairs.
james dubro, toronto ontario
01/28/11 7:03 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Pride Toronto needs to stop the misinformation
@james dubro. I agreee that it's really disturbing that Pride Co-chair Franciso Alvaraez would tell the media that Sandilands resigned and then indicate to the Pride general meeeting that she was forced out. The Pride board still doesn't get it: they need to either STOP the misinformation or resign.
David, Toronto Ontario
01/28/11 8:18 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Re: still none of our business?
@David, No I do not work for Pride, I share a common name with someone who does and I don't understand why people on this forum are constantly trying to "expose" others. You say, "The only reason that governments fund Pride is because it purports to serve the gay community. The moment you take taxpayer funds is the moment you become accountable to the public." First, governments fund Pride because they get a much larger return on their investment if you factor in all the tourists who come here and pay GST/HST, etc. So even though 2010 was a bum year for the organizers, the public didn't lose a dime, it gained. In that sense, Pride has been accountable. Transparency is another thing, and it's just my personal opinion (and again I'm not an insider) that we don't need to know if the ED quit or was fired. Especially when that kind of scrutiny is being used to drive a particular agenda.
Ryan, Toronto ON
01/28/11 8:22 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Even if you oppose QuAIA...
@Ryan - We obviously disagree on the degree to which Pride Toronto needs to be accountable and transparent to the public and why governments fund Pride. I do agree that Xtra and the supporters of QuAIA have been mounting a campaign against Sandilands and the Pride board for some time and have an "agenda". But, even if a person opposes QuAIA's participation in Pride, they should not defend misinformation by the Pride board and should want Pride Toronto to be accountable and transparent to the public. Ironically, after the Community Advisory Panel reports and the Pride board accepts their recommendations (the panel will undoubtedly support QuAIA's participation in Pride), I think that QuAIA opponents will then "give up" on the Pride board and will no longer have any reason to oppose the efforts of Xtra and others to "clean house" at Pride Toronto.
David, Toronto Ontario
01/28/11 9:05 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
HR Policies and practices
I just want to clarify that it is common practice in all organizations to avoid discussions regarding termination, severance packages, etc. The thinking behind such policies is that to fire someone, you leave the door open for legal action (for unlawful dismissal, libel/slander, etc.) Prudent organizations enter into these negotiations with lawyers who are charged with minimizing the non-profit's liabilities. When a termination agreeme0nt is written and signed, the terms of that agreement usually include a non-disclosure agreement by both parties. Failure to honor an agreement could cost Pride Toronto much more in legal fees and payouts. You might not like it, but it's the way the system works.
Chris M., Toronto ON
01/28/11 9:45 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Redundant
I've been reading all of these comments for about the last half hour. I'm bored. I was at the first pride picnic when I was 17 years old. I was at the first PROTEST and PUBLIC AWARENESS parades. I remember when all of the bars, clubs, community organizations contributed their home-made efforts at floats into a really fun parade that was uniquely "ours" and put on by "us". There were no barricades on the parade route. People could join in the parade and dance along with whoever they liked and join in with whatever group they felt embraced and included by. People were still getting bashed, beaten up, verbally abused, and targetted in all various ways. Police did the minimum... really. I could go on forever about what I "remember". A hefty percentage of my generation died in the health crisis of the 80's and 90's. And I know that many of my contemporaries are of the same mind as me, when I say we just sit back at home and don't bother any more. Not because we're "old" and don't have the energy. Not because we're jaded. I think we're just bewildered at how all of the meaning that this celebration had to us has been lost in a blatant, corporate advertising/sponsorship opportunity and exploitation of a demographic that most "in-the-know" advertising people recognize as those having the highest disposable income. The "acronym" community fought for so long, through so much pain, loss and abuse to be "equal" and, for lack of a better term "main stream". Well, a lot of that has been done now. We get same-sex benefits, equal treatment in employment,the right to prosecute those who persecute, the right and benefits that come from legal marriage....the list goes on. What I think we do NOT have, is the right to forget how we got there. Pride is redundant. It no longer celebrates HOW we got there. It only celebrates
DSQ, Halton ON
01/28/11 10:46 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Last words of Redundant
Pride is redundant. It no longer celebrates HOW we got there. It only celebrates that we did, somehow. It's a biiiiig corporate cash grab and an opportunity for corrupt organizers to feather their own nests. It's a big-ass party and freak show for many suburbanites and their children who would just as soon kick us in the head tomorrow as stand beside us on the parade route today. It's no longer relevant.
DSQ, Halton On
01/28/11 10:52 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
re:- Redundant (Jan 28/11)
@DSQ:- Darling, you are completely correct, let's just let Pride die a natural death because it no longer serves a useful purpose. If you want to party then you can do so every night of the week at any of the gay party palaces on Church St (except for Zelda's which has moved to Yonge St) and if you just want to get laid then you can do so 24/7 at the various local houses of gay physical culture (aka "bathhouses"). There is really no more need for people to donate their time and money to this redundant organization when there are other more pressing needs in the gay community which need to be addressed. I prefer to do my giving over at ACT where the people still know how to say "thank you" and there is no radical silliness and hysteria. Perhaps Pride is really as you imply an indirect victim of AIDS which seems to have taken away the core group of stable and sensible elders which the gay community really needs to lead it just like the two world wars in the 20th century took away many of the missing leaders who should have been running the world over the last 80 years. If they want to reform the governance of Pride to make it more stable then perhaps they should impose a condition that all directors of Pride must be gay or lesbian and at least 40 years old without a propensity for pedophilia so at least they will be more resistant to all the silliness and hysteria which has afflicted this organization in the recent past. Actually what the gay and lesbian community in Toronto really needs is a new general community organization which will integrate all those very closeted ethnic gays and lesbians who far outnumber Anglo-Torontonians and who are completely ignored and neglected by the Church St Anglo gay establishment. Oh, and by the way the ideal party to satisfy all the residual debts of Pride would be Pink Triangle Press which has been so instrumental in orchestrating its euthanization and because they are so rich and can easi
Yours Truly, Toronto Ontario
02/02/11 5:49 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Grow up Toronto
Dear Toronto, Not only have you become an international laughing stock - your collective incompetence in the "administration" of Pride reflects poorly on all glbt persons in Canada. I hope they immediately yank World Pride from your incompetent and amateurish little hands and give it to Vancouver where Pride actually MADE $400,000 last year. Or Winnipeg, or Edmonton or Red Deer - anywhere for chrissake but Toronto. You simply do not deserve any international validation of what has transpired. Seriously, you could not have fucked up any more if Fred Phelps and the Westborough Baptist Church were in charge of Toronto Pride. Stephen Harper, Tony Clement and Charles McVety could not be happier about how you collectively managed to set back the glbt struggle for justice in this nation. To the actual Pride members - shame on you for not booting the entire board and ED at the first whiff of incompetence. To Board and Former E.D. - a pox on you all for not resigning last spring. You have no honour. To the rest of you - shame of you for allowing the amateur hour to forever stain your city and formerly (10 yrs ago) great Pride and let descend to this level of ick. So pack it up. Close Pride Toronto. Call in the cops and forensic auditors and begin again. That means letting the drag queens clean up your mess and plan a celebration that might actually mean something other than greed and self interest. Now go to your room and think about what you have done.
Mike Dean, Vancouver BC
02/03/11 7:07 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
@mark dean :: bitter, much?
seriously ... u live in Vancouver...and your hatred of Torontonians is pretty darn clear. world pride is ours as we earned the right to hold it here. sure things are not perfect and screwed up. question to you tho mark, were you at the GM on Jan 26? or erm ... have you been to the festival in Toronto, within this decade? if not then by what authority do you have to criticize the event? to slander each and everyone involved in PT? seriously? really? thats pretty lame whatever.
s. fraser, toronto ontario
02/17/11 8:01 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Actually, no.
Actually, I love Toronto and have been to every Pride for the past seven years. The PT organization is a fustercluck that is beyond compare. It is unworthy of community, government or individual support. It has become an orgy of PC corporate excess and is afraid of its own shadow. I applaud those on the committee who have studied the PT abortion. It’s now time to put this sad festival out of its misery and begin anew. Again, put the drag queens in charge, it might regain some sense of humour about itself and it might actually become relevant again. Toronto is a terrifically vibrant world class city of wonderful folks and without a doubt our nation’s greatest city. Pride Toronto has become a national and international embarrassment though. If you can’t see that, you ain't looking at it objectively. Get at it Toronto - you have a lot of work ahead of you if you hope to revive this dog.
Mike Dean, Vancouver BC
03/02/11 8:01 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.