Pride Toronto still 'vulnerable'
NEWS / Mammoliti vows to defund festival, following city manager's report
Marcus McCann & Andrea Houston / Toronto / Wednesday, April 13, 2011
Share |

A tense day at city hall ended without any movement on the Pride Toronto (PT) file, after the city manager released a report saying the festival is in compliance with the city’s anti-discrimination policy.
 
However, Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti pledged to lead the charge to defund the parade beginning next week.
 
Mammoliti will broach the subject April 20 at an executive committee meeting. Because the executive is composed of sympathetic councillors, Mammoliti’s motion is expected to pass handily. The motion would then head to council in May or June.
 
In one scenario, the final vote on PT funding would be held on May 17, the International Day Against Homophobia. In another scenario, the vote would be delayed until mid-June, just days before the start of the Pride festival.
 
The news follows the release of a report by city manager Joseph Pannachetti, who wrote that "City staff have determined that the phrase ‘Israeli apartheid’ in and of itself does not violate the City’s Anti-discrimination policy.” It settles the question of whether or not PT broke the city’s rules when it allowed Queers Against Israeli Apartheid (QuAIA) to march in last year’s Pride parade.
 
Giorgio Mammoliti
(Marcus McCann)
PT submitted a funding application as a major cultural organization under the Community Partnership and Investment Program (CPIP) April 1, according to board co-chair Francisco Alvarez. The application is currently being reviewed by city staff.

"It means we do not violate the policy and we do qualify for funding," Alvarez says. "It certainly removes one possible barrier to the funding."

"We should get the funding on sheer precedent. We've applied many times and always gotten a grant through that process. The only thing that could impede our funding will be a political decision."
 
In an interview with Xtra, Councillor Adam Vaughan said that the city manager’s report will be ignored by those councillors who are gunning for the festival.
 
“There are people on this council who know how they are going to vote, with or without a report. And I don’t think there’s going to be a lot of flexibility there,” he says. “What we need to do as a city is create the space for a conversation, and until we do that, Pride is going to be in a very vulnerable position.”
 
Francisco Alvarez, Glen Brown, Michael Bach & Michael Went in council chambers April 13.
(Marcus McCann)
Pride Toronto supporters showed up throughout the day, including Alvarez, Community Advisory Panel member Michael Went, Proud of Toronto organizer Michael Bach and Glen Brown, PT’s new interim executive director.
 
Speaking from the gallery at city hall, activist Anna Willats says that it’s important for gay, lesbian and trans people to make their voices heard at city hall by emailing Mammoliti and the rest of council. She also suggests that folks — gay and straight — sign up to make deputations to the executive committee next week.
 
“I think it’s important that we let city council know that we understand that there are many different points of view in the parade. To punish Pride for a political message that some people don’t like is ridiculous,” she says.
 
Mammoliti’s afternoon press conference followed a speech in the morning by Kristyn Wong-Tam on the subject of Pride Toronto.
 
Wong-Tam emphasized the importance of Pride as a cultural event, tourist draw and economic vehicle for the city. In the full version of her speech, she characterizes moves to defund PT as “collective punishment.”
 
She urged her colleagues to consider the city manager’s report before making any decision about PT and spoke candidly about the risk both to the organization and its hosting duties for World Pride 2014.
 
“In three short years, the eyes of the world will be focused on Toronto,” she said.
 
She intended to add, “Defunding Pride Toronto… will mean the inevitable destruction of Pride Toronto in the months ahead and they will automatically lose the privilege to host World Pride in 2014.” Instead, she was cut off by fellow Councillor James Pasternak, who objected to Wong-Tam’s speech on technical grounds. The speaker ruled Wong-Tam out of order, and she was not allowed to finish her prepared remarks.


Share |


Reader Comments


 
Letters, We Get Letters
Check the OHRC - Quaia OUT of PRIDE The personal is political. Pride is political. Pride Toronto's charter became one of celebrating a city-funded and corporate funded tourism festival. Its terms of reference as a non-profit corporate limit its political engagement. It is interesting to see how often the same people whine about 'free speech' but forbid it to those who disagree with them. The question is not one of 'hate speech' under the Criminal Code, though it is arguable that QUAIA's wholesale demonization of Israel and Jews with the false allegation of apartheid does incite hatred, and their politics would incite the genocide and elimination of Israel as a Jewish state. But, QuAIA's documented menacing and bullying behaviour against Jews and others supportive of Israel or those against QUAIA's hijacking of Pride would make for a convincing case of (a) criminal intimidation of Jews from pursuing their lawful purposes at Pride and deriving equal benefit of the festival they are funding; and (b) a potential successful challenge at City Hall re: discrimination and OHRC on Pride Toronto's creation of a poisoned climate for Jews and others supportive of Israel, on grounds of ethnicity, religion, creed, conscience, and national origin. QuAIA cannot merely claim that it is being 'discriminated against' on grounds of conscience. Its use of marginal spokesjews like Elle Flanders and Reena Katz and Jennifer Peto don't convince anyone anymore. To single out Israel for disproportionate false vilification and Jews by association IS discriminatory, when there is no evidence that QUAIA or other groups actually challenge Muslim or Arab countries lynching queers, or the mullahs and imams invoking fatwas. QUAIA are hypocrites, and Barbara Hall of the OHRC recommended letter campaigns and defunding groups like this rather than OHRC or 'dispute resolution' Pride Court. Thats what we did. Bye
Letter This, Toronto ON
04/13/11 9:45 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Pride is over
When I saw the JDL marching in the parade last year I knew the end had come. What ever is left of Pride will be a very small shadow of its former self. It should be re-named Middle East Quagmire Day or JDL vs QuAIA Day. The political activists and homophobes on city council have won. It's time to move on.
Don, Toronto Ontario
04/14/11 2:14 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Re Pride Over
I believe it's time to revamp Pride, get away from the direction it has taken these past years with far too many corporate floats from companies that only do lip service support to the communities at any other time of the year. Just how many of those companies actually have positive human resources policies, for ALL the members within the queer umbrella?(most really just include lesbian/gay anti discrimination) Maybe that needs to be part of the vetting process as well as question in the application process. Never mind finding out just what else they do the rest of the year to show positive images. Pride needs to go back to the future, as they say.
femme, toronto ON
04/15/11 5:42 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.