Pride ED backtracks yet again
LOCAL NEWS / Event logistics manager resigns
Krishna Rau / Toronto / Thursday, February 05, 2009
Share |

THE GOOD OLD DAYS. Pride executive director Tracey Sandilands smiles during her initial interview with Xtra in December.
(Jenna Wakani)
In yet another mystifying about-face Pride Toronto executive director Tracey Sandilands says she will grant interviews to Xtra after all, but only if Pride’s public relations consultant is present.

In January Xtra reported that Sandilands had angrily declared that this paper was out to get Pride and had knifed the organization in the back. She said the Pride Toronto board of directors had approved her decision to no longer respond to Xtra’s requests for interviews.

She was responding to a Jan 1 story, written from a tape-recorded, in-depth face-to-face interview with her in December that enumerated her views about Pride.

Sandilands said the story presented her comments in a negative light. She originally claimed she was misquoted and then that her remarks were taken out of context. But after the recording of the interview was posted on Xtra.ca she retracted her accusations saying instead that her comments were not presented fully.

“I’m not going to run the risk of being in this position again,” she said in another taped interview. “I’ve cleared this with the board, we’ll be giving no more interviews to Xtra from hereon. There are enough other media out there who are not out to get us.”

Matt Mills, Xtra’s editorial director, met with Sandilands at her request on Jan 27. Sandilands told him that Pride officials would in fact make themselves available for comment to Xtra’s readers and that there was never a board policy against talking to Xtra.

At a Pride general meeting on Jan 29, when asked about whether or not the board approved Sandilands’ decision, Pride Toronto cochair Genevieve D’Iorio said only that the board is eager to talk to all media.

“The board is for promoting this festival in all mediums: online, in print, in advertising,” she said. “We want people to know about this festival.”

D’Iorio said the stories in Xtra about Sandiland’s comments were accurate.

“There’s not very much to say about what’s been going on with Xtra,” said D’Iorio. “I think it’s been pretty much in the paper what’s been going on with Xtra. Basically Tracey did an interview with Xtra in December. A second interview was made. A full tape recording of the first interview is available on the Xtra website.”

D’Iorio, Sandilands and Pride Toronto staff and directors scattered at the meeting’s conclusion without giving this reporter the opportunity to speak with any of them on anything, let alone to clarify whether or not the board ever cleared Sandilands’ initial decision not to speak to Xtra.

Xtra subsequently emailed D’Iorio to follow up and received a response from Pride public relations consultant Grant Ramsay.

“To be absolutely clear, there is no ban re: talking to Xtra,” he wrote.

For further clarification and to give Sandilands the chance to comment on the record, this reporter dropped by Pride’s office on Jan 4. Sandilands spoke with Xtra but refused to answer some questions saying any interviews would have to be conducted in the presence of Pride’s public relations consultant.

“I’m being careful about making any mistakes,” she said. “As people have been telling me I don’t know the media here. I was expecting a different approach from Xtra. We’ll see. After a few interviews, if I find I can trust you, that may change.”

“To be absolutely clear, there is no ban regarding talking to Xtra,” she wrote in a subsequent email received via Ramsay. “There was never a policy, although I did say I would not personally grant an interview to you [Krishna Rau]. I said that out of frustration but in the interest of moving forward and keeping the community informed I’m prepared to revisit my decision.”

In spite of her previous comments that she cleared her former no-talking-to-Xtra rule with the board, Sandilands writes that the board never approved her decision.

“But the cochairs were informed of my conversations with Xtra and they were both appraised of the situation,” she writes. “I have the full support of the board.”

Why did Sandilands say the board had cleared her decision to alienate Xtra’s readers when in fact it had not?

“I spoke out of frustration over what I perceived to be your continued negativity,” she states. “I travelled over 13,000 kilometres to begin a challenging new position. I realize now I shouldn't have spoken to Xtra after only eight days on the job. The scope of this position is immense. Challenges need to be met daily. It is an incredibly stressful time and I didn’t anticipate being such a target.”

In a further blow to Pride Toronto, Xtra has learned that event logistics manager Lisa Duke has resigned and will be leaving her post on Feb 13. Duke is the last full-time staff member who worked for the organization during last year’s celebration.

Duke also did not respond to Xtra’s request for an interview.

Sandilands did not say what Pride will do to cope with Duke’s resignation. She says there has been no decision about whether Dukes position will be filled in time for this summer’s celebration. Pride is already seeking to hire a new volunteer program manager.

“As I’m sure you are aware I can’t comment on Lisa’s situation. It is a confidential personnel matter,” wrote Sandilands. “She will be sorely missed at Pride Toronto and we wish her the very best in her future endeavours. Lisa has agreed to continue to be available for questions and the organization has her full support. We will be reviewing our options for the structuring of the [events logistics manager] portfolio over the next few weeks and then we’ll see.”

At the general meeting it was announced that Fri, Apr 3 is the deadline for groups to apply for Access and Diversity Grants for the Pride parade, the Dyke March and the community fair.

The meeting also voted on the theme for Pride 2009. The winner was Can’t Stop: Won’t Stop. The other finalist was Believe.

Sandilands told the meeting the two finalists had been selected from other submissions entered by community members.

“The staff, board members, coordinators and volunteers at our annual retreat which was held in November narrowed it down to two,” she said.

The entrant who submitted the winning theme also submitted a written explanation.

“‘Can’t Stop: Won’t Stop’ tells everyone straight to the point no matter what you throw at us we as a community will never quit.”

Sandilands said that Pride will be issuing a call later in February for suggestions for parade marshals and honoured groups. Candidates will be voted on at a general meeting in March.

The meeting also saw the awarding of prizes from the 2008 parade. The winners were announced in July.

In the float and vehicle division the award for best art direction went to the National Gay Pilots; for best choreography to We Love Japan; for best costume design to the Thai Society of Ontario; for best musical/sound arrangement to the Black Coalition for AIDS Prevention; for best embodiment of the queer community to the 519 Community Centre; and for best float to the Metropolitan Community Church of Toronto.

In the marching contingent division the award for best art direction went to the Engineering Society of the University of Toronto; for best choreography to Righteously Outrageous Twirling Corps – Toronto; for best costume design to The Imperial Court of Toronto; for best musical/sound arrangement to Latino group Hola; for best embodiment of the queer community to the Department of National Defence Canadian Forces.

In the all-entrants division grand marshal Enza Anderson won for most absolutely fabulous individual, Asian Community AIDS Services won a special judges’ award for best drag and Pflag won a special judges’ award for best celebration of the theme.








Share |


Reader Comments


 
What is the point of these Sandilands articles?
If I was this lady I wouldn't want to talk to Xtra either. More reporting and less witch-hunting please.
gloria gubermann, TO ON
02/05/09 6:12 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Peel the onions please...
I agree...more investigative reporting pls! What causes the high turnover for an organization that put on Pride Week? What happened there?
Zeus Prodromis, Toronto Ontario
02/06/09 4:10 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
A full page reporting on nothing
This has got to be a joke. A full article on absolutely nothing!!!! Who cares about an Xtra reporter and who cares what this woman has to say....get on with the party and get your reporters out there writing on something meaningful. he said, she said rubbish. tell us the date of Pride thats all thats important.
David Mason, Toronto Ont
02/06/09 4:42 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Zeus Prodromis - Agreed!
I totally agree! It is time that the community knows what is going on at the Pride office. Why is the turnover in staff and volunteer coordinators so high? What exactly is going on there that it seemingly drives staff and coordinators away? Are the staff under paid? Are the coordinators not being treated properly and given the respect they deserve? Why has this volunteer organization been taken over by paid staff? Why does it seem as though paid staff run the show? Why exactly does it seem as though the festival is turning more corporate each year? I for one would be curious to hear exactly all the goings on at the Pride office. To David Mason: Pride isn't just a party! Nor should it ever been seen as such. Need I remind you of Stonewall? Need I remind you of LGBTTIQQ2S history? Pride is a community not for profit organization (that should be run by dedicated volunteers and not paid persons) WE the community have a right to know what the hell is going on! WE the community should want to know. This festival serves many purposes and at the moment seems to be making OUR community look bad on a number of levels! YES, XTRA! DIG DEEPER!
I want to know more, Church & Wellesley Ontario
02/06/09 10:07 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Engage, contribute, improve!
I have watched Xtra and its readers lambast Pride Toronto and the annual Pride festival for more than a decade. Every year there's a slew of manufactured scandal, dozens if not hundreds of malcontented commenters, and, relatively recently, a series of articles on 'what Pride should do to make the festival better'. And yet the same people who write these scathing polemics never appear to come to the monthly general meetings, never seek or seize the opportunities to engage and get involved, never take the time to understand, to communicate, or work to improve the festival and the organisation that creates the festival we all enjoy. The simple fact is that a relatively small number of people put on the single largest annual festival in Canada. A relatively small number of people spend a year planning a three day festival down to 15-minute increments to make sure that everything runs as smoothly, safely, and enjoyably as possible, at no cost to the public. During the festival, volunteers (appallingly few in the community contribute a small amount of time during the weekend) are berated, assaulted, spat at, and in many other ways treated like trash. By patrons. By the people they are working to entertain. It's high time Xtra stopped its Pride-baiting. It's time this community got serious about working together to improve its celebration. Communicate. Engage. Contribute. Improve.
Anonymous, yet interested, Toronto ON
02/06/09 11:38 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
To Anonymous, yet interested
Take you're head out of the sand and wake up! If all that was needed to improve Pride was the community to get serious and for Xtra to stop baiting...Pride would be amazing by now! I have watched Pride for nearly a decade as well and by all appearances paid persons are now running the show and slowly taking control away from its volunteer coordinators. The Pride board is so far removed now (half never worked the festival in their life)that they have no clue just how much hard work and time their coordinators contribute. Pride does little to look after its coordinators while staff and board take majority of the credit. Don't you dare sit back and claim that the problem is Xtra baiting and the the patrons berate, assault, spit and treat volunteers like trash. The problems and treatment starts in house! The truth of the matter is that the organization does a pretty good job at treating their coordinators like garbage! The staff does not have their hearts in the festival! Its merely a JOB for them that pays their bills. The coordinators are the ones who put all their heart and soul into into this festival! Blaming Xtra and festival patrons for why Pride lacks community involvement is trash. It lacks because of the direction Pride is headed (corporate and paid staff in control) and how poorly it looks after its own PERIOD, enough said!
Anonymous, Toronto ON
02/07/09 9:56 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Keeping volunteers engaged
From my experience organizing events, it seems to me that running an event the size of Pride without any paid staff would be extremely difficult. However, I have observed that the ownership and engagement of volunteers is much more challenging once you have staff. So PRIDE would be a great place to be learning how to have amazing community involvement while having some critical tasks (fundraising, for example) led by staff. Can we do it? Can't stop, won't stop!
Shannon, Toronto ON
02/12/09 8:56 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Are we proud of Pride?
Isn't anyone interested in why Lisa Duke, who led Pride Toronto with passion and precision is suddenly resigning from a position she loved and took seriously for two years in a row? Isn't anyone interested in why there is such a high turnover at Pride and why is it that the volunteers and coordinators don't feel appreciated or in charge of how the Festival is presented? Isn't anyone interested in why the E.D. job was given to someone who didn't even live in the country let alone the neighbourhood/community? Isn't anyone interested in the fact that this year's Pride will be affected by these significant and sudden changes? Why is the Board so removed or seem so? Who really calls the shots at Pride? What is going on behind the closed doors of Pride? Should they not have to be transparent in the workings of our community Festival or does anyone even care? Its all just one big party to those who sit back and judge. It is hard work for many others involved. Are we proud of Pride? Do we even know who Pride Toronto is? Who does Pride represent? I believe that sadly, the real purpose of Pride has been lost to personal agendas and petty, competitive personalities. What have we, as a community let happen at Pride? What are we, as a community letting happen at Pride?
Anonymous, Toronto ON
03/08/09 1:01 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.