Police say Oshawa assault doesn't qualify as hate crime
LOCAL NEWS / Activists say decision sends negative message
Krishna Rau / Toronto / Tuesday, December 09, 2008
Share |

COMMUNITY SUPPORT. Anji Dimitriou and Jane Currie at an Oshawa rally in their support on Nov 14.
(Andrew Innis)
Durham Regional Police say the assault of two lesbians in front of their children last month in Oshawa isn't a hate crime under the Criminal Code.

Activists in the region say the announcement sends a message that assaults on queer people won't be treated seriously.

In a statement issued Dec 9 police say the assault on Anji Dimitriou and Jane Currie does not meet the legal standard of a hate crime, even though the assailant allegedly repeatedly referred to the women as "fucking dykes."

"On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 two females were physically assaulted and verbally abused by a male in front of Gordon B Attersley Public School on Attersley Dr in Oshawa," reads the statement. "Several children and adult witnesses reported a male physically assaulting and verbally abusing two female victims. A male arrested at the scene was charged with [two counts of] assault causing bodily harm, a serious criminal charge that carries with it a maximum penalty of 10 years.

"A number of community agencies and citizens have since contacted the Durham Regional Police, demanding additional charges be laid under the hate crime provisions of the Criminal Code. The case was looked at very carefully, witnesses were interviewed and investigators consulted with the Crown Attorney's office and the office of the Attorney General.

"Although these acts of violence were very disturbing and offensive, they do not meet the narrow definitions of hate crime under Sections 318 or 319 under the Criminal Code. Specifically under 318, they did not advocate genocide and under 319, there was no clear evidence the accused incited others to join him in the attack."

In the statement Durham police chief Mike Ewles said the force is taking the assault seriously.

"Any act of violence should not be tolerated by our society — especially violence in plain view of children," said Ewles. "In instances of this nature we are obligated to consult with the Crown Attorney and we will not lay a charge unless the evidence supports a charge. Our primary objective, in every investigation, is to contribute to a successful prosecution by way of a thorough investigation."

If the accused is found guilty the Crown may call for a stiffer sentence under subsection 718.2 of the Criminal Code which states that a court may take into account "evidence that the offence was motivated by bias, prejudice or hate based on... sexual orientation."

But those sentencing provisions are rarely used, say many of those in the justice system.

Tom Decker, the Toronto police LGBT liaison officer, says the crown attorney's willingness to approach an assault as a hate crime often changes by the time a case reaches court, meaning no additional time is added to a sentence.

"Often the hate crimes are the first things to get dropped," he told Xtra in an interview in October. "That's just the way the legal system operates. That whole bargaining, it's a give and take. As the crown attorney you want to get a conviction. You don't want to drop the assault but you might be willing to drop the aggravating circumstances."

Udana Muldoon, the chair of Durham Queer Parenting, says the move could lead to further assaults.

"I just don't want this decision to empower other people to do this and think it's not a hate crime," she says. "I don't want this to be a gateway to commit these crimes. In Oshawa this could very well lead to that. It's just given a bigger voice to haters.

"It would be nice if queer people could say, 'I can trust my judicial system.'"

Mark Jacula, the lawyer for accused Mark Scott, says the police decision is good news for his client.

"I never thought there would be hate charges laid based on what I've been told," he says. "I've talked to Mark and to some eyewitnesses and I don't think the evidence exists to lay those charges. I think the police and the crown have reviewed the case pretty thoroughly and it's good to see some of the truth here starting to come to light."

Scott, 44, of Oshawa has been charged with two counts of assault causing bodily harm. He is scheduled to appear in court on Thu, Jan 8.
 



Share |


Reader Comments


 
there is a difference...
there is a difference between a "hate crime" and a crime that was motivated by hate. but the two are often confused. all that's happened here is what should have been obvious to anyone who has read the hate crime provision of the criminal code. it was not a hate crime under that provision, so they are not laying a charge under that provision, which covers a narrow range of matters. the real issue here will be the sentencing provision and how it is applied. that is where the apparently homophobic/lesbophobic motivation can result in a heavier sentence, as it damned well should. the law is working exactly as it's supposed to here. no homophobe is being given an easy ride. at least not yet...we have to wait for sentencing to play out before anyone gets up in arms. the judge might throw the maximum *extra* time at the guy because of his homophobic motivation for the assault (if he's found guilty, doesn't plead out to a lower charge, etc. etc.)
Shannon B., Ottawa Ontario
12/09/08 7:43 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Hate IS hate...
I understand the position in stating the difference between a 'hate crime' vs a 'crime due to hate'. However, the end result is the same; two women were beaten, via physical and psychological means, by a man who obviously HATES same-sex people. In the media, this man is being shown as one who is nervous re: due process leading to court dates, et al. He needs to understand what impact he has affected on the witnesses (mostly children -- and their OWN children). Furthermore, being a man of colour, it is assumed that ignorance and bigotry would be life lessons that has been instilled into his nurture. This man/animal needs to serve (and be made an example of) what the law can do to those who decide to act so dispicably toward same-sex people! The Crimimal Code re: Hate Crimes needs to be revamped toward one that is not so narrow that such nasty (hatred-filled) people do not see this loop-hole as a way to promote hatred and violence (especially when involving children --- remember, bigotry is a learned behaviour). HATE IS HATE NO MATTER HOW YOU SLICE IT!
Phil B., Brampton Ontario
12/09/08 11:51 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
'hate crime' or 'due to hate'?
Phil B. wrote: ** "In the media, this man is being shown as one who is nervous re: due process leading to court dates, et al. He needs to understand what impact he has affected on the witnesses (mostly children -- and their OWN children)." ** You forgot to mention the terrorizing effect it has on others within the queer community. Crimes like this are aimed not ONLY at an individual, but against an entire group of people; its intention is to intimidate ALL queers, and all to often that works. Somehow, sentencing should reflect this reality. Phil also said: "** I understand the position in stating the difference between a 'hate crime' vs a 'crime due to hate'.** So do I, and I think it's an important distinction. I agree with Shannon -- let's see what the sentencing is, before we get TOO stoked up.
Nathanial, Slocan Valley BC
12/11/08 10:10 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Forced rights for Gay groups
Why do normal people dislike the gay community? They want to paint a picture to the world that they are normal acting and enforce normal people with laws to 'tolerate, like, love and financially support them. That does not work. My daugther outed herself in a extrem rude, dishonest and abusive way. Now she is the little bitch of another older lesbian women. All her normal thought processess are gone. The day the lesbian and gay community does create and pay without any supplementation from normal people or taxpayers their own health care system with intent to deal with their own diseases like HIV and what not, the day they do not force normal people and shuffle their disgusting live style down our throat, the day mankind can really say what normal is and means, they day those activist take real responsiblility not to bother the rest of the world, that day will be when I and millions of others may open up. But that will be a dream. Has any one checked what Christoper Street days really are as an exsample? Partying for days, citizens are unable to sleep and get rest, Sex-orgies from the Gay and Lesbian community with lots of alcohol and drugs, hundreds of thousands of dollars of gargabe, drugs, vomit, condoms left behind for the taxpayer to clean up. Bars where cougars are just waiting to take someone like my naive and dumm daugther in, promising her the world and stepping in the role of the nurturing mother. Now I hear you guys want all the rights like real married people too? Adoption, going to schools and discuss to our children how normal you are? That is just dead wrong and I can understand that someone just says no more to such a dishonorable and forced and ignorant behavior. Exactly for reasons like this, the world hates you guys. There is no honor in it, just give me and its my right. What about the rights of others? Have you ever thougth about it that in all moslem countries they would harm or even kill someone like my daughter and then you promote such a liv
Andy, Crofton BC
01/05/09 4:47 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.