Leveraging public outrage
SOD'S OPERA / Marcus McCann
Marcus McCann / Toronto / Thursday, February 24, 2011
Share |

It was one of those knock-down-dragout fights where gay activists call each other names. And it’s no surprise that it was over Catholic schools.

By and large, we agreed: Ontario Catholic schools, under the direction of the province’s bishops, are pumping awful, homophobic bullshit into a publicly funded system. Their guidebook for teachers and parents suggests that gays should not be encouraged to identify as gay. They may experience same-sex attraction, but those students are to be steered toward lifelong celibacy.

It’s damaging stuff, especially for teens. It’s also damaging for parents and teachers, school administrators and anyone else who comes in contact with the Catholic schools. Pretty much everyone who weighed in on the discussion — over email, Facebook and the comments section of xtra.ca — agreed on that.

Yet things got ugly, mostly over gay-straight alliances (GSAs), which the bishops forbid.

One school of thought says generic diversity clubs — where positive messages about gays can be quietly slipped in — is all we can hope for. Not that it’s the ideal solution, but it’s as far as the Catholics will go, practically speaking. The folks pushing this strategy are often activists working to change the system from within. They would characterize themselves as “incrementalists.”

Or, if you agree with my hotheaded comments from the discussions, you could call them “defeatists” and “apologists.”

Prodding the incrementalists are a group of idealists, who say that the Catholic schools had better smarten up, drop the bishops’ bigoted “pastoral guidelines” and let gay kids who want to start GSAs start them. (That’s not to say, for the record, that all teens want a GSA rather than a diversity club. The point is that youth who want a GSA shouldn’t be forbidden from starting one.)

This group — and I’m in this camp — argues that creating a climate where there’s a political cost for not acting will help MPPs find the backbone to act on this file. In the meantime, we could support protests, letter-writing campaigns and even a court challenge.

And if we can’t fix it, we should yank public funding from the Catholic school system.

Are the incrementalists and the idealists doomed to fight against each other forever? I don’t think so. In fact, these two groups can and should work together.

How? Well, feminists, evangelicals, unions, free-marketers, lefties and rightwingers — they all use the same formula. Here’s what it looks like:

Idealists scream and shout on the street, write to their MPPs, publish newspaper editorials. They denounce, deplore and satirize the status quo. The louder they shout, the more leverage the incrementalists have. The powers that be — usually risk-averse when it comes to negative publicity — make some concessions. Incrementalists take credit. Idealists cry, “Not good enough.”

Lather, rinse, repeat. Eventually, the institution is transformed. At least, that’s the idea. It’s symbiotic, and, as much as both groups are reluctant to admit it, they need each other.

But it only works when both sides are aware of what’s going on.

For us idealists, it involves recognizing that many of these power brokers aren’t prepared to talk to the rabble. They want to negotiate with someone in a button-down shirt; the incrementalists, in this regard, are useful. And it also involves recognizing the advances that have been made as, at least, good first steps.

For insiders, it means acknowledging that public outrage ultimately buoys their position. They can and should take our anger to school boards, politicians and principals and say, “I can help you get out of this mess.”

On the Catholic schools story, however, these groups aren’t doing that dance. Instead, Egale (an incrementalist lobby group that is palatable to politicians and bureaucrats) and its allies have actively tried to dissuade us from getting angry over the bishops’ anti-gay policies.

Says one Egale defender:

“No one is working on a court challenge or lobbying to withdraw the funding, so queer youth in the board will have to deal with the present legal right the Catholic board has right now for the foreseeable future.”

Says another activist, in reply:

“Wouldn’t that be what we would expect Egale to do, or am I wrong on its function?”

To the Egale types, this is exactly the challenge. There’s an angry mob assembling on the Catholic schools question. For insiders it’s scary, and the temptation will be to denounce the rabble to preserve the advances they’ve made so far.

Instead, it is my sincere hope that they’ll find the courage to leverage our community’s anger into winning more changes.

We’re not going away, and our anger is real. They might as well use it.

Read more:

Politicians stay silent on Catholic school funding

Halton Catholic schools continue to ban gay student groups

Catholic bishops prohibit gay-straight alliances in Ontario schools

Xtra's Halton Catholic School Board story: history and documents




Share |


Reader Comments


 
Bang on, thanks
Although the scary part for me is thinking that *I've* been the incrementalist all this time -- knowing full well that change happens slowly, two steps forwards, one step back. But the Catholics are not only harming gay people on this, they're harming *themselves* and their unbelievable blindness on this and so many even more urgent matters leads me to shriek at them. So yes, EGALE, protect them from me, will ya? ;)
Scott Dagostino, Toronto Ontario
02/24/11 5:11 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Constitutional Reform Required
Interesting column, Marcus, and your observations about the symbiotic relationship between incrementalists and idealists is well borne out in a host of social movements. However, having followed this particular issue for a while, I'm wondering if there actually is room for incremental compromise on this issue. The Catholic school boards of Ontario are protected by the Constitution Act of 1867, and as such have the right to promote Church teachings within their schools. Unfortunately, I don't think their position on GSAs is all that different from, for instance, their anti-abortion stance. You don't see pro-choice student groups in Catholic high schools either. Both positions are consistent with current Catholic church teachings - as repellent as you and I might find them. Given this fact, I think there's a stronger argument to be made to push for a constitutional amendment to eliminate the special status for Catholic schools in the province - as was done in both Newfoundland and Quebec. I don't think our current premier is likely to contemplate this, but I think that this route is really the only one that would be satisfactory. Either Catholic schools are allowed to teach their religious values (including their anti-gay teachings) with the benefit of public backing and funding, or this status should be revoked. A half-measure of allowing Catholic school boards to exist in name, but not being permitted to follow Church teachings seems like an unworkable, and possibly unconstitutional, solution.
Matthew Hayday, Guelph Ontario
02/24/11 5:13 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Name Two
@Marcus. Name two members of that angry mob who don't work for Xtra and who would lift a finger to launch a million dollar court challenge sans court challenges program or lobby to defund the Catholic Board. I'll be right on it.
challenging the church, Toronto ON
02/24/11 5:37 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
What she said!
Right on!
Jane W., Toronto Ontario
02/24/11 6:56 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
"Million dollar" court challenge?
Both Quebec and NFLD moved to one publicly funded school system (free of religious discrimination) about 12 years ago. They did it without a "million dollar court challenge". All it takes is political will. At the moment, not one single Ontario politician will even discuss the matter publicly. In fact, Andrea Horwath threatens and reprimands any ONDP member who dares to speak out on this issue. That confused me, but then I learned that Horwath's biggest campaign contributor was the Ontario Catholic teachers union. Ironically, that payola came out of the public purse. So much for democracy.
Rick, Ottawa ON
02/25/11 7:16 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Political Will
I agree with you, Rick, that a constitutional amendment would mostly take political will, but I don't think the circumstances that made it possible to do this in Quebec and Newfoundland aren't here yet. Quebec has become a far more secular society than Ontario is, and Ontario isn't facing the crippling financial costs that were associated with Newfoundland's six school systems (which was also before the oil money really started flowing there). I'm all in favour of pushing for a constitutional change, but this will take a major attitudinal shift among Ontarians. Remember that the NDP doesn't only get funding from teacher's unions - many of its voters, especially Franco-Ontarians in Northern Ontario, are Catholics. It's perhaps a good sign though that the Greens, fringe party though they may be, endorsed this constitutional change in the last provincial election. The challenge is to get the other major parties onside as well.
Matthew Hayday, Guelph Ontario
02/25/11 7:50 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
It's almost prom season. (Hint, hint)
Matthew, I agree that getting the public on-board is important. [Actually, I believe that the public already is on-board, which is amazing considering the pervasiveness of the myth that "only Catholics pay for Catholic schools". Ontario's misleading property tax forms are to blame for that one.] Anyway, getting this issue as much exposure as possible this summer is very important because this October will see an election. I can't think of a more elegant way of doing this than having 100 courageous, gay Catholic high school students across the province bring their dates to the Prom this June. Of course their school principals and Board officials will try to stop them. But that's when the real fun begins. That's when the world gets to find out that Canada isn't the human rights beacon it pretends to be, that one-third of our publicly funded schools are permitted to be as discriminatory as 1951 Alabama. Our dirty little secret will be exposed.
Rick, Ottawa ON
02/26/11 8:10 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Been There Done That
@Rick many Catholic Schools allow gay students to take same sex partners to proms since the 2002 injunction for Mark Hall. But from your extensive work in this area you'd know that already. A prom challenge is really not a strong court challenge but you'd know that too. What no insulting name calling for Matthew? From my read this article is essentially telling people working in this area that we are too stupid we need your Brilliant idealist ideas. Yea that helps People who are actually doing work on anything for he queer community are at risk of your bitter insulting mocking, oh right, you'll set up a Facebook page.
Challenging the Church, Toronto ON
02/26/11 9:00 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Why the personal attacks?
Dear *Been There Done That*: As a matter of fact, I *am* familiar with the Marc Hall case. In fact, I can even spell his name. And it's precisely his experience that convinces me that we need more like him. I don't know who you are, but you act like you're an Egale insider who knows everything to know about this issue. Here's what I know: You are lying or you are ignorant of the facts. You actively poison discussion. You've been insisting (virulently and condescendingly) that *many* Catholic schools have GSAs and that *many* Catholic schools allow same-sex dates to proms. When asked to prove it by naming just one, you lash out and insist that these things must be kept secret, for the good of the gay students(!). How utterly Orwellian! If you think that keeping gays quiet and firmly closeted is the best we can do for them in a publicly funded institution in 2011 Ontario, then you don't fully comprehend the issue. Or maybe you think you can change the Church's policy on gays and we all just need to sit tight and wait? What part of *immutable* confuses you? Or maybe *objectively disordered* is just an infallible typo? Please feel free to dismiss my genuine concerns with an insult and a sweep of the hand.
Rick, Ottawa ON
02/26/11 11:13 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
challenging the church
@Rick genuine concern. Get off your ass and organize a lobby to take funding from Catholic School. I encourage you. Look for another Marc Hall for all the good that will do but worth a try- go for it! Make this an election issue excellent timing. I'm all ears to hear of the work you are doing and the groundswell of support.
Knock Yourself Out, Toronto ON
02/26/11 11:41 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Let Ellen speak on this
Is anyone contacting Ellen about this issue? I know she played a large role in supporting a teenager who couldn't take her girlfriend to the prom. I'm sure a few comments from her on American tv would help stir the pot in Ontari-ari-ari-o.
Rae, Kitchener Ontario
02/27/11 3:16 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
What the hell is going on behind the scenes?
When not one person with any power is willing to discuss the problem, we have to wonder what is going on. Even Helen Kennedy is complicit in the conspiracy of silence, and the smoke and mirrors. She gets visibly irritated when the topic comes up. Helen, since when have you ever believed that "don't ask don't tell" is the right way to go? Why start now? Even Glen Murray mysteriously lost interest after promising to take up the matter with Leona Dombrowsky. I guess when the Bishops receive a $1 billion shot in the arm every year (courtesy of the Ontario tax payer), there's a lot left over for "political contributions". Case in point. Andrea Horwath. But I suspect it's across the board: NDP, Libs, PCs. Soon the Greens will also cave in (after a Bishop visits Mike Schreiner), I predict. I have zero faith in politicians to know right from wrong. If you're an MPP and you care, now would be a good time to speak up. Or has your leader assured you that the gay vote doesn't count for much? I've got news for you: plenty of non-gays (and plenty of Catholics!) see your cowardice and will vote accordingly. If Ontario needs to be embarrassed on the global stage before our politicians start to (pretend to) care, then so be it.
Channeling the Church (LOL), Toronto ON
02/28/11 10:51 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Catholics will provide for their students in their
The debate surrounding Homosexual/Straight Alliances (GSAs) in Catholic high schools is being complicated by the fact that people are not distinguishing between an objective and a strategy. GSAs are a strategy that some people propose to achieve an objective with which the Bishops of Ontario are in agreement: that all students in schools feel safe and respected. The Catholic objective is that each student be treated with dignity, for each is a child of God. It is not right or fair to suggest that one particular strategy is the only way to achieve a given goal. Catholics seek to achieve the goal of a safe and loving environment for all students in a way that is in harmony with their Christian faith.
Vox Populi Z, Sydney Nova Scotia
03/10/11 1:57 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.