Gays vs the Toronto Sun
ANALYSIS / A look at the record shows a decades-long history of opposition to gay issues
Andrew Brett / Toronto / Thursday, November 18, 2010
Share |

“Mr Leatherhead,” was the screaming headline on the Nov 4 cover of the Toronto Sun, accompanied by a doctored photo of Kyle Rae decked out in leather gear. Ostensibly an exposé of the so-called gravy train at city hall, the Sun highlighted the outgoing gay councillor’s $421 expense claim to cover a park permit for a leather charity fundraiser — which went right back into city coffers.

Was the Sun’s coverage really about wasteful spending?

“No, it’s about whipping up hate against the queer community, pure and simple,” according to Sky Gilbert, co-founder of Buddies in Bad Times Theatre, which had its own city funding attacked by the Toronto Sun in the 1990s. “It is one agenda, the same agenda: homophobia and bigotry directed towards gays and lesbians and their sexual orientation.”

“The Sun has always been as much an advocate and agitator as a newspaper,” says Tom Warner, who cofounded many of the city’s first gay activist groups. “It has been particularly notorious for unapologetically providing a forum for and attempting to confer credibility on the most extreme and scare-mongering expressions of homophobia.”

The Toronto Sun has always had a turbulent relationship with Toronto’s gay and trans communities. Going back to its beginnings in the 1970s, the paper has been at the forefront of most attacks on the city’s gay and trans organizations, politicians and community activities.

Xtra’s calls to Sun editor James Wallace were not returned by press time.

Here are some highlights from the historical record:

1977
In an article headlined “The Limp Wrist Lobby,” Sun columnist Claire Hoy accuses the Coalition for Gay Rights in Ontario (CGRO) of tiptoeing into Queen’s Park to “spread its particular brand of poison” by lobbying the Liberal caucus to support an amendment to the Ontario Human Rights Code that would include sexual orientation. “Hoy and the Sun — through its editorials and other columnists — waged a nasty and unrelenting campaign,” Warner explains. “There were many other equally vile pieces published in the paper that disparaged gays and lesbians and seemed intended to stir up homophobia and bigotry.”

Warner was one of the activists who co-founded CGRO in 1975, with the initial objective of extending human rights legislation to include gays and lesbians.

1978
Toronto police raid the offices of Pink Triangle Press (PTP).  Obscenity charges are laid against the organization’s directors for publishing an article in The Body Politic by Gerald Hannon. While civil libertarians send messages of support, the Sun runs an editorial describing The Body Politic as “a crummy, dirty publication without a redeeming feature.”

PTP would ultimately prevail, going on to publish Xtra. Ken Popert, who is executive director of PTP today, was among those arrested.

“It was Claire Hoy who led the charge,” he recalls. “He prepared the groundwork, because it was him who first raised the alarm about Gerald’s article. The Sun was politically creative. It was not an unconscious thing at all; I think they knew exactly what they were doing.”

1979
A Metro Toronto police sergeant equates homosexuality with murder and rape in an article published in the police association’s magazine. The Sun leaps to the officer’s defence; Hoy writes that he is “generally perceptive in his conclusions.”

1980
In Toronto’s municipal election, one of the most controversial issues is Mayor John Sewell’s support for the gay community. The day before the election, the Sun publishes a two-page ad attacking the gay community and Sewell’s support for gay rights.

1981
Following massive police raids on Toronto bathhouses, the Sun publishes the names and addresses of some of the men charged. Sun editor Peter Worthington tells the CBC, “I think a person’s sexual orientation or preferences should remain in the closet.” Except for some — he pledges to publish the identities of any men found in future bathhouse raids.

The transcript from a CBC Radio broadcast on February 15, 1981 illustrates the mood of the gay community at a public meeting held in response to the bath raids: “Here at the homosexual mass meeting, a motion has just come from the floor to eject any correspondent of the Toronto Sun who may be present. The reaction is overwhelming. The members of the gay community are united in their hatred and fear of the Toronto Sun.”

1991
Relying on police information that even its own news reports acknowledge could be spurious, the Sun runs a series of sensational articles suggesting that Laura Rowe, a lesbian appointed to the police commission by the Ontario NDP government, is linked to prostitution and an incident of alleged child abuse. An OPP investigation will later find that Rowe was not involved, but not before she is subjected to a lengthy smear campaign.

“This was obviously an irresistible story for the rabidly pro-police and anti-gay Sun,” says Warner, who was himself the first openly gay appointee to the Ontario Human Rights Commission. “It could use the police allegations against Rowe, even if they might be highly suspect, to bash the hated NDP and to link an out-of-the closet lesbian they had appointed with criminality.”

1993
Sun columnist Christina Blizzard launches a campaign against City of Toronto funding for Inside Out and Buddies in Bad Times Theatre, two of the 230 cultural groups funded by the city. In response, city council cuts funding for both, with funding for Buddies later restored thanks to a campaign led by the city’s artists.

Sky Gilbert, cofounder of Buddies, is on the receiving end of the campaign. “Christina Blizzard led a campaign through countless articles — it must have been at least five or six, but it just seemed to go on forever. In article after article, Blizzard spread rumours that our primary focus was running orgies and operating a sex club.”
A Nov 4 Sun cover shows retiring Councillor Kyle Rae in a doctored photo.

1994
The Ontario Legislature debates Bill 167, which would extend equal spousal protections to same-sex couples. Worthington writes an opinion piece called “The Squalor of Gay Life.”

Former attorney general Marion Boyd, who initiated the bill, believes the Sun had a role to play in the bill’s failure. “If you look at the ‘dirty dozen,’ the NDP members whose votes scuttled Bill 167, they were certainly affected by constituents who only read tabloids, like the Sun, and made the decision that ‘If the Sun says so, that must be the way my constituents feel.'”

2000
After the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council rules that American talk radio host Laura Schlessinger violated the standards of the industry regulator, Worthington defends her in an article that argues homosexuality is “abnormal.” He compares her to another “voice of morality”: 1970s anti-gay crusader Anita Bryant.

2005
In arguing against same-sex marriage rights, Worthington writes that “a homosexual… has no role in perpetuating the species.”

2010
The cover of the Toronto Sun during the municipal election campaign asks if mayoral candidate George Smitherman is “Too Gay?”




Share |


Reader Comments


 
Xtra! is really losing it
I'm sure something anti-gay was printed in the Star in the 1960's as well. Where's your outrage on that? The Sun is not the gay hating rag it used to be. Xtra! needs to lighten up.
Ford won Get over it, here there
11/18/10 1:03 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
XTRA = theSUN _bitchy twin sister publications
Is XTRA's style and quality of writing any better than the Sun's? Does XTRA take things out of context, twist, misrepresent and smear people less than the Sun? NO! Both are complainers and whiners. XTRA and the Sun are bitchy twin sister publications with equally bad opposing points of view. Like sibling rivalry... It must be a slow news week, or XTRA writers are having writer's block. How is this news?
XTRA = theSUN, Toronto Ont
11/18/10 2:56 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Who really cares?
What is Xtra's point? ?I believe every media outlet in Canada has at least publish at least one Anti-Gay Article in it history I would suggest anyone go and look at any well established media outlet in Canada and they have aired or published Anti-Gay material and either Liberal, far left, Separatist or Conservative media in Canada we are usually hated by all at one point. Also do not tell me that Xtra does not have bias of it's own and they do have this towards a certain ethic groups for political reasons
James, Toronto ON
11/18/10 4:15 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Sun apologists commenting on Xtra?
It is amusing that people who care to read or support the Sun and its endearingly troglodyte perspective on the world would even bother to come to Xtra and painstakingly type out (or, more likely, have their mothers type for them) their halfhearted defenses of The Little Rag That Could. 'I'm sure something anti-gay was printed in every media outlet...' Seriously, is that the best that the Sun apologists can do? This is not an opinion, it's a fact: the Sun conducted a very visible high-profile and intensely nasty campaign against gays for decades, and vestiges of that still remain no matter what its historically impaired supporters might like us to believe. Blatchford may have changed her tune (though really it took her leaving that paper--around the time she started voicing support for gay families--for that to manifest itself), but Blizzard was, is and likely will always be one of the great outspoken homophobes in the Canadian media. I can agree with the commenters on one thing: the Sun's ongoing right-wing maliciousness against gays, lesbians, trans people and other queers is certainly not news. But that doesn't mean it's not worthy of attention and consideration.
David D., Toronto Ontario
11/18/10 8:19 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Peter Worthington 007
Well, Peter Worthington has assured us for many years that he is,in fact,a Spy for Canada. I just don't know who pays his salary or which,if any,department he works for. The Sun was a huge success 30 years ago and has fallen in readership as it attacked many minorities around the city. The Italians hate this paper as much as we do. It appealed to Torontonians who were working class and uneducated. There were many many low-paying factory jobs back then. Today it is just a police blotter in a paperbox with 3 or 4 copies inside or a freebie "Metro" as no one will pay for it.
Bryan, Charlebois Ontario
11/18/10 11:51 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Nice rundown, Andrew!
And a big thumbs-down on you lot apologizing for the Sun with the lame "everyone's homophobic" defense. Yes, I'm sure Andrew could've written a similar piece on the Star but it would've taken nine times as long to dig for examples ;) As I explained to a work colleague, they could have equally run with a photo of Adam Giambrone in a French beret to illustrate their point but they didn't, did they?
Scott D, Toronto Ontario
11/18/10 12:42 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
whoa whoa whoa
I'm pretty shocked there is anyone on here defending the Toronto Sun. I don't think it has anything to do with their support of Rob Ford or Ford's historically homophobic comments that Xtra would write this. Instead its about focusing on that the fact that homophobia exists and is very real in contemporary Toronto and what better way to illustrate that then focusing on one of the city's primary media outlets and it's history of hatred. To say "who cares? All media is biased!" is a pretty short sighted and flawed view. One can be right-wing and still support queer rights. There have been historically close connections between libertarian activists and the queer community. The Sun though has a specifically homophobic (and often racist and sexist) editorial bent. That's not a political ideology, that's hatred. I'm going to go out on a limb and gage that actually a lot of this knee jerk Xtra bashing in comments sections are coming from more conservative and right leaning members of the queer community and their straight allies over this paper's criticism of Pride Toronto and their mishandling of the censorship battle. Their comments on this are pretty much the ultimate example in grasping at straws.
Dave S., Toronto ON
11/18/10 1:10 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
The SUN and XTRA are equally BAD
No one is defending the SUN. It is a horrible vicious little rag which is biased, poorly written, takes things out of context and smears people of differing opinions. The SUN writes biasedly about everything, not just Gays. We already knew that. XTRA is just like the SUN in quality and bias and smearing people and in vindictiveness. The only difference is that XTRA writes biasedly about Queer issues which favour radicalism. Neither is an objectively written paper.
Is this News?, Toronto Ont
11/18/10 3:12 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
smearing people
Ok Xtra haters: here's the challenge. Actually CITE instances where the paper has engaged in smear campaigns. Or has clearly taken "things out of context, twist, misrepresent and smear people." Actual examples. Dates. Evidence. All I've seen the haters do here (as in many other forums) are make declarative statements about how bad Xtra is.. but they never actually cite an example. So seriously, put up or shut up.
Put up or shut up., Toronto ON
11/18/10 4:04 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Negative toned smear campaign example:
Negative toned smear campaign example: Meet Ward 27 candidate Ken Chan ELECTION / Policing experience and political connections earn host of endorsements Marcus McCann / Toronto / Wednesday, October 20, 2010. http://www.xtra.ca/public/Toronto/Meet_Ward_27_candidate_Ken_Chan-9312.aspx Compare this to the glowing report on Krystin Wong Tam. There are other vindictive smears over the years.
Smear, Toronto Ont
11/18/10 5:22 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
re: Negative toned smear campaign example
I checked out the link you provided and its hardly a smear campaign, yes its not overly flattering to Ken Chan but it doesn't tell lies about or accuse him of anything nefarious, every newspaper has written similar sorts of articles about political candidates their editorial board isn't supporting. A smear campaign is not just a lack of positive things to say about some one or some group, its actively spreading lies and misinformation to try and convince others that they should be hated. If the Sun had written similar stories to the link you provide about gays and lesbians in Toronto nobody would have cared in the least. If you want smear campaigns its hard to beat the Sun but Gladstone's anti-QuAIA video managed to meet or even top them in outright lies and nasty accusations based on zero evidence. Try to find another example from Xtra that comes at least a little closer to real smear campaigns, something with lies and unfounded accusations is what you're looking for.
Rich, Toronto Ontario
11/18/10 7:27 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
RE: Biased Writing
Thankyou for the clarification Rich. Point taken. You do write well and objectively. I appreciate your lack of belligerence in your response. My preference is for more subtly biased writing than I have often read in the Sun and in XTRA. My favourite style of biased writing uses irony to expose faults and weaknesses, at the same time entertaining the reader, and freely implying that the writer is biased. Then it is above board. But in a news report I prefer objectivity. And in an interview, negative side comments are just irritating. A good interviewer can trap a interviewee to hang himself/herself with their own words and deeds, if they are truly shady and need to be exposed. But for example Ken Chan was not corrupt and hadn't done anything underhanded yet. Ken didn't deserve the overly negative slant. I voted for Krytin, but the obvious bias in Ken's writeup irritated me from the point of view of responsible reporting. There have been similar writings over the years...Yet, I have to admit, I do check XTRA every week for stories about Gay issues. I suppose there is a compliment there somewhere. :-)
Point taken, Toronto Ont
11/18/10 8:38 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Sun brings some sunshine
Me and my chosen family (my wife decided to have a cesazian two times) love the Sun. I found my minivan there and when she's up to it she whips up scrumtus meals from the recipeas. She's super busy tho coz two kids take up a lot of her time. Sometimes we wish we wearn't a chozen family! We'd choze to not have them! haha. Anyway, the Sun is a good magazine. We read it cover to cover and find some really good deals. I don't remember any anti-gay stuff that wasn't just reporting the facts. We even had a sunshine boy up at the office for the ladies in the 80s and even after we found out the dude was a fudgepacker. Seems like the Sun has always been pro-facts and if it made a few radical fairies upset, it never really changed the fact that we got a super deal on the van and my wife's chicken catcatory rocks!
boozy, toronto ON
11/19/10 12:46 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Radical left handwringers
X-tra has proven yet again that it does not represent the gay community as a whole -- but merely a radical left fringe element. You are shills for QuAIA and shills for the newly elected councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam. I noticed Mr. Brett did not include the fact that I came out on the front page of the Sun in 2007 and have written many subsequent columns about being openly gay and married. Heaven forbid, an openly gay Sun columnist! And Chris Blizzard was at my wedding, along with several other Toronto Sun "dinosaurs" as you call them. Mr. Brett, never let the facts get in the way of your own agenda.
Sue-Ann Levy, Toronto Ontario
11/19/10 9:50 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
shills and rags
I complain alot about Xtra's editorial content, but this article is in my mind historically accurate and fair. Another example of the Sun stirring up homophobia in Ontario is its laughable Pride coverage each year, complete with Peter Worthington blathering on about those ridiculous homosexual socialists in the streets. The simple fact is the Sun is a decidedly right-wing paper and the right-wing has taken decidedly anti-gay positions over the years. This may be changing but elements of it still exist (just read any right-wing online forum like the Sun's, they get even crazier than this one.) The Sun cannot utter a single good word about anything or anyone associated with the left - and all too often they conflate the left with the gay community in particular and in general. With all due respect to Sue-Ann Levy, when voices in the media convey a fiercely partisan tone or agenda, they can’t really accuse others of being on the “fringe”. Xtra may appeal to certain fringe elements in a similar way that the Sun does, but that doesn’t make those types of radical, one-sided, sometimes hateful messages any more tasteful. To be fair though, I've never seen Xtra use its cover and main story to publicly shame and defile somebody the way the Sun does 3 days a week.
Ryan, Toronto ON
11/20/10 12:32 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Sue Anne - talk about projection
"Mr. Brett, never let the facts get in the way of your own agenda." It's certainly never stopped Sue-Anne witness her claim a few months ago that an anti-nazi symbol worn by someone in the QuAIA contingent was actually a nazi symbol and other misstatements of fact Sue-Anne got from Martin Gladstone and reported as fact. Xtra and Kristin Wong Tam may not represent the entire LGBT community but they certainly represent much more of it than Sue Anne and Martin Gladstone if Kristin Wong Tam's election is anything to go by. Especially as KWT won despite Sue Anne's smear campaign in the pages of the Sun.
Dave, Toronto Ontario
11/21/10 4:44 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Of course Xtra is bias
Its a free publication for gays, lesbians , bi and trans folks. Of course it has a particular bias and perspective, and its also free, take it or leave it. The Toronto Sun pretends to be a newspaper for the whole of Toronto (read TORONTO Sun) , there lies the differences.
Casey Yau, Toronto Ontario
11/22/10 11:55 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Out and Proud and Weird.
So Sue-Anne thinks that just because the Sun makes you its lesbo Sunshine Woman for the new millennium, means you've become a voice for the queer community. You definitely are a voice, but one that has nothing to say outside of calling people shills for organizations you do not support. I was in the Pride Parade those groups, those people and the real shills (whatever does that word mean), were on the outside and inside. The goons from the Jewish Defense League...they wouldn't cross the road to help anyone who was queer and now they are your wing men. Before you start sending smears this way, you better make sure who you're sleeping with. We didn't care about who it was before you came out, but now that you're out, you're sleeping with (metaphorically speaking of course) with some questionable characters.
Sue, toronto ON
11/23/10 3:17 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.