UPDATE: man responds to King Station assault allegations
NEWS / Video footage will reveal the truth, says Collin Dillon
Rob Salerno / Toronto / Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Share |

Collin Dillon categorically denies that he’s a gaybasher and refutes assault charges pressed against him by Jon Chaisson after an altercation on a subway platform in the early morning of Friday, April 22 that left both with bruises.
 
Chaisson told Xtra that Dillon head-butted him on the train after harassing him and calling him “faggot” on the subway platform.
 
Dillon declined to give the cause of the altercation, worried that any details may taint his trial. But he says he and his girlfriend entered the station at the same time as Chaisson and that there was no interaction until all three were on the subway. Dillon says the whole story is “a 45-second confrontation” that happened on the ride between King and Queen subway stations.
 
When informed that Chaisson was pressing for the incident to be investigated as a hate crime, Dillon was overcome with emotion.

While he declined to say who hit whom first or what was the cause of the altercation, he says that allegations that he’s homophobic or that this was a hate crime are completely false. He denies calling Chaisson “faggot” before or after the incident.
 
“That’s so far from the truth. That makes no sense. How could anyone identify someone’s sex[ual orientation]?” Dillon says, holding back tears. “One of my best friends is gay. My cousin is gay. I’ve been to Pride. I’m not at all homophobic.”
 
Dillon says the issue of Chaisson’s sexual orientation didn’t come up until after their fight on the subway car, when Chaisson shouted at him, “I’m gay.” Dillon says he flippantly responded, “So what? You’re gay, I’m gay, we’re all gay.”

Chaisson agrees that this exchange took place.
 
Police are not at this point investigating the incident as a hate crime, but Chaisson is pushing for them to do so. Chaisson says police told him that the incident may not meet the criteria of a hate crime if Dillon was unaware of Chaisson’s sexual orientation at the start of the fight.
 
But Dillon also says that after the altercation, Chaisson repeatedly threatened Dillon and his girlfriend.
 
“He said he’d do his best to screw me over,” Dillon says. Dillon says Chaisson made reference to a family member that was a high-ranking judge. Chaisson refused to answer questions about Dillon’s allegations.
 
Contrary to Chaisson’s earlier assertion to Xtra that he hit Dillon only once in self-defence, Dillon says Chaisson hit him “five or six times,” and that it was Dillon who retreated from hitting him back in self-defence. Although Dillon declined to be photographed for this story, he has multiple bruises and cuts on his face that appear consistent with multiple punches. Six days after the incident, his left eye is still swollen, a bruise extends over his cheekbone and to his temple, and cuts are visible at his hairline.
 
When confronted with this information, Chaisson concedes he hit Dillon at least twice, “once inside the car and once on the platform [at Queen Station].” Chaisson had previously told Xtra that after he hit Dillon, Dillon retreated and tried to get away from him on the platform at Queen Station.
 
The two men are the same age and of similar height and build, which may explain why the fight was not one-sided.
 
Dillon also disputes Chaisson’s assertion that he and his girlfriend were drunk and arguing when Chaisson arrived in the station. Dillon says alcohol was “absolutely not” a factor in the incident. He says he was on his way home from a party but was not drunk.
 
“It’s total bullshit,” Chaisson says. “This guy was heavily under the influence of alcohol or drugs. My lawyers are looking into what bar he was at for over-serving him alcohol.”
 
Neither Chaisson nor Dillon have retained counsel.
 
Dillon says he was surprised when police accepted Chaisson’s story and took him into custody, but he was cooperative. His girlfriend, who spoke to Xtra but declined to give her name, agrees with Dillon’s account but says she was unable to give a statement to police at the time of the arrest because the fight left her hysterical.
 
She says that if she ever believed Dillon was homophobic she would dump him, and she brags that the couple have gone to club nights at Buddies and once visited Gladaman’s Den. Dillon laughs while remembering that the host at Gladaman’s mocked him for wearing flip-flops to the bar.
 
He says police told him that the incident should have been captured on the TTC’s security cameras, and Dillon says he’s confident that video evidence will exonerate him. Police have not returned Xtra’s calls as of press time.
 
The insinuation that their fight was a hate crime is most troubling for Dillon now, he says.
 
“It’s not at all what happened. It’s not even remotely near,” Dillon says. “As you can imagine, I’m extremely worried about my reputation. It’s very scary that someone would approach media in an attempt to paint it with that kind of brush.”
 
*
 
Jon Chaisson says he was attacked at a subway station in the early hours of April 22.
(courtesy of Jon Chaisson)
APRIL 27:
Verbal abuse on a subway platform escalated to a sudden head-butt inside the subway car, which left Jon Chaisson’s face covered in blood and shards of his own teeth in his hand, he says.
 
The confrontation happened in the early hours of April 22 at the King Subway Station.
 
“I pushed the emergency alarm after he hit me the first time. And that’s when I punched him,” Chaisson says. “He was actually kind of scared of me afterward. After I touched my face and saw that there was blood all over and I had half my tooth in my hand.”
 
Chaisson says he was coming home from a meeting at Goodhandy’s nightclub when he entered King Station at 12:45am. He says he first spotted the man on the mezzanine level of the station, where he was having an argument with a young woman. Chaisson says the man shouted, “Hey faggot,” at him repeatedly, but Chaisson ignored it until the man followed him down onto the northbound platform.
 
“At that point I got fed up. I knew it was being targeted to me,” Chaisson says. “I turned around and said, ‘I am a faggot. You got a problem with that?’”
 
Over the pleas of his female companion, who was shouting “Leave him alone,” the attacker allegedly followed Chaisson to the far end of the empty platform, continuing to taunt him.
 
“He came up right in my face and said, ‘Do you wanna fight? Do you wanna go?’” Chaisson says. “I told him to piss off. I’m not in the mood to fight; stay out of my face.”
 
Chaisson says he was cornered at the north end of the platform until the train arrived, but then his attacker followed him into the same subway car. That’s when the confrontation got violent.
 
In the just over 60 seconds it takes to get from King to Queen Station, Chaisson says he was cornered at the end of the car and took a head-butt to the face. He says he fired back one punch in self-defence and triggered the emergency stop, bringing the train to a standstill when it arrived at Queen. 
 
“This guy [the attacker] runs out on the platform. I think the girl was behind and crying ‘Leave him alone,’” Chaisson says. “I cornered him on the platform, and the TTC worker came up to him from behind and separated us.
 
“I tried to go at him again on the platform while the TTC workers were there. They had to hold me back at that point because I was so angry,” he says.
 
Chaisson estimates that police arrived about 10 minutes after he and the man got off the train. He says there was some tension, briefly, when the man claimed that he wanted to press charges against Chaisson for hitting him, but eyewitnesses to the fight told officers that it was self-defence and they quickly dropped that line of questioning.
 
Police confirm that Collin Dillon, 28, has been charged with assault causing bodily harm as a result of an altercation at the subway station April 22. At the time, police told Chaisson that he was taken into custody and charged with assault causing bodily harm but was released because he had no prior convictions. 
 
Dillon and his girlfriend have since spoken to Xtra. They deny being drunk or arguing, following Chaisson through the station, or calling him “faggot,” and say Dillon took the majority of the hits in the confrontation. Dillon has a black eye and bruising and cuts on his face, which appear consistent with multiple hits. They say the whole incident was a 45-second fight on inside the subway car, and both claim to be friends of the gay community. 
 
Chaisson later clarified to Xtra that he hit Dillon at least twice.
 
Chaisson wants the case investigated as a hate crime but says police have told him that it’s not being treated as hate-motivated because his attacker didn’t know he was gay when he entered the station. A call to the investigating officer, Faizal Karmali of 51st Division, was not immediately returned.
 
“I feel like that’s an insult,” Chaisson says. “I’ve spoken to them a few times now.”
 
After spending much of the weekend on pain medication and anti-inflammatory drugs to keep down the swelling, and visiting a dentist to fix his smashed teeth, Chaisson says his focus is now on making sure that the community stands strong against gaybashings.
 
“I’m trying to get a group of gay people together to attend his trial,” he says.
 
A court date is set for May 16 at 2pm at College Park Courthouse to set the date for the trial.


Share |


Reader Comments


 
pink mafia
Time to make a call to the Pink Mafia....
Scott, Toronto On
04/27/11 1:52 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
The cops don't care
All cops are assholes. All cops lie. Beware what they do in your case. They will not support you in this.
TG, Vancouver BC
04/27/11 2:23 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
What WOULD make it a hate crime?
What part of "Hey faggot," led the police to conclude that the victim is not gay? Here, in Burlington, when a bashing victim was held down while three assailants broke the orbital bone around his eye and masturbated into his face while calling him fu*king faggot, the police wanted to know what he had said or done to instigate the attack. In another local incident, there was little response when a lesbian couple was terrorized out of their home by their adust neighbours just last year. Hmmm...I guess that's how my community keeps its reputation as one of the safest places in Canada....just ignore the crime and deny it ever happened.
Dennis A. Yeo, Burlington ON
04/27/11 3:17 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
I'll be there on Monday, May 16
It would be very interesting to see how things go if a significant number of out gay citizens attended the trial. This is an opportunity to be an informed observer, rather than a news media consumer.
Mychol, Toronto ON
04/27/11 5:31 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
It makes a difference......
I attended two days of a trial in a Hamilton case a few years back. The perpetrator was found guilty and given an appropriate sentence....something that may not have happened without the presence of the queer community on a daily basis. Get organized.....the victim will appreciate your support.
Dennis Yeo, Burlington ON
04/27/11 7:15 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Senseless violence
What a case of senseless violence. I hope the judge takes a "tough on crime" approach. I feel sorry for Jon Chaisson.
Jake, Toronto Ontario
04/28/11 2:07 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Could Collin Dillon be drunken coward?
Of course Collin Dillon is going to try and deny these allegations. A hate crime is a very serious crime - A serious crime that should come with a no tolerance punishment. I'm sure Collin Dillon's crocodile tears are a big act for the reporters. Interesting to read that Dillon's girlfriend doesn't want to be named. They should both be ashamed of themselves. I understand this has took place a couple of blocks away from where Chris Skinner was murdered.
James, Toronto Ont
04/28/11 11:48 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Note To Police Dept.
A gay man is called "faggot" and head butted on the very public TTC, surrounded by witnesses. How is this not a hate crime?
James, Toronto Ont
04/28/11 12:06 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Actually JAmes....
Actually james you don't know what you are talking about. As a gay man and cousin to Collin Dillon - i can pretty much categorically say this was NOT a hate crime. Just because a victim is gay doens't instantly make it a hate crime - and trying to ruin another mans life just to "Get back" at Collin doesn't really make Jon seem like a good guy(although maybe he genuinely feels that way - doesn't make it right!). I am NOT condoning the actions of Collin Dillon - but painting him as a homophobe because he got in a fight wit a homosexual is stupid and illogical. If i get in a fight with a black person do i suddenly become racist? No - i just got in a fight with a black person. Also note this ~~ when Chaisson shouted at him, “I’m gay.” Dillon says he flippantly responded, “So what? You’re gay, I’m gay, we’re all gay.” Chaisson agrees that this exchange took place. ~~ Seems very hateful to me *eye rolls* Cheers G.
G, toronto ontario
04/28/11 12:10 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
G! You Must Be So Proud Of Your Cousin
G! Since you won't write out your full first name, I see you're so very proud of your cousin, Collin Dillon. Do yourself a favour, read the definition of "hate crime." Believe it or not, calling another man "faggot" and head butting him in a public place is considered a hate crime. Me thinks your "cousin" might have few skeletons in his closet. Jon has witnesses to the crime. Does your allegedly drunken cousin have any witnesses for his side of the story, outside of his allegedly drunken girlfriend? Collin Dillon was arrested. Jon Chaisson wasn't. You do the math. You must be so proud too, G. Could it be that your "cousin" is not the man he appears to be on the surface? I'm pretty sure that the realtives of Chris Skinners' killers have no idea that they have killers in their family.
James, Toronto Ont
04/28/11 12:58 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Get Over It
So if Jon did not announce his orientation until after the altercation how is this a hate crime? Was Collin supposed to know? And how did Jon know that Collin was drunk or under the influence of drugs? Were blood tests administered? Perhaps we will just have to wait for Jon's high powered family friend to sort this out and ensure justice is served? Or better yet, let's ignore Jon's drama and cry for attention and drop the whole thing and leave our overburdened justic system to deal with real hate crimes. Come on guys, you both need to get your testosterone under control and grow up! And yes, if anybody is wondering, I happen to be gay.
Glen, Toronto Ontatio
04/28/11 1:48 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Maybe you should do some research James....
Yes I do realize what i hate crime is - it is where you specifically target someone for that reason. E.G you go out - find a gay person and attack him solely on that aspect. If you are in a fight with someone already and your insult them, it is much different then targeting them BECAUSE of that aspect. Let me give you an example... When you are in the village and two little twinks get in an argument the first word out of their mouth is "faggot". I know because I have seen it constantly. So, according to you, all those gay people, of which there are fucking tons, are now Homophobe hate-crime committers because they used the word "faggot" while they were arguing with another person. It doesn't matter that both of them were gay, or wait is it okay for gay people to call other gay people faggots but not straight people?? Ah that makes sense... The fact is that this wasn't a hate crime, he wasn't targeted BECAUSE he was gay. Which is the DEFINITION of a hate crime. So: 1) Get Educated 2) Don't compare this to Christopher Skinner case, it is insulting to Christopher Skinner. 3) When people like Jon cry "hate crime" when they are nothing more then a victim it makes it much more difficult for future hate crimes to be convicted. Why you ask? Well when a case like this attempts to become a hate-crime, and then the judge throws it out because it's completely baseless - future cases where a Hate Crime might actually have BEEN committed can then reference this case as a support for their arguments - which is not ideal. Also "Collin Dillon was arrested. Jon Chaisson wasn't." Yes Collin Dillon also wasn't charged with a hate crime - so you do the math as well! Idiot :) And my name is Ben incase you are wondering. And no i am not "proud" of my cousin - he should be smart enough to walk away - but vililfying him for something he didn't committ is 100x worse then getting in a small scuffle.
G, toronto ontario
04/28/11 1:51 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
A press photo?
Isn't it so nice of Jon Chaisson to supply the media with his headshot? I'm so sure that justice is the only reason he's seeking all this attention.
Rex, Toronto Ontario
04/28/11 2:49 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Gee G (Ben), name calling just like your cousin
I don't think you're helping Colin's cause by name calling other posters on this site. You guys are two peas in a pod. If what I hear is true...and your cousin did head butt a gay man after calling him faggot, it most definitely is a hate crime. What kind of hooligan goes around head butting people? Who exactly was arrested in this crime? Oh, that's right, Colin. I'm showing up to the court date just to see what a gay basher looks like. Hmm...I bet he looks like someone's cousin.
Samuel, Toronto Ontario
04/28/11 3:01 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Story Changed
Is it just me or did this story change a from when it was first posted? I seem to remember some quotes from the victim that were quite different what is now posted. When I read it earlier, I seem to remember Chaisson saying that he tried to run away after he was assaulted, and that he hit him once in self-defence. Now it appears he says that he had to be restrained from going after the other guy. The original story should remain unchanged - he should not be permitted to go back and rejig his statement after more details come out. I think there's more here than meets the eye. Also, a head shot? Really?
Alf, Toronto Ontario
04/28/11 3:37 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Clarification
My apologies. It seems like the story does reflect that Chaisson did change his story after Xtra spoke to the other guy.
Alf, Toronto Ontario
04/28/11 4:00 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
I guess the questions are.....
Did Collin Dillon call Jon Chaisson a faggot? And did Collin Dillon head butt Jon? Let's hope there's video footage. Hopefully, the truth will come out in the end. Nice to know Collin's cousin is overzealous in his attempts to try and steer away from the fact that Collin is a potential gay basher, especially since G wasn't there. G, I'd be ashamed if my supposed gay friendly cousin was a gay basher too.
Tim, Toronto On
04/28/11 4:01 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Facts.....
First of all, thank you to Rob Salerno for putting aside the hysterics and allowing the accused to have a voice. It shows journalistic integrity, especially when the "omg horrible gay bashing" would make for a much juicier story. The bottom line is that we have none of the facts yet. Contrary to assertions made in these comments, we have no reason to believe that this was a hate crime. That will all come out in court, if it goes that far. I also note that there is no "hate crime assault" in the criminal code - if "hate" is even an issue, it will be dealt with by a judge during sentencing; however that presumes that he will be found guilty. So just because the police are not labeling this as a hate crime, does not mean that it will not be an issue, and no amount of community activism will change that. I think what we need to do is remain sober, and not turn into a bloodthirsty mob until we get all the facts. The reported notes that Chaission says that he only hit him once, in self defence; however, when he speaks to Dillion he notices that he has "has multiple bruises and cuts on his face that appear consistent with multiple punches," and this was six days later. So that alone should be an indication that there may be more going on here, especially when the story indicates that alcohol may have been a factor. Hate crimes are a horrible thing, and as a society, we have a duty to eradicate them at all costs. However, what we shouldn't do is get out the pitchforks and ruin a man's life before we know what really happened. Chassion wants to make this into an extravagant affair, and maybe I would too, if I was the aggrieved party. However, ruining a man's life over what could be nothing more than a scuffle seems a bit premature. Although this has nothing to do with anything, someone mentioned that Dillion and his girlfriend did not pose for photos when they were interviewed.
Actual Lawyer, toronto ontario
04/28/11 5:27 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Facts.....
I must note that Chaisson was not photographed for the story either, so we don't know for sure what kind of injuries he may have (he did however provide a glamour shot). This sort of reminds me of what happened when Michael Bryant (the former Attorney General) was charged with killing a cyclist with his car. Days later, bikers came out in droves to protest on Bloor street. Then, just after the police concluded their investigation, they saw that the video showing that the cyclist had attacked his wife, and was severely intoxicated at the time. After this, all the charges were dropped. Out of respect for those who have been victims of hate crimes in the past, I think we should hold off on our condemnation until all the facts are disclosed.
Actual Lawyer, toronto ontario
04/28/11 6:01 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
The Real Deal
I am a Toronto lawyer and from my experience with this type of charge, the justice will rule in favour of the victim if their is enough evidence, i.e witnesses, or video footage of the incident. According to the Toronto Police website, this is what a hate crime is defined as. -------What is hate crime?------- Hate Crime is a CRIMINAL OFFENCE committed against a person or property that is based upon the victim's race, national or ethnic origin, language, colour, religion, sex, age, mental or physical disability, sexual orientation, or any other similar factor. -----Public incitement of hatred------ This offence is committed when a person communicates statements in a public place, and incites hatred against an identifiable group that is likely to lead to a breach of the peace. This offence is also committed when someone communicates statements, other than in a private conversation, that willfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group. "Communication' includes: words spoken, recorded electronically or otherwise, gestures, signs or other visible representations. --------------------- I want to mention as well that the charges are being pursued by the crown and the accused was arrested on the scene. This means the police, based on evidence from the scene, along with witness accounts of the incident or other evidence, felt that Jon wasn't at fault criminally. So there is probably heavy evidence against the accused that will likely lead to the person being charged. But again this is decided by the judge. Also to my knowledge, the new cams on the platforms are not activated as of yet according to TTC security. I will also be attending this court case to see the outcome.
Amy W, Toronto Ontario
04/28/11 6:19 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Journalistic Integrity
I too applaud the reporter for getting both sides of the story. It's the right thing to do. That being said, and, since Mr. Dillon's cousin freely posted in Dillon's defence, I will post in my friend Jonny's defence. I've known Jonny for about three years...the most unlikely of friends there could ever be...I'm 47 with a family, he's 28, single and gay. I love this guy with all my heart. I also know that he's not the type of person who goes around seeking this type of attention...he does his thing and keeps his affairs to himself. The lawyer that thought Jonny was trying to make this into an "extravagant affair" couldn't be more wrong. The man I know doesn't suffer the foolish deeds of others, and will defend himself to the end. By the time this interview was taken, he had been taking painkillers, hadn't slept, and was more than a little depressed. The "glamour shot" of which you speak? I'd send a nice picture too, if no one was around to take my picture. Where's Dillon's picture? His girlfriend's? Where is her statement, in fact? If this was investigated the way I would imagine it was, since there were in fact eye-witnesses, why wasn't she taken into "Room B" and grilled too? I strongly suspect that some of the postings that paint Jonny in a negative light are people who may know him, and perhaps they had fallings out with him...no matter. What gay man or woman, or ANYONE for that matter, would just allow anyone to bully them? That's what it seems like to me...and, as we've all read in the news, bullying permeats our society from our schoolyards to our employment to our streets...if Jonny's defending himself from a bully makes him into someone seeking fame from a glamour shot in Xtra newspaper...then the readers of this paper have missed the big picture...one of intolerance for bullying, hatred, and for the vitim's right to seek justice...
Sylvia S, Toronto Ontario
04/28/11 10:45 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Beautifully said, Sylvia S
Sylvia S, I just wanted to thank you for your wonderful post. Well put. I'm sure Collin Dillon's cousin and a few of his friends, posting on this site, are trivializing Collin's actions because they realize how serious a hate crime is, in this day and age. In response to Rex's earlier post, Rex, are you serious? Your biggest issue, out of this ordeal, is the fact that the article uses Chaisson's head shot? Are for real? I'd rather see a nice picture of Chaisson instead of a posed, forlorn expression on his face, requested by the staff photographer/journalist. I also find it interesting that Collin Dillon's cousin is practically painting Dillon as a victim. Was his cousin even at the scene of the crime? Btw, where's Dillon's picture? If Dillon is innocent, he shouldn't have anything to hide, right?
Tim, Toronto On
04/29/11 1:34 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Answers and Questions from the Journalist
@Alf: None of Chaisson's quotes in the original story have been altered since it was originally posted. Chaisson never claimed to try to run away after the fight started; he claimed to have been trying to get away before the fight happened. He has changed his story on a couple of points between two chats I've had with him, and they're noted above. I would like to clear that up with Chaisson, but he's since told me he doesn't want to speak to me and refered to his (as yet unretained) lawyer. Which is odd. Because *he contacted us* about the story. @Everyone: There is, as yet, no proof that Dillon called Chaisson "faggot" at any point during the incident. Dillon's witness claims he did not. Chaisson has said he was alone on an empty platform when Dillon started shouting that at him, so it's unclear who he's provided as a witness to that. Also, simply calling someone "faggot" while unpleasant, isn't necessarily illegal or proof of a hate crime, as far as I understand. If the accused didn't know/suspect that Chaisson was gay, he couldn't have targetted him because of his real or perceived sexuality. It's possible that "faggot" may have been used as an all-purpose put down (although Dillon denies this as well -- he says he never used that word). I do not have all the evidence, and the TPS aren't sharing theirs until it's before court. Let's all stay calm. @Ben, thank you for your comments. Dillon spoke highly of you. A brief update to this story may be coming soon.
Rob Salerno, Toronto ON
04/30/11 10:02 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
'hate crime' sounds like a smear tactic to me
I have known Colin Dillon and he is not the type of person who would, at this stage of his life, to fight someone on the subway without cause. To suggest that this would be a hate crime is a perversion of the term, and an affront to all gays who have actually had directed violence towards them. Let's call this what it was: a fight on a subway probably dude to some misunderstanding. The real victim seems to be Colin, as Chaisson seems determined to push the 'orientation' angle as a way of smearing. And to be honest, for someone to cry out hate crime when there wasn't one - this is the type of personality who is looking for an ass kicking.
Jason Yung, Toronto ON
05/04/11 8:39 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
One thing to consider...
As someone who (and I am not proud of this) has been in and witnessed his fair share of fights, I cannot even count the number of times the word f*ggot is thrown around, when both parties are straight. Chaisson said himself “I tried to go at him again on the platform while the TTC workers were there. They had to hold me back at that point because I was so angry”. It doesn't exactly sound like it was as one sided as he would like us all to believe. Looking at Chaisson's picture I would not be able to tell whether or not he is gay, what makes us think that this Collin guy could? A guy traveling with his girlfriend is probably not the most likely person to commit a hate crime. It sounds like a fight broke out with both parties being involved and in my opinion, this trivializes real hate crimes.
Don, Toronto Ontario
05/04/11 10:29 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
This is getting ridiculous...
I can't believe the negativity towards Jonny on here...this person, Jason Yung, who's known Mr. Dillon for however long he's known him...turns around and says that the VICTIM in this case...the person who WAS NOT CHARGED with assault...DESERVES AN ASS KICKING?? Sounds like Mr. Dillon should tell his friends to keep their thoughts to themselves. Seems to me that perhaps Mr. Dillon has friends who may have a tendency for violence? Should that reflect on Dillon? On Jonny? NO ONE deserves to get their ass kicked...in media, and in life! I am more and more inclined to think that this reporter has swayed his opinion to be more sympathetic to Dillon, and his cousin, who at first wouldn't even give his real name...! Reporters should publish stories, and keep their opinions to themselves...especially in this case. I'm absolutely shocked at how this is going.
Sylvia S., Toronto Ontario
05/04/11 11:00 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
It's obvious who the attacker's friends are
Rob Salerno should be ashamed of himself. I also noticed Salerno favoured Collin Dillon - the attacker - in his article. Salerno even thanked Dillon's cousin, Ben, for posting comments on this site (one which Ben called a poster an "Idiot"). What was the about XTRA? Note to Jason Yung, Don, Ben, Rex and Alf: YOUR FRIEND WAS ARRESTED FOR HEAD BUTTING A GAY MAN ON A SUBWAY. Interestingly, you don't seem to have a problem with your friend, Collin Dillon, being arrested for causing bodily harm. You seem to be more concerned with arguing the fact that this is might be considered a hate crime. Also interesting, since none of you were actually there. But then again, I don't think I'd want to be associated with a "gay basher" either. It wouldn't say much about one's character, would it? I thought it was great that CBC Televsion covered this story on the 6 o'clock news tonight.
Tim, Toronto On
05/05/11 12:46 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
This is NOT a hate crime
The so called victim in this case, has changed his original story a few times as per your article. "real" events do not change, There are now more inconsistent statements that the victim has made. And if this so called GAY HATER is that why would he be speaking to a gay owned media? - It does not make sense and I do not believe it at all. Lets be serious, the victim does not look gay, I doubt it very much this story happened the way the victim said it did, He has changed his story a few times already. Chassion has engaged in creating a drama and in doing so is ruining another mans life. The real story is going to come out on this, and I bet this is about a bunch of drunk people who got in to a fight. That is the story. Shame Shame for saying this is a GAY HATE CRIME.
Matthew, Toronto ontario
05/05/11 10:54 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Matthew, admirable of you to protect Collin...
...your friend, but the fact of the matter is, you weren't there. Your friend Collin stated he wasn't drunk (I wouldn't be surprised if he was - an inconsistency in his story, since you think they were all drunk). What are all these inconsistencies, you speak of, in the victim's story. If the allegations are true, Collin Dillon angrily called Chaisson a "faggot" a few times before head butting him. Matthew, I have a sneaky suspicion you're just another friend or relative of Collin Dillon's who seems to think it's ok to go around head-butting complete strangers. Do I really have to remind you that Collin Dillon was arrested in this crime. Jon Chaisson wasn't. Without all the facts, only a foolish friend or relative of Collin Dillon's would attack the victim in this crime. Matthew, you should be happy to know that your friend, Collin Dillon, made the CBC 6 o'clock news. He's also a news feature on Yahoo.
Tim, Toronto On
05/05/11 11:41 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
RE: NOT A HATE CRIME
No I am not related to either of them. I find his story is full of not truths. 1. His story is not consistent. "Contrary to Chaisson’s earlier assertion to Xtra that he hit Dillon only once in self-defence, Dillon says Chaisson hit him “five or six times,” and that it was Dillon who retreated from hitting him back in self-defence" "When confronted with this information, Chaisson concedes he hit Dillon at least twice, “once inside the car and once on the platform [at Queen Station].” Chaisson had previously told Xtra that after he hit Dillon, Dillon retreated and tried to get away from him on the platform at Queen Station.- so which is it? 2.Chaisson wants the case investigated as a hate crime but says police have told him that it’s not being treated as hate-motivated because his attacker didn’t know he was gay when he entered the station- By looking at him I would agree as well. Then we have this great comment :He said he’d do his best to screw me over,” Dillon says. Dillon says Chaisson made reference to a family member that was a high-ranking judge. Chaisson refused to answer questions about Dillon’s allegations."- Why would not respond to that comment? Is it true? Why would you create a FB page? This entire story has the same feel as one that just went down which is by the way on Xtra " Myros case. T And do you really think someone who is classified as a homophobe is going to talk to a gay media outlet? Are you serious? It does not make sense. Funny how the victim refuses to answer question and refers Xtra to his lawyers. Odd how I bet he contacted Xtra in the first place.
matthew, toronto ont
05/05/11 12:45 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Matthew - friend or foe
Matthew, huh, so you have no issue with the fact that Collin Dillon head-butted a innocent victim? You had only mention that you're not related to Dillon, so that leads me to believe that you are are indeed a friend of the accused. I mean, who else would go on a rampage to attack the victim in any crime. Not typical human behavour, at all. Mind you, it does sound like the behaviour of a friend who goes around head butting strangers. Matthew, It's hard to take your comments seriously, since you weren't there. Do you honestly believe your friend, Collin Dillon, is 100% innocent, even after he was arrested?
Tim, Toronto On
05/05/11 1:36 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Re Hate Crime
I will state this AGAIN. I am NOT a friend NOR I am related. What we can agree on is this. There was a fight between those men. In most cases when a fight between two men occurs, its a simple punch and that is the end of it. YES I agree IF that head butted occurred that is a bit over the top. I agree with that. When fights happen, they are ugly no matter what. BUT this victims story is far from the truth. I have never ever heard of a so called homophobe speaking to a gay media outlet. That is the first I have ever heard, i may be totally wrong, but I do not think so. The other part is the victim created as per this article a FB page. I am curious to see what it contains. You're right I was not there, and either were you. We are going on what this victim TOLD Xtra. Its pretty clear he contacted them with this story. I will also say this. I worked in the insurance industry for years doing claims. There is a reason we ask the same question over and over again, because if a story is made up you"forget" certain parts. If it happened that way you always have a clear story one that does not ever change.
matthew, toronto ontario
05/05/11 1:49 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Without Fact how can you call someone a hater
The facts are not clear at this moment and you cant claim one thing or another.. But it does seem like Jon is trying to make this more than it is. If the person changes his story from what he initialize says kind of makes me question what he is trying to do... Like why change your story if you are completely innocent.. sounds weird. I am not saying any is right in the situation.. but if you cant even keep you story straight makes me wonder
Richard L, Toronto Ontario
05/05/11 4:38 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
@ Tim
So Tim, anybody who has anything to say that in any way supports some of Collin's claims is a friend or relative of his? You make some very ignorant claims yourself, maybe you are related to Chaisson and projecting on the rest of us. Also some of you say "How dare Rob Salerno..." He is a reporter working "Canada's Gay and Lesbian News", his job is to report the news and that is what he is doing, why in the world would he be biased in favor of Collin other then the fact that Chaisson seems to be lying? It seems that what you really want is do be biased in favor of Chaisson. Nobody is condoning the actions of either, but this does not at all sound like a hate crime, it sounds like a fight broke out and someone is seriously craving media attention and trying to ruin the other party. As I mentioned before, there is no proof that Chaisson was actually called "f*ggot" and even if he was it DOES NOT mean that Dillon knew he was gay, plenty of straight guys call each other f*ggot in a derogatory way in street fight type situations.
Don, Toronto Ontario
05/06/11 11:54 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
@ tim 2
I truly believe this story did not happen the way Chaisson said it did. As per the article and I quote "Chaisson previously altered his story when confronted with evidence that Dillon had been punched multiple times. He previously said he hit Dillon only once but now says he hit him at least one more time on the subway platform at Queen Station. When asked to clarify the inconsistencies, Chaisson told Xtra he no longer wishes to answer questions and referred us to his lawyer."_ what a very odd thing to do. Is it because his story did not happen this way? 2.Chaisson has created a Facebook group encouraging people to attend the court date. Among those who’ve confirmed is Ward 27 Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam.   “[Chaisson] called my office twice,” says Wong-Tam. “As a local councillor who represents the LGBT community in the Village, I wanted to lend my support that way."- It seems like someone is looking for allot of media attention, he also sent in a picture of himself for the article. Odd. 3.Chaisson wants the case investigated as a hate crime but says police have told him that it’s not being treated as hate-motivated because his attacker didn’t know he was gay when he entered the station. So how is then that Dillion called him a Fag over and over again. Again that does not make senesce. 4.But Dillon also says that after the altercation, Chaisson repeatedly threatened Dillon and his girlfriend.“He said he’d do his best to screw me over,” Dillon says. Dillon says Chaisson made reference to a family member that was a high-ranking judge. Chaisson refused to answer questions about Dillon’s allegations- I bet that happened considering this victim is drumming up his little support band to be at the court house.This story does NOT make sence, its full of inconsistent statements, one of which the victim cannot get right its because it did not happen this way. He is about to ruin a young mans life. I hope he gets sued by the defend
Matthew, toronto Ont
05/06/11 6:37 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Arrested= guilty
I cannot believe the number of times people have used "being arrested" as evidence of Colin's guilt. If that were the case, their would be no need for trials, just judges to sentence whoever the police arrested. From a completely objective standpoint, please stop using that fact as evidence that Colin did something wrong and that Jon did not. That is a huge fallacy that is being put forth here. I suppose all of those protesters arrested by the police at the G20 were guilty too by virtue of the fact that they were because they were arrested (likely by some of the exact same cops based on the location of Colin's arrest). Allow time for video footage and a full investigation to take place before conclusions are drawn. Thank you
Joe, Toronto ON
05/13/11 6:42 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Wow...
Hope this Chaisson loser goes to jail and gets what he deserves. Legal system isn't your plaything douchebag! I support gay people, but I hope this loser is the victim of an actual hate crime some day!
Wow, Toronto Ontario
05/18/11 8:50 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
A little tidbit about Chaisson
Collin Dillon, you're in the clear. I've known of Chaisson for years. He is manipulative, I almost view him as a con artist, but he's not that smart. The story given to the media has changed because he has made his story up. I don't know how things went down, but I do know that Chaisson has fabricated the events. I also know that Chaisson has physically assaulted people in the past and tried to blame the other party for abusing him. Be careful of Chaisson. If blood was spilled as described, I would be sure to have some blood work done. I don't believe this was a hate crime, I hope for his sake it wasn't.
Tim, Toronto On
06/18/11 11:23 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.