Dare you to look deeper
ON DISPLAY / Art campaign challenges HIV/AIDS stereotypes and taboos
Jonathan Valelly / Toronto / Friday, November 25, 2011
Share |

A block of posters on a hip stretch of Queen St repeatedly confronts passersby with the following text: "I Party. I Bareback. I'm Positive. I’m Responsible."
 
This is just one of the messages Torontonians will soon see as a result of a massive downtown postering campaign by the activist group AIDS Action Now! (AAN).
 
The group, which formed in the ’80s in response to the HIV/AIDS epidemic and has recently been reinvigorated, hopes the provocative images will get people talking.
 
The campaign also appears online in anticipation of A Day With(out) Art, an event AAN is co-presenting with the Art Gallery of Ontario Youth Council on Nov 30, the eve of World AIDS Day.
 
"We wanted to do something that was innovative and that would change the discourse around HIV in the community," says AAN's Alex McClelland, who helped organize the action.
Mikiki and Jessica Whitbread postering on Church St
(Rob Salerno)
 
Each of the posters was made by a different artist in collaboration with members of the HIV/AIDS community; participants include such heavyweights as John Greyson, Kent Monkman and Allyson Mitchell. And though they all bring up different issues affecting the community, they are linked by their rejection of the stigmatization of people living with AIDS.
 
Mitchell's piece, for instance, consists of a needlepoint that reads "Fuck Positive Women," while a piece by Daryl Vocat depicts a park ranger writing the words "We are not criminals.”
 
A trend toward ostracizing people with HIV gives these messages added urgency. In the last decade, Canada has seen a remarkable increase of cases in which individuals' failure to disclose a positive HIV status has resulted in criminal charges, ranging from sexual assault to murder. Most recently, Crown prosecutors succeeded in having attempted murder charges reinstated against an Ottawa man who failed to disclose.
 
With no clear prosecutorial guidelines around which activities have possible legal ramifications, poz people, their lovers and their potential lovers are faced with a society where their sexuality is not only demonized, but also criminalized.
 
"The current legal climate and subsequent cultural climate that is constructed through the criminalization of HIV nondisclosure actively impedes my ability to manage my health as a person living with HIV," states Mikiki, a coordinator with the Toronto People Living with AIDS Foundation and the artist who created the "I Bareback" poster in collaboration with Scott Donald.
 
For Mikiki, the legal situation is part of a larger poz-phobic paradigm where people living with AIDS are seen as inherently unhealthy and irresponsible. The reality latent in the poster, however, is that people living with AIDS can, and do, have normal sex lives on their own terms. And that can include partying and having sex without condoms.
 
"Negative people are seen as responsible whether they participate in these behaviours or not, but we're seen as inherently irresponsible because we have tested positive for HIV. But I flip it on its head: I got tested because I care about my health and care about my partners’ health," Mikiki says. "We are active agents managing our sex lives, and the poster wants to speak to that."
 
The messages of Mitchell’s and Mikiki's posters thus approach pressing legal issues on the level of individual empowerment.
 
"Us reaffirming our sexualities as people living with HIV is a political counter to the reality of us being criminalized," says McClelland. "They don't want us to claim our sexuality; the state doesn't want poz people to do that."
 
"[The posters] are super sex positive, and these messages are definitely not out there," says AAN's Jessica Whitbread, who collaborated with Mitchell on her poster. "That's not really talked about when it comes to positive women. A lot of the time, it's mothers and babies and nurturing and 'the good woman.' There's an underrepresentation of women's sexuality. Sometimes women just want to get fucked. And they can get laid, too."
 
Whitbread's sexual politic is informed by her own unique experience, having contracted HIV from a man who was later taken to court by two other women for nondisclosure, resulting in aggravated sexual assault charges. In recounting her story, she too approaches poz sexuality in terms of responsible interactions.
 
"I'm glad I didn't pursue [legal charges]," she explains. "One of the girls had a one-night stand, and I was like, Where was her responsibility to use a condom? Why is she not being charged? She didn't even test positive. I was just like, What are you so upset about? Did you talk about it? Did you bring it up?"
 
While the poster art aims to encourage people living with HIV to manage their own sexualities, it is also directed at those who might vilify any model for sexual health that is outside of the prescribed condoms-always-forever model. That AAN is an activist group, as opposed to a public health group or service provider, provides the autonomy necessary to confront this taboo.
 
"We have a good opportunity with AIDS Action Now! to say what other organizations can't say. Public-health messaging never wants to tell people living with HIV that they can have sex without condoms with each other, or that gay men can use their own judgment around how they practise safe sex," says McClelland.
 
Whitbread agrees: "As much as it's art, it's also an educational tool that hopefully loosens some screws in peoples minds, where they say, 'Oh, I can do that? You can do that?' and they create a dialogue or find out more information or talk to their friends about what that would look like."
 
The taboo messaging and public nature of the campaign thus challenges the entire community to engage with these issues.
 
"This is everyone's business," says John Greyson, whose poster addresses harm reduction in prisons. "It's everyone's responsibility when healthcare is failing, when treatment is unavailable and lives are being threatened."
 
Besides being plastered on Queen St, on Church St, in Parkdale and in Kensington Market, the images are being spread online through a Tumblr blog before their official launch at the AGO. And it is no mistake that the campaign, which AAN is calling “poster/virus,” overlaps with the gallery's retrospective of queer artist trio General Idea. Their widespread revision of Robert Indiana's "LOVE" graphic as "AIDS" is a seminal project for AIDS-related art and furthered the metaphor of the “image as virus” in the context of HIV.
 
The Day With(out) Art event will feature the poster art but will also take the form of a mock-protest performance in the gallery's Walker Court. It will host speakers (including Mitchell, Whitbread and Mikiki), DJs and performances by the Kiki Ballroom Alliance and the Ontario Aboriginal HIV/AIDS Strategy.
 
In the meantime, AAN hopes the street posters create controversy and discussion, no matter how difficult it may be.
"These conversations are fucking excruciating," Mikiki admits. "Especially when you're not used to having them." 


Share |


Reader Comments


 
hello boring time warp people
YAWN. Wake me when they're done playing elitist games.
the dead, Toronto Ontario
11/25/11 5:10 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Having something to say makes them elitest?
I suppose it would, to someone with nothing but a vacuum between his ears.
Patrick, Toronto ON
11/25/11 6:20 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Pozzing protectors
So, the pozzing protectors at AIDS Action Now have a new slogan: "I Party. I Bareback. I'm Positive. I’m Responsible." How exactly are these HIV positive barebackers responsible? Do they disclose their HIV status to their sexual partners before they bareback? Or, do they consider themselves responsible because pozzing protectors like Xtra and AIDS Action Now tell HIV positive people that they should be allowed to have all the bareback sex they want without disclosing their HIV status to their sexual partners.
Randy, Toronto Ontario
11/25/11 10:07 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
POZ prevention?
Mikiki Hickey is the “POZ Prevention Coordinator” at the Toronto People With AIDS Foundation (see: http://www.pwatoronto.org/english/contact.php). The above article states that Mr. Hickey is the artist who created the "I Bareback" poster. How exactly does Mr. Hickey’s public promotion of barebacking further POZ prevention? According to the 2011 audited financial statements of the Toronto People With AIDS Foundation (posted on the Foundation’s website at http://www.pwatoronto.org/english/publications.php), the annual costs of the Foundation’s POZ prevention program is funded in part by a $78,000 grant from the Public Health Agency of Canada (see page 13 of the financial statements). How does that government agency justify spending $78,000 of taxpayer funds for a so-called POZ prevention program headed by a person who publicly promotes barebacking?
Randy, Toronto Ontario
11/26/11 2:21 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
dialogue
innovative, discourse and... please stop helping us HIV's, ok? You aan and your ilk have done enough harm. Thank you.
kyle, toronto on
11/26/11 8:45 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
amazing project!
Kudos on an amazing project to AAN and all of the artists who contributed! The range of dialogues in the posters represent years of public activism on the part of the makers and an ongoing conversation that each is committed to in their art, activism and daily life. Referencing the work of General Idea, ACT UP, Gran Fury and many others shows the depth of our history and the legacy and present urgency of this work. Randy, evoking the spectre of public funding against Mikiki and PWA Toronto is a sensationalist and ill-informed scare tactic. Public funding doesn't come with a narrow moralistic agenda attached to it! Prevention is an ECOLOGY and we're not ever going to get further than we are now by collapsing the issues into binaries, silencing dialogue and shaming people. It's tiring and sad that we must "dare" to speak out. This is how things change: when people dare to speak out in such provocative, multi-layered and gorgeous ways, and commit to the conversations that result, with the aim of raising the level of public dialogue. Thanks again!
Anthea, London Ontario
11/26/11 11:30 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
To Anthea...
I knew General Idea and this is NO General Idea! Why did the best have to die? I miss Jorge. Anthea you are seemingly misinformed and yet another parroting seriously deluded "progressive" of the old school continuing with paradigms that are actually hurting people. My fellow HIV people. Anthea, please stop and go away. Thank you.
Chris, Toronto ON
11/26/11 11:47 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
No need to be too harsh.
I think this is a great inner-city youth project. They certainly mean well. They just don't know better. As Oprah says...When you know better, you do better. ...They're like the Occupy Toronto people. They meant well. Give them a break.
Charise, Toronto Ontario
11/26/11 12:09 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
I party + bareback: I AM responsible dammit!
The 'I Party' poster blows my mind -- in an incredibly positive way. Being poz is not inherently irresponsible; often it's just bad luck -- tons of neggies BB and they aren't genuinely judged across the board the way we are. Using drugs is not intrinsically irresponsible either. Neither is BB sex, which doesn't carry the risk of an infection every time it happens. To be so bold and so honest about this stuff is incredibly refreshing. That people are flipping out in the comments here just proves this conversation needs to happen. Not everyone who is poz can afford to be open about it, for many, many reasons (like the risk of being unfairly accused of non-disclosure and shunted off to some super-jail). We are lucky and grateful for the minority who can and do speak up. Thanks so much for having our backs.
Rodger, Toronto Ontario
11/26/11 10:28 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
BAREBACKING SPREADS DISEASES
If there are so many “Responsible” HIV+s then where are all the new infections coming from?BAREBACKING SPREADS DISEASES. BAREBACKING PROMOTES NEW HIV INFECTIONS. This is not rocket science. Just because a poster or a website gives you permission to Bareback, it doesn't mean that it is justified. Advertising promotes all kinds of products which make you sick. Only morons accept permission to do harmful things from advertising. Have all the sex you want. BUT, If you really are “Responsible” then you are RESPONSIBLE for NOT giving anyone HIV --even if they are too stupid or drugged to realize that they could get HIV from Barebacking. If there are so many “Responsible” HIV+s then where are all the new infections coming from?
STOP, Tor ont
11/27/11 3:50 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
A revolution or self-indulgence?
AAN has a case of the empire's new clothes. They think they are being revolutionary and forward-thinking, but really are giving people permission to be selfish and immature in how they negotiate their relationships and responsibilities to others – particularly in the "I bareback, I'm responsible" poster. It's shocking that Mikiki is responsible for positive prevention at the Toronto People Living with AIDS Foundation. AAN needs to stop expecting more from the government than they expect from the gay community and themselves.
Jane, Toronto Ontario
11/27/11 6:32 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Hmmn?
To JANE....If there are so many “Responsible” HIV+s then where are all the new infections coming from?...This is a good question and my suggestion is that you do some research and find out. You may be surprised at the answer. It may rock your thinking. This STI epidemic is not limited to simply HIV, there are also other types of STI's that are rampant, weird stuff that are seemingly new to Toronto, relatively speaking. People are not all that willing to get tested for HIV because of the repercussions, including not obtaining mortgage insurance, life insurance, stigma issues, criminalization/prison, fear for job loss and so forth. Unfortunately the HIV/AIDS support agencies have not addressed any of these issues adequately and may have supported the horrors faced by the newly HIV diagnosed. Which makes sense if you understand that it is vital that entities first need is to sustain themselves. Those on meds who are HIV+ and taking their meds and who are undetectable, which are most, are not spreading HIV, there simply is no evidence to support that notion. Yes, I suggest you do some research perhaps you will find your answer.
tim, toronto on
11/27/11 9:12 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Bareback
sex doesn't cause HIV. The HIV virus causes HIV.
schmendorf, TORONTO ON
11/27/11 9:36 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Showing a lack of care, Part 1
(1) Despite all the “feel good” propaganda from AIDS Action Now, HIV-positive men continue to infect HIV-negative men with the AIDS virus in depressing numbers. The latest numbers on ACT’s website for Toronto infections are for 2009. 596 Torontonians were diagnosed as HIV-positive in 2009. It is estimated that the number of people who were actually infected with HIV in Toronto in 2009 was almost 975 people. Gay, bisexual men and other men who have sex with men accounted for 69% of all new HIV diagnoses in 2009. See: http://www.actoronto.org/home.nsf/pages/hivaidsstatsto (2) Aside from showing a lack of care for the HIV negative men they infect, HIV-positive barebackers (including barebackers who refuse to get tested and are therefore willfully blind about their HIV status) also show a lack of care for larger Canadian society (which has to pay for health care costs of HIV-positive people). Every year, more gay men are infected with HIV and will require expensive anti-viral medications for the rest of their lives. If you’re low income, your drug costs will be paid for by a government drug plan. If you’re employed by an employer with a drug plan, your drug costs will be paid by your employer or your fellow employees (depending on if it’s an employer self-insured plan or a group insurance plan in which premiums are paid by the employer and employees). At a certain point, with rising drug costs resulting from more infections every year (and decreasing public sympathy for irresponsible behavior), governments and employers will require HIV positive people to pay a greater share of their own drug costs. The table at the following link will give you an idea just how pricey HIV medications can be: http://aids.about.com/od/hivmedicationfactsheets/a/drugcost.htm
Randy, Toronto Ontario
11/27/11 10:35 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Showing a lack of care, Part 1
(3) While I realize that many HIV advocates say that many HIV-positive men taking anti-viral medications have a low viral load and aren’t likely to infect anyone, those same HIV advocates refuse to acknowledge that some people develop resistance to the medications or do not take their medications properly and are therefore infectious. The same HIV advocates refuse to acknowledge or condemn the irresponsible behavior of HIV-positive men in the bareback fetish community (e.g., gift givers who go off their medications in order to poz a bugchaser or an unsuspecting negative person in a so-called stealth pozzing). For example, see http://www.rawtop.com/blog/gay/hookups/guys/high-viral-load-poz
Randy, Toronto Ontario
11/27/11 10:37 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Randy...
Your argument sounds all logical and stuff like that...but they are full of holes with a definite intent. I'm not buying what you're selling. First, HIV advocates do not exist! I do not know of anyone advocating for HIV? I mean seriously what is wrong with you? However, I am familiar with HIV/Human Rights Advocates. Your assertion that Low-Viral Load is the same as Undetectable is more anti-sex fear mongering horseshit. Further, statistics can be interpreted in many different ways. The accumulation of statistics either for qualitative or quantitative reasons are almost always directed by a hoped for outcome and specific interpretation, unless you've taken statistics at University it is difficult to critically assess for the average person. This is your and your extremist buddies strength. You exploit the ignorant and uninformed through fear. Statistics sadly is no longer compulsory or a prerequisite as it once was in University. I'll stop here, you're just too...too...I can't do it...it's too tiring. HIV Advocates? Good heavens man, get a grip.
tim, toronto on
11/27/11 11:57 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Response to Tim
Tim, with your attitude and lack of care for your fellow gay men, I wonder how many people you have infected with HIV.
Randy, Toronto Ontario
11/27/11 12:17 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Can't blame it on their youth.
Charise, the article isn't about a bunch of uninformed youth who made a mistake. These are people who work/have worked with agencies in the HIV and sexual health sector. They should know better and do better. How AAN can condemn Ford and Harper for not giving more money to the HIV sector, but then promotes barebacking as a responsible activity is beyond logic. All they're doing is giving governments good reason to worry about how ASOs spend taxpayer money.
Hector, Toronto ON
11/27/11 1:34 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Randy
You don't know me Randy so there is no way for you to know how far off your concerns for me and my behaviour actually are. But Randy, I do have great care for my fellow gay man. As a matter of fact so do those who work and live within the HIV community. There are many differing opinions of course but in the end Randy they all care for their fellow gay man/woman and not once have I ever heard any views that advocate HIV infecting. This Art project doesn't do that either. I've not questioned the HIV community's commitment or intent, ever. This is my way of suggesting to you Randy that you put away your petition to put all of us HIV+ people in trains to the camps and take a deep breath and calm down. This doesn't negate your concerns but is only a plea for you to consider placing them in context. You'll be happier.
tim, toronto on
11/27/11 5:03 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Sleazy lawyer techniques of distraction and doubt
Tim and other HIV+ advocates/lobbyists are using sleazy lawyer techniques of distraction and doubt, when they don't have a case. And as for the brilliant twisting of ideas: “Bareback sex doesn't cause HIV. The HIV virus causes HIV.” “Guns don't kill people. People kill people.” (NRA) People use guns to kill people. Bareback sex is the gun which shoots the bullet --HIV-- if the gun is loaded. We get HIV only from someone who has HIV. HIV+ people are loaded guns... In another post Tim described the traumas and turmoil in the daily lives of HIV+ people, caused by HIV, plus the uncomfortable and time consuming side effects of the medications, plus the opportunistic diseases that pop up for people living with HIV, such as lymphoma and cancer. Why would he then want even one more person to suffer those conditions, even by accident? Why would he not want to take all precautions from spreading HIV? SOMEONE FINALLY HAS TO SAY, explicitly, “STOP BAREBACKING !!” Barebacking, especially with strangers in silent dark places, is --and always was-- one of the best ways of spreading various diseases. Contrary to the HIV+ Lobbysts' proposal of guarranteed 100% safety in Barebacking with an HIV+ who has a “Zero Viral Count” --I would not bet my life on it.
STOP, Tor Ont
11/27/11 5:17 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Sleazy Lawyer Tim here...
just wanted to mention to you STOP...these are only little teeny tiny e-mail postings on Xtra's website. Hardly a place to engage in serious dialogue of any sort. However to suggest I want people to suffer HIV/AIDS is obscene and not based on anything remotely resembling reality. It is, to say the least a bizarre interpretation of my sleazy Lawyer posts. But you do seem to be truly passionate about this issue so I recommend that you might consider finding a more substantial forum with which to express your views. I can't imagine these little postings fill the obvious need and passions you have about the issue. I look forward to seeing this some time.
tim, toronto on
11/27/11 6:38 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
scapegoats of scapegoats
The new spin is that HIV poz men on meds are not spreading HIV despite so called barebacking because it is not possible with zero viral load. The culprits are those nasty neg men who are newly infected, a new scapegoat demonized gay man has emerged in the endless internecine HIV gay wars. The neg who does not know and is actually infected and spreading it to all the other negs who are too stupid to use condoms or to bareback with out HIV poz zero viral load. Indeed negative bottoms should seek out poz men on meds with zero viral to fuck raw since they will not get infected instead of taking their risk with the new Zombie of callous death, the neg gay who is newly infected and who has not yet bought the entire identity of good Poz. Good Poz and bad Neg-newly-infected. Another chapter in a diseased book.
david, Toronto Ontario
11/28/11 7:58 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Responsible
I'm sorry, but "I party and I bareback" is not 'responsible', whether or not you're positive. If you want to do it, go ahead, you should have the right to make stupid choices -- but don't expect to be praised for it.
Paul, Toronto ON
11/28/11 2:33 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Beautiful
The campaign posters are amazing. The people who created them are amazing artists. The people who inspired them are thoughtful and inspirational -- more than can be said for some of the haters who have left uniformed, even ignorant, comments. It is high time that art got back into the AIDS movement, as a way of educating and provoking thought and action. Great project AAN! Thoughtful article XTRA!
Glenn Betteridge, Toronto Ontario
11/28/11 10:01 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Fetishizing Barebacking, Not What You Think
Wow, it is really clear from the comments who is obsessed with and fetishizing barebacking. Hint: It is not Mikiki or Tim or ANN!. Many of you cannot get your head around the fact that barebacking does not necessarily risk newly infecting someone with HIV. Sero-sorting (ie: the practice by HIV+ people choosing to have sex with other HIV+ people) is well-documented in the peer-reviewed public health literature. It is recognized as a valid HIV prevention strategy--even where it involves barebacking. While it may result in re-infection of an HIV+ person, most HIV+ people know this and make decisions with this in mind. You may also be surprised to learn that early initiation of HIV antiretroviral therapy can reduce the chance of HIV transmission to a negative partner -- to a greater extent than condoms given the human factor in condom use. Here is one source: www.hptn.org/web documents/IndexDocs/HPTN052FactSheet19Jul2011.pdf. Google "HTPN 052" for many other sources.
Glenn Betteridge, Toronto Ontario
11/28/11 10:29 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Not Hate -but FEAR- instinct of self preservation
Glenn, The question still remains: Where are all the new infections coming from? Nice posters. But: Where are all the new infections coming from? Let's provoke some thought: Where are all the new infections coming from? THIS IS NOT HATE; IT IS FEAR. And rightfully so, based on instinct of self preservation and actual history of loved ones dying. Who actually wants to catch an illness which still causes discomfort for the rest of one's life? The new contention that: “antiretroviral therapy can REDUCE the chance of HIV transmission to a negative partner...” is not a guarrantee. Your internet link is not a solid proof which applies to all HIV+ people, merely a study of people who took that therapy. And the risk was merely reduced, not eliminated. FEAR is still justified and works better than condoms.
Joe, Tor Ont
11/29/11 1:43 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
just to clarify
If you fail to disclose that you are HIV positive to a negative sexual partner (no matter how stupid, uninformed, irresponsible, inebriated or ignorant said negative partner may be) you are opening yourself up to face retribution in the Canadian criminal justice system. That's how it is, and exactly how it should be. 'Well-designed posters' hanging in a 'hip' Toronto neighbourhood, thankfully have no power to change that.
Mike Tanner, Toronto Ontario
11/29/11 2:07 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
HIV Criminalization
I disagree that failure to disclose should be criminalized. It reminds me of the early days of HIV awareness, where there were calls to tattoo HIV+ people. Both partners need to share responsibility for the choices they make. I'm still trying to wrap my head around this campaign. "I party, I bareback, and I'm responsible." What does 'responsible' mean in this context? Is it "I'm making choices, and I'll be responsible for the outcomes?" or "barebacking and partying are reasonable choices to make"? I do think that someone can be HIV+, rationally weigh the variables (their viral load count, their partner's status, their partner's risk tolerance, risks of topping vs. bottoming, etc.) and make an informed choice to bareback. It will always be a riskier choice than the same situation with protection, but it is not necessarily 'irresponsible'. I have a harder time with it once 'partying' aka meth or other drug use comes into the picture. If you're doing meth, your ability to assess risk and make choices is undeniably damaged. Once you deliberately take your ability to reason out of the picture, it's harder to accept that you are being 'responsible'. Anyway, I guess the posters did make me think.
Paul, Toronto ON
11/29/11 2:35 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Gay men need factual information
There is lots of evidence to suggest that for casual sex gay men need to continue to use condoms whether guys with HIV are on treatment or not. Anyone that tells you otherwise is misinformed. And anyone that tells you that fucking bareback without a condom with a low viral load is 'better than' or even equivalent to a condom for casual sex is lying or hasn't done their homework. Don't buy it. Do your homework yourself and get well informed. In the end, you need to use a condom to fuck casually and if you do that you don't need to worry about whether the guys you are with have HIV or not. Anyone that tells you otherwise isn't thinking about you or your health.
Kevin, Toronto Ontario
11/30/11 7:52 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
mission accomplished!!!
Brilliant! Brilliant Brilliant! These posters have definately ignited some incredibly passionate arguments, conversations, rants, debates, tirades, etc etc. People are fuming mad, empowered, defensive and attacking and its all out in the open. We needed this. Epic win AAN!
Richard, toronto ontario
12/11/11 11:35 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
The posters are gone
The posters that AAN put up in the Church-Wellesley neighbourhood were gone within a week. It appears to have just been a one-time publicity stunt.
Dave, Toronto Ontario
12/12/11 12:07 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
the posters are gone
but the dialogues aren't. You and I still took the time to post about them in spite of them "being gone within a week" ;) I am still reading and hearing strong debates about them on a daily basis. You can't put an idea back in the box once its out. The fact that people have reacted so strongly says something. I think people will be talking about said posters for a very long time.
Richard, toronto ontario
12/17/11 12:11 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.