Condo proposal could force out fly, Fire on the East Side
DEVELOPMENT / Condo project would gut heritage buildings, could close clubs by 2015
Rob Salerno / Toronto / Thursday, July 07, 2011
Share |

The owner of the building that houses gay nightclub fly and its resto-bar, Fire on the East Side, has submitted a rezoning application to the city requesting permission to build a 29-storey condo tower on the property.
 
If the nearly 100-metre tower proposal is approved, both spots could be forced from their current locations. Fly holds a lease on its current location at 8 Gloucester St until 2015, which is the earliest it could be kicked out.
 
The proposal faces a number of hurdles before the city approves it. The affected properties at 2-8 Gloucester St have all been designated as protected under the Ontario Heritage Act, meaning that any development would have to be approved by the city’s Preservation Board.
Artist's rendering of the proposed tower at 8 Gloucester, where fly and Fire on the East Side are currently located.
 
The current application would leave the Masonic Temple, at 2 Gloucester St, untouched while gutting the properties at 6 and 8 Gloucester, leaving only their facades.
 
The proposed tower also exceeds the area’s current height restrictions and may cast shadows on the neighbouring Norman Jewison Park. There is also concern that it would encroach on existing parking in the laneway.
 
The owners of fly appear confident that the application as submitted won’t be approved, but they are prepared to move if they’re forced out.
 
“By mid-2013 we’ll have a better sense of what [the end of our current lease] will mean, so we’ll look at options to move both fly and Fire on the East Side,” says Ian Malcolm, one of the club’s owners. “But the landowner has a fair number of hurdles to jump through before the rezoning application is approved.”
 
Local Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam says she’s concerned about the loss of two of the neighbourhood’s queer hangouts.
 
“I know there’s some iconic businesses that the community cherishes that will be lost or have to move if the zoning goes ahead,” she says. “It’s really important to recognize that the key to any successful business environment is diversity.”
 
Wong-Tam says that if the clubs are forced to move, she will help them obtain liquor permits at their new locations.
 
“I’m not closed to having nightclubs in the neighbourhood,” she says. “You cannot have a vibrant gay village without a vibrant nightlife. We are social creatures; we love to go out, and we’re very good at doing so.
 
“I will not raise objections when the AGCO asks me if I have objections,” she adds.
 
The rezoning approval process will take at least nine months, according to the city planning department. The landowner’s proposal will first have to pass a heritage assessment, then a zoning review. After that, it will have to pass a detailed site plan review. The community will be able to participate in a public consultation on the proposals in the fall, city planning staff say.
 
This proposal comes shortly after pressure from the community led developers to withdraw a proposal to gut heritage properties at Church and Gloucester streets, home to queer hangouts Sugo and Fuzion, to build a massive tower.
 
The strip of Yonge St will soon be flooded with development and rezoning proposals.
 
A similar proposal was recently submitted to build a condo on Yonge St spanning the block from Maitland to Alexander streets.
 
Condo developers have also had meetings with the city to discuss rezoning applications for 599 Yonge St, at Gloucester, and 9 Isabella St, at Yonge, a source at the planning department has confirmed. Applications for these projects have not yet been submitted.
 
A condo tower has also been proposed for the parking lot across the street from The Barn.
 


Share |


Reader Comments


 
once it's gone it's gone
An August 2010 city zoning by-law stated that no new nightclubs can be built within 300 metres of a residential property (which is nowhere in Toronto), they can't have multiple floors or establishments, and they must also be at ground level. If Fly goes, it won't be replaced. Same with Guvernment, and pretty much the whole Entertainment District. There are so many new restrictions on nightclubs, it pretty much discourages any rich entrepreneur from opening up a new operation. Where in the Village would house another Fly? Where in downtown Toronto for that matter? Nightclubs of the future, if there are any, won't be like what we remember them today. Say goodbye to the old style clubs, seedy basements and 2nd levels. Maybe the new configuration will work, but don't expect it to be anything like yesteryear.
Ryan, Toronto ON
07/07/11 8:14 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
LeaseOptions
Lease Options are a financing instrument in which you can buy a property for a specific price within a specific period of time without the obligation of buying the property. Lease Options
LeaseOptions, London England
07/08/11 5:21 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Stop selling off my neighborhood
When will enough be enough? There are already 5 condo developments on the books for Church Street between Gerrard and Charles, how many people and how much traffic do people think the neighborhood can handle? I hear people in this publication say that they want to live in the neighborhood but there aren't enough rental spaces, well the lack of available rental spaces in the neighborhood is part of what makes it feel like a neighborhood and our home, once these "Black Death Stars" are errected in the area, you might as well kiss the "neighborhood" good-bye! PS-Thank you Kyle Rae for selling us out!
Jen, Toronto ontario
07/08/11 2:41 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
so true
i couldnt agree more jen the parking situation is already starting to get out of control. when will the city start raelizing this and make developers put up buildings that have smaller apartments and less parking/...especially in our church st area where we have subways one block away at yonge. the streets are not getting any wider yet the number of people living in our neighbourhood is increasing. more people equals more cars unless we do something
Rob, Toronto Ontario
07/08/11 5:30 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.