City hall to cut funds for global AIDS initiative
TORONTO NEWS / 'This council needs to recalibrate its values': Wong-Tam
Andrea Houston / Toronto / Friday, November 30, 2012
Share |

On the eve of World AIDS Day, Toronto City Council is considering putting the Global AIDS Prevention Initiative on the chopping block.

The proposed cut is included in the 2013 proposed budget summary, released Nov 29. The annual funding of $104,000 has been earmarked to Africa to assist local groups in HIV prevention, treatment and education. It was created as the city’s legacy to the 16th International AIDS Conference, held in Toronto in 2006.

Ward 27 Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam plans to fight the cut. She says there should be no reduction in the city’s funding to any HIV/AIDS programs.

“Any reduction to the AIDS prevention envelope should be fought with resistance,” she says. “I don’t believe we should be cutting this . . . We should all fight that. We need to take a stand. If we reduce this, what else is next?”

She calls the proposed cut part of the city’s “war on the poor.”

“This war on the disenfranchised needs to stop . . . People are hurting. This council needs to recalibrate its values.”

Wong-Tam says the money, which comes from the city’s AIDS Prevention Community Investment Program (APCIP), funds various initiatives in the fight against AIDS in Africa, such as palliative care, efforts to engage young people in HIV prevention, sexual health education and removing the stigma surrounding the disease.
AIDS Action Now protested cuts to HIV/AIDS service at Toronto City Hall during the 2011 budget deliberations.
(Courtesy AIDS Action Now)


“Other initiatives coming out of this very small amount focus on trying to empower young women and build civic engagement with government,” she says. “The funds are significant in terms of impact it is having.”

She also says the funding allows the city to take a very public profile on this issue and work in partnership with other cities taking steps in the global fight against AIDS.

“We must reach out internationally. This is a disease that has no border. This is a global pandemic,” she says. “After we hosted the International AIDS Conference, this was our pledge. This is the legacy of that. For us to go back onto the international stage and tell the world we cut the funding in 2013, that doesn’t demonstrate forward thinking.”

The Global AIDS Initiative is the only international funding included in the APCIP. The city budget is $9.4 billion.

“You know, for $104,000, it is doing fantastic international solidarity work,” Wong-Tam says.

Councillor John Filion, chair of the Board of Health, says the board agreed to the proposal, which came from Toronto Public Health.

“Well, we had to make cuts. This program was vulnerable to a cut because it’s not part of our mandate and it’s not one of our cost-shared programs,” he says.
Ward 23 councillor John Filion.


Unlike other Board of Health programs that are mandatory and cost-shared by the province, the Global AIDS Initiative is funded 100 percent by the city, Filion says. The province pays 75 percent of mandatory programs.

Wong-Tam says she will suggest that the funding be diverted to a local initiative, like the Stephen Lewis Foundation. Filion says a replacement is not being considered. “If we approve the budget, it will be gone,” he says. 

“[The fund] was for work outside Toronto. It’s not that it wasn’t worthwhile . . . We have to scrutinize our budget. We’re sorry to see it go. We would continue to fund it if it were not for a budget squeeze.”

Filion says he has to fight to keep funding for local AIDS programs. “We have struggled to maintain funding for AIDS prevention in Toronto.”

AIDS Action Now’s Tim McCaskell rejects Filion’s suggestion that a local program would be at risk if the initiative were saved. “It’s always this or something else. It shouldn’t be either or.”
Tim McCaskell speaks at an AIDS Action Now 25th anniversary function.
(Andrea Houston)


“We know the situation in Africa is really dire,” he says. “It’s not just a matter of getting drugs into people. Twenty years of AIDS there has changed the demographics. That’s why grandparents are raising children. Any removal of funds further exacerbates those problems and has cascading results.”

There are about 23.5 million people living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa, according to amfAR, the American Foundation for AIDS research. Every day nearly 7,000 people in the world contract HIV — that's 300 every hour.

“Someone should go over there and take pictures of the faces of those who benefit from this program,” McCaskell adds.

Meanwhile, on Nov 28, the federal Conservatives defeated Bill C-398, a private member’s bill that would have reformed Canada’s Access to Medicines Regime (CAMR) to make it easier to get Canadian generic medicines to developing countries, like those in Africa.

“We could talk about the implicit racism in both these attacks on Africa,” McCaskell says. “The city’s fiscal questions are more important than the lives of black people.”

Deputations for the 2013 budget will be Dec 10 and 11 at Toronto City Hall. Contact the budget committee at 416-338-5851 or 416-392-7445, or email buc@toronto.ca no later than 4pm on Dec 7 to make a public presentation.
 


Share |


Reader Comments


 
Perhaps Wong-Tam could
recalibrate her stance on the HIV people in her ward. For instance in very important issues such as housing and food. This money could go a long way in supporting an affordable housing initiative for HIV people in her ward. I'm not sure why she is dismissing the HIV people in her ward? It doesn't make sense? Why else would she wish to remove resources from Toronto and send them to another country when HIV positive people in her ward cannot secure appropriate safe affordable housing? Housing is the number one indicator of health. It seems Wong-Tam in her desire to help people in other countries is practicing a type of wilful blindness in regards to the extremely desperate housing situation for HIV positive people in her ward. It doesn't make any sense. People are hurting. I need some clarification here.
Rendall, Any Wherever
12/01/12 11:20 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Not a city concern, but the feds
McCaskell says that someone should go and take pictures of the Africans with AIDS. Kyle Rae went to Botswana for a week - on the public purse - to open a clinic. Perhaps he has a roll or two of film he could share if asked. What we don't need is Wong-Tam repeating that behaviour. Kyle Rae also toured Germany several times to learn about harm reduction. I suppose that will have to be re-learned as well? Spend funds at home. We have a federal foreign affairs bureaucracy to deliver funding and programmes. That's not what city council is for.
Nadine Oberman, Toronto ON
12/01/12 4:28 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Racism and ethnocentricm
It's truly disgusting to read comments like those above. It's thinly veiled racism. Tim's right. Basically you are saying "Let the black people die!" I refuse to accept that Toronto is so broke that we can't assist Africa in this global pandemic AND help HIV pos people here at home. Frankly, Rendall, it's pretty disingenuous to say Wong-Tam doesn't advocate for local services. What's so wrong in her advocating for this funding as well? Seriously Toronto, are you really this racist? I don't even know who you are anymore.
Juanita, Toronto Ontario
12/02/12 11:39 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
If you disagree, it must be because you are racist
No doubt some people are motivated by racism, but there's a significant argument to be made that the levels of government that conduct our foreign affairs are in a better position to and have responsibility for foreign assistance. To argue that the city ought not be involved in this sort of thing is not necessarily racism, and that kind of name-calling doesn't help the debate. The term 'racist' gets thrown around far too easily these days, and it diminishes the impact of the accusation when you simply pull it out to win an argument. I believe Canada can be doing more to help Africa, and that we should continue to have a generous refugee policy. I'm not racist. I simply happen to believe that the city should stay focused on local concerns and that it's reach has exceeded its grasp on so many matters. People of colour languish in Toronto, in shelters and on the streets. How is it racist to think we should care for them before sending money overseas for programmes we can't possibly oversee?
Nadine Oberman, Toronto Ontario
12/02/12 2:16 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
QuAIA hypocrisy
Those who speak for Palestinians (like Tim frequently has) have had to endure the slander that any criticism of the Israeli state is always a manifestation of anti-Semitism, as if Israel is beyond reproach. It is a specious accusation and a dishonest argument by those who don't want to debate the facts - they'd rather scream about hatred of Jews. Rather than engage with the details of the criticism (a disproportionate number of Palestinians die whenever there's a uptick in hostilities) some of Israel's defenders would rather just retreat to the old canard: they hate us because we're Jews! So it is very disappointing to see Tim McCaskell us the same spurious logic. Now, no doubt some who oppose municipal funding of the global AIDS battle devalue African lives. But not all! Can he not conceive that opposition might have other bases? But what about those of us who simply think that this isn't the level of government that should be doing this sort of work? Native Canadians have a higher HIV infection rate than the average. Thousands of Canadians are homeless - right here in downtown Toronto. And on it goes. We should let Africa deal with African problems. We give aid already via our governments and to Plan Canada and other charities. I'm not motivated by hatred of black people. I'd just rather the black people who live in Toronto be cared for first, and there's all kinds of evidence that isn't happening. On this issue at least, Tim McCaskell is a hypocrite. I hope he thinks about what he has said and withdraws it. I'm sure he said it in the heat of passion. Now he can explain what he really meant without maligning those of us who think that a city's focus should first and foremost be local problems that we can fix, and not be guilted into thinking that every emerging tragedy in the world is ours to solve. What about malaria? It kills way more than HIV, and still the population of Africa continues to skyrocket.
Iskander Mektupcuk, Longbranch ontario
12/03/12 2:14 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Stop the infighting!
When will the gay community realize they are dividing us, telling us to choose one or the other, that we can't have both. If Torontonians are dying, then we should be fighting for more funding and services, not sacrificing the much-needed funding for Africa as a bargaining chip. When did we roll over in defeat? I want both!
Old activist, Toronto Ontario
12/03/12 1:18 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Old activist with outdated advice
A discussion, even a heated discussion, isn't "infighting." I despise the notion that gay and lesbian people have to agree with each other or something is wrong. It is the same kind of thinking that says we cannot criticize a politician who is gay, a woman or comes from our own minority group. Let's treat each other with some respect, but when we disagree, let's use it as an opportunity to learn. And please, don't lecture us with the idea that we all have to think and believe the same thing. Debate and open discussion is healthy. Calling it "infighting" is not.
Ron, Toronto ON
12/04/12 2:26 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
party line rules
How does giving money to organizations in Africa help the poor in Toronto? Ron, the answer to that question also addresses your point. There is a Queer Party Line that broaches no dissent in the ranks. There are 2 kinds of people in the facebooked universe of Queer politics: "friends" (who agree with everything you say) and "haters" (who disagree with anything you say). Queer is forced inclusivity of not only "queers" but of all "intersectionalities of oppression". Really, Ron, you've been out of the Gulag too long and are missing the New Queer Order rules.
hanging by a thread, Toronto Ontario
12/05/12 5:09 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Its Wong-Tam who needs to "re-calibrate"
It is not the job of a city Councillor to solve the Aids crisis in Africa using our tax dollars. It might make Wong-Tam feel good helping African's but the fact is there are 1000's of HIV+ men living in poverty in her ward that could make better use of these funds. Maybe that is the problem. Its overwhelmingly men in Toronto that have HIV and as a Dyke Wong-Tam obviously doesn't have a thing for men. So much easier for her to feel compassion for some "disenfranchised" African with AID's. I regret voting for Wong-Tam and I bet that I am not alone. I will never make that mistake again.
Kevin, Toronto Ontario
12/12/12 10:57 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Relax Juanita ...Rendall is right
Juanita is too eager to play the racist card - Rendall is merely saying charity begins at home and not in other countries - never did he mention Africans - Rendall would oppose helping those in blue-eyed and blond Sweden etc at the expense of those in Toronto - Juanita should fund raise for Africa and put her money where her mouth is
G. Lee, Toronto ON
12/14/12 5:43 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Wong Tam - self-importance
George Remedios To George Remedios Councillor Wong Tam does not realize she is not an MP in the House of Commons nor the Foreign Minister of Canada handing out foreign aid - she was voted a mere city councillor to deal with things like garbage collection - she should not puff herself up and deal with international issues because no one gave her that mandate -- she is meddlesome like most politicians of NDP orientation
G. Lee, Toronto ON
12/14/12 6:41 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.