Changing directions for ACT?
COMMUNITY NEWS / New ED Hazelle Palmer takes the helm
Scott Dagostino / Toronto / Tuesday, July 14, 2009
Share |

Though Hazelle Palmer is still settling in as the new executive director of the AIDS Committee of Toronto (ACT) she's already given away one of the paintings that briefly hung in her new office. In addition to having a master's certificate in healthcare management from York and sitting on the board of Women's College Hospital, Palmer is also an artist with a couple of gallery showings under her belt.

NEW ED ON THE BLOCK. Hazelle Palmer became the AIDS Committee of Toronto's new executive director in April.
(Nicola Betts)
"They took it for an auction the other day," she says. "It's another way I get to contribute."

The auction was for the 16th anniversary of Teens Educating and Confronting Homophobia (TEACH), a high-school antihomophobia program run by Planned Parenthood Toronto (PPT). Prior to joining ACT in April, Palmer was PPT's executive director and describes her tenure as "a very successful eight years."

Under her leadership PPT unveiled an ambitious five-year strategic plan to expand programs and services (including a new anonymous HIV testing out of its clinic on Prince Arthur Ave) while adding a second Toronto location and increasing its annual surpluses (more than $200,000 in 2007-'08).

"We really stepped up the fundraising to meet program needs," says Palmer.

The strategic plan, Palmer says, was "a vision and strategic direction for the organization that made it more inclusive, more innovative and creative in responding to the needs of the community." It's what she's planning for ACT too.

While she now manages approximately 50 full-time staff compared to PPT's 40 and says that, in its programs, "ACT is certainly a larger organization, more complex," Palmer says ACT needs to be equally "responsive and effective." She believes the key lies in fostering greater partnerships with other AIDS service organizations (ASOs) like the Black Coalition for AIDS Prevention and Asian Community AIDS Services — understanding their priorities and "looking for overlap."

"I like the idea of all ASOs being open to working together," she says. "It's not, you know, us versus them. We have to figure out a way to work together to have the biggest impact.

"I'm really encouraging a community development model," says Palmer, adding she hopes to "allow everyone to feel they have a stake in the process."

If it all sounds a bit vague, Palmer admits, "I don't really have a lot of specifics right now," and particular HIV/AIDS issues are "part of what I want to listen to."

Through this listening process Palmer insists that ACT must "respond to what's the greatest need." But, given that more than 60 percent of those affected by HIV in Ontario are gay men, some are wondering why ACT didn't hire a gay man to replace outgoing ED Lori Lucier.

"I have nothing against the new ED of ACT personally but I am disappointed a woman was hired," says Shaun Proulx, ProudFM host and Xtra columnist who has written on the need for gay leadership at ACT. "No woman has ever navigated the complexities of gay living — from bathhouse sex, to PNP [party-and-play culture], to the complex internal pressures of gay male relationships, to HIV/AIDS stigma within the gay male community.... I really wanted to see the organization run from the top down by a man who got all this, preferably an HIV-positive man who would by nature of his identity understand the way no woman will ever."

John Maxwell, director of policy and communications at ACT, says he understands where such criticism is coming from. "As HIV began to affect more communities," he says, "there've been more people clamouring for limited resources and, in many cases, gay men have gotten squeezed out."

But one of Palmer's first acts, says Maxwell, was to move him "back into managing our prevention and education staff, the majority of whom are focusing on gay men." He says he's impressed that his new boss is "strategic and forward-thinking and surrounds herself with people who know what they're doing."

While Palmer identifies as queer, having had "wonderful relationships with men and women," she sees it as separate from her work at ACT. "I don't think it's about my own orientation or my gender or whether I'm [HIV-] positive or not," says Palmer, "I think it's my responsibility to recognize a need for more targeted outreach strategy."

The overall message, she says, is that "HIV/AIDS affects everyone but ACT is going to focus its specific efforts on certain priority populations: gay men, women, youth and, I think, intravenous drug users.... I don't think me being a black woman in this role is going to prevent that message from getting out there."

One huge issue currently facing ACT is the response to the ongoing criminalization of HIV. It's an issue that tests the limits of the gentle, cooperative process between ASOs that Palmer craves.

"I'm just entering into this discussion," she says. "We're finding that we need to say more." While she praises ACT staffers Maxwell and Angel Parks for being on the frontline in combating the way "the media has portrayed a particular image that the public is buying," Palmer notes that "ACT is part of a working group on HIV/AIDS that has agreed that no one organization would come out and lead on this issue."

Is this is a case of "tall poppy" syndrome so no one agency faces government funding fallout?

"No," Palmer says, "it's about us being a united front as ASOs — one position, one organization speaking on behalf of all of us. There is strength in us working together as a group to have one message and a strategic response."

Perhaps, but while this deliberation goes on, the mainstream media charges ahead with stories of HIV-positive people as criminals. "It can be frustrating for the general public," says Palmer, "and even our clients to ask, 'Where's your voice on this? Where's the public debate?'"

Still her collaborative approach "makes sense," says Maxwell, adding that ACT has been letting the HIV/AIDS Legal Clinic and the Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network take the lead on the criminalization issue.

"We're not legal experts so it makes sense to partner with them," he says. "They've got the ability to influence lawyers that we would never have."

Palmer says that ACT's role is to come at it "from a social perspective... a different kind of campaign that's focused on positive people and informing them what their rights are."

She points out, however, that ACT's various campaigns take money, something that's in short supply. In its 2007-2008 fiscal year ACT brought in $1 million less than the year before — its disastrous 2007 Fashion Cares event barely broke even and the organization was left with a deficit of $233,542.

Palmer laughs recalling her first reaction to looking at the books. "Oh my God!" she says, "It's certainly not a healthy state."

Funding has also been an issue. Following a dramatic 30-percent cut in AIDS funding to Ontario in 2007 the federal government has promised that same amount of $2,427,000 through 2011 but the current recession inspires doubt across the nonprofit sector.

"It's a challenging time," Palmer says. "I'm hearing that next year will be even harder than this one — what do you do in the middle of that?"

Faced with an accounting nightmare Palmer turns to her artistic background. "I always look at work through that lens," she says. "I love creativity, I love thinking outside the box, I love working in partnership and thinking of things with a fresh perspective."

Creativity, she insists, will carry ACT through tough financial times. "It's about having different kinds of donor events or third-party events," says Palmer. "Our fund development team is looking at new ways to raise funds so it's not just focused on event planning."

Palmer says she doesn't want ACT to see Fashion Cares stumble again. The previously annual event has taken a miss in 2009 and is scheduled to return in 2010. "We need time to really think about how we implement that event," she says.

Palmer says she approaches these decisions the same way she approaches a painting. "I try to visualize what I'd like the organization to be and to work with the management team to get a sense of their vision and it all helps me to create a picture of the organization that I want to lead."

"She's only been here less than two months and she's already supported a lot of good and exciting new projects," says Maxwell, who laughs at the suggestion that all her talk of cooperation and listening and change sounds, well, Obama-esque. "Well, give her her hundred days!" he laughs.

Palmer's vision of ACT is about "getting people excited about what they do and getting them to buy into a vision.... As we start to listen to people telling us what we should be doing, a new ACT will emerge."


Share |


Reader Comments


 
"Criminalization of HIV".
"One huge issue currently facing ACT is the response to the ongoing criminalization of HIV" claims the writer. Xtra keeps on with this alarmist editorial line. I wish they would present evidence that this is happening. The prosecutions that have happened thus far are hardly evidence in and of themselves - they seem quite reasonable to me, and the Crown has a duty to protect the public. Its a wonderful and emotive bit of fear mongering - with little to back it up. I wish you would back it up with some facts and a cogent argument. That is truly missing. So far, all we really have is slogans about the "criminalization of HIV". That's not enough. I am open minded, but I'll need more convincing to come on side. My sense is that most gay people I talk to are ambivalent about this tinfoil hat conspiracy theory that we are entering a new dark age of HIV repression and actually want to see some control of those who would purposefully infect others. If they are wrong, you need to convince them and me why that is so. More information, less agitprop please.
Alex MacLean, Toronto ON
07/15/09 12:14 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
No reason to be concerned about hiring
Gay men are a very important constituency for ACT but not the only one. Here is what is important: does the ED understand the issues and will she marshall her resources to best address them? That is the only question. She is right that her gender and sexuality have nothing to do with it. The knowledge you share and the decisions you make, and their outcomes; that is what matters. And for the commenter above, I think some of Xtra's coverage has pointed out how real the problem of HIV criminalization is, and I'm sure it will continue to do so. The problem is that these cases are not all reasonable at all, a lot of the time people are being arrested in he-said/he-said situations where no one get HIV and it is only one person's word against the other. Anyone with HIV could be busted on that basis. The charges are growing and it is gay men who are now on the receiving end. Believe me, even if you never put anyone at risk, this situation is terrifying.
Toronto gay man, TO ON
07/16/09 3:16 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
help
"My sense is that most gay people I talk to are ambivalent about this tinfoil hat conspiracy theory that we are entering a new dark age of HIV repression and actually want to see some control of those who would purposefully infect others." says a commenter named Alex. Well what's really happening alongside any valid cases is bullshit revenge cases where the negative person claims the positive person was risky with them, but they don't have to prove anything. Look at the case of D.C. in Quebec. She was open with her status to her boyfriend. It was only after he became violent and she had to press domestic assault against him that all of a sudden, she supposedly hadn't told him anything. This is negatives wielding power against positives because they can. And it's spreading to the gay community too as the number of male-on-male charges has increased in the past year and that is a fact. What about the guy who broke up with someone and as revenge, the guy claimed he had never disclosed. It's going to get worse before it gets better. I read about the fact of both those cases in Xtra. Commenter Alex, please think about it some more and get on side. This is bullshit and it is very scary for poz folks, almost all of us don't want to hurt anyone but this law can be used unfairly against us.
help, help help
07/18/09 11:43 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Misogyny, plan and simple
I can't quite believe that no one has called out Shaun Proulx for his sexist and misogynist comment: "I have nothing against the new ED of ACT personally but I am disappointed a woman was hired ... no woman has ever navigated the complexities of gay living ..." Proulx needs to read some queer history and talk to some of the HUNDREDS of dykes who cared for gay men dying of AIDS over the last 25 years. Women and men stood hand-in-hand to launch the gay liberation movement. The idea that a woman couldn't understand the complexities of gay male culture is complete and utter horseshit.
Ariel Troster, Ottawa ON
07/21/09 1:29 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
misogyny
I worked for a community AIDS Service Organization for two years. It was, and is to this day, directed by a woman and during the two years that I worked there, its gay men's health and HIV prevention grew by leaps and bounds, both in funding and innovative approaches to community health. Shaun Proulx's comments are boring, incorrect, devoid of any evidence, and, frankly, idiotic in the context of current mainstream thinking on gender. One can only assume from his quote that understanding epidemiological trends and managing a cadre of gay men working at ACT to facilitate community responses is somehow gender-specific. Which, we know, as Ariel Troster eloquently states, is "complete and utter horseshit."
Adam Graham, Geneva Switzerland
07/21/09 5:00 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Hooey
Congratulations and welcome to the new ED of ACT - Hazelle Palmer. It's a big job ahead and it sounds like Hazelle is a good choice to get it done. As far as whether or not a woman is the right choice for ACT - an organization that must provide leadership and strong voice on HIV related issues at a time when gay men continue to bear the brunt of the burden of HIV in Canada - I say why not. It's not like gay men have been providing the leadership required to effectively prevent HIV in our communities. Perhaps Hazelle will bring the strong voice and the leadership required to end the deafening silence around HIV in gay communities across Canada. Perhaps Hazelle will do for gay men what we aren't doing for ourselves.
Phillip, Vancouver bC
07/21/09 11:35 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
your comments
Shaun Proulx Your Comments Suck!
Luca, Toronto ontario
07/22/09 9:34 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Not just about HIV
ACT is supposed to 'help' the community in a number of ways. The sad truth is that there has 'never' been any accountability for the 'overstocked' number of employees, 1/2 of which are not needed. No wonder the books look bad. Its inevitable. The internal goings on at ACT are dreadful, with the illegal practices going on, the theft of dollars and the way volunteers are treated and betrayed in some cases. It's so sad. No one to talk to since no one accounts to anyone. Employees come and go as they want. Sex,drugs and rock and roll are just a part of what goes on, blind to the public. I hope the new ED can shake it all loose and start again. It needs to be started from scratch. I wonder is she really has the wearwithall to see all these terrible issues and change them. Is she capable because it will require major changes and decisions and pain, but can she see the problems even? It is sad but ACT as a community helper really is not necessary. If there was not ACT, would there really be a major difference in the community, especially with the 519, much better run and honest, which is all that is needed. The money given to ACT by the government could just go to HIV research. So sad. a former ACT employee.
Ron, Toronto Ontario
07/25/09 8:11 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.