Anti-gay ideology behind Pride Toronto funding snub, say opposition MPs
FEDERAL POLITICS / Clement says funding capped at two events per city, but Winnipeg and Quebec City got cash for three
Dale Smith / National / Monday, May 10, 2010
Share |

NDP MP Bill Siksay is the party's queer issues critic
Opposition MPs say anti-gay ideology is behind the Conservative government's decision not to fund Pride Toronto this year under the Marquee Tourism Events Program.

On Friday afternoon, the federal government released the list of events that will receive funds as part of the 2010 economic stimulus program — and Pride Toronto was left off the list. No gay events made the cut, including Montreal's Divers/Cité and Black and Blue festivals.

Industry Minister Tony Clement insists that the funding this year was meant to be spread across a greater number of cities, capping the events funded in major cities to two each. However, Winnipeg and the Quebec City area each received funding for three events.

"I don't think anybody can be surprised," says gay NDP MP Bill Siksay, who recalls how former tourism minister Diane Ablonczy was demoted in 2009 for funding Pride Toronto. "It was clear then that funding was in jeopardy for Toronto Pride, for Pride festivals anywhere.

"I think it just falls in line with the Conservatives making decisions based on ideology. We've seen it in recent weeks in funding for women's organizations.... I don't think it's surprising at all that they would act on the basis of their ideological beliefs and deny funding to Toronto Pride this year."

Liberal tourism critic Navdeep Bains, who raised the issue during Question Period on Monday, criticized the argument that money shouldn't go to events that are already successful. Clement told the CBC last week that Pride Toronto is "able to stand on its own two feet," but Bains notes that didn't stop the Tories from funding other successful events.

"If you look at the Marquee Tourism criteria, it is to promote key marquee events around the country," Bains tells Xtra. "The Calgary Stampede, for example, is a very successful event, and received funding last year and this year as well, so I think that logic of theirs [Clement and the Conservative government] is flawed."

Bains also had harsh words for the Tories in a Liberal press release. "The Conservatives have a long history of attacking gay rights — and they want us to believe that this decision is all about spreading the money around?" says Bains in the release. "Their justification for cutting funding to one of Canada’s largest and best-known tourism events in North America is just another example of the Conservative culture of deceit."

WHAT EVENTS RECEIVED FUNDS?

A selection of events that received funding from the 2010 Marquee Tourism Events Program:

Canada's Largest Ribfest:
$98,610

Pacific National Exhibition:
$2,984,250

Dauphin's Countryfest:

$532,560

International Plowing Match and Rural Expo:
$255,460

Festival International de Jazz de Montréal:
$3,000,000

Norfolk county Fair and Horse Show:
$171,000

Calgary Stampede:
$1,001,625

Rexall Edmonton Indy:
$821,250
Lesbian Conservative senator Nancy Ruth, who hails from Toronto, notes in an email to Xtra that the grants were "never meant to be annual," and that groups would have known this.

She adds, "I am disappointed that Pride didn't get $400,000 again."

Opposition MPs questioned large amounts of money given to two Toronto events: the Luminato arts festival and the Royal Agricultural Winter Fair.

"Based on the sheer economics of this, what Luminato contributes to the Canadian economy is simply not nearly the same extent of what Pride does," says gay Toronto Liberal MP Rob Oliphant. "We have a million people celebrating Pride for a week. They estimated that $6 million was generated from that $400,000 grant – that’s good business for this government.”

NDP MP Olivia Chow, a former Toronto city councillor, is aware that Toronto's Royal Agricultural Winter Fair has faced financial difficulty in the past, but she questions why the agricultural event received nearly $1.9 million.

"It's a huge amount of money," Chow says. "Does it have as huge a turnout as Pride? Absolutely nowhere near it."

Industry Canada officials have not responded to Xtra's request for clarification as to whether this year's funding application process was the same as it was last year. Clement has said that the process was different, which contradicts statements by Pride Toronto executive director Tracey Sandilands and the Liberals. As well, Xtra seeks clarification about why Winnipeg and the Quebec City area received cash for three events, if funding was capped to two events per major city, as Clement claims.



Share |


Reader Comments


 
Biased
It seems inherently biased. Rather than limit the number of events per city, dollars should be allocated on a per-capita basis, so each taxpayer sees that money being spent near them, in proportion. Further, to encourage a diversity of events, federal funding of any individual event should be capped at $500,000 or less, so things like the Jazz festival, PNE, or Stampede don't suck up all the money.
Randy, Windsor ON
05/10/10 10:21 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Anti-Torontoism
The Marquis Program shovels money into Quebec and Alberta events and stiffs Toronto. Typical. It's honestly very disgusting that Montreal (and I have nothing against MTL) received several times more than Toronto's share. $6 million for Jazzfest and Just For Laughs, two events that could also, as Clement says, stand on their own feet. The Tories chose 'safe' national events probably thinking they could plaster their party's logo on all the signage. Sure glad my tax dollars are going to a big pony ride that I'm not invited to.
Ryan, Toronto ON
05/10/10 11:03 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Why should we care, really?
I'm not yet convinced we should give much of a damn about this. If it is inspired by homophobia, well, news flash - the Tories are homophobic. Let's focus on defeating them, then. The money won't actually help us enjoy our Pride more, best I can tell, since the funds are for promotion. Selling the event to potential tourists, and swelling the numbers of attendees even further adds costs: to the city for policing, demands on transit and infrastructure for more volunteers. So it doesn't do anything for the average Torontonian/Pride attendee unless you think that the day is more successful the more people in attendance. I personally find it has gotten less enjoyable as it has grown beyond a certain point and now prefer Montreal's. After a certain point, any growth is uneconomic. The only reason why a larger pride is a better pride is that some businesses benefit. Fine - if this is now primarily an economic event, let business underwrite the cost of promoting this abroad. I don't see why Toronto citizens should fund the thing three times over - the city and the province already give funds. Asking us to fund it through our federal income tax as well is pushing it, especially with no demonstrable tangible benefit.
Alex MacLean, Toronto ON
05/11/10 10:16 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Perhaps there is another reason
While I don't believe that the Tory party has changed their views on us, I believe that there might be another reason for this. The Tories are staunch allies of Israel and, so far, it looks like QUAIA (Queers Against Israeli Apartheid) will be allowed to march in the Pride Parade. If I'm a Tory, I would ask myself "why should we give money to an event that allows the promotion hatred towards Israel?" Also, have we not evolved enough to be able to be self-sustainable? Where is all the support from the community? Where are all the successful people in our community and their support? Perhaps we should all be stepping up to the plate, no matter what the size of the contribution.
Wil, Toronto ON
05/11/10 11:14 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Tory is as Tory does
Why does this not surprise me? The Tories are acting like... Tories. It's up to us to turf the bastards out of office in the next election. In the meantime, concerning funding, maybe the Pride Committee could take a queue from the Catholics... Bingo. I hear it's a great way to raise money.
Kieran Earles, Mount Pearl Newfoundland
05/11/10 12:06 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Ideology?
It's so boring to hear the assign argument that the conservatives make decisions based on ''ideology''. Is that what every one should do. Make decisions based on their moral beliefs? But anyway, I don't think that this is a decision rooted in the hatred of GBTQ people. Hatred of Toronto? Maybe? But if you look at the events that they are pumping money into, they all seem to look like relatively safe and more or less ''family oriented'' and apolitical. Let's face it Toronto Pride is not Family oriented. With all of the hard drug use, nudity, and open displays of sex. Also it is not apolitical, especially with groups like the QUAIA.
mike, Barrie Ontario
05/11/10 12:41 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Another resaon why the Middle Eastern Problems
should stay there becasue Pride has become a martyr and the victim. I'm not really surprise the Conservative Government withdrew funding but they are also not Gay Friendly and I really doubt that one group was the reason behind this or the support for one Middle Eastern country. Lets face it we saw this coming a Conservative Government cutting funding, the clock was only ticking on this one and also anyone could argue that both sides of this debate either it be the QuAIA or the Israeli groups wanted this to happeb since they could only blame each other for all of this mess and this does give a reason how Middle Eastern Wars really have nothing to do with Gay Rights in Canada or Pride.
Peter from, Toronto ON
05/11/10 1:59 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
nothing to do with QuAIA
I'm sure the lack of funding has nothing to do with QuAIA, which btw does not promote hatred towards Israel as mentioned in an earlier post, anger maybe but hatred is very strong word, mind you I suppose there are some simpletons who can't tell the difference between criticism and hatred, who hated S.Africa when they practiced apartheid? No one I know of even though we were disgusted with the practice. Anyways the Harper Cons needed no reason other than it being an LGBT event to deny funding for it, we all knew this was going to happen last year when that MP got punished for funding Pride and that was long before the attempts to censor QuAIA and to get the city to pull its funding. Which btw is currently being debated so don't forget to contact the mayor and your councilor with your views on the issue. Anyways it says a lot about the Harper Cons that they'd let ideology trump economics, as equal citizens (under the law at least) we should be treated no differently from anyone else yet its obvious the Harper Cons can't bring themselves to do so, they have provided an excuse which would make proving discrimination in a court or HR tribunal very difficult, which, I'm sure, is why they decided to limit it to 2 events per city even though its supposed opt be targeting large scale events that draw international tourists and not small local events like a rib BBQ, how many international tourists do you suppose come to Canada to eat ribs? The only viable solution is to throw them out of office, why some LGBT folks continue to support the Harper Cons is far beyond me, if this isn't evidence enough for them that the Cons aren't supportive of LGBT folks then I don't know what would convince them to vote for a party that is supportive of us.
Rich, Toronto Ontario
05/11/10 8:15 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Wondering about censorship Rich
There is a difference here no one was trying to censor anyone on this debate but calling people the Israel Lobby for example or Zionist or even childish name calling a is censorship or even trying to make this a one sided debate is also censorship and very undemocratic. But you still haven't answered the golden question (nether Israeli groups or even the QuAIA can't seem to answer) How does a Middle Eastern War have anything to do with Gay Rights in Canada? I really doubt that is censorship. I believe the pro Israel people say since Israel has equal Gay Rights and the QuAIA says Palestinians don't have Gay Rights because of Israel(that's a issue they might want to take up with their so called democratically elected leadership such as Hamas and the Palestinian National Authority, but funny how I hear they have one from the far left and yet they fail to act on Palestinian Rights since other people just blame Israel for that problem) Also both sides are using human suffering as a cash cow, Israel uses the holocaust to justify anything they do to the Palestinians and Pro Palestinians uses their suffering and both sides use it to advance their political agendas in the West and Arab countries uses Palestinian suffering in the someway and blame so they can blame all of their problems on someone else(Israel) and that is not censorship for pointing this out. I say this because we do not live in a perfect world we never had and most likely never will, and it makes me sick that anyone uses the suffering of humans to advance their political agenda, also blaming a group of people and saying anti about them is discrimination and both sides either scream death to Israel or Anti Palestinians would not be allowed at any other event and companies or the local or federal government would not want to be apart of it since they have to be balance to everything. I say lets do the same at the Santa Claus Parade I doubt they would allow it even if both sides say it leads to Peace on Earth
Peter from, Toronto ON
05/11/10 8:52 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Good. Toronto sucks.
Don't give Toronto a cent..the place is a rat hole.
ron, Vancouver Bc
05/11/10 9:05 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Also
I really doubt that the federal conservatives were Gay friendly but if you have proof that the QuAIA was the cause of not giving funding and so far there is no evidence just might be the regular discrimination that every minority in Canada gets from the the Majority which is common in all countries then just go to the Human Right Commission or write your MP and scream bloody murder like everyone else does and I did write my MP about this I'm not happy about this but blaming the pro Israel policies of the federal government is what Arab counties do all the time and I think here in Canada we are better them when figuring out who is to blame for this and so far there is little evidence of this being the case and if so there most have been a lot of public influence on this since I see many on the CBC and Toronto Star comments broads agree with this cutting funding to our Pride which is sick since I doubt those people would not want there events to to cut by the federal government either and that is not censoring anyone for pointing that out either
Peter from, Toronto ON
05/11/10 9:10 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Good Luck
So the Conservative party of Canada is supposed to give money to a group (gays) that is forever attacking them and running them down at every turn ? Good luck on that one people !
Jeff Taylor, Toronto Ontario
05/11/10 9:13 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
gee wonder why
Jeff Taylor why do you suppose the LGBT community is generally anti-Harper Con? Could it be their rampant anti-gay bigotry? perhaps it was the way they tried to roll back our equal marriage rights, just because they failed doesn't mean they didn't want to succeed. Why on earth would anyone support a political party that is set against supporting them or the group they are a part of. It happens I know, there's you and ron for example, I just can't understand why you'd choose to align yourself with those opposed to us in every way, many of their team even support recriminalizing sex between those of the same sex, yes I know it isn't party policy but still it says something when you join with those who want to see you sent to jail for having sex that's natural for you. If the Con party wasn't full of anti-gay bigots and its policies weren't anti-gay then they just might get a lot more support from normal LGBT folk. Its not like the Cons were supportive of the LGBT community until the LGBT community turned against them and then they changed into a bunch of anti-gay bigots. Yes there's Baird, a closeted gay man in an anti-gay party does not make the party accepting of LGBT folks, there may be some remnant of the old PC party there but they are definitely not the ones in control of the Harper Cons, their social conservative members have all the power. Besides such things as funding are supposed to be decided on merit alone
Rich, Toronto Ontario
05/11/10 9:40 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
public money not Tory dollars
These dollars are not the purview of the Tory party. They are tax dollars, public monies, and are not meant to be allotted based on the ideology of the Tory party. This is just another example of how Stephen Harper's contempt for democracy and his twisted, vindictive and manipulative approach to governing.
Patricia, Toronto ON
05/12/10 5:25 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Loony left whiners
This is how the real world works children. Reward your friends..shut out your enemies. Queer leftists are the reason Toronto Pride got shut out. Bunch of screaming lunatic bitches..no wonder Ottawa wants nothing to do with you. The Tories reached out at Outgames in Montreal and you spat in their faces...what goes around....
ron, Vancouver Bc
05/12/10 5:32 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
But...
But Rich, does Toronto Pride merit a TOURISM grant? Is that all that pride has become? A cash cow tourist festival? I thought that it was about GLBTQ rights not raking in large amounts of money. A question we should all be asking is, ''does Pride matter anymore?'' If it does really matter as a political movement then it should not get this funding. If pride is little more then a shill for corporations and business to make money then sure let's write our MP's an complain.
Hello, Edmonton Alberta
05/12/10 5:35 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Here we go again ....
Rich, you never fail to amaze me. No matter what the subject is; free drugs, legalized drugs, making Pride parades all about ugly politics, etc, you're always the first one to post anti-Conservative comments. Have you ever thought that maybe there's gay people out there that don't believe in free illegal drugs for all, or Pride parades that are wrapped up in negative politics, or HIV + people being allowed and even encouraged to knowingly sleep with negative people and not have to tell them of their health issues. I know for a fact that you don't speak for ALL gay people - thankfully.
Jeff Taylor, Toronto Ontario
05/12/10 7:00 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Jeff: Rich speaks for most of us...
...Or perhaps just those of us who think critically with evidence and logic. For crying out loud: How many more studies do we need to get shit right? Criminalization of certain drugs creates more problems than it solves. Pride IS political, and politics are sometimes "ugly." C'est la vie. I'd rather have lawful political speech than censorship; we live in a democracy, don't we? Lastly, criminalizing sex/STIs will only increase the risks -- for all of us. The knowledge is out there, buddy. Drop the ideology and check the facts. To hell with the Conservatives: I hope Harper burns in hell. And may our sell-out gay Conservative friends burn extra hot!
Rick, London Ontario
05/12/10 7:53 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Jeff Taylor
Jeff, you never fail to amaze us. No matter what the subject is; "free drugs, legalized drugs ... " You are blinded by your self-righteousness. This is supposed to be a forum for intelligent debate. Oh pity the passive-aggressive ones that drool over their computer monitors, thinking that they command an audience. Please take a vacation from your little world, Jeffy, maybe make some friends? Pick some lilacs, they're in season, did you know?
Mike Jensen, Toronto Ontario
05/12/10 8:08 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Jeff Taylor, your place card awaits.
Jeff, I will be hosting a brunch in Toronto next week, and I insist you come. A chance for you to make some friends!
Bree Van de Kamp, Fairview Eagle State
05/12/10 8:36 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
re: But...
Hello from Edmonton over the past few days, and especially today when I found out that Pride Inc in Toronto has been lying to the community about not censoring QuAIA while assuring the city that they will be not allowing anyone to march under that banner I'm starting to come around to your way of thinking, I'd like to quote almost your entire post since I think it deserves to be said again. "Is that all that pride has become? A cash cow tourist festival? I thought that it was about GLBTQ rights not raking in large amounts of money. A question we should all be asking is, ''does Pride matter anymore?'' If it does really matter as a political movement then it should not get this funding. If pride is little more then a shill for corporations and business to make money then sure let's write our MP's an complain." I'm starting to think that all that money that was pouring into Toronto Pride really has corrupted it and that it would be better off as a smaller political event like it was in the beginning, it seems that so many nowadays want it to be a disneyfied version of a once proud LGBT event that celebrated our community but now is reduced to nothing but a party where its unacceptable to have anything that makes some uncomfortable even for a few moments as they pass by during the march. I enjoyed Toronto Pride way more when it was smaller and had much less money, it was the sense of community coming together in all our wonderful diversity that really appealed to me. Maybe we need to have a separate Pride march separate from the parade, we have a dyke march, a trans march so why not a people's march too where we can be who we are, all of us and not just those considered politically acceptable and ban corporate entries and ban censorship, then those who enjoy the disneyfication of Pride can have their parade where there will be nothing that might make anyone uncomfortable so that even anti-gay bigots would have nothing to complain about.
Rich, Toronto Ontario
05/13/10 7:54 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
It seemed like a good idea at the time....
Dear Bob Rae, MP, Toronto Centre It seemed like a good idea at the time. A change in government, fiscal responsibility, Stephen Harper wearing sweaters.... I voted Conservative in the last election. There were promises of a new, moderate party, a coalition that would respect all sides. But in the last two days, all that has been lost. The idea that in 2010 a coalition of men could stand up and decide the rights of women is disgusting. Where are the feminists, the men of conscience, the Canadian majority, who oppose limiting women's access to birth control? And The Toronto Star saying 68% of people support not funding Toronto Pride, how do they think crowd control and garbage collection will be paid for during the city's largest tourism event of the year, complete with the economic windfall it provides? I am not too big to admit I was wrong, and now I, and the civic minded people of Canada need your help to right this wrong. I realize it's a big task but I, my friends and family, and all good-hearted citizens of this country support you. Best of luck. Adam
Adam, Toronto Ontario
05/14/10 10:32 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Re: Jeff Taylor
Jeff Taylor. As they say he's 'touched'. In other words, don't take him seriously.
Tom Britton, Toronto Ontario
05/19/10 5:26 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Strikes me as Funny
how Tom (if that's your real name), Rich (if that's your real name), and Rick (if that's your real name) are the first to stand up for free speech (especially their own) yet are also the first ones to try and crush other's free speech. Years ago I was pretty much a total Liberal. My Father and his family were NDP from birth to grave. Growing up I was exposed to NDP & Liberal ways of thinking until I couldn't drink the Kool-Aid no more. In other words, once I realized that my hard earned tax money was flushed down the shitter every single time an NDP (Provincially) and Liberal (Federally) party was in charge, I got the message - socialism just doesn't work. I'm not saying that some social programs aren't good or some things that unions helped pass into law aren't wise, but for those of us that work, invest, and live life as well as we can, we are able to see both sides. All three of you claim to be from Toronto. Open your eyes real wide (and your minds) and take a serious, long look at your own city & Province. The millions, upon millions, upon millions of dollars wasted by the various Govt's could easily provide every homeless person with their own house, and then some. Hell, even free drugs (the illegal kind of course) for you Rich ! In closing, please don't be so stupid in thinking that because you can type out personal attacks, that you would or could ever intimidate everyone that doesn't think as you insist they must.
Jeff Taylor, Toronto Ontario
05/19/10 9:37 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Mad much?
Why are you so mad Jeff? You always come off as so angry.
Carla Vilaine, Toronto Ontario
05/21/10 5:05 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
free speech doesn't mean crticism free
Jeff (if that's your real name, what's that about anyways?) In no way has anyone tried to crush your free speech, you have been in no way prevented or hassled when posting your opinions on whatever. Free speech doesn't imply criticism not allowed, just because your posts have been criticized by myself and others in no way means your free speech has been harmed, you would have a case if we were petitioning Xtra to not accept any posts from you and they did ban you from posting then that would be crushing your free speech. That's not what's been happening, just as you post criticisms of what I and others post so do we post criticisms of what you write, just because there are more folks who share a certain political outlook than share your particular political outlook in no way means your free speech has been harmed, if we or you were not able to respond to each other's posts then that would be an attack on free speech but again that what's happening here either. You remind me of Peter who also felt that criticizing his point of view was also an attack on his free speech yet he also saw no problem with banning QuAIA just like you do, what is it about folks who want to ban QuAIA that they don't seem to understand the fundamentals of free speech? Why do they equate being challenged with a violation of their free speech rights yet see no problem at all with actually banning a group from Pride? Interesting isn't it.
Rich, Toronto Ontario
05/21/10 6:38 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Maybe…
Maybe they don't want to support a loud, obnoxious street party that has never changed in the 20 years I've experienced it. Get businesses to support it. Like the arts, the people who enjoy it should be the ones to pay for it. I don't want my taxes to pay for something I'm not particularly interested in. It's that simple.
Rufus T Firefly, Cambridge Ontario
05/22/10 12:16 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
poofters Parade
Ok, so the big bad homophobic Tories didn't fund the Poofters Parade this year. If gay "pride" is so successful, why don't you queers fund it yourselves? Better still, next time, try having your parade in Cuba or Iran, then you'll find out what "intolerance' is really all about.
Greg Randles, Calgary Alberta
07/08/10 5:31 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.