Young MPs: The future? Or a carnival sideshow?
COMMENT
Marcus McCann / Ottawa / Wednesday, May 04, 2011
Share |

The media’s gawking at the young age of some rookie New Democrat MPs probably says more about the media than it does about the newly elected politicians.
 
The MPs themselves run the gamut, from Pierre-Luc Dusseault, a 19-year-old representing Sherbrooke, to Ruth Ellen Brosseau, a 27-year-old single mom now representing Berthier-Maskinongé.
 
The media have treated them like a carnival freak show. They’re not. The guffaws betray some pretty shallow assumptions about young people. Dusseault and Brosseau — plus 20-year-olds Matthew Dubé, Charmain Borg and a handful of others — have, so far, not been treated fairly.
 
But such is politics.
 
The class of 2011 will be the laughing stock of the House of Commons — or they could be the voice of a generation. If they let the media and their opponents do the framing, the former is certainly more likely.
 
To avoid this, the NDP can turn the supposed weakness into a strength, if it is interested in doing so. After all, it has one of the biggest youth caucuses in history. It's the party best positioned to speak to the needs of our youth. But the party must commit to developing these young politicians, or else it will go down in history as a joke, a one-liner told about the 41st Parliament for years to come. It’s an uphill battle, there’s no doubt about it.
 
They’re probably getting advice from everyone today, but here are my two cents.
 
One: don’t give interviews — yet. Okay, it appears too late, but more stories about Dusseault’s planned summer job at a golf course aren’t going to help things. Neither are stories about MPs who’ve never been to the ridings they represent. Once they’ve toured their ridings and can speak about the needs of their constituents, then they’re ready for interviews.
 
Two: for those without facility in French, sign up for language training. ASAP. At the same time, they’ll need to hire local, francophone constituency assistants to handle requests from the riding and provide advice. Again, ASAP.
 
Three: go shopping. For the men, the risk is looking like they borrowed their fathers’ suits. To combat that, they’ll need to order a couple of tailored suits and some tapered dress shirts. For the women, the risk is failing to appear age-appropriate. So, they’ll need pant suits, blouses and five pairs of flats each. Stick to grey, black, beige and other muted tones. Limit bright colours to blouses and ties. The media will want to comment on your clothes; don’t give them anything to talk about.
 
Four: make connections. They’ll need to establish a youth caucus, then get to know their fellow MPs. At the same time, they’ll want to find a veteran MP to be their mentor.
 
Five: begin drafting a modest private member’s bill that’s likely to garner multi-party support, either on a youth issue or something local that benefits Quebeckers. The perception is that these young MPs are seat fillers. They’ll need to combat that. To that end, they’ll probably want to begin planning speaking engagements for 2012. Not for 2011, mind you. But their reputations will benefit from a small campus tour in the spring, perhaps with their fellow young MPs, that tries to engage university students.
 
The stakes are high for these MPs, and how they behave over the next few months will dog them for the rest of their lives. Expectations are low, and there is every opportunity for them to beat expectations. They have the potential to be the next generation of leaders, but only if they can navigate the next few months. I wish them luck.


Share |


Reader Comments


 
Give your head a skake
On the whole the voters of La Belle Province should give their collective heads a shake. What an abuse of the right to vote for a representative to the highest office in the land. Shame, shame, voting for " bodies" you know absolutely nothing about, in at least one case not even their whereabouts. Nuf said.
Murray Birch, Sorrento British Columbia
05/04/11 10:31 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
This will be interesting.
As Murray Birch said, this election was a disappointment, and not just because Harper got a majority. Many great Liberal & Bloc MPs aren't returning. Instead we have new NDP MPs some of which haven't visited their riding & are inexperienced with Canadian politics; and re-elected Conservative who refused to attend debates! Basically a group of MPs who didn't care about earning the public trust, and then Canadian citizens who actually voted for them. It's definitely a sad time for Canadian democracy. However, what's done is done. I completely agree with the article; if the NDP can capitalize on their new youth caucus, they could really make gains in the youth vote. A spring tour at universities & colleges would do well to help engage youth. It is also a chance to re-shape the House if the new MPs use their positions wisely and most importantly, with respect. Respect for the voters who trusted them enough to vote for them (even if they didn't know them); and respect for parliament. Let's also hope this new batch improve the tone in the House. It will be an interesting 4 years. Let's see what happens.
Jalex Alexander, Ottawa Ontario
05/04/11 12:53 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
simple souls
My fellow Kebekers got conned by Jack's "stache and stick" what's the saying about "nine of which are fools". Very sad
Dave Lucas, NDG Montreal Quebec
05/04/11 7:56 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
youth
I liked what Jack Layton said the other night on Tout le monde en parle: we are sending our young people to Afghanistan; why not to Ottawa?
LaReyne, Montreal QC
05/09/11 12:43 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Live and in colour
I think McCann's article is worthwhile and makes more of a point than just "the NDP will do well with the youth vote" as someone commented. I believe he's saying that there is an inherent value to young MPs and I couldn't agree more. Where I disagree is in his third point. I do not think that the MPs should be giving the media nothing to talk about. Young professionals should be dressing as such. Muted colours and pant suits for women are fine if they're relevant to their personalities, but they shouldn't be encouraged as staple outfits. Young people want their young MPs to be vibrant, full of life, and full of energy, so their clothing should reflect that. Give the media clothing to talk about so they forget that the young politicians are young politicians. If I were in their shoes, literally and metaphorically, I'd be wearing bright socks so I have more time to figure out where to hang my coat.
James McDonald, Toronto Ontario
05/09/11 5:43 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
More hypocrisy from Xtra
This column is yet another example of hypocrisy from Xtra. The author gives the following advice to the new NDP MPs: "don't give interviews - yet". Yet, Xtra condemned the Ontario Education Minister for waiting several weeks before agreeing to an interview with Xtra on the GSA issue (Xtra's website even had a little box with her picture counting the number of days that they had been waiting for an interview). Similarly, during last Fall's municipal election campaign in Toronto, Xtra wrote several columns condemning gay candidate Ken Chan for his answers on whether QuAIA should be able to march in the Pride parade (Xtra even posted a taped video interview in which Xtra editor Matt Mills was grilling Chan on the issue). It's seems that there is one set of interview rules for Xtra's left-wing friends and other set of interview rules for Xtra's enemies (gay or straight). The nerdy gay kids have now become the bullies that used to torment them in school.
Joe, Toronto Ontario
05/21/11 11:51 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.