Paul Dewar: the best fit for Ottawa Centre
EDITORIAL
Noreen Fagan / Ottawa / Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Share |

Ottawa Centre Liberal candidate Scott Bradley has been waiting in the wings for the past 18 months for an election. With all that time, one would think that Bradley would have done his homework on issues pertinent to the queer community.
 
Bradley supports both C-389 (trans rights) and C-393 (access to inexpensive AIDS drugs for the developing world), although he stresses that they were NDP bills and if elected he could not bring them to the table. He is enthusiastic about the gay village and confused as to why the Bank Street Business Improvement Area (BIA) insists on stalling the inevitable.
 
When Xtra asked about the criminalization of HIV, Bradley was stumped. He says that he knows the issue and what is at stake, yet he took a circuitous route to say that he needed to do more research before taking a stand. 
 
Bradley is a community man, and, I fear, a neighbourhood-association man. He supports community policing and the regular hooker sweeps. He has a general view that all sex workers are drug addicts and the prostitution laws should remain intact.
 
Contrast that with the NDP’s Paul Dewar. He is a visible figure in the community and is always present at various events — from AIDS fundraisers to the Jer’s Vision gala.
 
Dewar understands the issues relevant to the community. He helped Bill Siksay push Bill C-389 through, and he is ready to pick up C-393 when he gets reelected. He understands the issues around HIV criminalization — that it should be a public health matter rather than a police one.
 
He supports the legalization of prostitution, saying that sex workers' rights should be protected and that sex workers should be treated like other citizens. Although Dewar does not support the current polygamy laws — he is unsure of how polygamy fits into the current social norms — he is not opposed to letting the courts deal with it.
 
As for the Conservative and Green Party candidates, they both leave something to be desired.
 
The Conservatives’ Damian Konstantinakos is, perhaps not surprisingly, the weakest of the lot when it comes to sexuality and gender issues. He doesn’t think Canada needs to explicitly protect trans people from discrimination. He doesn’t think that HIV criminalization exists. He supports the contested laws around sex work and polygamy.
 
The Green Party’s Jen Hunter supports the trans bill and is honest enough to say she doesn’t know all the details of Bill C-393. She loves the diversity of the gay village but doesn’t understand the issues surrounding the criminalization of HIV. She sees police targeting of sex workers as “persecuting people who have already been isolated,” but she did not say “yay” or “nay” to whether she supported the legalization of prostitution. She did acknowledge that it is an important issue to discuss, which is what she said about polygamy — another issue for future discussion.
 
Ottawa Centre needs a candidate who's committed to the well-being of the whole community, someone who's an ally to the gay, bisexual and trans community. It doesn’t mean that he or she has to be supportive of all our issues, but it does mean that the candidate should have an understanding of and knowledge about issues that affect the various individuals in our community — from sex workers to people living with HIV/AIDS.
 
Paul Dewar is the candidate who fits the role.


Share |


Reader Comments


 
That's nice, but...
...what about other higher-GLBT-density electoral districts, such as Ottawa-Vanier and Ottawa West-Nepean? Heck, why not endorse candidates in all NCR ridings? It's XTRA! Ottawa, not just "XTRA! The Village".
Ian, Ottawa Ontario
04/28/11 6:23 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Xtra endorsements
Hi Ian. Thanks for your comment. I agree with you that there are lots of ridings with gay people in them, not just Ottawa-Centre, and that Xtra isn't just the newspaper of the gaybourhood. When Noreen and I discussed an Ottawa-Centre endorsement, we decided it was worth remarking on Ottawa-Centre specifically. There are a couple of reasons for this. Firstly, all the candidates in Ottawa-Centre have made a direct pitch to the city's queer communities. And secondly, we believed there was a substantial difference between the Liberal and NDP frontrunners, Bradley and Dewar, and it was worth sharing that reflection with readers. The decision was based on the specific candidates. We don't intend to endorse any other Ottawa-area candidates, and you'll notice, for instance, that the Toronto paper has not endorsed anyone -- and isn't likely to. All the best, Marcus McCann, Managing Editor
Marcus McCann, Ottawa ON
04/28/11 9:27 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Nah, no bias evident at all
"Bradley is a community man, and, I fear, a neighbourhood-association man. He supports community policing and the regular hooker sweeps. He has a general view that all sex workers are drug addicts and the prostitution laws should remain intact." I'm sure there are a lot of good reasons why Paul Dewar would be the best choice for Ottawa Centre, which leads one to question why it was necessary to print this gross distortion of what Scott Bradley actually said. (The same could be said about the headline accompanying the interview done with him.) Likewise, it's interesting to see him characterized as "stumped" for saying he needed to do more research into HIV criminalization, while Jen Hunter is described as "honest" for admitting her ignorance about Bill C-393. Of course, the reason for such distinctions couldn't possibly have anything to do with the fact that Bradley is a viable contender for Dewar's seat and Hunter is not.
Patrick, Toronto ON
04/28/11 3:49 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Yikes - stereotypes abound
I'm a little disturbed with the stereotypes and assumptions of Bradley as a "community man." LOL. We've worked too hard to counter assumptions and stereotypes about ourselves, so I'm not going to do it to others. Bradley gets my vote.
Evan, Ottawa ON
04/28/11 11:12 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
A singular endorsement (and the problem with it)
"When Noreen and I discussed an Ottawa-Centre endorsement, we decided it was worth remarking on Ottawa-Centre specifically." A tautological argument, at best. "The decision was based on the specific candidates." In Soviet Russia, news writes you? Sorry, Marcus, but the argument really doesn't hold water. Either XTRA! reflects the cities in which it publishes or, as in this case, it doesn't. There are differences among candidates in ridings across the region, so it's a lame duck argument to suggest that the differences between the two front-running candidates in only one electoral district in the entire National Capital Region are the only ones substantive enough to warrant comment. And, if it's true that XTRA! (Noreen, in this case) can't be bothered to do the same work on other districts, then XTRA! (as a whole) is as deserving of criticism as any other media outlet that doesn't tell the "whole story".
Ian, Ottawa Ontario
04/29/11 6:50 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.