Former board member blasts Pride chair
PRIDE NEWS / Public battle another setback for conflict-prone board
Bradley Turcotte / Ottawa / Saturday, September 22, 2012
Share |

A post-festival Pride town-hall meeting on Sept 13 was notable mostly for what was left unspoken.
 
While organizers boasted of a successful 26th annual festival, a former board member and volunteer has rained on their party with accusations of mismanagement on the Pride board.
 
Guy Hughes, who resigned from the board in 2011, says that while chair Loresa Novy cares deeply for Ottawa’s queer community, she is not qualified for the position. Hughes accused Novy of incompetence in a lengthy letter sent to media ahead of this year’s Pride Week.
 
 
“She does have other commitments and I recognize that, but it’s quite clear that she has been negligent toward the festival,” Hughes tells Xtra. “I knew she was incompetent when I resigned, and I knew the festival was a sinking ship.”

Hughes says Novy specifically elected members to the Pride board who would act subserviently. In addition, she does not accept criticism, he says.
 
For her part, Novy dismisses Hughes and says he is “mentally unstable.” She did not address Hughes’s letter or accusations at the post-Pride meeting.

Chair Loresa Novy, seen here at the Pride awards gala, has dismissed Hughes as "mentally unstable."
(Laura Zahody)
“He wanted to make changes. I don’t think he knew enough about how the organization works, and some of his actions ended up being more harmful than positive in the outcome,” she says.
 
But Hughes says the Pride board has “utterly failed” to provide Ottawa with a well-planned festival.
 
“They have not put the effort in that maximizes their capacity as individuals or the capacity of the corporation,” Hughes says.
 
“The Pride Guide is the clearest product of the organizational failures at Capital Pride,” Hughes says, noting that this year’s guide was a “carbon copy” of last year’s booklet and even listed events at unconfirmed venues.
 
Additionally, Hughes thinks parade security was inadequate. He says he witnessed spectators who were put in harm’s way because not enough security was brought in to keep people off the road.
 
“I was extremely concerned while watching the parade that someone was going to get killed," Hughes says. “My experience with risk is that these are not risks you take. You have to police the line.”
 
Hughes also created a blog, titled Capital Pride Revealed, where he posted emails sent between board members that he says outline these alleged failures. While the site has now been taken down and Hughes has apologized for creating it, Novy says it infringed on a confidentiality agreement Hughes signed. Hughes denies signing an agreement.
 
The public spat has community members talking, and several have also criticized Novy’s handling of the annual event.
 
Wicked Wanda’s owner Wanda Cotie says she was surprised by Pride’s lack of outreach to local queer-positive businesses. Cotie participated in years past, but she says this year Pride didn’t have an ambassador urging businesses to take part.
 
“I found it highly disorganized this year. [Novy] has to go,” Cotie says.
 
Meanwhile, The Lookout hosted several official Pride events, and bartender Jacob Woloshin says he witnessed Novy treating bar staff disrespectfully.
 
“She’s one of those people who demands respect without earning it,” Woloshin says. “Some people who want power are not good at it.”
 
Community member Portia Young says the closing day of the festival exemplifies Pride's complete disorganization. Several performers were late or did not understand their proper roles, Young says, prompting many festival-goers to leave.
 
“The responsibility of somebody organizing an event is to manage it well,” Young says.
 
But Denis Schryburt, a member of Ottawa’s queer community who is involved with several organizations, says he has never encountered issues with Novy.
Despite Hughes' serious allegations against the current board, he says he will still run for the board at the upcoming AGM.
(Andrea Houston)

“She has strong opinions, as everybody does,” says Schryburt, who worked with Novy on the Ottawa police liaison committee. “When she works for a cause, she seems passionate about it and works hard on it. I have always found her competent.”
 
Novy admits the festival was not perfect and says there is always room for improvement.
 
“That’s why we have new boards. That is why we have town halls. We do that to get the input from the community, to see how we can improve,” Novy says. “It is never perfect.”
 
Hughes first became involved with Capital Pride in 2011 in a volunteer capacity, planning last year’s Capital Pride awards gala. Elected to the position of vice-chair of communications at the 2011 AGM, held on Oct 19, he resigned in December 2011, before returning to volunteer this August. He once again severed ties because of the mismanagement of an event held at Gallery 101.
 
In spite of Hughes’s qualms with the current board’s actions, he says he only wants Capital Pride to be the best it can be. He plans to run for a board position at the upcoming AGM.

“I feel like I have been bullied out of being involved. My reputation in the community has absolutely been damaged,” Hughes says.  “I would like to be on the board again. I would really like to see power decentralized. I wish Loresa would be able to stay on the board, and I wish I would be able to work with her.”
 
Past chair Doug Saunders and director of community relations Joanne Law declined to comment on the accusations.
 
Bitter infighting on the Pride board, regardless of the festival’s financial situation, is a common occurrence, dating back to 1994.   Guy Hughes Resignation Letter (1) Guy Hughes Resignation Letter (2)
Share |


Reader Comments


 
It is true.
It is true. Loresa Novy is the most incompetent and damaging chair Capital Pride has known in recent years. The festival was a success despite her ineptitude down to the hard work of her fellow directors, coordinators and volunteers. The only thing this woman was ever interested in was her reflection in a mirror and pu**y.
Me, Ottawa ON
09/24/12 12:24 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
It is unfortunate
It is unfortunate that Xtra is yet again showing that they are not a part of the community by posting this article. I have heard several complaints that there were people harassed by inappropriate questioning. Also, I was approached by a reporter that did not disclose them selves in the so called interview. Hopefully one day Xtra Ottawa will become a rfeporting force in the community. However they have yet to prove themselves.
me, Ottawa ontario
09/24/12 1:32 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Sad
There are no winners. Just losers. How truly sad for all involved. Especially Capital Pride.
R, Ottawa Ontario
09/24/12 6:47 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Prowess in Journalism
Bradley Turcotte and Andrea Houston are among the highest quality reporters I've met, and both are extremely professional.The allegations from an anonymous user that they harassed others in researching the facts and circumstances of this story are absurd. Both Bradley and Andrea are extremely recognizable as reporters, and as public figures in our community. They require no introduction and should be commended for the hard work that went into convincing others to speak on these issues, in the face of the overwhelming spirit of non-tolerance for any criticism of volunteer work in our communities.
Guy Hughes, Ottawa ON
09/24/12 9:51 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
"the so called interview"
I begin every interview with "Hi this is Bradley from Xtra," or some variation of that introduction.
Bradley Turcotte, Ottawa Ontario
09/24/12 11:57 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
A sad power struggle
This article is beyond sad. It shows once again that the LGBTTQ community is more focused on power struggles and in fighting than it is at working together. What bothers me the most is that here you have a new board member (Mr. Huges) who stood up at an AGM last year and said that he wanted to work with Pride because it plays an active role in the community and helps increase visibility of queer issues? Whose issues Mr. Huges? Yours? The Community? We all have opinions, some are stronger than others. You took on the role as communications on a board and the first sign that things didn’t work out you ran to the press without any lack of respect for the impact it could have on the organization that you signed up to serve . Now, with quite a bit of damage, you want the community to rally behind you when you present yourself at the next AGM? Really? You may want to give that more thought. As for Loresa, poor choice of words. She should have probably communicated better with her director of communications. But clearly they both had their own agendas and it had nothing to do with the community, parades or Pride for that matter. Check your egos at the door next time folks.
Paul Joseph, Ottawa ON
09/24/12 12:21 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
unfair comment
I am going to address just one aspect of this story: the "mentally unstable" comment. It is a completely untrue characterization and the denigration of a member's legitmate right to criticize the board. It plays into the negative sterotypes and stigma around mental illness by dismissing a person who disagrees with you as 'crazy'. Pride is part of a wider social justice movement based upon ending prejudice and increasing understanding of others' circumstances. The Chair's comment does not represent my attitude or that of others involved with Pride.
C. Ellis, Ottawa Ontario
09/24/12 1:07 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
RE: PAUL JOSEPH'S COMMENT
Hello Paul! I agree that I could have put more effort into working with the board. Yes, while I did try, some argue that I did not try hard enough, and that is a fair comment. However the following is not a fair comment: "…the first sign that things didn’t work out you ran to the press without any lack of respect for the impact it could have...". Firstly, in my resignation letter I noted that my reasons for leaving were based on Ms. Novy's instructions that I stop communicating with others internally about incidents of mismanagement of the festival. I felt that this was an attempt to silence me, and that it was highly inappropriate. She could have picked up the phone and told me that she didn't like my analysis or that she felt targeted and that she wanted to work together going forward for a better festival. I worked very hard for the festival in August 2012. At no point did I go running to the media. My resignation letter was addressed to the Secretary of the corporation, and I shared it with media, because these events are newsworthy. That is hardly running, sir. That is transparency and openness. Secondly, when I resigned as Vice-Chair Comms and from the board in December 2011, it was because of my feeling that the Chair did not want to work with others and because of my judgement the Chair was incompetent from various internal battles. I left then for the better of the organization without contest and without a fuss, and without going to the media. (This is not spelled out in the article, so I can appreciate that you could not have known this.) You're welcome to contact me directly if you'd like to discuss. I hope this addresses your concerns about my willingness to work together with others in our communities. http://about.me/guyhughes
Guy Hughes, Ottawa ON
09/24/12 6:21 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Much to do about Nothing
This is perhaps the textbook definition of “yellow journalism”. From Wikipedia: “Yellow journalism, or the yellow press, is a type of journalism that presents little or no legitimate well-researched news and instead uses eye-catching headlines to sell more newspapers. Techniques may include exaggerations of news events, scandal-mongering, or sensationalism. By extension, the term yellow journalism is used today as a pejorative to decry any journalism that treats news in an unprofessional or unethical fashion”. If you re-read the story it is simply a bunch of quotes from different sources strung together without investigating any of the allegations and without any research or supporting facts. “Guy said this… Loresa said that… Sebastian said this… Guy said that… Loresa retort this.” The facts are these, in no particular order- - Novy is the Chair of Pride. - Huges resigned as a result of a personal disagreement with Novy. (Surprise, surprise people disagree on a committee). - Huges criticized Novy (Same Novy he couldn’t get along with on the committee.) - Huges created, authored and promoted a webpage entitled “Capital Pride Revealed” which alleges that disagreements happened but no not allege fraudulent or professional misconduct beyond personal disputes. - Provost, who is not a paid member of Pride, had previously created an extremely unsuccessful competing event on Bank St and subsequently, this year, created the money-losing “House of SAS” with the help of Hump Night and the Mercury Lounge to compete against Pride, drove from Montreal to contribute to his first-ever Pride Town Hall. His remarks of the competition were critical. - Capital Xtra, House of SAS, Mercury Lounge and HUMP Night are not sponsors or contributors to Capital Pride. - No laws were broken and no funds were misappropriated. Moreover, the allegations are of a personal nature (ie Novy’s personal suitability for the role as Chair). - During Novy’s term as Chair the parade grew, sponsorship
Benoit Degras, OTTAWA Ontario
09/24/12 6:42 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Such a sorry mess.
I have had the misfortune to encounter both of these people, and while Hughes is clearly delusional, Novy takes no responsibility for her actions or has any concept of leadership. Between the 2 of them, there is on one side, an unsuitable,confused, senseless and combustible irritant (Hughes) and the other, a disrespectful, egocentric, vacuous guffawing donkey (Novy). Which one is worse? The fact that the donkey has power but no rationale or intelligence, yet the irritant has misguided and irrational argument... you decide.
A. Harkham, Ottawa Ontario
09/25/12 11:59 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
I want to second the comment
"The LGBTTQ community is more focused on power struggles and in fighting than it is at working together." I'm more or less new to this town, and coming from Montreal, I just see this horrid lack of community and MAJER snottiness in the queer "community." It's lonely, actually. Maybe everyone on this thread or who has ever snubbed me feels the same too?
Lina, o-town qc
09/26/12 11:22 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Capital Xtra, for Shame!
Regardless of what might think of Pride or the way it is run or the individuals involved in this messy in-fighting, this is not journalism. Posting a series of negative opinions without proper substantiation or facts and calling it a news article is shameful. Where are the countering views? The responses? Where's the bias towards fairness? Where are the linkages to the problems people brought up to Novy in particular? Where's the unbiased assessment of the festival to hold against these opinions? If the intent was to drag Novy's name through the mud, all you've succeeded in doing is making me wonder what would motivate this hatchet job going to print. With this level of writing, one has cause to doubt the integrity of anything said within it and the integrity of the paper itself.
Kara-El, Ottawa On
09/27/12 10:58 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Mentally Unstable?
What does mentally unstable mean? Is the chair of Pride a doctor of some sort? Is this a diagnosis? Apart from being a intended derogatory and immature 'insult', this kind of libelous language has no place in an adult world, least of all a community group that ‘prides’ itself in the fight against prejudice and hate. The fact that this is a comment that slurs mental illness is particularly shameful from the mouth of a so called community leader. Does the Ottawa Pride Committee have nothing better to do with their time? I support neither side of this childish in-house squabble, as it is dull, uninteresting and frankly a waste of time. I do however urge the chair to apologize publically for this shameful comment to the community and to Guy Hughes.
Jessica M, Ottawa ON
09/27/12 9:36 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Defamation of Character?
Is saying someone is 'mentally unstable' an acceptable comment / retort? I hope that Hughes takes Novy to court for this comment. This is 2012 people. This kind of language is not acceptable. Hughes' reputation is already in tatters. The only recompense he can hope to get is to sue Novy for defamation of character. I hope he does. He would certainly win.
Dan S, Ottawa Ontario
09/28/12 1:42 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Retraction
I apologize for calling Loresa Novy 'negligent toward the festival' and 'incompetent' in an interview for this article. And I retract these claims. I did not intend for these claims to be published without the context of the direct substantiation that accompanied them, part of which is included in my open letter of resignation dated 10 August 2012.
Guy Hughes, Ottawa Ontario
09/29/12 11:02 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Shameful
I have known Loresa Novy for quite sometime when I was living in Ottawa, and during my past involvement with the community there. She is one of the most passionate people I have met, and an outstanding person who CARES about INDIVIDUALS and the COMMUNITY. While I agree that Capital Pride needs a heck of a lot of work, Loresa's tireless efforts on the board are examples of someone who really cares about what they do and the community as a whole. With several resignations on the board last year, the fact that she came back - for me - shows character and an idealism that I value and strive for in our community (instead of dramatic accusations that shows a poor judge in character in Guy Hughes' part). While I haven't had much interactions with Guy, the few I have had were extremely negative, belligerent, and downright rude. Toast to you though Guy for a grand exit. ... And I do hope you never EVER come back.
Nameless, Toronto Ontario
10/13/12 3:48 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Re: Nameless, Toronto, Ontario
Nameless! It's fascinating that your remarks are anonymous. I encourage you to read them to your mother, record her reaction, and post the video online. You wrote that Novy "CARES about INDIVIDUALS and the COMMUNITY." With which of those principles is it consistent for her to have called me "mentally unstable"? Neither! The persons who do really suffer from mental illnesses and their allies are surely deeply offended by Novy's comment. You wrote, "While I haven't had much interactions with Guy..." Then if you do not know me, why have you judged me so? Do you hate me? It seems so. You wrote, "the fact that [Novy] came back." This is a misrepresentation of events: Novy was not re-appointed in 2011; she merely continued the second year of her two year tenure. Further, some claim that Novy did not continue her involvement out of duty, but rather out of the pursuit of personal glory. You wrote that I have made "dramatic accusations that shows a poor judge in [sic] character." Exactly what "shows" that would you argue? There is nothing in your remarks that substantiates that. And I believe that this is because you did not make your remarks based on evidence, you made it based on your hatred for me. Your parting words are fascinating as well, Nameless. Since you hold yourself in such high regard, as you do Novy, which group do your parting remarks show you genuinely care for: "INDIVIDUALS" or the "COMMUNITY"? "Toast to you though Guy for a grand exit. ... And I do hope you never EVER come back." Neither, shamefully. - I only want to work together; you and your friends only want to hate me more than you already do and be rid of me. - I've only worked for a better Pride festival; you and your friends have only worked to undermine me personally, professionally and permanently, without regard for what's
Guy Hughes, Ottawa Ontario
10/14/12 1:26 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Re: Nameless, Toronto, Ontario (2/2)
- I only want to work together; you and your friends only want to hate me more than you already do and be rid of me. // - I've only worked for a better Pride festival; you and your friends have only worked to undermine me personally, professionally and permanently, without regard for what's best for pride.
Guy Hughes, Ottawa Ontario
10/14/12 1:30 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Novy is the problem
I volunteered for pride and some of my friends still do. I don't know Guy Hughes. From what I have seen myself and heard he is right. Novy is mean and vindictive if you cross her. She takes credit for the work of others even though shit from her many screw ups don't stick to her. She does nothing but complain about other people and how she is the "victim". Capital pride has gone downhill with her in charge. Everyone there is miserable. The only thing that saved it this year was good weather. Did anyone see her during pride? She didn't go to pride's own parties because she couldn't be bothered or when she did she was falling down drunk. Pride needs to clean house. I will not be back next year if the same people are in charge.
Dan D., Ottawa Ontario
10/14/12 2:41 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Hi Dan D.
Dan D., since you volunteered this year, you are a member of Capital Pride and I hope you'll be able to make the Annual General Meeting on Wednesday, October 24th to express your views and vote for the new board. https://www.facebook.com/events/281740565258738/?fref=ts
Guy Hughes, Ottawa Ontario
10/15/12 12:41 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Gurl!
Guy Hughes, the comments you have left here indicate a certain level of unhinged-ness. Did someone say Drama Queen? I enjoyed working with Loresa. HOWEVER it is painfully clear to me that Capital Pride needs a top to bottom house-cleaning. New board, new organizers, breathe some fresh life into it. Every year it's a behind-the-scenes gong show, and everyone there now is too deeply invested in drama. There's not a pride festival anywhere in the world that is smoothly organized and run (and you can take that to the bank), but Capital Pride needs to start fresh.
prince, hottawa holler ontario
10/15/12 2:22 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
This is sad .... and predictable
Watching from outside, one can see many problems that maybe those on the inside do not see. It all begins at the top of pride and rolls down from there. If Loresa Novy can't keep it together then to quote the business owner in the article “I found it highly disorganized this year. [Novy] has to go,” I would like to know what qualifies Loresa for this position in the community if she would attack another person in this way. Anyone who voted for her should be regretting it.
Sandra Jones, Ottawa ON
10/15/12 2:34 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
speak it!
More more more!!! We need more journalists who will expose this shit. Bradley did not make this up. More more more!!! Dig for it! And good for Hughes for standing up for what is right! Don't let them tear you down!
W.W., Smiths Falls Ontario
10/15/12 2:48 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
What can't Loresa Novy say sorry?
Leaders Don't Make Excuses...They Apologize
Natalie Tyler, Ottawa ON
10/16/12 8:58 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
What can't Loresa Novy say sorry?
Because she is a weak pathetic coward.
Paula W, Ottawa ON
10/16/12 9:04 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
What can't Loresa Novy say sorry?
Loresa Novy is a Bully.
Chantal F, Ottawa ON
10/17/12 11:16 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
What can't Loresa Novy say sorry?
I am ashamed. I am ashamed that this woman represents me and my community. As a woman, as a gay woman, she has really let me and the community down. So much damage. She and her ego need to leave the building. I know people like Hughes are not easy to deal with, but offensive bullying comments are not the way forward. Remember your position in the community and whom you represent. If you cannot cope with it, then step down. We don't need this kind of immaturity and unprofessionalism defining our community. I hope people realize that not all lesbians are as hateful and incompetent.
T Romano, Ottawa ON
10/18/12 8:54 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Re: T Romano, Ottawa, ON
T Romano, surely when you say, "I know people like Hughes are not easy to deal with..." you mean that [constructive criticism] is not easy to deal with. ///// On that, I feel that constructive criticism is easy to deal with and a necessary part of any leadership role. It may require maturity to be able to accept it, yes. But it does not have to be a difficult process unless one makes it so by one's own attitude. ///// From a wider perspective, it seems that Novy may ]or may not] have stated to others that she has felt "attacked" when various other _objective_ criticisms of the festival were raised (that were not personal attacks at all). Whether her response was to demand "compliance" with instructions amounting to internal gag orders is another question. ///// It is possible that the intent is to silence any criticism of the workings of Pride, as a matter of privilege, (i.e. to protect one's reputation). Could it be that calling me "mentally unstable" in this online and print article is a means intended to do so? Yes, I believe so, and without any regard for the consequences of the abuse of the term "mentally unstable".
Guy Hughes, Ottawa Ontario
10/18/12 2:54 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.