Urban Spread
XTRA SPECIAL REPORT / Sexually transmitted infections are on the rise in Ontario's big cities
Andrea Houston / National / Thursday, February 21, 2013
Share |

While there are many reasons for the rise of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in Ontario, there’s no getting around the fact that more people are having unprotected sex, says a representative of the Canadian AIDS Treatment Information Exchange (CATIE).
 
Sean Hosein, CATIE’s science and medicine editor, says infection rates in Canada have been rising steadily for the past decade.
 
“For the most part, people are having unprotected sex,” Hosein says, noting that the majority of new STIs occur among men who have sex with men, some of whom don’t necessarily identify as gay or bisexual. “In the city of Toronto, researchers believe that about 20 percent of men who have sex with men have HIV. That’s a very high concentration.”
Sean Hosein says infection rates in Canada have been rising steadily for the past decade.
(Matt Watson)
 
Throughout Canada, STIs continue to be a significant and growing public health concern. Reported rates of chlamydia, gonorrhea and syphilis have been rising since 1997, according to the Public Health Agency of Canada. Chlamydia remains the most frequently reported STI in Canada.
 
In Ontario, infection rates are concentrated in urban areas.
 
There are just more opportunities to have sex when you live in the city, says Shannon Ryan, executive director of the Black Coalition for AIDS Prevention. “The more access you’ve got to that pool, the more likely it is you will acquire an infection. That’s just a fact. In a rural community, your opportunities for sex may be more limited.”
 
Likewise, the ways men hook up for sex is changing, he says. AIDS organizations are facing new challenges in getting the message — and condoms — to men.
 
“It’s been difficult for us to keep up with the curve,” Ryan says. “Fifteen years ago it was all about bathhouses and clubs, because that’s where guys would go. Now, we are in the world of Grindr, with connections right in your pocket.”
 
Recent studies suggest that men who hook up online, using sites like Scruff, Grindr and Squirt, are taking greater risks. Ryan suspects that may have something to do with the immediacy and availability of anonymous sex.
 
“How can AIDS organizations get in the middle of that conversation?” he asks. “Historically, in the bathhouse, we could be in guys’ faces as they walked in, handing them a condom and talking about STIs. In the virtual world, we can’t get into those spaces, unfortunately.”
 
At the same time, STIs are becoming increasingly difficult to treat by traditional courses of antibiotics. A new drug-resistant form of gonorrhea has recently been reported in Toronto. It is particularly prevalent among gay men.
 
“This is a clear trend that gonorrhea is getting more vicious and harder to treat,” Hosein says. “Eventually, there will be cases that do not respond to treatment. It’s only a matter of time.”
 
He says the same is true for other infections, which has researchers worried.
 
Ontario could reduce infections by investing in targeted public education and awareness campaigns, he says. “Where are the ads for safer sex? We need to go back to the kind of campaigns that we had 20 years ago in newspapers and subways and on billboards.”


Share |


Reader Comments


 
It's time to re-direct donation dollars from ACT
Each year, the AIDS Committee of Toronto (ACT) solicits governments, corporations and individual donors for monies for HIV prevention programs for gay men and other men who have sex with men (MSM). Each year, ACT gets those funds. What does it do with them? It makes pamphlets promoting barebacking. See http://www.xtra.ca/public/Toronto/ACT_reaches_out_to_men_who_bareback-10221.aspx ACT is dominated by leftists who follow a political and ideological agenda. Indeed, many of the employees and contract workers of ACT are QuAIA supporters (e.g., Andrew Brett, Rahim Thawer, etc.) who spend a lot of time in the social media and after work on their left-wing political causes. Many of the employees and contract workers of ACT (including the people who do graphic design for their posters and brochures) are HIV-positive activists. These leftists and HIV-positive activists oppose hard-hitting prevention campaigns for political and ideological reasons (e.g., they believe that ACT should not do anything that would further stigmatize HIV-positive people who have unprotected sex, they believe that ACT should not question the decision of people who have unsafe sex). Many ACT personnel also enjoy and promote bareback sex in their personal lives ( I remember one HIV-positive board member of ACT in the 1990s who used to brag about the raunchy bareback sex parties he went to in New York). So, it’s not surprising that HIV and STD infections are increasing among young gay men and other MSM in Toronto. It’s time for government, corporate and individual donors to take the money that they regularly give to ACT each year for HIV and STD prevention and to instead give it to another organization that is truly focused on helping young gay men and other MSM stay HIV-negative and STD-free. ACT is primarily focused on left-wing ideology and political correctness.
David, Toronto ON
02/22/13 7:22 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
oyyy david
it's 2013 and you're harping on some convo that happened in the 90s? get real. I'd take your post more seriously if it didn't devolve into leftie bashing and anti-QuAIA speak. You reveal your own bias and agenda, and you've done nothing to convince me to donate my dollars elsewhere.
prince, tdot ON
02/22/13 1:14 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
@prince
prince,the ACT board member from the 1990s is not an isolated example of ACT personnel and other AIDS activists who bareback. Today, there is a whole internet trail of ACT personnel and other AIDS activists who bareback (e.g., Grindr and other hook-up sites). The so-called left bashing in my post is justified: the ideology of left-wing employees and contract workers of ACT (e.g., let's not judge oppressed gays who bareback, let's not do anything that may stigmatize oppressed HIV-positive people who bareback) is preventing them from using the tax dollars they receive to make effective HIV prevention campaigns. But, you are right about one thing. I do have an agenda: for governments and other donors to re-direct their HIV prevention dollars to an organization that is not so rife with conflicts of interest.
David, Toronto ON
02/22/13 8:35 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
E-fucking-NUF
I think the community-based ASO model with money from government to 'raise awareness' and help people make better choices has outlived its ever-debatable utility. These organizations are bloated and ineffective and have nothing useful to offer. The Lung Association and cancer orgs don't tell people to inhale less freqently or do harm reduction. They tell you not to smoke and to tell others not to smoke in your presence - they want you off the stuff entirely because it is how lives are saved. They don't commission studies saying that people smoke because of racist oppression or disempowerment, etc. It's high time that those who take risks and put others at risk were socially ostracized. The nicey-nicey social work stuff is killing people. Lay down some ground rules and make the social outcome of not following them clear and plain to see, like with spousal abuse, rape and other social ills. Draw the line in the sand, and draw it far back. Enough soft-selling unsafe sex practises and encouraging "awareness". I'm tired of awareness. It's time for consequences and repurcussions for your stupidity.
Louis Pasteur, Paris France
02/23/13 3:16 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Science, not "ideology"
The problem with the do-gooder discourse, here, is that it's all about attacking "left-wing ideology" instead of examining the scientific research underpinning the positions and programs of organizations like ACT. ACT takes scientific research very seriously. Reactionary comments -- e.g., "It's time for consequences and repurcussions for your stupidity" -- do not. In fact, such comments are part of the problem -- not just for the health of particular individuals, but for the health of our entire community. So, in short: Level your criticisms when, and only when, they're backed by credible research. Otherwise your opinion is worthless, and your nastiness unwelcome.
Rick, London Ontario
03/04/13 3:45 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
If infections are rising...
Then doesn't that mean that the current approach is failing? That's the bottom line (no pun intended). People are getting infected again despite the current prevention approaches. The goal needs to be on stopping and preventing HIV/STI infections not on reducing stigma. Logically if you reduce stigma doesn't that mean that people are less scared of contracting the disease?
Mike, Winnipeg MB
03/04/13 4:19 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Killing Us Softly
The drumbeat for effective action against HIV continues to go ignored by the medically unqualified bureaucrats and academics who manage the HIV sector gravy train with an iron grip - This is a great quote from the article "Killing Us Softly" at http://www.lifeormeth.com/#/hiv-the-way-forward/4536656373 Use the scroll down feature at the link to read the full article.
Ryan, Toronto Ontario
03/04/13 10:51 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
@Rick
Rick, you referred to some posters' opinions as being worthless and unwelcome. What ever happened to the Rick Telfer from QuAIA who supposedly believed in the unrestricted freedom of speech (unless it was Margaret Somerville).
Al, Toronto ON
03/05/13 12:29 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.