Trans student protests school gender policies
NEW BRUNSWICK / But mixed messages leave media and university administrators scratching their heads
Nick Logan / National / Saturday, November 13, 2010
Share |

Michelle Rayner’s first day of classes at Fredericton’s St Thomas University (STU) was meant to be a new beginning. Instead, she started her first year off, on Sept 13, with a punch in the face after entering a women’s washroom on campus. The alleged assailant thought she was a man.

The 22-year-old Rayner describes herself as androgynous and identifies as transgendered. So, she says, a quick trip to the toilet isn’t so simple in a world of gender-designated lavatories.

“It’s kind of an anxious part of the day, for something that should be so normal,” she explains. “Anyone that is androgynous, we deal with that on a daily basis.”

Rayner wants the university to rethink gender policies concerning the school’s facilities and provide gender-neutral toilets, but the administration is in the dark this week as she speaks principally to local media.

“We were only made aware of this yesterday [Wednesday, Nov 10] afternoon,” says STU’s director of communications. That was when a press release, sent by Rob Frenette, Rayner’s “publicist” and the co-founder of bullyingcanada.ca, arrived in inboxes at media outlets around the city.

STU spokesperson Jeffrey Carleton insists the administration wants to be a part of this dialogue to assure all students are safe and comfortable on campus.
Michelle Rayner says having to use gender-designated toilets on the STU campus is awkward for trans students, but 15 of 29 public washrooms on campus are unisex.

“What we have to do as an administration is meet with the victim in this circumstance and make sure we understand her story and see how we’re going to go from there,” he says.

STU already has private gender-neutral washrooms, Carleton says, which the university installed in George Martin Hall as the school year began. The move was part of refurbishing the building, not because of any complaints.

In fact, at post time Rayner had not filed formal complaints about the alleged assault with either the university or campus security. She says she thinks doing so would detract from the gender-neutrality discussion.

The title of Frenette’s press release is “STU Female Student Physically Assaulted For Using Ladies' Washroom.” Media jumped on the story, and it has been profiled on several outlets, including CTV and CBC television.

The assault may not be the desired focus of Rayner's conversation, but it is certainly the catalyst.

“My point of coming out with this was never to come after the student who took a swing at me or to come after the university because they weren’t as prepared gender-wise as they should be,” says Rayner.

After speaking with Xtra, Carleton had facilities supervisor Dave Dunbar do an audit of all university toilets. Carleton has a long list of private, lockable washrooms on the campus – 29 to be precise, 15 of which are unisex.

The only building that didn’t have one was James Dunn Hall (JDH), which is where Rayner attends all of her classes. She says it’s unfair for her to have to traverse the campus to use a washroom she feels is safe.

She still uses the same women’s washroom on the top floor of JDH where the alleged assault took place, but the two closest academic buildings with unisex toilets, Carleton says, are approximately 100 feet from the front doors of JDH.

The administration is “concerned” about talk of an attack on campus, Carleton says, but it took until Friday afternoon, Nov 12, for the school to reach Rayner. Carleton says no meeting was set because Rayner said she was “indisposed,” but Rayner and Frenette were interviewed on the CBC the same day.

Reporters, including this one, have had no trouble lining up meetings with Rayner. A message to Frenette on Nov 10 was returned by Rayner within five minutes.

“The reason I suggested she go to the media was to get the ball rolling,” Frenette wrote in an email interview. “Since she contacted media, people have come to support Michelle. When I spoke out on the issue of bullying, I contacted the media first. And doing so was the best thing for me.”

He supports Rayner’s attempts to dissuade talk of the attack. But another email, circulated on the evening of Nov 11, proposes a rally “in response to an attack on Michelle Rayner.”


Share |


Reader Comments


 
????
There is no excuse for what happened. That said... instead of going to the university administration and dealing with this through the proper channels, this is self-centered attention seeking brat goes to the media straight of the bat and blindsides the university? Wow kids today really annoy me.
???, Canada Canada
11/14/10 11:29 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Not really...
I don't think that her going to the media was about getting attention. It was stated in the article that it's less about the university itself. She's trying to get some attention called to the subject, not herself. Most people don't even know the importance of gender neutral washrooms, so don't jump on this person because they tried to get some genderqueer visibility.
Rhube, Ottawa Ontario
11/14/10 1:51 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Red flags
I've read various versions of this incident. It brings up many red flags. Things like if this student is worried about being accosted in the loo, why didn't she go to the bldg just 100 feet away which has gender neutral bathrooms. As for the university, having 15 out of 29 washroom designated as gender neutral is great. That's just a bit more than 50 per cent. To me that demonstrates that the college has been and is doing something to ensure that students can feel safe. The whole story sounds contrived to me. I don't care what the reason for it is. However if one has a problem it should be taken care of in-house. Only if that fails should one go to the press. But going to the press without giving the University a chance shows that one has an agenda to push, not justice. Pax, Gwen
gwen, Providence RI, USA
11/14/10 4:21 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
"Red flags"?
@gwen: The fact that the campus has gender-neutral washrooms is irrelevant. Yes, it is. Why? Just because a woman is able to purchase mace, personal alarms and other protective devices, doesn't mean a woman should never go out after 9PM since it's "her fault" if she gets sexually assaulted. The person in question should have the unalienable right to use the women's washrooms if they so choose. They should not be forced to hop two buildings over just to use the washroom. What about in the public sphere, where there often AREN'T any gender-neutral washrooms, like in malls or movie theatres? Should they never use those facilities on fear of being assaulted? Your comment reeks of "blame the victim," and the eyes should be on the perpetrator of this attack. Insinuating that the student did something wrong means that we're saying people do not have the right to NOT be physically assaulted in washrooms. Is that really where you want to go with this?
tower, Toronto Ontario
11/17/10 11:11 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Another student at STU
As a trans student at St Thomas I can assure you that the ratio of gender neutral bathrooms is misrepresented. There is no way 50% of the bathrooms are gender neutral. Only two of the 5 academic buildings on campus have gender neutral bathrooms. There are six in one building, and the couple others are located on floors that house no classrooms, and are rarely seen by students unless on a mission to a faculty office. And this isn't even about bathrooms really, is it? It's about us being harassed in classrooms, hallways, cafeterias and even in our own residences. It's an issue everywhere, and I'm so proud of Michelle for speaking out!
Anon, Fredericton NB
11/17/10 11:21 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.