So Rob Ford doesn't like the Pride parade? So what?
COMMENT / Why gay rights aren't endangered by Toronto's mayor
Emma Teitel / National / Thursday, June 30, 2011
Share |

I’m gay, which is inconvenient. Not for the obvious reasons — but for the sobering reality that many people who know my sexual orientation automatically assume I identify with everyone who shares it. Take the Toronto Pride parade for example. So Mayor Rob Ford doesn’t want to march in the parade. So what? Call me old-fashioned, but since when did our mayor’s civic duties include being hosed down with super soakers by men in diamond-studded codpieces?

Tolerance is a two-way street. If you want the socially conservative mayor to shake your hand, put on some pants.
But Toronto’s left has spoken: gay pride — assless chaps and all — is forever bound to gay rights, and Ford’s pending absence at the annual parade is a direct admission that he considers such rights revocable. In other words, if Ford is not for gay pride, he is definitely not for gay rights — or at the very least, as Pride co-chair Francisco Alvarez suggests, his actions jeopardize them. “There have been a lot of hard-won and incremental gains over the years, for lesbians and gays in this country,” Alvarez told the Toronto Star last week, “but they are all easily reversible.”
 
Rob Ford is not going to reverse my gains. He is going to the cottage. Apparently, though, this makes him an unapologetic homophobe, whose acquiescence to family tradition is nothing more than a convenient way to snub the gay community. Or is it? Let’s examine the possibilities:
 
1. Ford really wants to go to the cottage. He has no qualms about assless chaps or nipple tassels; he just likes beer and belly-flopping better. He recognizes that going to Pride is a mayoral tradition (though a relatively new one), but he simply can’t resist the call of his own wild. What does this make him? A poor politician? Maybe (certainly one who isn’t interested in garnering new votes or ingratiating himself to a community that’s not yet onboard with his policies). A Canadian? Yes. A homophobe? Probably not.
 
2. Ford actually wouldn’t mind going to the parade, but he’s definitely grossed out by assless chaps and nipple tassels, and maybe even the thought of homosexual sex itself. He is not the devil incarnate. He’s just kind of delicate. Like a lot of parents (unless your kids are named Storm or Jazz), Ford may not be comfortable in an environment that mixes free-range genitals with children buying snow cones. Does this make him a prude? Definitely. Does it make him a homophobe? No — not unless you equate disgust with discrimination. I don’t. Cringing at something doesn’t mean you think it should be prohibited. Who knows — Rob might fight to his death for your right to engage in homosexual activity. He’d just rather die than watch you do it. (Unless you’re lesbians.)
 
3. Ford is, in fact, deeply homophobic. Gay people repulse him and in his perfect world there wouldn’t be any. His refusal to attend the parade is a cynical political move designed to appease his socially conservative constituents and, as a bonus, remove himself from a “lifestyle” he finds morally repugnant. Where does that leave us? The chair of Queer Ontario’s Political Action Committee, Casey Oraa, told the Star that Ford should “own up to his homophobia” and tell the world exactly how he feels about gays. Oraa and like-minded activists want the mayor to come out as a bigot. Shouldn’t they be proud that a powerful person is afraid to admit he’s homophobic? When gays can come out of the closet, and homophobes have to step inside it, isn’t that cause to celebrate? Frankly, I don’t want Ford to tell the world how he really feels about gay people. I’d prefer he go up north.
 
Tubing enthusiast, shrinking violet, homophobic opportunist — or a little of each — one thing’s for sure: Rob Ford will not join ranks with the rainbow brigade this weekend. Cannibalism survivor and gay rights darling Mel Lastman is confident the mayor will eventually embrace the parade’s more bawdy elements and one day get a squirt gun of his own. Maybe he will — but he’s not obliged to.
 
I like Pride. It’s like spring break without frat boys, the only time of year my girlfriend and I can kiss publicly without scandalizing or exciting anyone. But to blindly defend the parade’s more salacious and arguably sophomoric overtones— notwithstanding their context in the history of gay activism — is simply naive. Rob Ford may be a bigoted jerk after all, but his alleged snub has been positively received by many people who are uncomfortable with the promiscuity that characterizes Pride. If Pride’s mandate is to host an epic party, then it should never change; but if its purpose is to advance gay rights — as many anti-Ford activists maintain — then perhaps it’s time for Pride to evolve with the rights it celebrates. Because until the parade looks more like an affirmation of same-sex freedoms than sex itself, important people will seem justified in skipping town.
Tags: gay, pride, rob ford


Share |


Reader Comments


 
this is about more than the parade
Hi Emma: You make the comment "Rob Ford is not going to reverse my gains?" What makes you think that? You haven't been paying attention to what Ford has said or done over the past few years. This is a politician that has clearly come out against same-sex marriage, against funding for HIV/AIDS testing and against grants for queer community groups. One of the important gains of the past two decades here in Toronto has been that LGBTQ organizations now receive funding for vital health, social and arts programs. Particularly for the most marginalized members of our communities (homeless gay youth, trans people, queer refugees) these services are vital. Ford's refusal to participate in ANY Pride events, is reason to be concerned that he and his allies on council will not be supportive of our services and programs. This is about far more than simply showing up at a parade.
Doug Kerr, Toronto Ontario
06/30/11 11:39 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Silly Lesbian
Whoever wrote this is really ignorant. First of all I never once thought Pride to be a sex party unless you actually go to a sex party. I admit there are few "eccentrics" with the ass showing chaps and nipples tassle. But when I walk down Church street I see couples and friends just having a good time. You may not care if Ford does not march and frankly anything he does now will seem insincere but the fact that he chose to not march and not raise the Pride flag and not attend any of the charity events happening over the past week is extremely disturbing. No one is asking him to have gay sex or even perform gay marriages, but by him snubbing our community he is in fact snubbing everything we have gone through as if its no big deal. Imagine being a gay kid in Toronto and knowing that the person representing your city that was voted in by a majority refuses to acknowledge your sexuality. "just ignore them and they will go away". Ford is setting a presidency for hate and is not being a role model for the people he represents. Furthermore the only way Toronto can afford his right wing agenda is because events like Pride brings in millions of dollars so for that reason alone he should show a little respect to his fellow queers. Parade or no Parade, Ford should've made the effort to attend something during Pride...how hard is it to stand while a flag is being raised or attend a charity event to raise money for HIV/AIDS. Pride is meant to unite people and be an event filled with positivity and now it seems to be filled with negativity and an "Us versus him" attitude.
HM, Toroonto Ontario
06/30/11 12:00 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Exactly
Doug Kerr has hit the nail on the head! I realize the article's author is trying to be provocative while making the point that the "show will go on" with or without Mayor Ford, that his absence doesn't necessarily signal or threaten our rights. Unfortunately, Ford's decision is part of a history of statements and votes that greatly concern me. If he didn't want to attend the parade, he could have attended another event (such as the Pride flag-raising right at City Hall). Even the Globe and Mail recognizes that his snubbing gives encouragement to homophobia (http://tinyurl.com/3hjt5xo). If Pride was any other event that draws millions of people and generates such intense economic activity, Ford would have been there, even for a few minutes, if not at the parade then at some other event. His "No" speaks volumes.
Gilles Marchildon, Toronto Ontario
06/30/11 12:11 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Not the man but THE Mayor needed at Pride
I couldn't disagree more with the premise of this peice--that Ford has just got different priorities for the weekend than a flamboyant LGBT street party. I agree with Doug and Gilles about the significance of Mayor Ford's non-attendance at Pride. While not necessarily motivated by irrational fear of gays by not coming to any Pride event Ford is sending a signal to bigoted people that it is alright to be anti-gay. I would add too that it isn't the presence of the man that is important, but of the Mayor-a symbol and embodiment of the city. I well remember 20 years ago when our Mayor was Art Eggleton who refused to proclaim Gay Pride day or attend any Pride functions. Since that time every Mayor has proclaimed the Day & marched in the Sunday Pride parade. And while Ford at least has signed the Proclamation of LGBT Pride Week--by not coming to any event in Pride's now 10 day celebration--not even the flag raising which after all is a relatively easy 10 minute job of reading his own Proclamation just steps from his office at City Hall & which involves none of the flamboyant displays of sexuality that Emma writes about--Ford is saying that he does not see it as his priority as Mayor to lend any of his mayoral prestige to Pride. At this stage not many gays I know want Ford the man to come to big Pride parade--especially against his will, but many of us still want Toronto's Mayor to be there or at some Pride event just to show in a real way that the Mayor is behind gay rights and equality in Toronto (as former Mayors Lastman, Hall and Miller have said they proudly were happy to do while Mayor. While it may now be too late for Ford the man to appear as something other than a man personally very uncomfortable with homosexuality , it may still be not too late (though it is fast approaching that) for the Mayor to symbolically show his affirmation for Toronto Gay Pride by coming to a Pride event. It is not enough to sign a Proclamation while as Mayor he
james dubro, toronto ontario
06/30/11 1:50 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Keep Rob Ford away... Impeach him !!
I don't want to see Rob Ford at our Pride Parade --or anywhere. He disgusts me. Whenever I do see him I can't help but think of his --eroding blood-vessels bubbling with gravy --his high cholesterol level --his over-proportionate LDL --his excessively burdening layers of adipose tissue bouncing as he walks --his sweating --his fake smile --his superior, entitled, low-class, nouveau-riche attitudes --his right-wing fascist politics... (Allegedly...) The sight of him alone would ruin the Parade for me. I don't need him to validate me as an LGBT person. Keep him away... Impeach him !!
Ford-Phobic (Fearing), Toronto Ont
06/30/11 3:26 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
I agree with Emma Teitel
I agree with Emma Teitel.
Paul, Toronto Ontario
06/30/11 9:43 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
I'm truly amazed
at the idiocy which is rampant in our community. I've heard we are living in a dumb down culture, I see this evidence every where.....Let me be clear, THIS IS NOT ABOUT that babbling buffoon with a silver spoon attending or not attending THE PARADE.
tim, toronto on
07/01/11 8:47 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
emma misses the point
Thanks to the author of this piece for perpetuating the myth that Pride is nothing more than a big parade full of silly men in ass-less chaps. You sound just like those idiots on all the news forums ranting on and on about what a perverted spectable Pride is. Thanks, friend, what a great service you've done. Thanks for being part of the new wave of homophobia splashing across Toronto like a watergun on a parade float. The Mayor snubbing Pride has given our anti-gay neighbours license to mock all of us. Defending his decision allows for this type of meanspirited reaction. Hope that makes you feel proud.
Ryan, Toronto ON
07/01/11 10:01 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
A Parade is a showcase of a people's culture
To those who are embarrassed by their own people's culture as reflected in gay pride parades I'd like to say I disagree with you. You say that Pride Parades should be toned down, should have no nudity, should have no leather men showing their behinds or drag queens or nearly nude buff men or women showing their breasts. These are symbols of our culture our art our history and I am proud of these symbols, proud of our leather men's exposed behinds, proud of their whips, proud of our drag queens with silver or blue or red wigs and with 8 inch high heels, proud of of our buff young men in tiny speedos, proud of our Lesbians baring breasts for all to see, proud of our history, our art, our culture. A parade is a showcase of a people's art, culture, history, costume, music and it is a chance to shout out these things for all the world to see. I'd ask anyone who is ashamed of Pride Parades to look within because I'm sure they'd find layers of internalized homophobia. I'd suggest dealing with this internalized homophobia rather than acting it out onto other people or parades. As for the inevitable argument that children may watch Pride Parades and need protecting from nudity etc consider this; children have no inherent problem with nudity only people inculcated with an aversion to nudity have a problem with it. The adults who use children as an excuse to argue against nudity do so because they have no other more pertinent argument against it so they pull up the "its because of the children" card. As a gay community we should be on to that trick it's been used against granting us child custody rights, same sex marriage rights etc I repeat children have no inherent aversion to nudity its only once people have that aversion inculcated that they develop it. One way to counter that developed aversion is to expose oneself to nudity. Thus Pride Parades create a service to help liberate people from their hangups should they have the moral character to g
Mike Jan, Ottawa ON
07/01/11 10:44 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
What's with all these
stupid self-hating ignorant lesbians and gay men that seem to be taking up so much space everywhere lately? Where did these dimwits come from? From the Pride Board to this nitwit writing in Macleans. What is going on here?
tim, toronto on
07/01/11 12:08 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Quisling
The only thing worse than a world-class city's having a homophobic mayor is a homo apologist for that mayor. Get real Teitel. EVERYONE on the right is a threat to gay rights. I am sick of gays who spew archaic conservative slush and claim discrimination when called on it. If a homo has a sick need to be a political bottom, that is pathetic. But it's also dangerous to me. Homos who support their political oppressors also support my political oppressors. That makes it personal. Every right-wing homo should be outed and ostracized for the Quislings they are.
Donald Quinn, Toronto Ont
07/03/11 12:35 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Mayor, yes, exhibitionism, no
I am straight and I totally enjoyed the whole pride week! The spirit of celebration was felt, reminded me of Woodstock 69'. Ford should have been there, not as Rob the guy, but as a mayor that represents the entire city. But at the same time, I was shocked to see sex toy vendors on the street, and many male exhibitionists. Tolerance and acceptance both require a 2 way street, if no one is supposed to walk around half naked at Yonge and Dundas Square, then that should be the bottom line, same applies to sex toys. I saw many families came out to support the cause, but I wouldn't know how to explain to the kids what buttplugs and dildos are, or why some men are fully naked. If that was the reason Ford didn't want to participate, then it's kind of understandable. Even apart from the pride week, posters of half naked men are plastered all over Church street. If LGBT community is serious about better understanding and unity, they have to do something about the exhibitionism, it has absolutely nothing to do with sexual orientation or gay pride. Many people who are otherwise neutral on the issue, and would support the cause are put off by bombardment of exhibitionism, it is very counterproductive. If the LGBT community can't connect with the rest of the citizens, then the pride week is only preaching to the choir, and I'm sure that's not the intent of the pride events. I hope one day, gays and lesbians can hold hands anywhere without getting stared at, any time, any day, not just during the pride week. But at the same time, I also hope the LGBT community can attract more open minded straight people to the village, and the focus should be on you guys throwing awesome parties instead of exhibitionism. And only then, Ford will be more inclined to participate. One day, gays and lesbians will adopt children, and they will have to face the same conundrum. Again, showing butts and weenies have nothing to do with sexual orientation! Where's the great sense of fashion?
Straight man LGBT supporter, Toronto Ontario
07/04/11 9:26 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Support the family, no matter what
While I think Ford should have attended, I'm bothered by the tribalistic tone of some of the arguments directed Ms. Teitel's way here. It's as if anyone who's gay and isn't bona fide left-wing has to justify to the Group why they're not a traitor out to sell Their People. This smacks of pettiness and (self) ghettoization. We're a diverse community, one in which it should be okay for people to disagree on things like Pride without being accused by the queer left of working with the Evildoers to put the rest of us in the closet. "EVERYONE on the right is a threat to gay rights. " This is so narrow-minded and dogmatic. Everyone on the left = good. Everyone on the right = evil. Maybe you can tell that to conservatives like Mayor Mike Bloomberg and the 4 Republican Senators in New York State who just helped pass same-sex marriage.
Tribalism, Toronto ON
07/07/11 2:11 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Straight Sexuality on Parade 365
What they never consider is the hyper- sexualization of women in our culture for the pleasure of straight men. There are women wearing very little in music videos, as pop stars, in advertising(including beer ads), posters, magazines such as Maxim, TV and movies. And let's also consider how young straight men love to talk about who they are doing and how, in the locker rooms or anywhere else they get together. In sharp contrast to our straight brethren, the mainstream media and culture most often present gay men as asexual or ignored. When lesbians are presented, it's generally for the pleasure of straight men as the author of this article alludes to, when she considers Ford's possible agreeableness to seeing them. You must realize, it makes a certain amount of sense that gay men and lesbians would go all out on one day of the year to draw attention to our sexuality. What's wrong with seeing a fit gay man in a speedo, if we can see hot women in bikinis supposedly pursuing straight men who drink a lot of beer in TV advertising? Is it because the former represents homosexuality?
Clint, Thunder Bay ON
07/13/11 8:38 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Is he at least better than Mel Lastman?
http://www.betterthanlastman.ca
BTL, Toronto Ontario
07/15/11 12:43 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Did any mosques walk in the parade?
I'd like to know if any Mosque members or Muslim denomination walked in the parade. What do gays think of increasing immigration of Muslims if none of them will be supportive of gay rights?
xox, Ontario Ontario
07/21/11 11:52 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Good work, Emma!
I love all the "she misses the point" comments. Maybe she just doesn't agree with "the point." A remarkable number of people I know share this viewpoint. Sorry, Chicken Little, but the sky is not falling down just because the mayor broke a decace-old "tradition." Most of us just don't fucking care. Only losers obsess over this stuff.
alejandro, toronto on
08/02/11 11:55 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.