Queers uniting around Liberal-NDP coalition
POLITICS / Best hope for progress, activists say; rallies planned across Canada
Dale Smith / National / Tuesday, December 02, 2008
Share |

MAKE PARLIAMENT WORK. Ariel Troster is mobilizing support for the fledgling Liberal-NDP coalition. The coalition represents a greater share of the popular vote than the Conservatives do, she points out.
(Pat Croteau photo)
With a signed agreement between the Liberals and the NDP to form a coalition government under the leadership of Stéphane Dion, with the support of the Bloc Quebecois, progressives across the country are moving to show their support for the union.

Ottawa activist Ariel Troster is rallying support for the coalition.

"In terms of any possibility of making gains for our community, a coalition government is the best way to go," says Troster.

Toronto activist and Spa Excess owner Peter Bochove is moving to organize his network to get involved online.

"I'm delighted," Bochove says of the coalition. "I want to see as many people as possible speaking out in light of the massive public relations campaign the other side is financing."

The Conservatives began their public relations assault almost immediately, inviting their supporters to not only offer up "emergency donations" to the party, but also to call into radio talk shows and to write letters to the editor, complete with scripted talking points.

The party has also set up a number of rallies around the country to take place on Dec 6, which they have called "Rally for Canada," seems largely aimed at both discrediting Bloc support for the coalition, while proclaiming itself as a voice for Canadian democracy.

To counter this sentiment, progressives are rallying around MakeParliamentWork.com, which highlights the need for a coalition because of the Conservatives' failed economic performance. The site also references the Conservatives' plan to curtail the right of public servants to strike, and their proposal to claw back women's right to pay equity.

Public sector unions including the Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC) and the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) are part of the Make Parliament Work movement.
 
As well, women's groups, cultural groups, and even anti-war groups are getting involved, hoping to add their voices to the demand for a coalition government.

"More than 60 percent of the people voted against Stephen Harper in the last election," Troster points out.

Indeed, the actual number was rounded out to 38 percent support for the Conservatives, while the combined Liberal and NDP support works out to 44 percent, 54 percent if you include the Bloc.

"As far as I'm concerned, a coalition government has the clear mandate to govern," Troster adds.

Aside from Harper's lack of responsiveness to queer issues, grassroots organizers are hoping that other areas of social justice will be restored under a coalition government, including the Court Challenges Program, the Kelowna Accord, funding for the Status of Women, and action on the environment.

The last item has already been agreed to in the coalition document signed by the three party leaders, in which they have agreed to a cap-and-trade system with absolute emissions reductions using 1990 as a baseline year. Green Party leader Elizabeth May has also thrown her party's "unanimous" support behind the coalition.

"It's not just about getting Harper out," Troster says. "It's also about the possibility of a government that will work collaboratively and that will frankly be susceptible to the will of the public because they know that this is controversial territory. I think this is a good opportunity for us."



Share |


Reader Comments


 
Get off your ass, Xtra.
Why does every fucking story about politics involve Peter Bochove? Voter turnout is down - let's ask Bochove. Are queers supporting the queer positive NDP? Not if we ask Bochove, who's supporting the Skokes/Wappel/McLeod party this time around, despite Siksay and Davies being stalwart warriors for the cause. Maybe it is time to update the speed dial in the Xtra editorial offices. There are all kinds of activists in this city, young people, people of colour, trannies, women, non-business owners, you know? Other kinds of queers? What is your fascination with 80's-era bathhouse "activism" which is - let's be frank - just business development under another name.
Alex MacLean, Toronto ON
12/02/08 9:25 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Hardly the guy
Peter Bochouve is hardly the person to be getting up in our faces about this. He trashed Jack Layton and the NDP, who ran gay Muslim El Farouk Khaki in Toronto Centre, in the last election. If someone is going to rally queers to support a "progressive coalition" it ought to be someone with less baggage Peter. He is not a coalition builder, he is a rant.
James L., Toronto ON
12/03/08 1:07 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Oh no, not the NDP!
Gee Alex and James.. your frothy adherence to the NDP party line is admirable. But let's be clear - Bochove called out Jack and NDP (as a party) on their support for the Age of Consent bill, criminalizing sex between minors. As to Bochove's bona fides - he started/chairs the "Committee to Abolish the 19th Century" which is doing a lot more for queers than the NDP (as a party) currently is. He's also a long-time activist in the community, and frankly has more credibility than Jack Layton when it comes to queer issues.
Dan, Toronto ON
12/03/08 11:09 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
LET'S FOCUS HERE
Let's focus on the issue here: the need for a coalition government. Personal attacks against a quoted community leader are off-topic and should be beneath the dignity of commentators. Move on, gentlemen.
Editor, Ottawa ON
12/03/08 12:20 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
No party adherence here
Mr/Ms Editor, my "personal attack" if it can be called that was at core a request for Xtra to do a better job and ask actual activists (who ought to be represented in their variety in this multicultural city) for their opinions rather than recycling the usual ones a la Bochove. Hey "Dan": I can't speak for Mr. L, but I have no "frothy adherence" to the NDP, having quit that party in the 1990s, and am not a fan of the unctuous Mr. Layton. At all. I am, however, a keen follower of lgbt politicians and how they represent the communities that give them their strength. Davies and (especially) Siksay are beyond compare. Btw, the age of consent bill was debated even within the community, so stop the pretence there was a consensus position. There wasn't, though I opposed criminalization. I admit, Dan, that Mr. Bochove does a lot for queers - I always get a fresh towel for the asking, and for that I am appreciative. Jack Layton has never done me such a favour. Thanks, Peter! I think we have the right, however, to question someone whose activism is in fact a business interest for bathhouse and club owners. Which is fine, but stop the pretence. Anyway, I've never visited a news commentary website so obsessed with chirpy, sunny dialogue. You need to lighten up. These are important issues, and you need to let the gloves come off. You gave space to Bochove to take swings at Layton - fair enough. You've taken legendary swings at Bob Rae and Marion Boyd and many others, so what's up with the pious admonitions and the "if you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all" bullshit? This isn't a church paper - or is it? Because we can just take the dialogue somewhere else if Xtra.ca isn't grown-up enough to handle it. Considering how little interest Xtra.ca seem to have drummed up, one might expect you'd be a little more appreciative of any kind of interest at all. Usually you either delete or print my co
Alex MacLean, Toronto ON
12/03/08 11:58 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Coalition builders
Let's take the editor at his/her word and say the discussion here should be about coalition building, including whether what is now proposed is the best way forward for the country. Most of us have identities that are not limited to our sexuality and thus have a host of other issues that concern us and alliances we value. That must be honoured. The people best suited to do that within our communit(ies) are those who, while they may members of parties, have not been bitterly divisive. And that's the test Bochove fails. He was vociferously critical of the NDP just a couple of issues back and thus has no good will in that circle. NDPers, those who are left/green independents like me, and others are not going to be rallied by someone who is a Liberal party apologist. I'm not saying there is no role for him, but it is not as a coalition builder and he cannot speak for the gay community. In addition, his issues of interest as expressed here are incredibly parochial, important as age of consent is for some people. (Personally, I've just fucked whom I wanted and didn't wait to find out if it was widely approved of, but some are obsessed with the rights discourse and obtaining permission of governments to do things. To each their own). There's little time but let's have a brief chat about whether coalition ought be a shared goal. The editor talks about the "need for a coalition government" as if they've already decided that for us. Anyone whose opinion I value has a political assessment that is more sophisticated than just who is most in favour of legalized intergenerational fucking, gay marriage, or reformed bawdy house laws. This is where the need to talk to a diversity of queer people come in. Look at the incredible fuck-up that happened in California when people made assumptions that they could equate their 'marriage rights' with the inequality faced by other disenfranchised communities. It has created rifts that will take years to heal.
Alex MacLean, Toronto ON
12/04/08 3:00 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
I agree with Alex
When it comes to Bochove. Of course, I don't think it's JUST Bochove who has a hate on for the NDP and acts as a Liberal Party apologist; I think the editorial staff of Xtra, with its selective attacks on the NDP, and either VERY muted criticism of the Liberals -- or even fawning adoration of them, in some cases -- has displayed that they are firmly in that camp, as well. As for the coalition, I only support the NDP sullying itself by consorting with opportunist Liberal sleazebags because the alternative -- a continuation of the Harpokon regime -- is so much WORSE.
Nathanial, Slocan Valley BC
12/06/08 4:47 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
city hall today 12 - 1pm
I will be at the rally at city hall today from 12 to 1pm. I support the coalition because it will be more progressive than the the current government. I do think this newspaper has a Liberal Party bent, why else would they continually quote a Liberal party supporter views without seeking other progressive partisans. The higher standard demanded by the editor here of the NDP is at times frustrating. It would be great if they felt they could take on the Liberal pragmatist approach to everything now and again. All that said, it is time too make the coalition work and Xtra to no surprise loves the idea. The weak link in the coalition is Dion and the Liberals. Lets show them just how strong we can be!
Ricky Barnes, Toronto ON
12/06/08 8:00 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Tragic choices
Aren't we all sick of tragic choices? I'm with Nathanial that after a fair amount of nose-holding and moral flaccidity, I come to 'support' the coalition, not because it is an inspiring idea, but because a Harper-led government is just so much worse. I have never voted Conservative, and never will, but I think I could live with a moderate Conservative Party (were such a creature possible) over the Dion-Layton Frankenstein, but of course, I don't have that as a choice to make today. Harper is such an obnoxious embarrassment of a leader, that even the NDP propped-up moribund Liberal party is the preferred alternative. Christ, this being an adult thing sucks. Oh, Canada indeed. Perhaps this is the beginning of the end of the NDP as we know it. I'm starting to feel like an undergraduate Trot - when will we have a socialist alternative party, one with integrity?! Layton was supposed to be the hope for Canadian left, a return to form, and look where he has taken it. The Bloc support doesn't bother me. But sharing a stage with and installing as government a capitalist party of liars and thieves is not the kind of action you will live down in the years to come. But hey, for a while, you might get the great ministerial offices, staff, the hybrid limo and driver, and the title "Honourable" - which will hold less meaning than it ever has.
Alex MacLean, Toronto ON
12/06/08 1:38 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
I take it back...
With the Liberals now on the verge of UNdemocratically anointing Iggy Thumbscrews, who I see as an ideological soul-mate of Dear Leader Harper (can you say "fast track to Deep Integration" kids?) I withdraw any support for any coalition between the NDP and the Liberals. Dion at least felt *constrained* into backing down and hiding from the Harpokons; Iggy Thumbscrews will acquiesce to the Dear Leader's agenda *willingly*. If Jack even TRIES to maintain a coalition with Iggy Thumbscrews, I will be disgusted -- it really WILL look like a desperate play for power, rather than any sort of principled stand, or even an attempt to compromise for the sake of progressive legislation. With Iggy in, all bets are off.
Nathanial, Slocan Valley BC
12/08/08 6:23 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.