Queer support of NDP dropped between 2006 and 2008 elections: study
CANADIAN POLITICS / Data suggest that Liberals held steady while NDP declined by nine percentage points
Nick Taylor-Vaisey / National / Friday, January 22, 2010
Share |

QUEER SHIFT? NDP leader Jack Layton. A study of two post-election surveys suggests queer support for the NDP dropped nine percentage points between 2006 and 2008.
(ndp.ca)
NDP MPs are surprised that a recent study suggests queer support for the NDP fell significantly between the last two federal election campaigns.

Three political science professors at Wilfrid Laurier University — Andrea Perrella, Steven Brown and Barry Kay — came to this conclusion after analyzing the results of two Ipsos Reid surveys conducted after the federal elections in 2006 and 2008. The surveys, on which the study is based, asked respondents whether or not they were members of the gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgendered community. More than 1,300 voters answered affirmatively in both polls.

The online polls provided voter samples that were much larger than most surveys, and researchers say it allowed them to draw stronger conclusions about queer voting patterns than had previously been possible.

The data suggest that queer support for the Liberals held steady at 44 percent in both elections, but support for the NDP dropped by nine percentage points between the two elections — from 40 percent in 2006 to 31 percent in 2008.

Bill Siksay and Libby Davies — both NDP MPs — told Xtra that the queer community's support for the party has always been substantial and consistent.

"There's always a dialogue on issues, but nobody has called to say 'You're not doing your job,'" said Siksay, who pointed to several areas where the queer community is represented by the NDP. "We're the only party with a queer issues critic, and we also have an LGBT committee on the federal level, dedicated to queer issues."

Siksay was surprised that the numbers suggested a dip in the queer vote for the NDP. He pointed to the work the party has done on trans rights as proof of queer advocacy. Early last year, Siksay introduced a bill in the House that would add gender identity and gender expression to the list of prohibited grounds of discrimination in the Canadian Human Rights Act. It aims to give trans-identified Canadians access to human rights protections.

Davies was also intrigued by the study's findings. She said that, for decades, the NDP has been a tireless supporter of the queer community in the House of Commons. She conceded that it's not surprising queer voters are thinking about other issues at the ballot box but indicated she thinks the Liberal claim that it is Canada's queer-friendly party is just a mirage.

"Liberals might hide behind the Charter," she said, "but sometimes people forget that, on individual issues, the Liberals aren't queer-friendly. When Paul Martin allowed a free vote on same-sex marriage, there were huge splits in that caucus."

Liberal MP Rob Oliphant, one of three openly gay MPs in his caucus, said that his party has been "pretty rock solid" on human rights issues. He added, though, that the party can only take so much credit for capturing such a large chunk of the gay vote in the last two campaigns because external factors are at play.

"I'd suggest there is increasing affluence among the gay population, and it tends to move not to the right wing, but to the centre," he said. "And, especially in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver, the gay population is increasingly multicultural — a demographic that, traditionally, has an affinity for the Liberals."

Oliphant added that Liberals are also working internationally to oppose anti-gay regimes around the world.

Ian Capstick, an Ottawa consultant who was, for several years, Jack Layton's press secretary, said that if the numbers are reliable — and he doubts they are because of the small sample groups used in the study — it can be attributed mostly to perception.

"The Liberals have been very good at managing the perception that they are queer-friendly," he said, adding that the Liberals have done a great job positioning themselves as the party that can get things done for the queer community on Parliament Hill.

But he disputes the conclusions of the Wilfrid Laurier study. He says the data aren't reliable because it's nearly impossible to know whether such a small sample is representative of the total queer population in Canada. In the report, the authors do note the "need for additional validating surveys using a variety of sampling frames and survey methodologies" to bolster the legitimacy of their findings.

Nevertheless, Capstick says that the study does make it clear the NDP can't depend solely on queer voters.

"The queer community is not indentured to any one political party."



Share |


Reader Comments

These reader comments are posted directly. No editorial review is made prior to posting. Readers may contact the moderator with any complaints or concerns, and these will be reviewed within two business days.

 
A little obvious...
While the article doesn't seem to explain how the sample was created -- which leads me to believe the study may be flawed -- it seems that the conclusion could have been reached just by looking at vote counts. The NDP take dipped substantially to third place in the queerest ridings in Canada -- Toronto Centre and Vancouver Centre. In particular, VC had a strong queer challenger running for the Conservatives. It would be interesting to know how queers outside these ridings vote, but the article doesn't indicate that the study took geography, or other variables into account.
Rob Salerno, Toronto ON
01/22/10 12:30 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Biting the Hand that Feeds Us
It is disconcerting to see that the gay community is failing to back the one party that has our interests at heart. The NDP is the one party in Ottawa we can absolutely trust. Not only that, it is also disturbing to see the number of people in the gay community who seem to want to march in lock-step with the capitalist and corporate culture of the right without regards to our history as a people who stood against the corporate agenda for years. As a gay man and life-long Socialist, I shiver when I think that gay voters have the potential to allow us to suffer under four more years of the Tories. 'Nuff said.
Kieran Earles, Mount Pearl Newfoundland
01/22/10 2:10 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Leftist = Hypocrite
Why should Canadian gay men support an anti-male feminist party that supports anti-gay bogus refugees and other foreign riffraff ahead of us. The left wants to open the floodgates from Haiti. The left is a threat to the people that built this country. Fuck the NDP. How gay friendly is that socialist paradise Cuba? And stop calling gay men queer..I will not be lumped in with lesbians and asexuals.
ron, Vancouver Bc
01/22/10 2:58 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Jack is whack
Kieran, voters would be stupid to have absolute trust in any party, and the NDP is no exception. Jack Layton made no effort to find common ground with the Liberals after the 2005 budget and it was ultimately his decision to vote against the government in 2006 triggering an election. When Harper took power, the NDP still spent most of their time fighting the Liberals. Layton made no effort to form a transparent, working coalition with the Liberals BEFORE the 2008 campaign, and that stunt he pulled in Dec. 2008 with Dion and Duceppe was beyond the pale. In this fractured parliamentary climate, a vote for the NDP really is a vote for the Tory's. If they were smart maybe they should stop running candidates that have no chance of winning in ridings that the Conservatives have taken from the Liberals. But they aren't smart. They are just another self-interested party that only adds to the dysfunction in Ottawa. Yes I can appreciate the NDP for its fervent support of queer rights issues over the years, and I even used to vote for them way back when. But now they disgust me because they were too weak and too scared to really challenge the Conservatives. They are letting Harper off easy compared to how they treated Martin because to the NDP a Liberal victory is worse than Conservative one - which only baffles progressive voters.
Ryan, Toronto ON
01/22/10 3:08 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
I Have
"nobody has called to say 'You're not doing your job'". Well, actually I have called my NDP MP and Jack Layton's office, multiple times in recent years to say just that. I used to be an NDP member, but recently all it does it prop up the Tories so Layton can stroke his ego. I don't really have a party I support any more.
Randy, Windsor ON
01/22/10 4:18 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Problem with Leighton
A serious change that occurred under Leighton's rule of the NDP is the deafening silence in terms of criticising China. No complaints about Canadian (UNION) jobs disappearing thanks to China's undervalued currency, no mention of the PRC's vicious colonialism of Uighur, Tibetan and Mongolian land, not a peep about persecution of religious minorities. Obviously, sinophile Jack Leighton wants to cozy up to his Chinese bloc-voters and business constituents.
Adam, Calgary Alberta
01/22/10 4:49 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
There is a lot of factors
The GLBTQ community is very big Kieran. We don't all necessarily want to live on welfare in a hippy commune. Also I would object to the idea of a common history of opposing the evil corporations. But anyway...another issue here is also that GLBTQ people are indeed more integrated in the larger Canadian culture there are other issues to focus on so some of us probably don't feel the need to vote NDP as if our lives depend on it. But for me personally I dislike the NDP's stance on military spending esspecailly when important things like our arctic sovereignty is being violated and other nations are greedily eyeing our resources. There's also a desire to take a more direct and actually effective role in world affairs. instaed of a buch of useless, ineffective, BS, peacekeeping.
Mike, Edmonton Alberta
01/22/10 8:15 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
A couple of other reasons for the bleeding vote...
I would also suggest two other factors 1) the rise of the Green Party as a gay-friendly alternative and 2) the desire to vote for the strongest bulwark against a Conservatives majority (Liberals or even BQ) would be two reasons why the 'urban gay vote' would bleed away from the NDP to some degree. The NDP is, ironically, a very conservative organization, slow to embrace change and still often lost in 1970s rhetoric and low-return identity politics. As well, the trade union bloc within the party has been slow to respond to the decline of the industrial economy, often distrustful of e.g. environmentalism. So we endure the usual election events - the leader standing ranting in front of a padlocked factory is a standard cliche. And that doesn't really resonate with your average urban gay man or lesbian. As well, for those of us who do consider ourselves socialists to some degree, Jack Layton has not been able to take the party in a fresh direction or articulate an updated critique of globalized capitalism and growth economics in a world of declining resources - a great disappointment.
Alex MacLean, Toronto ON
01/23/10 2:02 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Stephen Harper is till too scary
This is more about getting Harper out of office than it is about turning away from the NDP. The Liberals are the only ones that can do that, even thought they are blowing it by electing weak leaders like Dione and Iggy.
Jason, Mississauga Ontario
01/23/10 10:57 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Nonsense
The way that people vote in a first-past-the-post system like we have is not necessarily representative of their actual political leanings. In the last several elections left-wingers have focused on ousting the Conservatives. Many voted strategically in an attempt to get rid of Harper. No Canadian political party is doing a good enough job to garner my real support.
Bob, Van BC
01/23/10 2:17 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
"Strategic" voteing... my ass!!
A lot of good that did in the last election the conservatives GAINED seats!!! There is absolutely no proof that such a practice actually works. It's so utterly stupid! I'm sorry for being a bit off topic but when you vote you pick the person who best represents YOU not for the guy with the best chance of beating the Conservative Party candidate!! "I keep hearing let's get rid of Harper" Unless you live in his riding you didn't elect him in the first place!! The last election I lived in Edmonton. I voted for the Conservative candidate in my riding because I thought she best represented me. I also like the direction the Conservatives are taking my country. I support increased military spending and a more active and aggressive military role on the world stage. I want to protect our arctic sovereignty, I support strong ties to the United States as opposed to Europe. I like free markets, and lower taxes, ect.....But voting strategically? It boggles my mind that anyone would throw away their vote on party that doesn't represent them just to "get rid of Harper". If you support the NDP then VOTE FOR THEM. The Liberals are not a left wing party anyway why vote for people you don't believe in?
Right of center Gay man and no I'm not white, Borden Ontario
01/23/10 7:40 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Taxation Time
Last time I checked, gay people work and pay taxes just like everyone else does in Canada. So, it's not all that surprising that gay voters that would usually vote NDP are deciding that maybe voting NDP and having their pay cheques raped by NDP (and Liberal Govt's) isn't such a great thing to happen to their income every month. I stopped voting NDP and Liberal once I realized that taxation was a quick way to having less of my hard earned money stay in my pocket instead of being shipped off to Ottawa to be wasted on NDP and Liberal programs that mainly help the various 'welfare type industries' through-out the country.
Jeff Taylor, Toronto Ontario
01/24/10 9:47 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
The research reveals the truth
About time proper research was done to address the lies and misrepresentations of New Democracts. NDP remember what they choose and hide the facts when the facts reveal their own hypocrisy. NDP MP Libby Davies conveniently overlooks the division within her own party. Fact - some NDP MPs opposed marriage FACT - NDP caucus has been divided FACT - NDP members/delegates at policy conventions have opposed equal rights for glbtq FACT - NDP candidates have opposed equality for glbtq people FACT - NDP party members said they would not support Sven Robinson as leader because he is gay Libby and Layton are happy to support Harper and the Conservatives yet they take any opportunity to piss on liberals. NDP will never get this gay man's vote nor will they get the $ from my vote again. It has been the Liberal's who have put forward equality legislation that has been passed. It has been Liberals who have been attacked by religious right and opponents of equality.
Jamie, Vancouver BC
01/25/10 3:55 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
what?
Jamie -- you say among other things that there were NDP MPs who opposed same-sex marriage, and then say you'll vote for the Liberals. There was one NDP MP who voted against equal marriage, and she was dropped from the shadow cabinet and then lost the nomination in her own riding, whereas there were no fewer than 32 Liberal MPs who voted against same-sex marriage and they faced no consequences at all. The NDP is not perfect -- no human entity is -- and New Democrats often disagree; but it's very odd to claim that one MP opposing marriage and being disciplined for it is better than 32 MPs opposing it and getting off scot-free.
Matt, Verdun QC
01/25/10 9:34 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Also...
"happy to support Harper and the Conservatives" seems to be a much better description of a party that supported them 79 times for free -- like the Liberals -- than a party that voted with them once in order to secure $1 billion for employment insurance -- like the NDP.
Matt, Verdun QC
01/25/10 9:41 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Post Your Comment!
Your Name:
(required)


City/Town:
(required)


Province:
(required)




Email Address:
(required)



For verification purposes only. Not for publication, nor released to any mailing list. (Privacy statement)

Title of your comment:
(required)


Your Comment: (max. 2000 characters)
(required)
characters remaining

 Refresh
Enter the code shown on the left (case-sensitive):
(required)




   
Click here to read guidelines

Guidelines for reader comments

All submissions are reviewed by our editorial team. Comments are subject to editing for clarification, style and content. We reserve the right to refuse submissions.

Your comment must directly relate to the subject of the article.

Avoid confusing statements; express your thoughts clearly and succinctly so readers will understand your opinion. Do not post superficial comments, such as a phrase of just a few words.

Postings that include promotion of products, services or events will be
refused.

Your comment and name may also be published in a Xtra paper.

Publication of your comments on Xtra.ca or in an Xtra paper is not an endorsement of your views by Xtra.ca or Pink Triangle Press.

Please note that anything you write in your comment (for example: your name, city) may be indexed by search engines. If you are concerned about your privacy, consider using your first name or initials only.