Minister punished for funding Pride: Tory MP
FEDERAL POLITICS / Ablonczy's decision 'surprised' caucus & PMO, says Brad Trost
Dale Smith / National / Tuesday, July 07, 2009
Share |

'A VERY ISOLATED DECISION.' Conservative MP Brad Trost says the decision to fund Pride was "not supported... by a large majority of the MPs" in the Tory caucus. He reassures his pro-family supporters that funding Pride is "not government policy."
(Nicola Betts photo)
Minister of State for Tourism Diane Ablonczy is no longer responsible for a key tourism stimulus program, and a Tory MP suggests it is because she signed off on funding for Pride Toronto.

Conservative MP Brad Trost told the rightwing website LifeSiteNews.com that Ablonczy's decision to give Pride Toronto $400,000 came as a shock to most of the Conservative caucus and even the Prime Minister's Office.

"The pro-life and the pro-family community should know and understand that the tourism funding money that went to the gay pride parade in Toronto was not government policy, was not supported by — I think it's safe to say by a large majority — of the MPs," says Trost. "This was a very isolated decision."

The funds were part of the Marquee Tourism Events Program (MTEP), a $100-million stimulus program that will fund major festivals and events that draw visitors to Canada. Other events that received money from the program include the Calgary Stampede, the Toronto International Film Festival and the Edmonton International Fringe Theatre Festival. Ablonczy made the Pride Toronto funding announcement on Jun 15.

"Today's funding announcement will not only benefit the festival but also the thousands of local businesses that provide services to event attendees," Ablonczy said in the press release last month. "The Government of Canada is proud to show its commitment to the tourism industry, particularly during this difficult economic period."

Trost hinted to LifeSiteNews that Ablonczy had lost the file as a result, attributing the decision to fund Pride Toronto as "sloppiness." Ablonczy remains the minister of state for tourism, but in recent weeks other cabinet ministers and MPs have made MTEP announcements in her stead. Industry Minister Tony Clement told CanWest that Ablonczy remains in her portfolio, but it was later confirmed that Ablonczy was no longer responsible for the Marquee Tourism Events Program.

That responsibility has been handed to Clement, ostensibly because his summer workload means he has more time to make announcements, and that Ablonczy's office was not equipped to handle the $100-million program. Clement's office says the shifting of responsibilities has nothing to do with money being given to Pride Toronto.


Advertisement
Advertisement


Social conservatives such as the Campaign Life Coalition and the president of the Canada Christian College, Charles McVety, have denounced the government's decision to fund Pride Toronto.

Ablonczy was reputed to be one of the more socially conservative members of the caucus, her name appearing on lists of anti-abortion supporters. She also once served as special assistant to Reform Party leader Preston Manning.

Other political parties were quick to denounce Trost's comments.

"At a time when tourism numbers are down across Canada, the real question is whether Conservative homophobia, prejudice and censorship will mean no funding for these important events in the future," says gay Liberal MP Scott Brison. "There's a very good reason why the Conservative Party dropped the moniker of 'Progressive,' and keep in mind that a few years ago in the Progressive Conservative party, Joe Clark was the parade marshal of the Calgary Gay Pride parade."

Brison was a member of the Progressive Conservative caucus under Joe Clark, but he crossed the floor to become a Liberal after the Progressive Conservative and Reform/Alliance parties merged.

"This just underlines the difference between the former Progressive Conservative party and the new regressive Conservative party," Brison says.

"Diane Ablonczy made a good decision," says lesbian NDP MP Libby Davies. "To provide funds to a major festival in Canada, the Toronto Pride festival, and to the fact that the Conservative backbench MPs are now squawking about it, to me is just further evidence of their completely narrow-minded agenda."

Davies is also disturbed by talk that Ablonczy was removed from the MTEP file, possibly for the Pride Toronto funding. "That's pretty outrageous, and I think that Stephen Harper needs to say something. Does he support that? If he does, I find that completely unacceptable, because as far as I can tell, she was doing her job."

Both Divers/cité and the Black & Blue festivals in Montreal have applied for MTEP funds, though neither have heard back regarding their requests. Vancouver Pride was not eligible, as their festival was considered too small.

Divers/cité didn't apply for as much as Toronto Pride, says festival director Suzanne Girard, and she remains optimistic about their chances.

Robert Vezina, who organizes the Black & Blue festival, remains cautious, considering that his festival has not received any funding since the Conservatives came to power, despite getting funding from the previous Liberal government.

"Every time that the civil servants approve funding, it still has to be signed by the minister, so he has the authority to reverse the decision by the civil servants, and that's exactly what the Conservative minister did to us," Vezina says.

"We've requested $125,000, and we really need it this year, so I hope it comes through."

Some may take heart that the government funded Pride Toronto after previously denying funds to festivals like Black & Blue. But others note the Tories are still going out of their way to appease their social conservative supporters.

"To fund something and then make excuses for the funding of it, and be apologetic for it, would seem to be a pyrrhic victory for the community," Brison says.


Share |


Reader Comments


 
Pro Family Indeed
Check out online Court of Appeal decision for pro family in Feb 22,2007 or the upcoming verdict from the trial which ended June 23rd.It lasted over a month in trial,two weeks have passed as we await a precedent setting,media banned cases decision.It took over 3 yrs to get to trial & almost never happened due to discrimination & intended stalling from a threat.If our family laws & marriage laws were equal & fair then it would be obvious that WE want pro family rights protected as well.As non biological parents in modern 3 parent families which many gays,lesbians,transgendered people are involved with we find so far we have NO RIGHTS!Families begin with unions, marriages & parades to celebrate diversity & equality are importantI for one did not attend any of this years gay pride parades or events because I see the true nature of things in this country have a long way to go.We'll have to defend our rights,our pride on a case by case instance with no pro bono lawyers,no law students,no government grants, no financial aid, no help from EGALE or anything.We are on our own as a community so need to band together for equal rights,respects & dignities.By pro family they mean pro conservative,pro no gay rights.Thanks to companies such as TD bank for supporting our community based events. If they in turn get a marketing advantage so fing what they are still supporting equality,diversity and a community event.Thank goodness for slopiness in the case of Toronto's Pride Parade because at least it got it done some way or another.Gay pride has a long long way to go in Canada even in the hub of the universe,Toronto.I'll wait to celebrate gay pride and Canada day...thanks anyways.I invite our leaders to hear it from people like me who it truly affects.Those in power like Ignatieff & PM Harper who in reply to my plea stated "after CAREFUL CONSIDERATION of your case of Family law""I'm sorry but we cannot help,you need a lawyer" then
papa, cal ab
07/07/09 2:50 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
pro family indeed
Then....proceeded to get my Name & gender incorrect. So much for CAREFUL CONSIDERATION, so much for the Pro family claims. This government enabled my family to be torn apart by the legal system with all is slowness, processes, financial costs, unequal laws and legislative gaps. Pro family INDEED. Pro conservative families hell ya. Our GLBT communities need to support each other. This government better pick up its pace and at least try to get equality for all Canadians and all families. Instead of allowing discrimination to dominate other cultures, including the gay one. Where are our queer heros?
papa, cal ab
07/07/09 3:03 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Get real
Attention bigots, it's 2009 and you lost the culture war. Please proceed to get old and die so that we don't have to listen to your nonsense anymore.
Sean, None of Your Business
07/07/09 3:48 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
I don't want to distract....
This might sound like a tangent...and I'm sorry if it does...but since when is Pride a tourist event? Is that all that Toronto Pride has been reduced too? Tourism and Business? Not that these things are bad but...I always felt that Pride had a politcal stand, which is still important to us as a community. If Pride is still trully political and wants to make a statement and take a stand on issues, then it should not have gotten that funding in the first place regardless of how many people show up for it. That's not what the money was for, however, if Toronto Pride is about being apolitical, drawing in crowds, partying, makeing money and showing out of towners a good time... then yeah they would deserve that particular funding. But I think we loose a lot more than 400,000$ if the later is the case.
Sai, Edmonton Alberta
07/07/09 6:04 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
surprise!
when will people wake up and realize that the government in ottawa is not the conservative party but the reform party with a new name?
k v, toronto ontario
07/07/09 8:54 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Funny
What strikes me as funny is that I'm gay and I haven't been to Pride for years. (Can't take the crowds) But I know a lot of younger people in their 20s and 30s who go, not because they're gay but because they identify with the celebration of sexual freedom. Or cool straight families who take their young kids as a fun family event. Pride is so mainstream (in a mostly good way) that the objections really seem so 20th-century.
Gord, Toronto Ontario
07/07/09 11:05 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Funding brouhaha
What was the federal government share of the revenues from Gay Pride? Did it exceed the $400,000? (GST etc)
Neale Gifford, Toronto Ontario
07/08/09 8:36 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Brian Trost
Would someone please bitch slap some sense into Brian? If the term ‘inbred, white trash’ hadn’t already been assigned to some of our southern neighbours, Brian Trost would certainly be a leading contender for Crown Prince. His inflammatory and insensitive remarks indicate an incredible lack of understanding of the GLBT rights movement. The right to marry and have children has been a struggle for gays and lesbians that has only been recently resolved. To presume to speak for the pro-life and pro-family community is an assumption which needs to be challenged. Next he will suggest that he speaks for the Christian community as well. Not. To think that a Canadian government would consider such outrageous behaviour appropriate for a Member of Parliament ignores the incredible contribution that the GLBT community has made to making Canada an inclusive, caring community. To censure a Minister for her grant to one of the largest tourist attractions in Toronto smacks more of regionalism than good policy. Kind regards, Jesse Cohoon Toronto cc. LifeSiteNews.com PM Brian Harper Hon. Tony Clement Hon. Diane Ablonczy Hon. Jack Layton Olivia Chow Egale Canada The Toronto Star
Jesse Cohoon, Toronto Ontario
07/08/09 10:54 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Trost an idiot
It's seems strange that Mr. Trost had to go to Toronto to complain about funding for a queer event when Heritage Canada provided $9,000 in funding for Saskatoon's pride week. Apparently he doesn't have a clue what is happening in his own riding. If he doesn't want tax-payers money going to queer groups perhaps queer people should be exempt from paying taxes to support the salaries of social dinosaurs like Trost and his Conservatives colleagues.
Gens Hellquist, Saskatoon Sask
07/08/09 11:34 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Much ado about nothing
Responding to your article, one man in Alberta "hinted" that the reason Ablonczy is no longer in charge of the portfolio is because of the Pride funding. One presumes he's not in charge of the program so why are we believing him over the party line that a more senior offical is now in charge of handing out government cash, which is the way it should be. The Conservative "backbench" as you call it has not been offically acknowledged by the Conservative party, and in fact their party line remains unchanged and is quoted in your article as "The Government of Canada is proud to show its committment to the tourism industry." You later say in your article that all funding must be approved by a minister, another argument against Ablonczy solely being displaced for funding Pride. I don't understand, the foundation of your article seems to be "Crackpot Saskatchemwan doesn't like Pride". It's one man's opinion. And you can bet he will be disciplined for voicing it.
Adam, Toronto Ontario
07/08/09 12:42 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Never trust a Tory
Here, once again, we see the true blue Tory agenda: to deprive our people of their God-given civil liberties. This donation of $400,000 was simply a reinvestment of OUR taxes. The reaction by government and conservatives in general only proves what I am always saying in my posts: The Tories are our deadly enemy, never to be trusted.
Kieran Earles, Mount Pearl Newfoundland
07/08/09 3:17 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Never Trust the Aforementioned
Kieran, I really do get tired of your anti-conservative rhetoric. I am conservative, and I am gay, and I disagree with what this backbench member is saying, but it is not reflective of the government because the man is a backbencher. Thank goodness for that. Though in caucus there may be some isues. No one is our enemy Kieran, and to say that is utterly ridiculous and inane. Well you could always look for the website "Republicans for Ignatieff" and vote for him if you want. But really, this fearmongering is just silly. The Conservative Party of Canada has members with various viewpoints, and that backbencher is one who has one, and I belong to the CPC and I have different viewpoints on such issues. I think it offers room for dialogue, in the party I support,on this issue.
Sheldon, Vancouver BC
07/08/09 8:23 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
homophobia in canada
In case you need to be reminded that homophobia is still alive and well in Canada, just head on over to any of our national (including The Star) newspapers' websites to read about this story - and check out the reader's comments section. I'm sickened by how stupid people are here in this great land. You wouldn't believe how many, "why should my tax dollars go to flaunt the gay agenda in my face" kind of crap there is. Sad, so sad. So few people know the economic importance of Pride, and they wish we queers just got cut off from the public purse completely. Idiots.
Ryan, Toronto Ontario
07/08/09 8:47 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
The Public Purse?
Why does everything have to be subsidized through government these days Ryan? People seem to want handouts, no one wants to work hard anymore. This is a shame. I think things could be more effective with less government handouts, and more economic freedom. Not entirely Milton Friedman all the way, we should have some regulation and oversight - but things get bad when incompetent politicians try to manage the economy. Politicians are rarely experts on the economy.
Sheldon, Vancouver BC
07/08/09 11:32 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
I don't think anyone saw this coming!!
I was on the CBC website and found an artical that relates to this story. It has to do with the Montreal Pride Parade. The link makes me wonder, why doesn't Xtra report this?http://www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/story/2009/07/08/gay-montreal008.html#socialcomments
hahaha, .... Alberta
07/09/09 12:05 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Profamily
We ARE family. Some of us are fighting with every fiber of our being, using every resource possible. Maybe my case at trial fighting for my family, my dignity, my rights and that of my lost family is in vain. Partly due to discrimination and lack of rights/pride support that I'm fighting the legal system alone and unaided. I need to have help in my case after over 3 years, and wins in my favour at court yet still have to proceed on due to legislative gaps. I need financial help to continue yet cannot ask for help due to media ban and publication bans. Censorship, freedom of speech, grants for my legal case, legal aid...ha whats this. Maybe I'd be better off asking the tourism minister or pro family backers for financial help in defending my family. Oh ya... I still have no rights as a gay non bio parent. Go pride, go Canada day celebrations all this means zilch to me and my family as along as discrimination, racial prejudice, gay bashings and the like remain as it is in Canada. Ironic that the Liberal party I've asked for help is now sending ME requests for financial aid. Gay parent studies go buried by the conservatives and "after careful consideration of your case" the PM Harper got my name & gender wrong...what a joke this government is at times. We need some queeros to save our diversity and uniqueness. I may be the first to challenge the system but by no means am I the only one or the last one who is trying to protect and preserve the same equal values and principles of family. The government MUST acknowledge gay parents and modern families such as mine. WE ARE FAMILY AND WE ARE CANADIANS LIKE IT OR NOT.
papa, cal ab
07/09/09 12:36 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Tory Support of the GLBT Community
There are plenty of examples of Conservative support for the GLBT community in Canada - just our community does a very bad job of acknowledging them. $400,000.00 from MTEP may have earned Diane Ablonczy (a personal friend of mine) a demotion. Where is our so called community? Has anyone here bothered to thank Diane for the government's contribution? No one here seems to be rallying to her defense. Why is that? Another example out here in British Columbia is the recent Shooting Stars Foundation event, "Fit for a Queen". This year, there was a letter of support from Prime Minister Stephen Harper at the front of the program - his support was never acknowledged from the Mistress of Ceremonies, Xtra West or any of the other event organizers. Is this a partisan smear? Consider the Free vote on Gay Marriage in 2006. How many of our community wrote letters acknowledging that John Baird, Lawrence Cannon, Bill Casey, Mike Chong, David Emerson, Gerald Keddy, Peter MacKay, Fabian Manning, James Moore, Christian Paradis, Jim Prentice, Lee Richardson and Josee Verner all voted for Gay Marriage. Have you thanked them for their support in the face of adversity in the Conservative Caucus? Today, we have concrete evidence of changing attitudes in the Conservative Party of Canada - Diane Ablonczy felt comfortable enough to spend this money in our community despite her vote in 2006 and in the face of certain criticism. Sadly, our community is doing her no favors. Herman
Herman, Vancouver British Columbia
07/09/09 1:55 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Twisted logic
Herman, nice motherfucking try. So we're to feel collectively guilty for being insufficiently grateful for crumbs? Where the hell is John Baird these days? Is he speaking out? Where the fuck is Jaime Watt? Have you seen the online conservative homophobia this has kicked off with nary a word of rescue from anyone of authority in the PMO or elsewhere? Oh, and this isn't Conservative Party money - btw - it's my tax dollars and the tax dollars of thousands of gays and lesbians across the country. It ain't no gift, wrapped in blue ribbon. In what manner would you have us grovel? You know what? Fuck you and your gobsmackingly offensive finger-wagging lecture. Evidence of progress, my ass. Because Dianne A gave up some of our own money? Have you seen what's happened to her? She's been hung out to dry. What in hell kind of mushrooms are you doing out there today?
Alex MacLean, Toronto ON
07/09/09 2:33 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Liberals voted Overwhelmingly Against Gay Marriage
...in 1999. Since then, their attitudes have changed and we have evidence of changing attitudes within the Conservative Party as well some evidence that I detailed in my earlier post. I'm not asking anyone to grovel, merely acknowledge the support certain members in the Conservative Government's caucus and cabinet have directed to the GLBT community - give credit where credit is due. I am troubled that it appears as if Diane Ablonczy is being hung out to dry, Alex. I am more deeply saddened that our so called community is leaving her to be hung out to dry too.
Herman Nilsson, Vancouver British Columbia
07/09/09 3:55 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Politics
Well I think Herman, this is all politics. There are militant gays who think it is evil for people to be Conservative, and I know because I am a gay conservative. It just gets so annoying, of what is right and wrong for gay people to do. None of those militant gay groups appreciate such things, because of their ideological war with such people, and they would resent thanking the very people they oppose all the time. Thankfully not all, but it is still a shame.
Sheldon, Vancouver BC
07/10/09 2:53 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Well, Sheldon...
...considering that Harper has voted against every single queer rights initiative to come before Parliament during his entire time as an MP; that his first campaign promise in 2006 was to try to kill equal marriage; that he's appointed open homophobes including major anti-equal-marriage activists to the PMO and to refugee boards; that the Tories cancelled the Court Challenges Program that permitted us to win Egan v. Canada and the equal marriage fight in the first place; I don't think you have to be "militant" to think Harper and the Tories are anti-gay. You just have to have your eyes open.
Matt, Verdun QC
07/10/09 3:45 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
NEONAZI CONSERVATIVE PARTY
Haper and his conservative party are nothing but a bunch of Neonazis. Remember Harper also refused to attend or open the AIDS conference in Toronto a few years ago. He dosesn't give a dam about gay issues other than hope we would all die or be placed in concerntration camps.
MANFRED ANDERSON, TORONTO ONT
07/10/09 7:38 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Matt and Manfred
Manfred: You are correct, Stephen Harper did not attend the conference, but turned around and more than doubled funding for AIDS research on World Aids Day a short time later. He also increased foreign aid to step up funding for Aids treatment in the developing world. I think that clearly demonstrates his personal concern, the interests of the Conservative Party of Canada and the will of the Canadian voter - don't you? This is his record -do you think you can acknowledge these achievements? Matt: He didn't try to 'kill' gay marriage, but was deeply offended by party discipline that prevented MPs from voting their conscience and the way their constituents would have liked. 13 Conservative MPs including several cabinet ministers voted against the motion and therefore supported Gay Marriage. I've listed that pedigree earlier. Truly SILENCE=DEATH. You can be an opponent of a political movement, but each time our community fails to acknowledge the contributions of the Conservative government, a part of our community dies just as certainly as when we fail to confront homophobia in our community. When you stand silent on the contributions of the Conservative Party of Canada and the Conservative Government or misrepresent that record as both of you have, you actually support the elements of the party whose interests oppose our community. Can I expect that you will write Diane Ablonczy and thank her for her extraordinary support in the face of radical opposition?
Herman Nilsson, Vancouver British Columbia
07/10/09 1:10 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Try some history
Poor Conservatives, you feel very picked on. "Wah wah wah": we get it already. Well, this is nothing! Actually, you've had it pretty easy, because expectations were very low. If you really want to see the gay press and activists excoriate politicians, go into the Xtra offices and look at the archived issues for the early nineties. Looks at what happened to Rae's NDP, and especially to Attorney General Marion Boyd, when they failed to act with due haste. They were eviscerated. Look what happened to the Ontario Liberals under Lyn McLeod when they flip-flopped and voted against Bill 167. So stop whining. It's not that bad. If you'd made promises and hadn't delivered, well then you'd know the white hot wrath of hell. This is nothing! So quit yer kvetching and count your blessings that expectations were never very high in the first place.
Alex MacLean, Toronto ON
07/10/09 5:44 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
doing the right thing shouldn't be exceptional
While I am sorry to hear that Diane Ablonczy seems to have been punished for doing the right thing by approving the funding for Pride (it fits the requirements of the funding plan perfectly) I don't believe that any politician should get a round of applause for doing their jobs properly and in the interest of all Canadians. I understand that the Cons have more trouble doing the right thing since they have so many social conservatives and bigots in their party but I don't think any of us should feel compelled to congratulate Diane Ablonczy on doing her job in spite of what others in her party might have thought. She likely will gain some respect from the queer community but its not like doing one's job is an extradorinary thing. Surely no one would expect any other party that is more socially progressive to be applauded for funding Pride, they have the track record of supporting equality for all, the Cons have shown that there are still some PCs around and that they can obey the Charter of Rights but not much more since the Reform element is firmly in control of the party. If they ever did something for the queer community that went above and beyond the basic fairness mandated by the Charter then I'm sure they would be applauded by more, as it is they're just doing their job properly in spite of their party's bigots. Its the minimum that can be expected of any gov't, the fact that Diane has been punished for doing her job properly speaks volumes about the state of the Con party and why they aren't fit to form our gov't.
Rich, Toronto Ontario
07/10/09 6:55 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
The Government of Canada...
...is a Conservative Government right now because more people voted for Conservative candidates than for Liberal, NDP, Green or Bloq Candidates. A lot of Canadians do not want to see Pride Parades at all, and certainly don't want to see taxpayer money spent to support our Parades and festivals. It is sad, but true I assure you, that there are many Canadians who feel that Diane didn't do her job when she supported the Toronto Pride Parade, and have let their opinions be known. These are voters just like you and I and have an absolute right to have their views considered even when I don't agree with them. I believe that is why it is essential to recognize the efforts of politicians who support our community regardless of their political stripe and not simply dismiss their contributions simply because of the party to which they belong. Our opinions do matter and by recognizing efforts with which we agree, more consideration will naturally follow when we criticize directions with which we do not.
Herman Nilsson, Vancouver British Columbia
07/10/09 8:45 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.