Magnotta lawyer wants media, public banned from trial
NEWS / Accused on trial for several charges, including murder and dismemberment
Justin Ling / National / Monday, March 11, 2013
Share |

In the first day of his preliminary hearing March 11, Luka Magnotta maintained his composure: deadpan, with his hands folded and on his lap.

Clad in white T-shirt and jeans, the accused murderer spent most of the hearing wearing a blank stare, occasionally looking around his clear glass prisoner's box, listening as his lawyer sparred with the prosecution.
 
The first day of the two-week hearing centred on a defence motion to move the rest of the trial in camera  — banning all members of the media and the public from the courtroom.
 
Luc Leclair, Magnotta’s chief counsel, argued that evidence presented in the case, if reported, could taint the jury pool and compromise the integrity of the trial. While a publication ban on that information has been in place for months, Leclair  — citing a PostMedia report that he argued infringed the ban — says the media, especially international outlets not necessarily beholden to Canadian law, could jeopardize his client’s right to a fair trial and should therefore be banned altogether.
The Ontario driver's licence linked to alleged murderer Luka Magnotta.
 
Lawyers hired by various Canadian media outlets intervened in the hearing to argue that Leclair’s motion contravened the right to free expression.
 
Judge Lori-Renee Weitzman took the morning to hear arguments and adjourned until March 12, when she will decide whether to allow media and the public in the courtroom.
 
A separate ruling she made March 11, however, suggests she’s not likely to agree with Leclair.
 
The Toronto-based lawyer argued that the publication ban should extend to everything covered in the hearing  — including Magnotta’s appearance. Leclair is seeking to have his client hidden behind a curtain, as he feels that showing the accused with handcuffs on, flanked by guards, could taint his client’s view in the public eye.
 
Weitzman ruled that only the submitted evidence could fall under that publication ban.
 
The family of Lin Jun, the victim, were also present in the Montreal courthouse to watch the beginning of the preliminary hearing. Their own lawyer, who intervened to contest the motion to hold a closed trial, represented them. He told the court that the family wanted to honour their son by seeing the Canadian justice system run its course.
 
After this two-week hearing, which could go longer if needed, a new judge will take over the case and a jury will be selected.
 
Magnotta made his first court appearance in June after being arrested in Berlin earlier in the month, following an international manhunt. He is being tried for a slew of charges stemming from the murder and dismemberment of Chinese national Jun. 


Share |


Reader Comments

These reader comments are posted directly. No editorial review is made prior to posting. Readers may contact the moderator with any complaints or concerns, and these will be reviewed within two business days.

 
Seriously?
"...He feels that showing the accused with handcuffs on, flanked by guards, could taint his client’s view in the public eye." Ha, now THAT'S rich.
E, Toronto Ontario
03/11/13 6:36 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
license
Looks like his license is going to expire in a few months. Hope he's on that.
Mike, Yakima BC
03/13/13 12:46 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
@Mike
Mike, the system is all set up to help him. If he's found "not criminally responsible", he'll probably be sent to mental health institution. See: http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/What+defence+will+Magnotta+present/6820789/story.html If he's later pronounced to be cured by sympathetic doctors and released and put in a halfway house, a sympathetic social worker will no doubt help him get his driver's license renewed - all at taxpayers' expense.
Jason, Toronto ON
03/13/13 1:02 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Umm, no.
@Jason: Olson, Bernardo, Pickton. Were/are they in psych institutions? No. Your argument falls right there.
Biff, Burnaby BC
03/13/13 8:17 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Post Your Comment!
Your Name:
(required)


City/Town:
(required)


Province:
(required)




Email Address:
(required)



For verification purposes only. Not for publication, nor released to any mailing list. (Privacy statement)

Title of your comment:
(required)


Your Comment: (max. 2000 characters)
(required)
characters remaining

 Refresh
Enter the code shown on the left (case-sensitive):
(required)




   
Click here to read guidelines

Guidelines for reader comments

Submissions go directly online, without being seen by editors. So, it’s important that you follow the laws against defamation. Do that by keeping your comments focussed on issues, and on your ideas and opinions. Do not get personal and do not defame others. If you see defamatory comments made in other people’s postings, report them to our moderator, who will investigate within two business days.

Your comment must directly relate to the subject of the article.

Avoid confusing statements; express your thoughts clearly and succinctly so readers will understand your opinion. Do not post superficial comments, such as a short phrase or just a few words.

Do not post promotions of products, services or events. If you see such postings, report them to our moderator, who will investigate within two business days.

Your comment and name may also be published in an Xtra paper.

Publication of your comments on Xtra.ca or in an Xtra paper is not an endorsement of your views by Xtra.ca or Pink Triangle Press.