How Canada tried to purge its queers
HOMOPHOBIA / 'It really does punch a hole in the master narrative of Canada being nice': Kinsman
Jeremy Hainsworth / Vancouver / Friday, January 01, 2010
Share |

UNDER THE STATE'S WATCHFUL EYE. RCMP officers watch the Jun 30 1975 cross-country lesbian and gay rights demonstration on Parliament Hill.
(Canadian Lesbian and Gay Archives)
Gary Kinsman and Patrizia Gentile want to launch their book The Canadian War on Queers at Ottawa’s Lord Elgin Hotel in March. It’s there, Kinsman says, that gay men began to turn the tables on RCMP surveillance officers taking photos from behind newspapers.
 
Kinsman and Gentile’s new book documents the government security apparatus used to root out gays and lesbians from Canada’s military and civil service starting in the 1950s, as the world emerged from World War II and the Cold War began.
 
The state decided that gays and lesbians had character defects that made them susceptible to communist infiltration, Kinsman and Gentile discovered in official documents and interviews.
 
In short, the Canadian government decided that queers could not be trusted.
 
With the Burgess-Maclean spy scandal having taken place already in Britain and the McCarthy communist witch-hunts unfolding in the US, Canada was tied to its primary allies in anti-Soviet paranoia. The ensuing witch-hunts in Canada, the authors write, cost thousands of people their careers, their homes and their families — and in some cases led to suicide.
 
“It really does punch a hole in the master narrative of Canada being nice and better than the United States,” Kinsman tells Xtra West. “It’s obviously a horrendous story, but it’s also a story of resilience and survival.”
 
While queers working in the RCMP, the military and the Department of External Affairs were the main focus of the stings, those outside the public service were also targeted if they were connected to industries dealing with sensitive contracts.
 
In their research, Kinsman and Gentile found repeated tales of surveillance, illegal searches, interrogations and attempts at blackmail by police who attempted to force queers to out others so they could be targeted as well.
 
A 1959 memo from Don Wall of the federal Security Panel (which reported to the cabinet and had members from the RCMP, the Privy Council Office and the Department of National Defence) describes homosexuality as the “character weakness that was most frequently exploited by Soviet intelligence.”
 
Another Security Panel memo from the same year conceded “there were no cases of a homosexual having committed an act of treason under threat of blackmail.”
 
But that did not stop the witch-hunts.
 
A lieutenant commander with naval intelligence, Harold was forced out. “It was the immediate and devastating collapse of not only my career but a philosophy and way of life which had taken most of a lifetime to build,” Harold says in the book.
 
And then there was the fruit machine.
 
The Canadian War on Queers describes “an Orwellian-like project” whereby a machine would monitor eye movement, pulse and sweat reactions to a series of racy or art pictures shown to suspected homosexuals.
 
The project, headed by Frank Robert Wake, a Carleton University psychologist, was approved in 1963 by the Security Committee in the presence of then-justice minister Donald Fleming.
 
While the purges hit many government areas, historian Howard Mackenzie says the Department of External Affairs lost people with valuable skills and knowledge. And that, he says, affected policy formation regarding the Soviet Union.
 
Even the 1969 decriminalization of gay sex between consenting adults in private didn’t remove homosexuality from suspicion.
 
By May 1977, little had changed as Private Barbara Thornburrow struggled with discrimination in the military.
 
When Gays of Ottawa and Lesbians of Ottawa Now turned up at a Standing Committee on Justice and Legal Affairs discussion on the Human Rights Act, then-justice minister Ron Basford said national security justified excluding sexual orientation from the legislation.
 
The claim that queers could be blackmailed was still being used.
 
“That’s ridiculous,” Thornburrow said. “If I am open about it, how can I be blackmailed?”
 
In less than a month, she was discharged as “not advantageously employable.”
 
Gloria Cameron suffered the same injustice in the navy the same year.
 
After a nine-hour interrogation about official secrets, she was found loyal to Canada but was proven to be a lesbian. She too was purged.
 
When she appealed, the chief of defence staff, General JA Dextraze, told her: “It is deemed necessary to discriminate against those who, having admitted or demonstrated behaviour traits such as homosexuality, might impose them on others, particularly youthful members…
 
“Despite the admissions you have made openly and notwithstanding that your loyalty to Canada has not been questioned, a potential hazard to security remains,” Dextraze said.
 
Five years later, NDP MP Svend Robinson asked the same standing committee why queers could not join the RCMP.
 
Replied commissioner Robert Simmonds: It is not in the “interest of law enforcement or the image of law enforcement.”
 
Simmonds further told the committee: “We have a pretty firm backing from the people of Canada… to not accept people like that knowingly into the police organization.”
 
Ironically, say Kinsman and Gentile, the state’s security campaign against queers contributed to the emergence of the gay liberation movement in Canada.
 
“Some gay men and lesbians challenged the basis of the security campaigns by placing their erotic, emotional, and social ties to their friends and other queers above the interests of Canadian security,” Kinsman and Gentile write. “In contrast to state attempts to morally problematize queers, expanding gay and lesbian networks in the 1960s provided the basis for an ethics of resistance.”
 
The emerging liberation movement was hardly exempt from RCMP surveillance.
 
Demonstrations in Vancouver and Montreal were watched, and the 1971 launch of Xtra’s predecessor The Body Politic was considered “so significant the entire issue was included in RCMP files.” 
 
Such scrutiny was part of a long tradition of surveillance of groups deemed a threat to national security, including the Housewives Consumers’ Association and the ladies auxiliary of the Mine Mill union, not to mention early feminist singer Rita MacNeil, the book notes.
 
Surveillance was soon replaced with outright raids.
 
“In the late 1970s and early 1980s, the expansion of gay and lesbian community formation clashed with the sexual policing as raids and attacks replaced RCMP surveillance,” the authors say.
 
As the community grew and gained strength, voice and visibility, it challenged and undermined the homophobic security campaigns.
 
Kinsman describes the history of Canada’s war on queers as a cautionary tale of how the government treats those it perceives to be a threat to national security.
 
It’s a tale that’s still unfolding today, he says, as authorities react to perceived terrorists and even Olympic protestors.


Share |


Reader Comments


 
Which narrative?
An important story to tell, of course; but does it really "punch a hole" as Kinsman is quoted to have said, in the "master narrative of Canada being nice and better that the United States?" What master narrative is that? Surely the true narrative must include the actions of the likes of the government of Mackenzie King, which claimed similar threats to national security as the basis for refusing entry in 1939 to 900 Jewish refugees aboard the liner M.S. St. Louis, and as the basis for overseeing in 1942 the internment of 22,000 Japanese-Canadians (followed by the confiscation of their property and belongings). In all of these cases surely the main goal for every Canadian is to remember; only remember.
Magnus, Montreal QC
01/01/10 11:32 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Excellent article; but things have changed in Otta
Excellent study and a cautionary tale. This is a study that must be read in its entirety, There definitey was an offiicial war against queers (gays and lesbians) in the 50's and 60's emanating out of Ottawa. And yes even an RCMP attempt at what they called a fruit machine-measuring physical eye movememnts and in reaction to vieiwing male nudes--(prototype in WAr Museum in Ottawa) to identify queers in the Mounties and the military. Yet we have come a long way in CAnada since the Charter case (ex military officer & now lawyer Michelle Douglas in the early 1990's) Now not only does the Defence department allow open gays to serve, but there have been even Defence dept study groups on transgendered soldiers and the Dept has sponsered celebrations of gay marriages as the RCMP--officially. So it is in the US now--with its persistent drumming out of gays and lesbians under "don't Ask/ Don't Tell" where there are persistent official effforts to "war" on gays. But in Canada now it is officially the opposite. I had this emphasized a couple of years ago when I was working as a co-producer with Robert Prowse and Dick Neilsen on a proposed CBC documnetary on the fruit machine and the war against gays in Otttawa in the 50's-early 1970's--and the CBC found the situation up in CAnada now far--ironically enough given the recent oast-- too positive to try and expose (as opposed to the US) and the CBC cancelled the documentary before production was to begin (most of it being the historical stuff (pre Michelle Douglas successful lawsuit and GAry KInsman worked with us as a consultant & an important source of information. The CBC killed the historical doc on the war against gays because the situation had had improved so in Ottawa compared with the US. Very Ironic, eh?much But we as a LGBT community need to know our nasty and oppressive past and always be on gu
james Dubro, toronto Ontario
01/03/10 7:15 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
A Part of Our Heritage
Since when does Canada have a 'master narrative' of any kind? It's important not to forget this part of our history, but to sensationalize it with all the Canada-bashing is a bit much. No nation has a perfect, or even acceptable record on queer rights. During the Cold War this hyperparanoia concerning homosexuality was rampant in the US, UK, and Canada. Google John Wendell Holmes, Alan Turing, or Eisenhower's Executive Order 10450 to see how far it went. The 1950s was a dark period in our history. For queers and other minorities in Canada the problems didn't stop there. But the fact that things did get better, that progress did happen, says alot about our national character. If you take a look at the world around us, how others treat their citizens today, it's evident Canada is top shelf. History is not meant to shame us. History is meant to teach us. And it has..
Ryan, Toronto ON
01/04/10 8:46 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
It was the 50's...
It was the 1950's! You can't apply modern standards of fairness to the past, that doesn't make any sense. This article is absurd
D, Calgary Alberta
01/06/10 5:26 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Repression of Gays in the past in Canada
I do not understand the criticism of this informative article about repression of gays in the past in Canada. Is it the suggestion that nothing matters as things are different now?
Tom, London England
01/10/10 1:34 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
a part of our history
I find the lives of LGBT folk before the time of decriminalization to be fascinating and would like to read more about them. I've also enjoyed the article on old gay bars from those times too, I know how I felt being in gay bars in the 90s, I can only imagine how different it must have been when you could be arrested at any time for being yourself and then finding a place where there were others like you. These stories are a part of our history and are very important for us all to know about, too many people think that equality came about in Canada naturally and overlook all the persecution against LGBT folk and the bravery and hard work of all those who fought back to win us our equality today. Excellent article! I'd like to see more on gay history in Canada.
Rich, Toronto Ontario
01/10/10 2:48 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Re: It was the 50s...
Your response sums up the typical kind of cop-out retort that enables the ignorance to continue. In so many respects (esp here in Alberta), the mentality continues to be not much diff't than it was back in the 50s Collective fear stimulates herd instinct, and tends to produce ferocity toward those who are not regarded as members of the herd. This type of behaviour still continues to this day for minorities of all walks of life - to deny that is simply burying your head in the sand and perpetuating the ignorance.
Gregg, Calgary Alberta
01/12/10 12:21 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.