Gay blood ban divides McMaster campus
NEWS / Canadian Federation of Students rep says 87 institutions have joined End the Ban campaign
Janice Thiessen / National / Friday, March 02, 2012
Share |

The Canadian Blood Service’s contentious gay blood ban has tugged on the heartstrings of students at Hamilton’s McMaster University who are now trying to rally campus support to join a national protest campaign.
 
During a routine CBS blood drive on campus last fall, several gay students went public after they were not allowed to donate blood.
 
The ensuing controversy has divided the university’s student union and its board. On one side are those who want to join the Canadian Federation of Students’ (CFS) and its End the Ban campaign; on the other are those who want to maintain a close relationship with CBS and continue to hold blood drives.
 
Riaz Sayani-Mulji, acting operations commissioner for the McMaster Students Union’s (MSU) Student Representative Assembly, first submitted a motion last year to endorse and participate in the CFS campaign.
 
He says the MSU board delayed the motion because members thought the campaign could violate the university’s partnership agreement with CBS.
Riaz Sayani-Mulji has been trying to get McMaster University to join the CFS End the Ban campaign.
 
Eighty-seven post-secondary institutions across Canada, representing more than 600,000 students, have endorsed the campaign, which has teamed with the Canadian AIDS Society and EGALE, says Sandy Hudson, Ontario CFS chairperson.
 
Hudson notes that most institutions have maintained relationships with CBS after joining.
 
The campaign’s mission statement calls on the Ministry of Health, CBS and Héma-Québec to “end the lifetime ban on blood from men who have had sex with other men and base any deferral periods on behaviours, not demographics.”
 
Sayani-Mulji says this statement has concerned some members of the MSU who say the union shouldn’t get involved in social issues or join the CFS.
 
Hudson says she hopes the MSU will decide to stop discrimination against students on campus.
 
“Canadian students don’t feel safe donating blood on campus,” she says. “It can be alienating and outing for some people. This is not an isolated event. It’s up to the representatives to do something about it.”
 
Despite the recent lifting of a ban on men who have sex with men (MSM) donating blood in Britain, CBS has committed only to a review of the current ban in Canada.
 
On Feb 29 the CBS took to social media, asking followers to fill in a 17-question survey about the ban. Hudson says she thinks the survey is merely a PR exercise.
 
Most such bans were put in place in the early 1980s in response to the spread of HIV/AIDS. However, while Canadian statistics show that men who sleep with men still run the highest risk of contracting HIV, the technology used to screen and test blood is far more advanced today than it was when the original policy was adopted.
 
Public Health Agency of Canada research has found that HIV infection rates are on the rise in other groups, including aboriginals and immigrant groups from Africa and the Caribbean.
 
Marc Plante, public relations coordinator for CBS, says CBS is considering the option of a deferral policy of five to 10 years. This is one question CBS raised in its online survey.
CFS Ontario chairperson Sandy Hudson (centre) says the CBS ban is discriminatory.
(Monirul Pathan)
 
Critics have said a five or 10-year deferral period is not realistic.
 
Meanwhile, CFS national deputy chairperson Adam Awad says many student unions have chosen to stop organizing blood drives on campus.
 
“We don’t encourage people to end the relationship altogether, but it’s about pressuring CBS to have non-homophobic policy based on science,” he says.
 
Sayani-Mulji is disappointed because the MSU once again voted against endorsing the CFS campaign at its Feb 5 meeting.
 
“By having a partnership with CBS, we are indirectly condoning their practices and are complicit in their discrimination against MSM,” he says. “Part of the debate was that board members were not convinced that the MSM ban is discriminatory. The students there are frustrated.”
 
He says students circulated a petition in support of joining the End the Ban campaign.
 
“It’s about partisan politics,” says Simon Granat, another SRA member who supports the CFS campaign. “I’ve received 1,000 signatures in support. So far we can only personally support the End the Ban campaign.”
 
Granat wants the MSU to take a stand on social issues that are important to students.
 
Several members of MSU’s board of directors recently approached the Canadian AIDS Society in order to create an MSU-specific campaign and circumvent joining CFS.
 
The CAS denied the request, noting it wanted to send consistent messaging.
 
“We welcome you to get involved with the End the Ban campaign so that our voices, united, send a strong message that this homophobic policy must be stopped,” wrote Monique Doolittle-Romas, CAS executive director, in a letter to the SRA.
 
Sayani-Mulji says he distributed copies of the letter to further support the cause.
 
“The board of directors made it clear that they do not support the campaign because of the CFS connection,” he says. “MSU president-elect Siobhan Stewart said that the End the Ban campaign doesn't present both sides of the story and we should provide students with the pros and cons -- when prompted on what she meant by pros and cons for lifting the ban, she had no response.”
 
Board members, including Stewart, did not respond to Xtra’s requests for comment.
 
Sayani-Mulji is frustrated by the rejection of the most recent motion, noting it had the support of local NDP MP Chris Charlton.
 
“My colleagues and I walked out to protest what we saw was an unfair, biased and shameful decision,” he says, noting that MSU president and CEO Matthew Dillon-Leitch said he wanted to start a campaign unique to McMaster University.
 
Considering MSU’s history with the issue, Sayani-Mulji is not hopeful about this alternative. 
 
“It will probably be a watered-down version of the campaign that does not take a stance against the discriminatory ban,” he says. 


Share |


Reader Comments


 
CBS needs to get with the times
I once had a Canadian Blood Services communications director speak to my class a few years ago. I was appalled when the woman refered to African Canadians as "the Blacks". It seems discrimination runs in the organization. It is time that CBS ends its ban on gay blood. Not only does it send a homophobic message, but also that it do not trust its own testing and oversight.
James B, Halifax NS
03/02/12 11:38 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
This is outrageous
I really can't believe I stumbled on this. Yes it is discriminatory, and hopefully this situation will get resolved quickly.
EF, Hamilton ON
03/02/12 12:07 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Outdated thinking
I am a male who has been a monogamous relationship with a man for over ten years. I also happen to have a Universal Blood Type which is always in demand. If the CBS doesn't want my blood, then so be it! I will not fight to give my blood, but their lack of supply is due, in large part, to their outdated thinking. Also, I don't have much faith in their testing methods if they still uphold their archaic, outdated ideology. The risk of HIV transmissIon is just as likely from all persons with multiple partners. Get your heads out of your asses!
JJ, Mississauga Ontario
03/02/12 1:34 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Survey
Canadian Blood Services is conducting a short survey about change blood donation eligibility for gay men and men who have sex with men. The survey is open to everyone. Have your say on this issue. All responses are strictly confidential - No names. English: https://www.zoomerang.com/Survey/WEB22EXBB93RJT French: https://www.zoomerang.com/Survey/WEB22EXBHE3VB4 Take a few minutes to complete the survey. Deadline is this Friday March 2, 2012. Canadian Blood Services is responsible for the management & distribution of the blood supply. They are proposing only to reduce the timeframe of the ban - sexually activity between two males would still lead to a ban from donating blood for 5 to 10 years rather than from the current policy of any sexual activity between gay men or men who have sex with men since 1977.
Ty, Lethbridge AB
03/02/12 5:07 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Is the ban really so unreasonable?
Is the ban really so unreasonable? Barebacking and bareback porn in the gay male community are now ubiquitous. Safe sex campaigns are ineffective for many gay men. Very few gay male couples are truly monogamous (many gay men have unprotected sex inside and outside their long-term relationships). Many gay men have unprotected sex without knowing that they have recently seroconverted and are now HIV-positive (and are therefore not taking anti-retroviral medications). Many HIV-positive men who have unprotected sex are not taking their medications properly and are infectious. According to statistics on the website of the AIDS Committee of Toronto, (1) In Toronto since 1985, men have accounted for 87.5% of all positive HIV test reports. 82% of all infections among men in Toronto since 1985 have been among gay, bisexual men, and other men who have sex with men (MSM). Gay and bisexual men and other MSM accounted for 71.3% of all infections in Toronto since 1985. (2) In Toronto in 2009, gay, bisexual men and other MSM accounted for 69% of all new HIV diagnoses. (3) In Ontario since 1985, men have accounted for 82% of all positive HIV test reports. Gay and bisexual men and other MSM accounted for 64.5% of infections in Ontario since 1985. (4) In Ontario in 2008, gay and bisexual men, and other MSM continued to form the largest group affected by HIV and AIDS in Ontario, comprising 47.3% of all new HIV diagnoses. (5) In Canada in 2009, gay, bisexual and other MSM continued to comprise the greatest proportion (44%) of new HIV infections. Source: http://www.actoronto.org/home.nsf/pages/hivaidsstatistics
Simon M., Toronto ON
03/02/12 7:50 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Wow....
Simon M., of Toronto ON. Gay men are just nasty. Rather than just ban them from giving blood we should lock them all up! Nasty sex crazed animals, they're putting everyone at risk. They should be imprisoned at the very least. I have a sneaky feeling that you work in the AID$ Industry and you'll be able to supply the names of these AID$ men with no problem at all. Of course you're parroting crap and figures doesn't mean it's relevant to those with critical thinking skills, but you're not pandering to them are you? Now hand over the names!
Kyle, Toronto ON
03/02/12 8:12 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Yes, it is.
Simon M., all of your statistics are about HIV+ people who are also MSM, not how many MSMs have HIV+. That's exactly the problem with this ban, just because many Poz people are gay dudes doesn't mean that most or lots of gay dudes are Poz. I also have to wonder if for the MSM who are diagnosed, if it isn't just more likely for them to be informed into getting tested. In Canada only 10% of those diagnosed are women, so by the same logic I suppose we should ban ALL males from donating? Aboriginal Canadians are more likely to have an HIV+ diagnosis than other populations, I suppose we'll just ban them too. I mean, it's not like they have blood screening or testing anything.
Tamara Gorzalka, Edmonton AB
03/02/12 10:26 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Life is unfair...
Having been a recipient of HIV / Hep C and CJD tainted blood of course I am going to fall on the side of safety. I agree with the science of testing for HIV and based on that evidence I support a lift of the ban on MSM blood donations. HOWEVER we don't currently have a test for vCJD, (except brain biopsy after death,) and these emerging pathogens have proven to spread faster within the MSM, (and other specific,) communities. With this in mind I am reluctant to lift the ban. It is unfair to the MSM community??? Yes... It it unfair that my life has been cut short because no ban was put in place in time during the first wave of the epidemic???? I will let the readers decide.
Curtis, Vancouver BC
03/05/12 12:01 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Is it really Unreasonable
Why does the gay men as a group feel that they are above the law? The reason why gay men are prohibited from donating blood is statistical and medical and has nothing to do with discrimination. I applaud the CBS for refusing to play with the lives of other members of the population because of a vocal minority in a community that is concerned only about itself. @JamesB, if calling people african canadians as "black" was a sign of racial intolerance, I wonder where the gay canadian community would stand , gives the rampant racisim among its members and spaces not only towards african canadians but also asians and Indians not to forget Natives.
Sam, Ottawa Ontario
03/06/12 5:13 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Being socially responsible
Many Canadians became infected with HIV and the Hepatitis C virus in the 1980s through blood and blood products from Canada’s blood system. Canadian governments had to invest some $2.7-billion in paying compensation to hemophiliacs and other people who became infected with HIV or Hepatitis C after receiving transfusions with tainted blood. See: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health/tainted-blood-compensation-incomplete-as-deadline-nears/article1623665/ Furthermore, Canadian governments spend millions of dollars each year in subsidizing the cost of expensive anti-retroviral drugs and medical care for HIV-positive people (e.g. if a young gay man becomes infected with HIV after having unprotected sex in his late teens or early 20s, he will need those expensive drugs and medical care for the rest of his life). So, it’s not as though Canadian governments have failed to help gay men who get infected with HIV while having unprotected sex. Given the continuing, very high rates of HIV infection among Canadian gay men, it’s not unreasonable for the ban on gay men donating blood to continue in the interests of (a) the safety of Canada’s blood system and hemophiliacs and other people who need blood transfusions to live, and (b) preventing governments from having to spend even more money in compensation, drugs and medical care for the victims of tainted blood.
Kurt, Toronto Ontario
03/06/12 9:55 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
The Law in Britain
As a British resident who recently moved to Canada, I can say that there as a ban in place in Britain and it is effectively still there. Although blood is accepted from men who have sex with men, it is only allowed if you have had no sex for the last 12 months. Basically, you must be a celibate gay man to give blood. It was a political move to garner extra support for a dying NHS service. I think the best way to show the hypocracy is to turn up to give blood en masse. Register that you want to give blood but they won't let you. Write to blood donation charities that constantly try to make us feel guilty for not donating and point out they reject hundreds of thousands of litres of blood every month, simply to uphold old-fashioned stereotypical views.
Alan, Hamilton Ontario
03/13/12 12:36 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.