Evangelicals get top PMO jobs after shuffle
FEDERAL POLITICS / More proof Harper close to religious right: Egale
Dale Smith / National / Thursday, February 19, 2009
Share |

DIRTY WORK. "When we take a look at who they've hired to run their policy shop, it's a good indication of where this government is going," says Ottawa activist Ariel Troster.
(Brent Creelman photo)
A shuffle in the Prime Minister's Office has put another evangelical Christian figure near the top political post in the country.

Darrel Reid, the former head of Focus on the Family Canada, has moved from the position of director of policy to become the new deputy chief of staff.

Replacing Reid as director of policy is Paul Wilson. Wilson is the former executive director of Trinity Western University's Laurentian Leadership Centre in Ottawa. In 2006, Wilson moved to the Hill to become the senior policy advisor to Conservative cabinet minister Vic Toews, and in March of last year moved over to the role of senior special advisor to then-Human Resources and Social Development minister Monte Solberg.

Prior to his time at Trinity Western — a Christian-focussed university based in the Bible-belt of Langley, BC — Wilson had worked for both Preston Manning and Stockwell Day in both the Reform and Alliance parties. While at Trinity Western, he was responsible for coordinating the internships of Trinity Western's students on the Hill and among various non-governmental organizations. At the time, Wilson also studiously avoided being labelled a big-C Conservative and denied that he was running a political training program.

"It's about understanding citizenship and faith," Wilson told the Ottawa Citizen in 2006, downplaying the comparisons between Trinity Western and Patrick Henry College in the States.

Wilson has previously said that his message to Christians was that they needed to be cautiously engaged in politics, lest their cause blow up and be discredited in the pubic eye, pointing to the conservative Christian community's failed attempt to block same-sex marriage legislation.

"We need to be temperate, we need to be restrained, we need to be respectful," Wilson said at the time. "Maybe the debate sometimes wasn't held with that tone. And in a sense, we not only lost the particular legislative battle, we lost the broader battle by effectively being marginalized and just basically discredited."

In some mainstream circles, Wilson's appointment is being seen as a move towards less partisanship in the PMO, given Wilson's previous attempts to eschew the big-C Conservative label and his willingness to work with MPs from other parties in his faith-in-politics work.

But the move to place more overt conservative Christians in the upper echelons of government raises concerns with the queer community.

"It's something we've suspected for a long time — that Harper has deep roots with the religious right, and this just further acknowledges that that is in fact the case," says Egale Canada executive director Helen Kennedy. "This is pretty overt though — we haven't really seen that in the past."

Kennedy cites policies like health, Canadian Blood Services and aid linked to queer human rights as potential victims of policy driven by religious right ideology.

"We don't expect to see a lot of favourable recommendations coming out of the PM's office with respect to lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans human rights," Kennedy says. "It'll be more of the same, although more entrenched."

Ottawa activist Ariel Troster is also quick to remind people of Reid's record as head of Focus on the Family Canada.

"Focus on the Family actively advocates reparative therapy for gays and lesbians," Troster says. "They've run these 'Love Won Out' seminars which essentially encourage gays and lesbians to marry members of the opposite sex, so that everyone is miserable. They're against universal daycare, and they're explicitly anti-feminist.

"You can tell a lot about a government by the people they hire to do their dirty work. When we take a look at who they've hired to run their policy shop, it's a good indication of where this government is going."



Share |


Reader Comments


 
Just a quibble
I would just like to know where Xtra and Egale were when the Liberal candidate Omar Alghabra was first elected? This man has been accused of having islamist ideologies. How come Xtra and Egale were not cautioning us about the Liberals when the Canadian Islamic Congress (CIC) endorsed them in the 2004 election? Why didn't Egale or Xtra blast them? How come when in the subsequent election when the CIC endorsed the NDP we were not warned of "this evidence" of "potential roots" that NDP had in the CIC? Where was Xtra and Egale when the Canadian Islamic Congress has given "failing 'F' grades" to two Muslim NDP Candidates, Gary Dale and Ali Naqvi because of their support for same-sex marriage legislation? I guess it's only news when it's Conservatives and Christians?
Just wondering, Some town Alberta
02/19/09 3:44 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Hate Groups on the Rise
Focus on the Family, based in the US and with chapters located throughout the world, are a group that I would label as a "hate group." It is no secret that they have attempted to spread their anti-gay, anti-feminist garbage into Canada, but recent articles outlining their financial contributions to advocacy and lobbyist groups that seek to get politicians to support anti-gay legislation show just how far these people are willing to go. Just look at what happened in California with the Prop 8 fiasco. Canadians are very protective of their rights, and if any group seeks to take those rights away, you can bet the Canadian public will be in an uproar. So the solution is to spread the word about Focus on the Family, this individual's link to that group and I believe in this way he loses his credibility and ability to do his job effectively. Done correctly, he'll become a "lame-duck" and will do no good for Mr Harper and his gang of right-wing extremist thugs.
Jason, Hamilton Ontario
02/19/09 4:35 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
quibbles.. ha.
I'm pretty sure that the day a radical/fundamentalist Muslim becomes Prime Minister and appoints their cronies to the inner circle that more than just Xtra will report on it. A couple of Muslim members in a given political party ultimately doesn't matter, except perhaps to "Just Wondering (whose nicely racist view that Muslim are the same as Radical Evangelical Christians pretty much sums why his voice can be safely written off) Today, in the real world, we have a hard-right evangelical Christian as PM who has shown time and time again to be no friend to the gays, women, and pretty much any socially disadvantaged group. That he's shuffling radical evangelicals into more powerful positions is alarming. These people make no bones about their desire to strip queer Canadians of their HUMAN RIGHTS - this is definitely newsworthy.
Dan, Toronto ON
02/20/09 8:26 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
racist towards and evangelistic religion?
Calling me a racist considering you have no idea what I look like or what my religious affiliation is, is a bit of an exaggeration don't you think? Also, Islam like Christianity is an evangelistic world religion practiced by whites, blacks, browns, orientals...etc. Religion, unlike being gay is a choice, you choose to have faith. You can't be racist towards peoples life choices. By your logic a person can be racist towards Christianity by comparing radical evangelicals to radical Islamic fundamentalists. I abhor all religions and I disagree with everything that radical evangelicals stand for including their unscientific and dangerous stance concerning "ex-gay therapy" but comparing those two groups is ridiculous. My comparison between the CIC and radical evangelicals is much more fair. The larger issue here is the Canadian left wing's obsession with the religious affiliation of the PM. He's from the province with the second highest percentage of people reporting that they don't have a religion, 23% and that's not confined in within a city either. Does his religious affiliation affect his decisions? Probably yes. Do I agree with all of his decisions? No, certainly not. But to say that some government appointments that the PM made are "cause for concern" and prove his ties to evangelical Christianity is absurd. Let's not forget Present Obama's choice of Rick Warren as inaugural pastor. Yes, that was just a symbolic action, but people for the most part did not go off on a radical tangent accusing the president of ties to extreme right wing evangelical Christianity. So why do we accuse the PM of that? All parties have ties to religious organizations and even if they don't appear to may still not support gay rights, remember bill C-23 1999-2000 and all of the liberal support it got?
Just wondering, Edmonton Alberta
02/20/09 12:23 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Thank Budha
Thank Budha, Alah, God, Jewah or whatever supernatural force out there for xtra west not focusing on us orientals. Otherwise they might join the dots, that because Chinese culture naturally espouses conservative philosophies, that we too focus on the (heterosexual) family, they may start running a couple of these nasty extremist-amongst-us articles delineating with examples like our head of state (e.g. Adrian Clarkson was born in Hong Kong) or government rep (e.g. Chinese Canadian MP Doug Jung elected in the 70's), or Conservative MPs Inky Mark, Michael Chong, Bev Oda and Alice Wong. Thank you for not holding a bias view against us, or perusing us because of our race or faith.
KC, Richmond BC
02/20/09 6:30 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
intolerant of intolerance
Never apologize for being intolerant of the intolerant, we should never tolerate those who will not tolerate us, to do so is self defeating. Same with those who claim equality for gays/lesbians is a violation of their religious rights, they're the type who say its unfair to call them bigots for opposing our equality, who claim gays/lesbians are in fact the bigots for opposing those who oppose us. The religious right wing works away quietly trying to present the anti-gay religious right as the victims of gays/lesbians attacking them just for being "good" Christians. You can see examples of others trying to position the religious right as the victim of bigoted gays/lesbians in other responses to this article. By trying to claim the victim status the religious right figures it will gain sympathy but more importantly victims have a much greater leeway to act "to protect themselves". I find it incredibly obnoxious when some claim gays/lesbians on guard to preserve our rights are the bigots and biased. It is good and right to be biased against the biased, to be intolerant of the intolerant and we must never hesitate because of that. I'm sure the vast majority of folks see through the claims of the anti-gay/lesbian right wing when they claim gay/lesbian opposition to them is biased and bigoted and who try to make it seem gays/lesbians are the villains out to get the virtuous anti-gay religious right wing types. We've all seen and heard too much of the hatred from these "virtuous" types to ever believe they're now being victimized by their victims no matter how hard some try in these sorts of forums. We must never hesitate or apologize for standing up for ourselves.
Rich, Toronto Ontario
02/20/09 7:41 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.