Dire Straits' "faggot" lyric too hot for Canadian radio
NEWS / Single complaint sparked CBSC investigation
Neil McKinnon / National / Thursday, January 13, 2011
Share |

The word “faggot,” used in the song "Money for Nothing" by British rock band Dire Straits, is too controversial for Canadian radio, the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council (CBSC) has decided.

In a ruling released Jan 12, the CBSC said the gay slur used in the song does not fit with the Canadian Association of Broadcasters’ Code of Ethics and Equitable Portrayal Code human rights clauses.

“Our decision says the use of the word ‘faggot’ is problematic in the broadcast area, not off the airways,” says Ron Cohen, CBSC national chair.

The decision follows a single complaint from a St John’s, Newfoundland, CHOZ-FM listener.

Radio stations like OZ are not required to be CBSC members and can leave the association if they choose. The CBSC is not a governmental organization and has no power to fine those who defy its edicts.

In the ruling, the listener’s complaint was quoted verbatim:

“A song was aired, ‘Money for Nothing’ by Dire Straits, and included the word ‘faggot’ a total of three times. I am aware of other versions of the song, in which the word was replaced with another, and yet OZ FM chose to play and not censor this particular version that I am complaining about.

I find this extremely offensive as a member of the LGBT community and feel that there is absolutely no valid reason for such discriminatory remarks to be played on-air.”

The song's second verse uses the offensive word three times: “The little faggot with the earring and the makeup”; “That little faggot's got his own jet airplane”; “That little faggot, he's a millionaire.”

Cohen says no lobby groups were involved in the decision. 

“Our job is not to conduct a poll. The issue is not numbers. The issue is whether the standard is or isn't breached. I can't speak to other groups who might not be happy. We have standards and our application to them is not reaching a threshold number of complaints,” says Cohen.

Over the years, CBSC has looked at many instances where words could potentially be perceived as gay slurs. There are two earlier decisions dealing with the British slang “fag,” which means cigarette.

“That word was in that case acceptable because of context. This is the first time we dealt with the word in length. Is it different? Maybe,” says Cohen.

The CBSC's membership is made up of private broadcasters, meaning that the CBC — which represents about 15 percent of the country's radio listeners — is not a member.


Share |


Reader Comments


 
But "NIGGER" OK to use
While the CBSC outlaws "faggot", the CBC declares "Nigger" the toast of the great white way. http://heyitsjustablogman.blogspot.com/2011/01/i-want-my-cbsc.html
Ted, Vancouver BC
01/13/11 7:26 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
More evidence of censorship by unelected guardians
Whoa - they don't have on/off buttons on Newfoundland radios?? Get a grip. Let's not make Canada the laughing stock of the world.BTW, I wonder if the offended listener was even born when Dire Straits released the song.
Lorne Smith, Mississauga Ontario
01/13/11 7:27 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
re: Ted
The context between how the two words are used in the respective songs is very different, in the example from Hair its more about reclamation of hurtful words while in Dire Straits its meant as an insult. However I don't think the CBSC banning the song is justifiable either. Both are just words and they only have power to hurt if we allow them to do so. Its also not like when they sanctioned McVety for calling gays and lesbians pedophiles because that sort of thing actually does spread hatred while just using the word faggot as an insult in a song does not. I use the word faggot with my friends sometimes, though its never used as an insult. I think this is a case of the CBSC being overly cautious and restrictive, now if it were a murder music raggae song that encourages people to kill gays that would be very different but they way Dire Straits uses it is pretty benign. Even the Kids in the Hall, by far the gay friendliest TV comedy, especially at its time, even they used the word faggot, whether in a Buddy Cole sketch or in one of my favourite sketches, "Running Faggot" it was frequently used though never as an insult. Would the CBSC now ban those classic episodes of Kids in the Hall now too? I would hope not. I think its important to put such things in context. Just because Dire Straits used the word faggot as an insult in no way implies the song would spread hatred against gays and lesbians like the McVety case did. I think the spreading of hatred should be the determining factor in such cases.
Rich, Toronto Ontario
01/13/11 8:47 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
faggot? So what! It's freedom of Expression
and I defend their right to use it since this is a democracy . This is censorship and I believe most people are educated enough to figure out faggot is not a nice word to say to us is like reading the N word in Mark Twain. Also why isn't Xtra up in arms over this fine example of censorship or certain group? I can always see some bias in what censorship seems to be on the gay left
Peter From, Toronto Ontario
01/13/11 9:01 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
It's about time!
When Dire Straits released "Money for Nothing" back in the '80's, it made me sick. As a teenager growing up in a small hick town in Ontario it really bothered me as a closeted gay kid. I've been waiting 30 years for something to be done about it!
Keith, Vancouver bc
01/13/11 9:04 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Not an insult
Rich: I disagree that Dire straits used is as an insult. The whole song is a parody of an outsider - working man's view of musicians and the rewards they get for diong what appears t be such little work. (Get a blister on my little finger) The video enforces that perspective. It's a parody of those who would use the word as an insult - it is not an insult as it is used in the song.
Ted, Vancouver BC
01/13/11 9:05 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
re: Peter From
Peter do you really believe that Xtra supports this decision based on their history of free speech support including never censoring these comments section no matter how vile some comments may be? So what if they aren't up in arms over it, they're a media for LGBT Canadians and not British rockers so I think its understandable they would take a stronger stance against censorship of the community they serve rather than censorship of a song by some British rockers. Sometimes you have to pick and choose your battles, no one can be against or for everything, I think its quite appropriate that Xtra is more concerned with the LGBT community than 80's British rockers.
Rich, Toronto Ontario
01/13/11 9:52 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Rich this is still freedom of expression
If Xtra, certain group(some say they are a hate group) and the Gay left can say their rights were being violated at pride and use the freedom of speech, expression, and censorship card then why is this rock group being targeted for what they say in a song? This still is violation of freedom of speech, expression and artistic freedom from this rock band and their rights are being violated. If people do not like the song then they can simply not listen it, buy their CD/download MP3, seed the album on a torrent site(if you want payback) or not watch their video. I believe most Canadians can figure out saying the word faggot is not a right word in describing anyone who have sex with men/men or women/women. Also the government can not enforce what people can and cannot view. I believe I can still download the song uncensored off the internet. Also no one can just tell people what to believe or even listen too. Canadian Broadcast Standards Council is just a joke in the 21 century and who listens to radio anyway? I also believe the song will still play uncensored in Canada via steaming radio, satellite radio, and on iPods and MP3 players anyway
Peter From, Toronto Ontario
01/13/11 10:15 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Not Government Censorship
Peter: The CBSC is a an organization broadcasters voluntarily join. It's not connected to the government. The CBSC was only acting as an advisor to the radio station. "Faggot" is a word that spreads hate against gay men. Saying it insults but doesn't spread hate, as Rich did(I usually have a lot of respect for his opinions), seems to be splitting hairs. People may have some other images in their minds when they use the word as well, but they are also thinking of gay men to some extent. Reinforcement of homophobia and how real(think straight men) are supposed to act, is in the mix always. That's also true in the case of this Dire Straits song. We need to be careful about being tolerant of the word, and the people who use it. Use of the "f" word to refer to gay men is used as evidence in hate crimes, when these are successfully investigated and prosecuted. Recently in Thunder Bay, Jake Raynard's basher got off with an absolute discharge. The TBPD didn't give too much relevance to the fact that the word "fag" was used before Raynard was almost beaten to death.
Clint, Thunder Bay ON
01/13/11 10:44 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
You can;'t have it both ways
If QuAIA gets to chant hateful comments against Jews in Israel at Pride, then Dire Straights gets to say faggot on the public airwaves. You can't have it both ways.
Joe, Toronto Ontario
01/13/11 10:49 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Its only freedom of Speech! I'm defending it.
Clint, Then why stop there, what about the TV show South Park? They use the word in most eposides since 1997. The problem with Rich and most on the Gay left they will defend freedom of speech and expression when it suits their interests but has no problem censoring others when they seem to be a threat to their interests. This case is a attack on both freedom of speech, expression, and artistic freedom. As for gay bashing I really doubt the word Faggot made those people commit that crime and most likely motives was something else other then a word . If you can give any examples of banning a word has reduced hate crimes in Canada? I believe if most Canadians can figure out that the N word is not the right word to describe African Canadians then most Canadians are educated enough to figure faggot is not a nice word either to word out community.
Peter From, Toronto Ontario
01/13/11 11:13 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Words Have Power
Peter: I'd say the word spreads homophobia on South Park too. Notice the government hasn't pulled South Park off the air. The fact one has the right to do something, doesn't mean it's intelligent, responsible or ethical to do so. That's what I was talking about, specifically in relation to the CBSC, and its advice and code of ethics which broadcasters voluntarily follow, or don't follow. As far as I know, the CBSC, is made up of both conservatives, and those who veer more to the left. Use of the word "fag" is suspiciously present more often than not, before those using "fag" physically beat someone who is gay. Words do have power and don't come out of a social vacuum. Epithets help to dehumanize an individual and the group to which the person belongs in the mind of the basher. This makes it easier to have no respect for the targeted person's life and to maim or kill him/her. I'll continue to speak out against the use of this word, as I'm not associated with anyone or any organization which would advice me not to do so. It also works with my own freedom of speech and conscience.
Clint, Thunder Bay ON
01/13/11 11:50 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Clint and the Gay Left censor this
In South Park's the F word fag is said over 100 times and why doesn't Canadian Association of Broadcasters’ Code of Ethics and the Gay left have this taken off the air or have the word censored when it airs on TV or it banned for sale on DVD The F word {http://bit.ly/i1muOO} { http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_F_Word_(South_Park)} Also Clint please give a single cases when a banned word has ever reduced hate crimes in Canada. I just hope this comment does not get deleted because it would be censorship
Peter From, Toronto Ontario
01/14/11 12:13 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Double Standard
The problem I have with this is that the people that demand the right to use ``faggot`` wouldn`t dare use ``nigger`` in public. We are perceived as weak and they are outraged their right to insult us is being challenged. South Park is the perfect example. Gays and Christians are routinely slurred, yet that cowardly show doesn`t dare offend Islam. Anyway, public airways should be child friendly during daytime hours, and late at night can be anything goes.
ron, Vancouver Bc
01/14/11 12:02 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
re Ted and Peter
Ted after hearing the song again for the first time in many years I have to agree with you that Dire Straits wasn't using the word faggot as an insult but the characters they are singing about are using it as an insult even if Dire Straits themselves don't. Peter From when have i ever supported and censorship other than for hate speech? You need a dictionary and thesaurus, yet again just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean you are being censored, criticized yes but not censored. The best part of these comments sections is when people disagree and debate something, it makes people think and exposes alternate views even if neither side is won over, its the basis of democracies too and at the heart of freedom of speech. I don't know where you got the idea that its censorship to disagree or why you cling so tightly to that notion. You accuse me of censorship for disagreeing and arguing with people yet you're the one who fully supported banning LGBT folks from Pride because of their beliefs and messaging which is a clear cut case of censorship.
Rich, Toronto Ontario
01/14/11 6:03 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
it can be a compliment too
Context is everything when it comes to language and it takes at least two people or more agreeing on the meaning of any word for it to have any particular meaning at all. I'm a traditionally masculine guy, almost always mistaken for being hetero unless you spend some time with me and I don't lisp or sound gay either, well sometimes when I get really excited but not normally. At one point in my life that was a big issue for me, not appearing very gay and always being mistaken for hetero, I felt like I wasn't gay enough in my life. One day while walking down Lakeshore in south Etobicoke where I live a guy passing me sneered "faggot" and walked away. Well I was thrilled! To me calling me faggot, especially at that time in my life, was the kindest most affirming thing anyone, especially a relative stranger, could have said to me. Sure he meant it as an insult but to me it was a great compliment that he was able to recognize that I'm gay without spending much time with me, I had seen him around the neighbourhood and on the bus sometimes so we recognized each other but we had never talked before. My point being just because one person uses the word faggot as an insult its not actually an insult unless the person hearing it agrees its an insult, if not then its what ever you make of it. Mind you I do sometimes use the word fag or faggot and other slang words for gay too but in positive ways, when among my friends so I'm not inclined to feel insulted by being called a faggot but that is my point. Something is not an insult unless both the person saying it and those hearing it both agree its an insult. That's also the theory behind reclaiming words that used to be hurtful like queer for example, we don't have to let words hurt us, though of course sometimes we have little to no control over it, but sometimes we can take control and use and understand formerly hurtful words in positive ways so they no longer hurt or insult. That's a good thing in my opinion.
Rich, Toronto Ontario
01/14/11 6:34 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
money for nothing
I want my CBSC Now look at you yo-yo's that's the way you do it You play the censor at the CBSC It ain't workin' but that's the way you do it Money for nothin' and the dicks are free Now that ain't workin' that's the way you do it Lemme tell ya you guys are dumb Maybe get a blister on your little finger Maybe get a blister sticking it up your bum We gotta install gas fueled ovens Aborted fetus deliveries We gotta remove you freedom haters We gotta remove you CBSCs (See the little f***** with the earring and the makeup Yeah buddy I guess you’re off the air, That little f***** had his own jet airplane That little f***** was a millionaire) We gotta install gas fueled ovens Aborted fetus deliveries We gotta remove you freedom haters We gotta remove these CBSCs I shoulda learned to play the victim I shoulda learned to play your games Jesus Christ! bitch she got it stickin' in the camera Man we can’t ban that And she's up there, what's that? Whining noises? Bangin' on the bongoes like a niggeranzee Your way doesn’t work, but that's the way you do it You Get money for nothin', get your dicks for free We gotta install gas fueled ovens Aborted fetus deliveries We gotta remove you freedom haters We gotta remove these CBSCs Look a' here That ain't workin' that's the way you do it You play God at the CBSC It ain't workin' that's the way you do it Money for nothin' and your dicks for free Money for nothin' and dicks for free Money for nothin' and your dicks for free Look at that, look at that Money for nothin' and your dicks for free I want my, I want my, I want my CBSC Money for nothin' and fag goes free (Fade) I want my, I want my, I want my CBSC
Mark Knockoffler, toronto ontario
01/14/11 7:28 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Faggoty question
I wonder why the homophobic words & sentiments in The Bible (e.g Leviticus and the words of St Paul) are not censored (or banned outright) by some public-spirited, politically correct entity? (I also wonder if MCC members use a censored Bible to avoid the hateful words?) These Biblical words/strictures cause a lot more both real & psychic damage in the world than do the lyrics of a classic 1980's rock song satirizing such homophobia. But maybe But I have to admit as a left of centre free speech advocate (note that Peter) I do not support the censorship or banning of the Bible or of Dire Straits.
james dubro, toronto ontario
01/15/11 2:11 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Cheeky ?
I still think of how cheeky this song was. In the 80's with all the glam, etc being gay or knowing someone gay was just fab and the folklore about us was as fantastic, we were all supposed to be rich, right? Think of the movie " Guido" GWM: gay with money.I understand it is wrong but at the time I had a chuckle about it, I also understand it was degrading as a word. The band has offered to change it to fudger and this will throw us back to the 50's.
Louis, Vancouber BC
01/15/11 4:43 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
what is a bad word?
I was living in Halifax in 2002. One bright sunny day, I was happily driving my sisters car, the sun was out, I was having a good day until I turned on the radio. "that little faggot with his earring and his makeup ......" blared out. I thought, "why should I have to listen to that word being broadcasted out like its a non-offensive term. I don't hear white people singing Nigga in their lyrics. I don't hear fuck on the radio. So I decided to call the radio station. I spoke to the programmer and told him I find that term offensive and why should I have to hear it. He told me in the 25 years he has been on the radio, no one has ever called in to complain so that means that since thousands and thousands of others don't seem to mind, it makes him think I am being unreasonable. I then told him I don't hear bad words like fuck on the radio. Faggot is a bad word. To which he said, based on the fact that I was the only one to complain EVER...... he thinks I am off base. I hung up sooo pissed off. But the very next day, I was listening to Alannis Morrisette's song that has fuck in the lyrics. They had cut the word! So I thought... oh,,, fuck is bad but faggot is ok to say. Only within a homophobic social paradigm!
David, Vancouver British Columbia
01/15/11 7:08 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
The imperialists in Toronto has double standard
with censorship issues, and some in the local LGBT community even supported Q104 to play the song uncensored.
Steve, Halifax Nova Scotia
01/15/11 9:34 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Even the International community are laughing
at Canada http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBV3pyctIW4 this is nothing short of censorship
Peter From, Toronto Ontario
01/16/11 1:53 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Hysterical Hypocrites
It is a fairly rendered decision on existing broadcast standards, bleeps/edits are everywhere on pop radio. Where are the proponents of free speech when it comes to the censorship of gay expression in schools or primetime TV? Don't you think it suspect that they cry censorship now, considering how much it already exists, without the hysterical uproar? I hardly think this is the best case to champion freedom of expression when gays are still beaten/killed for public affection/expression. This only amounts to complete and disgusting hypocrisy. Those who truly love freedom should get their priorities straight, and champion violations of freedom that have real consequences, rather than quibble suspiciously over a fair decision on existing standards. HA! Double standards! Xtra comments has a policy of no defamation, yet prints an article supporting the use of defamatory lyrics! http://www.xtra.ca/blog/national/post/2011/01/14/Dire-Straits-Money-For-Nothing-is-not-homophobic.aspx
Jan, Brandon Manitoba
01/16/11 6:35 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Research & Education
In 1980, Dire Straits released an album called Making Movies. This album included a song called Les Boys. Anyone on the planet that thinks Mark Knofler and Dire Straits is homophobic, had better take a listen to Les Boys. You'll find out very quickly that in fact there's everything except homophobia in connection to Knofler and his old band Dire Straits. One note about the comments made on the other related store that were made about Elton John; for almost 2 decades now, he has donated millions of dollars towards AIDS research, education of AIDS and the hospice care of people living with AIDS. Elton John's coming out of the closet in the mid 1980's has done much for younger people around the world comforting them that if a famous person in Rock 'n Roll can openly say they are gay, then maybe they can find the strength to be themselves too. Shame on the people that have decided to take shots at this man.
Jeff Taylor, Vancouver BC
01/17/11 6:20 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Pathetic decision
Yup, I'm a gay man. Yup, I'm a Brit too. Yup, I'm a Dire Straits fan. I find this decision by the CBSC disgraceful. Did they even listen to the song? If so, their review process is woefully inadequate or they are complete idiots. It's written in THIRD PERSON, do they not understand this most basic of writing tools? There's also a cultural aspect to this which is not being discussed. Growing up gay in the north of England is not easy, especially as it's full of homophobes as described in this song. The word "faggot" is/was used extensively by these asshats, especially in the 80s. Apparently the CBSC and some people commenting here are too stupid to realise the song is *MAKING FUN OF* those aforementioned meathead homophobes. Is it really that difficult to grasp? Stuff like this is a slippery slope. Especially if we are banning songs based on ONE complaint over 25 years. Canada, get your act together you're becoming a laughing stock.
Paul, Fraser Valley BC
01/17/11 8:03 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.