Asylum seekers allege mistreatment by guards
NEWS / 'The situation in Mexico for queers is extremely unsafe,' says Morrisey
Andrea Houston / Toronto / Wednesday, November 10, 2010
Share |


UPDATE - DEC 1: For the safety of the couple, Xtra has agreed to remove both of their names from the story below. Both men asked Xtra to delete the names because they fear for their safety when they return to Mexico on Dec 6.

"We don't want to go, but we have no other option," they say. "We are being deported."


NOV 10: Behind a thick wall of glass, the 26-year-old’s eyes well up with tears as he speaks in hushed tones describing the homophobic mistreatment he and his boyfriend endured at the Toronto Immigration Holding Centre.

He was only in the centre a few days when guards and other staff members started taunting him and questioning his sexuality, he says.

“I am really open with my boyfriend,” he says. “We’ve been questioned by people here. They ask, ‘So, who’s the man and who’s the woman?’

“The guards asked us how much we like to be penetrated,” he says, holding the tip of his finger up, imitating the guard. “It was so offensive.”

He has been detained in the holding centre for one week. His bloodshot eyes look sleep deprived. As he speaks, he shiftily glances from side to side, fearing who might be eavesdropping on the conversation.

“We have to watch everything we say,” he says. “We are frightened. The only people we have is each other. When we touch, the guards tell us to stop."

The couple came to Canada from Mexico in 2006, seeking a better life.

But after their refugee claim was denied, the couple were arrested on Oct 26 and forced to spend a week in the holding centre before friends fronted their $5,000 bail.

The couple filed for refugee status on the basis of his sexuality because he fears for his life in Mexico.

But with comments from Canadian guards like “Who penetrates who?” he says his trust in Canadian authorities is shaky.

“We are still safer here than in Mexico,” he says. “We really don’t want to go back to Mexico.”

Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) communications spokesperson Anna Pape says the allegations of mistreatment raised by the couple were never brought to the attention of any CBSA official.

“All allegations of improper behaviour by CBSA employees are taken very seriously and are thoroughly investigated and acted upon accordingly,” she says. “CBSA employees are expected to uphold the law in carrying out their duties. The agency has no tolerance for any illegal or inappropriate actions.”

Confused, scared and without legal representation, the couple are now grudgingly buying plane tickets home and fearing for their future as they prepare to return to Mexican soil.

In the meantime, the couple is filing a complaint with the Human Rights Commission regarding how they were treated in the holding centre. But the complaint likely won’t be grounds enough for the couple to be granted a stay, says Michael Battista, a Toronto lawyer who has expertise in dealing with gay and lesbian refugee claims.

Chris Morrissey from Rainbow Refugee Committee in Vancouver, a non-profit group offering support to queer refugee claimants, says it’s a sad story she’s heard many times before. The reality is, she says, almost all claims by people from Mexico, especially gay Mexicans, are being denied.

“The situation in Mexico for queers is extremely unsafe,” she says. “From our perspective, Mexico is not safe for queer people. But that’s not the decision by the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB). They have an across-the-board policy on Mexico.”

And the situation got worse this year, Morrissey says. Since August, when Mexico’s Supreme Court ordered all Mexican states to recognize same-sex marriages performed in Mexico City, the country became wrongly perceived as a safe haven for gay people. Perez says gay people are persecuted by macho bullies not happy with the change in laws.

“When the laws change to recognize protections for sexual minorities often there is a backlash from members of the public,” said Battista.

Then there’s the issue of internal flight. If there is a place in the country that is deemed “safe,” such as Mexico City, the claimant must seek protection there, according to international refugee case law, says IRB spokesperson Charles Hawkins.

“If there’s no protection anywhere in their country, then they would be deserving of refugee protection,” he says.

In certain IRB decisions, Mexico City is considered to be a safe place for refugees to go back to, an “internal flight alternative,” he says.

But that’s certainly not the attitude of the police officers or citizens on the ground, Morrissey says.

Mexico's justice system is failing its gay citizens, she says. The country's constitution prohibits discrimination on the grounds of sexual preference, but those laws are not enforced and homophobia is systemic within police departments.

“There is a reasonable fear of persecution if they’re sent back,” she says. “The state police don’t provide protection because they don’t take the situation seriously, which adds to the abuse and homophobia.

“Queer people are not given state protection in Mexico.”

Battista said there is a real breach between law and practice in Mexico. On paper, sexual minorities have protection, but that’s not the case in practice.

In 2007 Mexico surpassed China as Canada’s largest source of refugee claimants. While 38 percent of claimants overall were granted refugee status in 2007, only 10 percent of Mexican claims were successful.

That number has only continued to decline, says Hawkins. Currently only around eight percent are granted refugee status, according to numbers released to Xtra from the IRB.

In 2009 the IRB received 6,092 claims from Mexico. Of that, only 516 were accepted.

Battista said the shockingly low number of refugee claimants granted asylum illustrates the rapidly deteriorating human rights in Mexico.

“What is going on there?” he said. “When I started representing refugee claimants from Mexico around 1998, the acceptance rate was somewhere around 45 percent. It’s amazing to see how the country has deteriorated and the acceptance rate has gone down at the same time.”

Hawkins says the IRB doesn’t have a blanket policy on Mexico, assuring that each claim is looked at on a case-by-case basis.

“The risk [in a country] is evaluated on each claim. [The board] looks at the well-foundedness of the claimant’s fear,” he says. “That’s not only looking at the legislation in another country, it’s also how the laws are enforced and what the situation is like on the ground.”

Hawkins could not provide Xtra with statistics to show how many refugee claimants are seeking asylum because they are gay, lesbian or trans, nor could he say how many rejected Mexican refugee claimants are gay.

In 2007, Enrique Villegas, 35, was killed in his apartment in Mexico City just four years after CIRB rejected his claim. In 2008, Xtra told the story of Leonardo Zuniga, who was also afraid to return to Mexico.

According to the Youth Action Network, a youth-driven non-profit organization focused on social justice issues, more than 1,000 gay people have been murdered in Mexico in the past 10 years with little sign of justice.



Share |


Reader Comments


 
Parasites
Get the FUCK out of my country you parasites. You have the same rights in your country as Canadians do here. While Canadians go hungry and homeless, and without health care, you have cost the Canadian taxpayer hundreds of thousands of dollars in government support and in return contributed NOTHING except whining about how you were treated. We don't need you here, we don't want you here, and tell all your queer Mexican buddies to stay the fuck out of Canada as well.
ron, Vancouver Bc
11/11/10 12:22 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
You neglected to mention...............
.........that according to information readily available in the media, this detention center's guards are privately contracted out through local security guard companies and are not actually Government officers! Given the huge amount of recent immigrant workers in the GTA security field (many are muslim), is it any wonder they would treat detainees in a less than Canadian way?
Running Prophet, Toronto ONT
11/11/10 12:50 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Just Ignore ron
He's a dick and thinks it's HIS country.
Dave, Toronto BC
11/11/10 1:06 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Sorry , typo
Should read Toronto, Ontario. BTW, ron is still a dick :)
Dave, Toronto Ontario
11/11/10 1:10 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
hilarious
oh ron. unlike you, they are indigenous to this continent.
elias, toronto ont
11/11/10 4:51 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Poor Queen Ron
Ron, is your "we" a royal we....much like Queen Victoria? I guess you represent the views of all Canadians. Or maybe you're not a Victoria, but just an angry queen. Personally, I would take the two of them if we could send people like you far away.
Sean, Vancouver BC
11/11/10 5:04 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Convenient
Doesn't anyone else find it a bit too convenient that these two are filling a human rights complaint after a failed refugee claim?
hmm, Barie Ontario
11/11/10 9:05 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Refugees? Queer?
I'm sorry, but I just don't think Mexicans, gay or otherwise, should ever get refugee status in Canada. How can Mexicans get refugee status in Canada? I go there (with my partner) at least once a year. Puerto Vallarta has one of the most vibrant gay scenes in North America. Why can't they go to Puerto Vallarta rather than comes all the way to Canada? Also, I resent the use of the word "queer" in the headline. Supposing they are homosexual at all (since that is an issue in these claims), I would prefer to use the term "gay". It's disturbing that Canada's gay news outlet uses the word "queer" so meaninglessly.
Jim, Toronto Ontario
11/11/10 12:26 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Fishy
I don't buy their claims one bit.
Alex, Toronto ON
11/11/10 12:33 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
More PC crap from Xtra
Yes, Canada is a terrible, terrible place. We get it. So awful that we take so many refugees and continue to be a top destination for people fleeing oppression, economic or otherwise. This writer always seems to do fear-mongering PC stories about oppression, and is reminiscent of the new "queer" Xtra. I don't like it one bit. It says on the masthead that it's a gay and lesbian biweekly. What was wrong with that? It's easy to publish online now. Can't the alphabet soup tribe (LGBTIQQTWSabcdefg) publish their own stuff? Why is it okay to say "dyke" as in "dyke march" but "gay is banned from use?
Chas, Toront ON
11/11/10 12:51 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Judgement is harsh and final here eh?
Considering how often I see "human rights" protection comments to other articles, I'm surprised at how most of the comments here are ignoring a whole series of situations that these two may be in. We need to keep in mind that the article doesn’t outline all of the evidence that was brought by the couple. And even if they don’t have a legitimate refugee claim, they certainly should not have been subjected to the treatment that the article suggests happened. If we let GLBTQ refugees get treated poorly, what about GLTBQ Canadians when they get arrested, why not the general GLBTQ public? Also, while it is possible they have options, no one seems to be considering what options these two feel they have. Let me compare this to a high school student. They have options available to them to avoid the nasty situations that happen in high school. However, most gay high school students don’t know how to handle those situations. Imagine saying to the high school kid that all they need to do to avoid harassment is move from their small town to a big city. That kid may not be able to imagine how they could ever go about doing that, yet the option is available to them if you apply the same “internal flight” line of thinking being applied by CBS. These guys may have no idea about safe resources and places they can go in Mexico for help. Also, the idea that just because tourists see a safe place, does not make it a safe place to live. Las Vegas is a great example of a safe place to visit because of how they protect the strip and the tourists, but anyone who has left the strip (myself included) can tell you Las Vegas is NOT a safe city to live. I highly doubt anyone reading this article has full knowledge of all of the facts, so maybe everyone should keep in mind that there may be a legitimate refugee situation here that is being missed because of a generalized “Mexico is safe” policy and regardless of the refugee claim, CBS should be treating everyone with basic huma
Jason, Ottawa ON
11/11/10 1:39 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Use of the word Queer
I am amazed that the conversation over using certain words is still taking place. This was an issue 20 years ago and the fact that it still gets brought up amazes me. I think it comes from people who believe that language is static. What a word meant 20 years ago is NOT the same as what is means today. To illustrate how wrong that line of thinking is, think about going back 20 years and telling someone about being poked on-line. The people 20 years ago would take a totally different understanding of the word than people would today. The same applies to the word Queer. While I loath using a wiki as a source, you may find this article interesting: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queer. My view on this is if you don’t like the word, don’t use it. But let’s not censor the people who want to take advantage of the power that comes from changing people’s perspectives towards hate by taking away part of their ability to hate on us.
Jason, Ottawa ON
11/11/10 1:40 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Refugee claims Legitimate or not --hard to tell
RE: Refugee claims...There are now Heteros claiming that they are Gay and escaping Homophobic persecution from their country, just to get into Canada. I met one who was posing for photos with DragQueens to prove to immigration that he is Gay, and have heard of others. This is upsetting when there are legitimate victims of Homophobic torture and incarceration around the world. This is a new twist on people trying to get into Canada anyway they can. I don't know if these two Mexicans have a legitimate claim, maybe they do. In various repressive regimes, tourists in tourist spots, get treated differently by police than the locals. As Canadian guards mistreated these two in democratic Canada, it is possible that Mexican Gays are mistreated in their own country by police, as we were mistreated by police in Canada in Canada before our Charter of Rights arrived in 1983.
Refugee Claims, Toronto Ont
11/11/10 2:34 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Ron, Van, BC
Ron,you must be pure laine, then? I do not want to be suspicious. Most folks are legit some not.Immigration Canada and Service Canada need better trained or more gaydar input in order to be/ act less childish while investigating any claims dealing with any gay issues.
Louis, Vancouver BC
11/11/10 6:39 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Scammers
These two clowns are from one of the most gay friendly countries in the world. Yesterday, the Mexican congress extended social security benefits to same sex partners making Mexico one of a handful of countries that offer gay citizens complete equality under the law including equal marriage. Mexico is a beautiful and rich place full of kind and gracious people that are more gay friendly that many homophobic hell holes that I've traveled across such as Australia. This bogus sob story is typical Canadian queer leftism at its worst. So much easier to go to Canada, say "refugee" and get a free ride than get a low-wage job in one's own country. We can't afford to pander to scammers like this anymore.
ron, Vancouver Bc
11/11/10 7:17 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Judgemental
I'm not very knowledgeable about Queers in Mexico and their situations but I would believe not all areas of Mexico are queer friendly. I'm sure that not all of those claims are legitimate either. Any method I can come up with to screen for authenticity would violate the rights of the individual (using a P.I. to detect fraudulent use of refugee status). Not to mention a waste of resources. I know from personal experience that every case is different. I had a family member in a great country - not queer but he should have applied to come here as a refugee as his family was in danger. In Canada we readily accept immigrants all the time. It deeply saddens me that people would use something so precious as a refugee status rather than using the regular system to apply for immigration when they don't qualify as a refugee. As long the refugees contribute to society - why should we kick up so much of a fuss, especially when we can't determine who is legit. Let's not judge all refugees because of the bad apples. We wouldn't want to be judged because of a few ill-manner queers or gays.
Vanessa, Mississauga Ontario
11/12/10 1:12 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Ron, Van, BC
Ron,Vancouver is very gay friendly, right? Please explain to me the reasons we have so many bashing! Activists in recent years have been killed in Mexico just for passing pamphlet on HIV or just for talking on gay issues. Mexico is a very macho culture, just because you see glossy pictures of Puerto Vallarta doen't mean it is safe and this even for gay mexicans.Time for you to move back to the prairies and even there people are from every ethnic groups and they keep moving in. Ron !!!!!!!! We are being invaded!!!!!!!!!!!!! It is about time you shed your white bread mentality.
Louis, Vancouver BC
11/12/10 5:07 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
What about the real refugees?
Louis, you're missing the point. There are gays all over the third world who really do deserve our protection. Desperately. If we cheapen the concept by letting in Mexicans, the whole concept of asylum gets diluted and loses meaning. It's not just Puerto Vallarta. Have you ever experienced gay life in Mexico City? It's excellent. These people are abusing their gay identity to jump the queue. Perhaps they are economic migrants. And for their lawyer now to start attacking the Canadian system because of injustices...well, it just smacks of the same kind of whiney approach taken by the gay G-20 protestors. Although admittedly it's usually the trannies, lesbians and queers who freak out at these perceived insults. Their attitude is that every white male in authority should immediately get on his knees in front of them and apologize profusely for his existence and the systemic homophobia of society in general. Anything less than that is perceived as homophobic abuse.
Jim, Toronto Ontario
11/12/10 8:56 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
It's not just a word
Jason - You're missing the point. To me, queer is a hateful word that I would never use to describe myself and my friends. It is derogatory to me. Occasional use is fine in the right context I suppose, but some people apparently see all of us as being queer. If someone ever called me queer to my face, I'd feel like punching him in the face, gay or straight. I'm not queer. End of story. Whenever the word is used by Xtra, it alienates me and makes me feel like Xtra is not representing me and the gay world in general. Recently, I just see the word as an indication that the writer is a biased political hack. And if that's the case, he or she shouldn't be a journalist and why am I wasting my time reading the story? When I come to Xtra (which is pathetically Canada's only gay news outlet) I'm mostly alienated from it, partly because I constantly see the word "queer" and constantly read references to politics that I see as off-putting if not extremist. I'm as socially progressive as anyone out there, but I just don't want to read biased political crap from sophomoric journalists who are still trying to figure out the world. Do you get it now? There's a reason why the word is not used by reputable news organizations like the Globe or the CBC.
Jim, Toronto Ontario
11/12/10 9:08 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Jim, the Gringo, Toronto
"If we cheapen the concept by allowing Mexicans in....". Which country do you favor, who are the folks you want in? I lived in Mexico with locals and not as a tourist.The repression in Mexico will not hit you in the face if you are under the pallapa. The soldiers on the beaches are there for your protection? Mexico is a police state so being gay in a macho culture is very easy for them if they are out of the norm? Think of the 1950's. Wishing you the best case of tourista, amigo!
Louis, Vancouver BC
11/14/10 7:50 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
RE: Jim
Jim, in response to your take on the word Queer I totally respect how you feel on that matter. I don’t know your history and where your feelings come from. The interesting part of your reply is I feel your own words proved my point with your focus on what the word means to you and how others seem to take a different meaning of it when they use it. Language is not an exact science like math where there is only one answer to each equation. Human language is an art form of expression where different people will interpret different meanings from the exact same words based on the shared experiences of the people communicating. I used to be right with you making the exact same points you did about the word Queer until I started working with translators. They explained to me why you can’t just use computers to translate and why you need to have people translate to their native language (never from their native language). That’s because the same words can have different meanings even in the same language and the meaning comes from the shared experiences and contexts of the people speaking the words. Look at the word fag and how it is used in the UK. An English speaking country with so many similarities to Canadian English, yet these two regions have a very different meaning for the word (it’s a cigarette in the UK). The people who are trying to “reclaim” the word by changing the context in which it is spoken are trying to take back the power of the word by making it challenging for it to be a hate word. I haven’t seen anyone study if the approach is successful or not in the past (great thesis for a language studies person to take on) but looking at the positive motive of those making the effort, I changed my tune to say if they think that is how they can make a change in the world, I’ll support that.
Jason, Ottawa ON
11/16/10 11:46 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
A single word is not enough
Jason, thanks for explaining your views on this. Frankly, I think the gay community no longer exists. One single word to describe us is apparently no longer sufficient. I no longer wish to be associated with those who identify as "queer". This is easy to do because this nonsense only takes place in Toronto. The rest of the gay world still values gay unity. Just don't count on my support in the future. I think increasingly the city will notice that the gay community is no longer speaking with a single voice.
Jim, Toronto Ontario
11/16/10 4:27 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Saudi Arabia, Iran, Zimbabwe...
Louis, thanks for your post. There are plenty of countries where gays truly are persecuted. Do you really need me to list them for you? I really don't think that having to live in a 1950s macho culture is persecution, especially when places like Puerto Vallarta and Mexico City beckon. And even if it is all that bad, why can't they just cross the border and go to LA or Florida? Why come all the way to Canada? And surely it's not because Canada is an easy country to get into. Have we reached the point where we have to spend millions to process thousands of bogus claims only to make ourselves feel superior to the Americans? Canada should not be a haven for phoney refugees, regardless of sexual orientation. I don't think Canada should be a place where the option is even held open to them. The lawyers who support these claims should be investigated.
Jim, Toronto Ontario
11/16/10 4:37 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
may be legitimate refugees from Mexico
There very well may be legitimate refugees coming from Mexico, especially gay ones. The definition of a refugee also includes those not actively persecuted by their gov't but also includes those facing violent threats whom their gov't can't or won't protect them against. This is the area where gay refugees from Mexico may be legitimate considering the abysmal state of the police force in Mexico and their reputation for not only ignoring crimes against LGBT people but for also attacking LGBT people themselves, in essence the police in Mexico don't work for LGBT people, and many others for that matter, especially women. Most of what I know about gay life in Mexico comes from a gay friend of mine who immigrated here to get away from the violence he faced for being gay in Mexico, he came from a wealthy family so had the resources to immigrate to Canada easily, wealth is a huge determining factor in selecting immigrants, but less well off Mexicans still need protection and can't afford to buy their way into Canada so they have to rely on the refugee system. The main reason so many are refused is that Mexico city is considered a safe refuge for LGBT Mexicans, otherwise their claims would've met the test for being genuine refugees. Personally I think the safe haven in country clause has serious limitations for many would be refugees, but that's another story. As for why they should come to Canada instead of the US I think its pretty obvious, we have full legal equality for gays and lesbians while the US doesn't, why would any refugee turn down a new life in a new country where they'd be treated as equals and choose a country where by law they'd be second class citizens? So of course they come to Canada instead of the US, its our more advanced LGBT equality that brought my friend here from Mexico instead of the US, along with a pile of his family's money he invested in some company in order to get admitted as an immigrant.
Rich, Toronto Ontario
11/16/10 8:06 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Broken System, unprofessional lawyer, journalists
Canada's refugee system is a precious example of our humanitarian tradition and our commitment to helping those whose countries cannot or will not protect them. When people, like these two guys, try to abuse the system to the maximum and then cry foul, it brings shame to the whole immigration and refugee set up that allowed their meritless claim to get thus far. While I do believe that these two are truly in search of a better life, they should have done it through the regular immigration channels. Instead they took up time and good will from the overburdened system that could have been spent on properly evaluating the deserving claims of those who are actually relying on our system for their very survival! Shame. Mexico has its problems, but it is a huge and diverse country with lots of internal flight alternatives for gay people - believe me! I am also shocked by highly unprofessional behaviour of the author of this article whose bias is evident throughout the text. This article should not pass for a piece of investigative journalism when no actual investigation was done. If I were one of the guards, I would sue for slender, so these boys better present some evidence of their claims ( I am sure other people must have head these comments as the holding centers are pretty full). Lastly, Michael Battista seems to be a go to person for everything gay refugee/immigration related. No doubt Mr. Battista is an OK lawyer, but he does NOT deal with MExican refugee cases (as I have been told when I called their office!), as there is no money in them. He is one of the most overpriced and overrated lawyers in the City. I should now because I once had a consultation with him and ended up going with someone else who did a far better job for much less than Michael ever could. He will clearly make any statement to attract unsuspecting clients - it is a sham. He used to be good....but I guess he just went in teh same direction as our refugee system.
Pablo, Toronto Ontario
11/19/10 4:17 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.