Government seeks to dismiss Montreal man's claims of institutional homophobia
QUEBEC / Attorney General's Memorandum says too much time has passed since alleged discrimination
Tracey Lindeman / Montreal / Thursday, February 11, 2010
Share |

Former public servant Paul Richard's battle with the Canadian Human Rights Commission over allegations of homophobia has taken another turn. Last week, the Attorney General's office submitted its Memorandum of Facts and Law stating that it is seeking an order dismissing Richard's application for judicial review.

Among its points of contention, the Attorney General's Memorandum states the prejudice in obtaining evidence is so great that it is stifling the Commission's ability to move forward with the case. "The applicant cannot deny the prejudice which would be suffered by the respondent if this claim were to go forward. The applicant himself acknowledged being frustrated by his inability to obtain copies of his medical records as they had been destroyed given the lapse of time," the Memorandum, dated Feb 5, 2010, reads.

Richard says that while obtaining his medical records took some effort, he submitted them to the Commission in 2008, and they are in an appendix of his Affidavit. He also says that the Attorney General's Memorandum did not acknowledge his 19 named witnesses from his original complaint, nor did they make a genuine effort to locate any of them.

Richard contends that while there is prejudice in this case on both sides, "the prejudice to me is greater than it is to them," adding that the Attorney General's office asked for two extensions in compiling its most recent reply to Richard's complaint, citing that the main attorney for this case was overworked. "The federal government has all kinds of resources; I don't," Richard says.

Richard will be filing an application for a federal court date in Montreal by the end of this week, with hopes of being before a judge within the next three months.


Share |


Reader Comments


 
Keep Fighting
Richard: Just hang in there, it is difficult without any outside help, even if you do have it most don't understand. I am still waiting for some issues to be resolved at my end regarding my Harassment Issues. Like one that is nearly two years late, and they are pissing around with it. A level 3/4 grievance still sits on the Commissioner's desk. That was from January 20, 2010 and still have not heard, and I am being instructed to work with the HR department on the final issue. They just don't get it at all. The process is slow and demoralizing to say the least. But hang in there, don't give up the fight, if you want to talk or need help contact Extra you have my permission to contact me by email. I will be waiting to here how you are doing. in solidarity G Caron
Garth Caron, Calgary Alberta
02/26/10 5:08 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
good luck
I reread the articles on this story and feel that Richard has an excellent case, being victimized by homophobia/heterosexism can cause effects that take a person a very long time to recover from or to be able to find the strength and ability to fight back against them. I too am in the process of rebuilding myself after suffering the damage done to me by wide spread anti-gay bigotry particularly in my younger years when I was more vulnerable than as an adult, for some people the process of recovery comes quickly for others it takes a very long time. There should be some recognition of this fact when such cases are being dealt with. There is no time limitation on all sorts of criminal matters and being victimized by anti-gay people and establishments is a form of abuse with enough similarities to other sorts of abuse that it should be given the same sort of consideration when being tackled many years later. Richard is in a tough position with his case, I hope he wins it but more importantly I hope he overcomes and recovers fully from the damage done to him when he was being victimized.
Rich, Toronto Ontario
03/20/10 8:31 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.