Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Pride Toronto to Torontoist: We're not that bad

  

   

It may be a “villain” in 2010, but Pride Toronto (PT) hopes to be a hero in 2011.

A Torontoist story this week names PT as one of the year’s villains because of the brouhaha that erupted around Queers Against Israeli Apartheid (QuAIA), just in time to put a serious damper on this year’s party. 

“The divisions ran deep,” the Torontoist states. “Side with QuAIA’s right to march and you were labelled anti-Israel, or worse. Side with those demanding QuAIA's expulsion and you were viewed as caving to censorship and betraying Pride’s founding principle of inclusion. All of a sudden, Pride wasn't fun anymore.” 

But Francisco Alvarez, co-chair of the board, says Torontoist tells only half the story. 

“We’re a little disappointed,” Alvarez tells Xtra, but he adds, the organization is “not overly concerned about it.” 

“The article does not take into account anything that’s happened since the parade,” he says, such as setting up the Community Advisory Panels (CAP). 

The Torontoist story focuses on the board’s actions during the QuAIA controversy, Alvarez says. 

“It’s speaking to the idea that the Pride board attempted to be censors,” he says. “Then [the Torontoist] blames us a second time for reversing our decision to censor and include them in the parade. It’s not very clear what position they’re taking.” 

The CAP panels have been meeting with the community throughout this month and will present recommendations to PT by late January or early February. The findings may also be used by the city of Toronto to table budget decisions on funding. 

So far there have been five CAP sessions. The last session was Dec 14 at the 519 Church Street Community Centre at 6:30pm, aimed at the racialized community. 

“There’s lots of good news to report, but they’re maybe not as public as the dispute that happened leading up to the parade, regarding the inclusion of QuAIA in the parade,” Alvarez says. 

“At the end of all this, we’re hopeful the board will come to a resolution that will make us heroes in 2011.” 

Alvarez notes that the other villains Torontoist names “are not that serious, in my opinion — things like bedbugs. I think the story is tongue-in-cheek. 

“We get it. We get the sense of humour.” 

Torontoist says it’s ending the year by naming the city’s “Heroes and Villains — Toronto's very best and very worst people, places and things over the past 12 months.” 

POLL: Do you think PT's inclusion on the list of Torontoist villains was warranted? Let us know here (right column).

 Bookmark and Share

 

 


Comments

Tuesday, December 14, 2010 5:40 PM

Wow! more leftest garbage

James ca


Tuesday, December 14, 2010 6:00 PM

and again Xtra is the QuAIA paper not the community's

James ca


Tuesday, December 14, 2010 9:56 PM

The Torontoist has it right for once. People who oppose the QuAIA are not pro censorship or Pro Israel but the other side always says they are "Pro Israel Lobby", or "racist",to silence people who have different opinions.

Peter From ca


Wednesday, December 15, 2010 4:17 PM

How does this article make Xtra QuAIA's paper? It is giving the Pride board an opportunity to respond and doesn't say anything negative about PT.

wow ca


Wednesday, December 15, 2010 5:43 PM

I can tell you how Xtra is QuAIA's paper. First, every time they have a story on the kerfuffle, like AT THE TOP OF THIS PAGE!! - they run a photo showing QuAIA supporters with "free speech" banners. There were other people with other banners against them at Pride: I can supply you with a photo if you wish! How come Pride never runs THOSE photos to accompany its stories?
Every time Tim McCaskell opens his mouth, he gets quoted in Xtra... he also tends to get the last word. Whereas those who could ANSWER Tim with some pointed questions DON'T get their voices heard. Or certainly not as much or in a way that is well placed. For every direct quote against QUAIA's manipulation of the entire gay community, you get three quotes from the other side. This is hardly partial journalism.
Free speech? How about some investigative reporting? If McCaskel is so much for free speech and the right to participate, how come he and QuAIA tried to manipulate TIFF so that the festival would be boycotted if they continued to run Israeli films last autumn? Where was free speech then for the Israelis? But you won't find Xtra asking him any pointed questions, ever!
Go on QuAIA's website and see how they answer the question of whether they think Israel has the right to exist...they basically refuse to answer that question directly...it would be too revealing of their true nature. Interesting that there is no President of the Toronto QuAIA group, no Treasurer... no-one is even named on their site...where does their money come from? How come Xtra isn't digging to give us a bit more about exactly WHO QUAIA's leaders are? If they were following QuAIA and digging as much as they do for the members of the Pride executive, there are lots of things that they might be able to reveal - but they don't bother. Gee, I wonder why?

Ken in Paris fr


Thursday, December 16, 2010 10:08 AM

I think Francisco's concerns speak to a broader issue about Pride. After the broad and vocal opposition to Pride's willingly taking on the role to act as censor on behalf of the City, they backed down. They listened and reversed their position in response to the an articulate and forceful sub-set of the community. But there's this continuing narrative that Pride as an organization is deeply flawed, unrepresentative, in bed with business, etc. This was a diverse board of some of Toronto's best and they made an unfortunate choice before eventually listening to their constituency and the advice of their lawyers that they weren't responsible for policing QuAIA. At some point the critics should run for the board and show us how it's done. The whiny criticism that the panel (Hawkes et al.) now consulting us all for our opinions about Pride wasn't openly and democratically selected is bullshit. Come on! You don't elect people to conduct enquiries. You appoint people who can do the job. You can't hold an election for every fucking thing.

Alex ca



Comments are closed

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.4.0.0

The Roundup

Xtra.ca's Roundup
blog is your source
for news and
analysis that has
queer people
talking.

The Roundup is
written by Xtra's
staff reporters:

Rob Salerno
rob.salerno@xtra.ca

Andrea Houston
andrea.houston@xtra.ca

Natasha Barsotti
natasha.barsotti@xtra.ca

and

Adam Glen
Editorial Intern


Log in
Feed Subscribe