Activists to Toronto Pride sponsors: Support free expression - Latest News Roundup
Thursday, March 18, 2010

Activists to Toronto Pride sponsors: Support free expression

Rick Telfer, the activist who started the Don't Sanitize Pride Facebook group (which has grown to more than 1,300 members), has created another online tool to oppose Pride Toronto's new terms and conditions for parade participants.


Participants in the 2009 Toronto Pride Parade. (Jenna Wakani photo)

"Those who have been lobbying for censorship in Pride have already been targeting Pride's sponsors," Telfer said in a March 18 message to members of the Don't Sanitize Pride Facebook group. "It is now imperative that Pride's sponsors hear from the rest of us -- i.e., the wider community and the majority."

As a next step, Telfer has created a web-based email system which allows users to quickly send the following message to Pride sponsors:

Dear Sponsor of Toronto Pride,

I am writing to ask that you oppose the new censorship policy being imposed on participants in this year's Pride Parade and Dyke March.

Since last year, a small but persistent group of pro-censorship lobbyists have been pressuring Pride Toronto Inc. to limit freedom of expression for some groups. My understanding is that you may have been contacted by pro-censorship lobbyists who are now directing their efforts towards sponsors and financers of Pride. As such, I believe it is important for you to hear from the rest of us: We are the overwhelming majority within the community who are strongly opposed to any regulation of free expression beyond that which is already defined as hate and prohibited by the Criminal Code of Canada.

On March 10, Pride Toronto Inc. announced new terms and conditions for Pride participants that will require pre-approval of all signs and messaging. It is a requirement that has never before existed in the histories of the Pride Parade and Dyke March. A few days later, Pride Toronto Inc. announced an impending "free expression policy." Preventing "hate" is the rationale for the new policies. However, Pride participants have always been expected to comply with hate speech laws, and that expectation was already covered by existing Pride policies. In short, hate was already prohibited -- as it should be. We in the community are therefore unconvinced that this year's new terms and conditions are really intended to prohibit hate. The vagueness of the new policies almost certainly leaves them open to misuse and abuse -- i.e., to censorship.

I am therefore asking you, as a sponsor of Toronto Pride, to listen to the overwhelming majority and to both uphold and celebrate freedom of expression within our Pride Parade and Dyke March. In just one week, over 1,300 people joined a Facebook group to oppose the new censorship policy. The opposition continues to grow. In our community, the right to freedom of expression is deeply valued and vigorously defended. I will therefore be paying close attention to ensure that you, as a sponsor, support a Pride that upholds freedom of expression.

Tell Toronto Pride's Sponsors: No Censorship.
Ricktelfer.ca/pride.

 

Read more on Xtra.ca:

 
Bookmark and Share


Comments

Thursday, March 18, 2010 2:39 PM

While I have no issue with freedom of expression I do have issue with political issues being raised that have nothing to do with gay rights.

Case in point was the anti Israel demonstrators that were allowed to march in last years parade. Quite poignant considering that the Palestinians still stone their gays to death much like the Iraqi's and the Iranians and the Saudis etc etc etc.

Scott Bryen ca


Thursday, March 18, 2010 5:44 PM

I saw no anti-Israel demonstrations in last year's parade. I did, however, see an anti-apartheid contingent. They are rightly opposed to separation and domination along ethnic/racial lines in Israel. Israel's oppression of the Palestinian people is a crime against humanity. Palestinian gays suffer terribly because they live in a society that is starved and under siege by Israel. To liberate Palestinian gays, we must start by ending apartheid in Israel.

For an extended explanation/argument regarding this position, I refer you to the following analysis/commentary:
rabble.ca/.../coming-out-against-israeli-apartheid-case-solidarity

Opposing apartheid is absolutely related to gay rights. Israel pretends to be a liberal democracy by claiming to celebrate equality rights for gays. It is propaganda to hide the truth of apartheid and the devastation that it causes gays in Palestine.

Rick ca


Thursday, March 18, 2010 5:02 PM

I'm in agreement with Scott: I have no issues with freedom of expression.

The problem I have with Pride Parades is that they are VERY FAR from being kid-friendly and because of that, I cannot justify bringing my family to the celebration. It's as the very group I am supposedly part of, is purposefully excluding me and using "freedom of expression" to justify my exclusion.

Furthermore, every time I have brought up my problem: not being able to attend Pride Parade and celebrate life with other gay people due to all the nudity and profanity at Pride Parades, I am bombarded with comments and emails whose purpose is to convince me that there is nothing wrong with the status quo.

I'm sorry, but there IS something wrong with it. What is wrong with Pride Parades is that they cater to only a certain segment of the LGBT community. A segment that I am NOT part of, or so it seems.

The parade does not promote inclusion.

I would even argue that, in fact, it promotes exclusion.

Jason ca


Thursday, March 18, 2010 5:40 PM

People who feel uncomfortable seeing people with different opinions or lifestyles have the other 364 days of the year to walk down Yonge Street and not be offended. There are plenty of other parades with clowns and baton-twirlers for your amusement.

For the rest of us who have the spend the majority of the year being censored, told to shut up, or hide our sexuality and opinions, this is our day.

If you don't like being offended, maybe the Pride parade isn't for you.

Paul ca


Thursday, March 18, 2010 6:51 PM

Jason, you got to be kidding me! Bring your kids to pride parade?!! You should bring your kids to the Santa Claus parade instead or Family Pride area during Pride Week. I don't see a history of family-friendly, kids-focus demonstration that moved gay rights in our 30 years of history. You're one clueless case. *sigh* Go do some research on the Pride movement worldwide and get your internalized homophobia handled.

Bruno ca


Thursday, March 18, 2010 7:16 PM

Some movies are rated "F".
Some are "PG-13".
Others "R".
Are those movies "exclusionary"?
No, they're simply for mature audiences.
It's up to parents to decide what they let their children watch.

Rick ca


Thursday, March 18, 2010 7:46 PM

Well hopefully most gay and lesbians are a little more well read than rabble.ca As one has pointed out, If it wasn't so frighteningly scary the results: queers and apartheid might be excusable. This group's leftist fantiasies live in a netherworld ignoring the fact that they can forget about gay rights in "Palestine". Gays are tortured, and murdered routinely in "Palestine" and in other Arab and Muslim territories and countries. (There were recent public hangings in Iran of gay teenagers) In fact, most Palestinian gays emigrate to israel where they have legal protections. And this doesn't even include the degradation of women in Islamic societies such as honour killings and marriages and rape at eight years old.

Harold ca


Thursday, March 18, 2010 8:31 PM

Harold: It is a logical fallacy to attack the source (rabble.ca) and not the content of the article -- i.e., its claims, arguments, logic, and evidence. Furthermore, Jimmy Carter, Desmond Tutu, Ehud Barak, and Michael Ignatieff are hardly "leftists" -- yet all of them have compared Israel to apartheid. Israeli apartheid creates terrible social conditions in Palestine; consequently, LGBT people suffer. Note, also, that Palestine does not require quotation marks; it is an internationally recognized historical and geographical region. Lastly, just because crimes are committed against LGBT people elsewhere in the Middle East, that doesn't mean we should abandon our LGBT brothers and sisters in Israel/Palestine. Israel itself is hardly a bastion of LGBT safety; religious fanatics following certain versions of Judaism have, in recent years, committed murders stemming from homophobia and hate. Nor have women achieved full equality in Israel. Again, it is a logical fallacy to respond to an argument by redirecting to a different issue; it's a red herring. We should condemn all homophobia, sexism, and hate. And, as we did for South Africa, we should demand that Israel end its apartheid regime.

Rick ca


Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:57 PM

Just because you disagree with some groups or what they have to say doesn't mean they should be censored! its that simple and considering the way that the mainstream society who largely disagrees with LGBT people and how we live our lives have used censorship to silence and hide us so they can pretend we don't exist its disturbing that some would be so willing to do the same thing to other LGBT folks they disagree with. We should be rejecting the tactics of anti-gay bigots and not embracing them. I also don't support QuAIA and disagree with many of their views of the situation however I fully support heir right to march in the parade and to express themselves however they wish. The issue isn't if they're right or wrong, the issue is that they're being treated by Pride Inc. the same way anti-gay bigots treat LGBT folks in general. Hate speech is already illegal under our criminal code, this new policy isn't about getting rid of hate speech since that's always been banned by nature of it being illegal, criticizing Israeli policies towards the Palestinians is in no way hate speech just because you hate to hear it, if it were those who managed to make censorship a part of Pride would've been going to the police instead to have charges laid. if you really can't stand to hear opinions you disagree with then you should simply look away when that contingent comes by you in the parade, besides the other side of the issue is well represented by the pro-occupation, pro-Israeli policy contingent in the parade, both sides of the issue are represented or at least were, this year we'll only being hearing one side of it if this policy stands. Censorship is never acceptable, I'm disturbed that so many LGBT folks seem willing to embrace it to use against other LGBT folks.

Rich ca


Friday, March 19, 2010 3:48 PM

Why is this form letter on a NEWS SITE. I sense a little bias xtra.ca. A little more journalistic integrity please.

Alex ca


Sunday, March 21, 2010 12:27 PM

Alex Anthony, Food Vendor Coordinator of Pride, any attempt at discrediting Xtra on journalistic integrity is lame. Investigative journalism is about uncovering the truth!!

Bruno ca



Comments are closed

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.4.0.0

The Roundup

Xtra.ca's Roundup
blog is your source
for news and
analysis that has
queer people
talking.

The Roundup is
written by Xtra's
staff reporters:

Andrea Houston
andrea.houston@xtra.ca

Natasha Barsotti
natasha.barsotti@xtra.ca

 


Log in
Feed Subscribe